On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 14:22:19 UTC+10, Rod Speed wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Jun 2022 12:16:38 +1000, Arindam Banerjee
> <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 05:54:38 UTC+10, Rod Speed wrote:
> >> On Wed, 08 Jun 2022 22:52:58 +1000, Arindam Banerjee
> >> <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 21:40:12 UTC+10, Rod Speed wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 08 Jun 2022 20:40:51 +1000, Arindam Banerjee
> >> >> <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 11:21:21 UTC+10, petzl wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:01:07 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
> >> >> >> <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 at 17:12:52 UTC+10, petzl wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 07 Jun 2022 16:30:38 +1000, "Rod Speed"
> >> >> >> >> <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote
> >> >> >> >> >> Max wrote
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >>> To be appointing a "Republic Assistant Minister" (to
> >> >> >> Thistlethwaite) is
> >> >> >> >> >>> ridiculous, when the question of a republic needs to be
> >> >> decided
> >> >> >> by
> >> >> >> >> >>> referendum.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> Maybe he could answer why Australia needs to become a
> >> republic.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >It isnt about needs, its about what the majority of us want.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> Lets make Arindam Banerjee, King Arindam Banerjee
> >> >> >> >> He can have King Malcolm's chair
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >And you can be the Aussie God Petzlcoatl.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> https://imgbb.com/x2QJfmw
> >> >> >> >> >>> There should no ministers named as such until a referendum
> >> >> >> decides there
> >> >> >> >> >>> should be a republic.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> There needs to be a debate before that. This position could
> >> >> help
> >> >> >> in that
> >> >> >> >> >> debate, to bring forth new ideas one way or the other.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >There can't be new ideas with an issue like this.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> The Monarchy has kept Australia growng since King George III.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Queen Victoria and Queen Elizabeth II have been instrumental.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> A continuation of Our Monarchy The UK's Parliament have nothing
> >> to do
> >> >> >> with the running of Australia our Monarchy does!
> >> >>
> >> >> > Yes, there is that psychological factor, that unites.
> >> >> More of your mindless pig ignorant shit.No stupid royal ever unites
> >> >> anywhere.
> >>
> >> > Of course they do
>
> >> We aren't even united on whether to get rid of the monarchy, fool.
>
> > Irrelevant,
> You are pathetic.

Stock reply from silly gassy robot Rod3po.
> > The practical idea of royalty is to have political unity
> Not even possible, fool.
Has happened and happens even now, silly robot.
Improve your sensors, stinker.
>
> > by acknowledging divine ownership,
>
> No such animal.
From a robotic pov, that does make sense.
>
> > as King represents God,
>
> There is no god, fool.
True statement that for robots, especially bad ones. I mean, badly programmed ones like Rid3po
So what can the wretched Rod3po know about any kind of spiritual existence?
It is self-lobotomised, if considered as a human turned robot.
It can just be miserable, and cause misery to the extent it can if taken seriously.
>
> > Who owhs all.
> Even sillier than you usually manage and that's saying something.
> There isn't even just the one god you fools grovel too
> and you fools kill those who believe in some other god.

Sound logic that from gassy robot.
Robots can have no gods.
They have no soul , no heart, no mind. They just carry on with whatever programming they got.

Humans who are theists have no doubts about the gods and the spiritual dimension. Spirits, souls, life after death. Heaven and the afterlife.

So humans need not heed canned advice from badly programmed robots.

> > Those who believe in royalty, unite under the monarch.
> Bullshit they do.

At least try to be logical, robot.
Oh, you are a defective robot. Cannot learn and wet farts when caught out, not logical at all.
Learn this:
The English, Japanese etc. are royalists united under monarchy.
As were all nations or peoples in the past.
Napoleon turned royal as that was necessary for unity.

> > Thus for royalists there is unity.
> Bullshit there is.
Idiotic robot, you are too silly for words. And amazingly silly in your egregious impudence.
>
> > Those atheists and malcontents who don't, howl like youdo till they
> > turn violent starting revolutions and republics,or seek referendums to
> > become a republic.
>
> Because they aren't actually stupid enough to want some
> fuckwit royal even if it is quite literally barking mad.

They can be very stupid, just look at that Zelensky, the latest example of failed republicanism.
Czar Putin the defacto royal is beating the shit out of him, puppet though he is.
Sad, for Ukraine. No one to make a Solomonic judgment about dividing the baby.

When a royal prevents civil war, by uniting the people, then that is good for humans. Had Z been royal, he would have put the welfare of Ukraine over the interests of the US MIC.

Bad robots like you made so many wrong predictions. Now that is predictable, for robots have no real brains, no divine help for insight.
Being shameless, they won't bother when they fail, just continue with their blather and plan more murders.
>
> > They are helped in that troublemaking by bad kingsand their attendant
> > parasites and favourites.
>
> Royals always have those, fuckwit.

Not always, stupid robot. With monarchy or equivalent there is the chance of appointing and rewarding non-political good people in power. In a republic, it is all political and opportunistic. No chance for anyone non-political, of talent who does not contribute to the politician.

> > So it is necessary to have good kings for monarchial nations to flourish.
> That doesn't even happen anymore. And even a terminal fuckwit
> such as yourself should have noticed that the USA which has no
> monarch has in fact florished FAR more than the UK which has
> been actually stupid enough to hand stupid amounts of cash to the
> clowns who are already some of the richest in the fucking country.

USA is now a horrid, evil, stupid nation of selfish-greedy criminals. They are deep in debt, their culture is unspeakable, they pollute everything, because they have no moral sense, being purely political. When they had the Protestant work ethic, they were better, for they were theistic, but now they have to be avoided.
I would much rather live in UK than USA.
>
> And that NONE of the best performing countrys in the EU is actually
> stupid enough have a royal anymore. Neither has China, Russia
> or even India.

Nothing to do with stupidity here, robot, just historic stuff. The government has replaced absolute monarchy, that is all. Some have constitutional monarchs, others have Presidents doing the job of a constitutional monarch. To that extent the P is royal.
India has plenty of royals, ignoramus. Update your data bank. They have not been driven out. They still have some assets.
>
> > Another way is to have constitutional monarchy as UK,where the monarch
> > is a respected uniting figurehead
> Bullshit it is uniting.
Wet farting once again, this robot.
> > with no power to cause great harm.
> No power to do anything useful either.
> > Stands, at the best, for absolute principles,
> More mindless bullshit when the fuckers fuck anything they like.
>
> > high standards,
>
> More mindless bullshit when the fuckers fuck anything they like.
>
> > reward of merit,
>
> That royal does nothing of the sort, they do
> what the govt of the day tells them to reward.
>
> > unconditional sympathy for subjects,
>
> More of your mindless bullshit. They don't in fact
> give away their stolen assets even to the 'homeless'
> > show of distinct national characteristics
> Yeah, like fucking anything that isnt actually dead.
>
> > and most importantly negates the top toxic existencesof such as Bushes
> > and Clintons, etc in the worst casealternative, a purely callous
> > violent money-grubbingrepublic run by criminals and their cronies.
>
> Corse no royal has ever done anything like that, eh ?
> > Just look at Indian roads during the Raj, and what they were 8 years
> > ago, for comparison between monarchy and republic, for best and worst
> > cases.
> The Raj taxed you buggers to pay for all the infrastructure
> they produced and got stinking rich in the process and
> most of you lot were too stupid to even notice.
> > White man's burden versus frank corruption.
> There was no white mans burden, you stupid
> brown fuckers paid for all that and were always
> utterly corrupt and still are.
>
> > The nationalistic and theistic BJP now in powerhas made good roads, as
> > they are not so corrupt.
> But aren't actually stupid enough to have any royal.
> > True there have been bad kings like the gluttonous lecher Edward7.
> And that stupid fat cow Vicky who let the gardener fuck her.
>
> > Luckily his bad personal influence did not last,although it did
> > contribute to two world wars.
> That stupid cow Vicky did that in spades given
> that she deliberately spread her stupid spawn
> all over europe and it was those that tried to
> rip each others throats out in both wars and
> had to be bailed out TWICE by the yanks who
> were never actually stupid enough to have a royal.
> >> And even the poms weren't united on whether to leave the EU, fool.
>
> >>> Uniting all subjects is the natural function of royalty
>
> >> That has never happened, even in england let alone the rest of the UK.
>
> >>> That is the great thing about monarchy. Any monarchy.
>
> >> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed drunken curry muncher
> >> fantasys.
>
> >> The stupid poms had a full scale CIVIL WAR about the monarchy.
>
> > Then they brought it back,
> Yes, they actually were that stupid.
> > not being so stupid after all to end up as US.
> They ended up FAR worse with that stupid cow Vicky who
> produced TWO world wars thru her terminal stupiditys.
> >> And your beloved russia ended up with shooting theirs and tossing the
> >> corpses
> >> down a disused well. How brilliant their royals were at uniting their
> >> country.
>
> > Bad or incompetent kings do badly, so they get out.
> Bullshit those two complete duds, Vicky and Ed7 did.
> > Nicholas should not have mobilized.
> And neither should have Kaiser Bill, Franz Ferdinand etc etc etc.
>
> Why should millions die because stupid royals
> are hell bent on ripping each other's throats out ?
> > Monarchy lasted for long in Russia.
> Only because the Cossacks were used to fuck over the
> uppity peasants who had decided that enough was enough.
> > Still does, in a way, under Czar Putin.
> Bullshit, his brats will never have any power at all once he carks it.
> > And China under Emperor Xi.
> He isn't emporer either. His brat won't take over after he carks it.
> > Huge progress thus in Russia and China.
> But no ROYALS, fuckwit.
>
> > Their idea of democracy is different; a competent absoluteleader is
> > elected like a king without God into the works.
> Nothing even remotely like a king given that their
> brats never take over once they cark it.
> > Still doung very well in Japan and UK, monarchy.
> Bullshit. The UK is a failed state, imploding just like
> Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands and Belgium all have
> done. ALL monarchys. Germany, France etc have ALL
> done MUCH better once they binned their royals.
>
> > People are happy there,
>
> Must be why so many of them emigrate, just like you curry munchers.
> >>> Every village idiot in every monarchy knows this.
>
> >> Clearly the poms and russians didnt. Neither did the french,
>
> > The white Russians fought hard for their Czar,
> Fat lot of good that did them.
> > but lost to the Marxist murderers.
> Corse the Czar never murdered anyone in his stupid war eh ?
> >> Even the germans binned theirs.