It ought to be noted that the other DEME value #214 associated to noumenon
redaction of the word for scribes #700 as [#3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #1,
#300, #5, #10, #200] = grammateús (G1122) as then further suggesting the
theological issues is the thesis of nothingness as nihilism as five final
form letters v's ONTIC /
DEME and MALE / FEME redaction to noumenon...

#121 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #214 as [#1, #30, #40, #50] = ʼalmân (H488):
{UMBRA: #121 % #41 = #39} 1) widowed, forsaken, forsaken as a widow;

#121 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #214 as [#1, #30, #40, #50] = ʼalmôn (H489):
{UMBRA: #127 % #41 = #4} 1) widowhood;

"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows'
houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the
greater damnation." [Matthew 23:14 (KJV)]

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
> We found a reference within the Sefer Yetzirah (before 200 CE) states in
> #24 to Chapter 2:3, "the fact that these letters are not mentioned in
> the Sefer Yetzirah may be indicative of there extreme antiquity."
>
> "But woe unto you, *scribes*-G1122 and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye
> shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in
> yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in." [Matthew
> 23:13]
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.10.1&bible:Matthew@23:13>
>
> #700 as [#3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #1, #300, #5, #10, #200] = grammateús
> (G1122): ...
>
> G1122@{
> {@1: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3)},
> {@2: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#25); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#22)},
> {@3: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#48); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#23)},
> {@4: Sup: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#111); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#63)},
> {@5: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#133); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#103)},
> {@6: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21} / I DO
> NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#104 - I COMMIT NO
> FRAUD {%7})},
> {@7: Sup: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#236); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU
> (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9} / I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9})},
> {@8: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#240); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
> (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11})},
> {@9: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#254); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
> DISTORTION: HSIEN (#176)},
> {@10: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#306); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#214)},
> Male: #306; Feme: #214
> } // #700
>
> It appears that it is a #PENTA thesis (Chapter 1:13) upon the language
> itself and the Kabbalistic Tree "It is significant to note that all five
> families are present in the Bereshit (H7225), the first word of the
> TORAH." [p 103]
>
> #913 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#2, #200, #1, #300, #10, #400] \
> #918 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#2, #200, #1, #300, #10, #400, #5]
> = rêʼshîyth (H7225): {UMBRA: #911 % #41 = #9} 1) first, beginning, best,
> chief; 1a) beginning; 1b) first; 1c) chief; 1d) choice part;
>
> THREE MOTHERS MALE LETTERS
> MEM - WATER (CHOKMAH) YOD
> SHIN - FIRE (BINAH) HE
> ALEF - AIR / BREATH (SIX) VAV
>
> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 - ROMAN PROTOTYPE #TWO
>
> #480 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#6, #8, #20, #40, #400, #6] =
> chokmâh (H2451): {UMBRA: #73 % #41 = #32} 1) wisdom; 1a) skill (in war);
> 1b) wisdom (in administration); 1c) shrewdness, wisdom; 1d) wisdom,
> prudence (in religious affairs); 1e) wisdom (ethical and religious);
>
> #1067 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #400, #600] =
> bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 = #21} 1) to discern, understand,
> consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive, discern; 1a2) to understand, know
> (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark, give heed to, distinguish,
> consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight, understanding; 1b) (Niphal)
> to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have understanding; 1c)
> (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to understand, give
> understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself discerning or
> attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach, instruct; 2)
> (TWOT) prudent, regard;
>
> #114 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#10, #80, #10, #8, #6] = pûwach
> (H6315): {UMBRA: #94 % #41 = #12} 1) to breathe, blow; 1a) (Qal) to
> breathe; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause to exhale or breathe; 1b2) to puff,
> snort; 1b3) to excite, inflame; 1b4) to puff, pant for it; 1b5) to
> breathe out, utter; 1b6) to blow, blast;
>
> #1388 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#20, #8, #100, #400, #60, #800] =
> kērýssō (G2784): {UMBRA: #1728 % #41 = #6} 1) to be a herald, to
> officiate as a herald; 1a) to proclaim after the manner of a herald; 1b)
> always with the suggestion of formality, gravity and an authority which
> must be listened to and obeyed; 2) to publish, proclaim openly:
> something which has been done; 3) used of the public proclamation of the
> gospel and matters pertaining to it, made by John the Baptist, by Jesus,
> by the apostles and other Christian teachers;
>
> #156 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#50, #70, #30, #6] = naʻal (H5275):
> {UMBRA: #150 % #41 = #27} 1) sandal, shoe;
>
> "And *preached*-G2784, saying, There cometh one mightier than I after
> me, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to stoop down and
> unloose." [Mark 1:7]
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.10.1&bible:Mark@1:7>
>
> #531 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70, #5,
> #10, #50] \
> #692 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70, #8,
> #200, #8, #10] \
> #892 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70, #8,
> #200, #8, #10, #200] \
> #1266 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70, #800] \
> #1271 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70, #5,
> #800] \
> #1404 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70, #8,
> #200, #70, #400, #200, #10, #50] \
> #1734 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70, #8,
> #200, #800, #200, #10, #50] = metanoéō (G3340): {UMBRA: #1271 % #41 =
> #41} 1) to change one's mind, i.e. to repent; 2) to change one's mind
> for better, heartily to amend with abhorrence of one's past sins;
>
> "The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and
> shall condemn it: because they repented-G3340 at the preaching of Jonas;
> and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here." [Matthew 12:41]
>
> #563 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#200, #1, #300, #1, #50, #1, #10]
> = Satanâs (G4567): {UMBRA: #753 % #41 = #15} 1) adversary (one who
> opposes another in purpose or act), the name given to; 1a) the prince of
> evil spirits, the inveterate adversary of God and Christ; 1a1) he
> incites apostasy from God and to sin; 1a2) circumventing men by his
> wiles; 1a3) the worshippers of idols are said to be under his control;
> 1a4) by his demons he is able to take possession of men and inflict them
> with diseases; 1a5) by God's assistance he is overcome; 1a6) on Christ's
> return from heaven he will be bound with chains for a thousand years,
> but when the thousand years are finished he will walk the earth in yet
> greater power, but shortly after will be given over to eternal
> punishment; 1b) a Satan-like man;
>
> "If Satan-G4567 also be divided against himself, how shall his kingdom
> stand? because ye say that I cast out devils through Beelzebub." [Luke
> 11:18]
>
> "Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I
> send thee, to open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light,
> and from the power of Satan-G4567 unto God, that they may receive
> forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by
> faith that is in me." [Acts 26:17-18]
>
> "One of the mysteries of the Sefer Yitzirah is the fact that double (ie.
> the final form) letters are not mentioned. These double letters are the
> ones which have different forms in the middle and at the end of a word:
> MEM (40: 600), NUN (50: 700), TZADI (90: 900), PEH (80: 800), and KAF
> (20: 500). As the TALMUD states, the forms of these letters were
> forgotten, and later reinstituted by the prophets. There is absolutely
> no reference to these doubles in the Sefer Yitzirah.
>
> The Kabbalists, however, draw a parallel between the five phonetic
> families (ie. known to the ZOHAR which recording the teachings of Simeon
> ben Yochai (c. 100 CE) although this antiquity is rejected by some) and
> the five double (ie. final form) letters." [Sefer Yitzirah, Kaplan, page
> 103]
>
> #1340 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#1, #3, #100, #1, #400, #30, #5,
> #800] = agrauléō (G63): {UMBRA: #1340 % #41 = #28} 1) to live in the
> fields, be under the open sky, even at night;
>
> "And there were in the same country shepherds abiding-G63 in the field,
> keeping watch over their flock by night." [Luke 2:8]
>
> YOUTUBE: "ANNIE LENNOX ANGELS FROM THE REALMS OF GLORY LIVE VATICAN 2017"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO4ggX95an8>
>
> Since the biblical textual narrative gives precedence to ONTIC / DEME
> and MALE / FEME redaction to noumenon grounding instead of the thesis of
> nothingness we've updated our neural linguistic pragma to avoid a
> potential bias towards nihilism which might be consequential to the
> usage of FIVE final form letters within the HEBREW prototypes.
>
> On 28/9/2023 11:58, dolf wrote:
>> Hopefully today, we'll have implemented the calendar which will be a
>> semantical morph obtained from our earlier grumble prototype...
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Temporal%20Noumenon%20Resonance>
>>
>> We've noted from discussion elsewhere that there will be a need to
>> update our neural linguistic pragma to avoid a potential bias towards
>> nihilism which might be consequential to the usage of FIVE final form
>> letters within the HEBREW prototypes and so after completing this
>> ACTIONABLE TASK we'll undertake that activity.
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Temporal%20Noumenon%20Resonance.json> <--
>> *CORRECTED* the link
>>
>> Overnight we updated the semantic form of our ACTIONABLE TASK to include
>> an auto function and we note in terms of code execution (ie. we did a
>> for {} loop with a mod % 100 == 0 increment to test it) that this auto
>> function() will be actioned before the main() is executed.
>>
>> Our metemprical / metaphysical philosophical question is not unlike the
>> neural linguistic problem resolution method (magnitude --> meta
>> descriptor) as the observed dynamic (ie. by means of a concise discourse
>> from someone formerly educated in philosophy) quantum pairing to the
>> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (note: that this has a
>> corresponding ONTIC / DEME, or event MALE / FEME associators as pragma).
>>
>> QUESTION: If a vEVENT@[ONTIC: #324, DEME: #190, MALE: #292, FEME: #358]
>> occurs can it then be considered as being steeped or an immersive action
>> relative to the pragma memeBrain?
>>
>> Thusly if any NOUMENON RESONANCE occurs, what then has precedence as
>> dynamic process: either ONTIC / DEME grounding as cause or the MALE /
>> FEME dialectic noumenon redacted element as then an effect where each is
>> a magnitude against the meta-descriptor element (ie. does it need to
>> even have an equivalence since it is a metakosmeo with a telelogical /
>> temporal resonance).
>>
>> It's seems reasonable that the meta-descriptor element is only a focal
>> point for change, but does this manifest as AUGMENTATION / AMELIORATION
>> dynamic / static DELIMITER like our primitive SPIRAL SELECTOR@{SCENARIO}
>> prototype.
>>
>> By that I mean, if the ONTIC / DEME grounding is the cause, the
>> manifested change is either the quantum of POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY
>> OF OPPOSITES, however if the MALE / FEME dialectic element is the
>> effective cause then quantum of change  might be considered the
>> preceding (or the entire) dialectic.
>>
>> So many questions, which will doubtlessly keep our mind occupied for
>> years to come.
>>
>> On 27/9/2023 07:01, dolf wrote:
>>> We've decided to delay implementing the "bring screen dialog to the
>>> foreground" feature until we've undertaken our development on the
>>> following ACTIONABLE TASK:
>>>
>>> Given a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE [ONTIC: #324, DEME: #190, MALE: #292,
>>> FEME: #358] devised from an impress of mind associative to a bomb blast.
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Note%2020230926.pdf>
>>>
>>> We'll consider an actionable task to query temporal neural linguistic
>>> pragma for noumenon resonance and if it is optimal for vitality
>>>
>>> RULES BASED?
>>>
>>> We are not as informal research seeking to transgress the boundaries
>>> of professional faculty knowledge, neither are we venturing into the
>>> Artificial Intelligence realm but rather ours is a metalogic concern...
>>>
>>> Our informal research as existential philosophical goal is to firstly
>>> visualise through enquiry by date / time and perhaps IDEA categories
>>> the available neural linguistic pragma such that if a vEVENT@[ONTIC:
>>> #324, DEME: #190, MALE: #292, FEME: #358] occurs can it then be
>>> considered as being steeped or an immersive action relative to the
>>> pragma memeBrain?
>>>
>>> What is then the relationship and process of mediation by means of the
>>> temporal neural linguistic pragma for noumenon resonance in order to
>>> facilitate an optimal recovery from the adverse event as vitality.
>>>
>>> To give an example:
>>>
>>> If we have a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE [ONTIC: #???, DEME: #???, MALE:
>>> #???, FEME: #???] as a comprehensible multi-media object being then a
>>> known cause with a corresponding psychological effect (eg: a COCA-COLA
>>> advert), can one schedule it at a specific time in association to a
>>> vEVENT@[ONTIC: #324, DEME: #190, MALE: #292, FEME: #358] occurrence
>>> and then mediate the chaotic state towards a condition of well-being?
>>>
>>>      #107 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 27 SEPTEMBER 2023 / DEME CHECKSUM
>>> TOTAL: #318 as [#1, #6, #50, #10, #600] = ʼôwn (H202): {UMBRA: #57 %
>>> #41 = #16} 1) vigour, generative power; 2) wealth; 3) physical
>>> strength (of men and behemoth);
>>>
>>> FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: #237 - USE OF FORCE
>>>
>>> FORMULA OF HUMANITY: + #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE) = #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE
>>> A TEST
>>>
>>> FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: + #41 - RESPONSE (YING) = #278 - RELAXATION
>>>
>>> FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: + #81 - FOSTERING (YANG) = #318 - PUT TO DEATH
>>> BY VIOLENCE
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?deme:237,277,278,318>
>>>
>>> NOTE ON COMMONWEALTH: From common (“public”) +‎ wealth (“well-being”).
>>>  From c. 1450 as common wele (commonweal). In the form common-wealth
>>> (common welthe) from c. 1520, used by Tyndale in the sense "secular
>>> society" in particular, for which other authors preferred publike
>>> weal. Also from the 1520s treated as a synonym or loan-translation of
>>> res publica (republic) (Rollison 2017:67f).
>>>
>>> On 20/9/2023 06:58, dolf wrote:
>>>> We've given some preliminary thought on how to efficiently bring any on
>>>> screen dialog to the foreground by introducing an [ ] action element
>>>> upon
>>>> the dialog frame.
>>>>
>>>> This theoretically only involves moving the ONSCREEN [] array nth
>>>> entry to
>>>> being the last entry and then adjusting the yOffset / y variables.
>>>>
>>>> We're just having to verify any non conformity issues with respects
>>>> to the
>>>> MOVE {} and ONSCREEN {} move {} objects -- am I duplicating a MOVE {}
>>>> object and then changing the size dynamic which might have a
>>>> consequence on
>>>> the yOffset / y delta change?
>>>>
>>>> And extending the simple 2 dialog scenario where our coding retains the
>>>> dialog position dynamic and toggles a dialog to the foreground.
>>>>
>>>> We've implemented the TELOS idea {} concept in our SPIRAL SELECTOR@{}
>>>> and
>>>> we notice there is an expansive ONTIC / DEME infusion within the
>>>> Hebrew /
>>>> Greek lexicon as having an implication on epistemological premise.
>>>>
>>>> Accordingly we're going to today focus on completing the STRONGS {}
>>>> concept
>>>> which will convey the LEXICON entry with the BIBLOS narrative occurrence
>>>> links.
>>>>
>>>> We'll shortly implement the URL start option for multiple LEXICON
>>>> entries:
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?lexicon:H505>
>>>>
>>>> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> We've now completed our leisurely Sunday logical thinking activity
>>>>> which
>>>>> was to implement the URL start options for each of the ONTC, DEME, MALE
>>>>> and FEME linguistic notions
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?ontic:452,411&deme:472&male:123&feme:400>
>>>>>
>>>>> We've now implemented the SPIRAL SELECTOR@{NOUMENON} concept for the
>>>>> ONTC, DEME, MALE and FEME linguistic notions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since the memeBrain Chat deployed English with accents we've changed
>>>>> this to "Lingua Franca" as a generalised term for the Romanised
>>>>> alphabet.
>>>>>
>>>>> To test this we parsed President Macron's tweet (x): "J’ai fait bondir
>>>>> les gamers." <https://x.com/emmanuelmacron/status/1703065883617231135>
>>>>>
>>>>> melant tous les arts. {@14: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#568); Ego:
>>>>> 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#568)}
>>>>>
>>>>> YOUTUBE: "THEY SEEK HIM HERE - SCARLET PIMPERNEL: ENCORE!"
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dbs0-jIAht4>
>>>>>
>>>>> #1380 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #568 as [#80, #5, #80, #5, #30, #5, #20,
>>>>> #10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #800, #50] = pelekízō (G3990): {UMBRA: #957 %
>>>>> #41 = #14} 1) to cut off with an axe, to behead;
>>>>>
>>>>> #1526 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #568 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #200, #300,
>>>>> #1, #40, #5, #50, #70, #400, #200] = proḯstēmi (G4291): {UMBRA: #818 %
>>>>> #41 = #39} 1) to set or place before; 1a) to set over; 1b) to be over,
>>>>> to superintend, preside over; 1c) to be a protector or guardian;
>>>>> 1c1) to
>>>>> give aid; 1d) to care for, give attention to; 1d1) profess honest
>>>>> occupations;
>>>>>
>>>>> Our next activity will be to implement the TELOS {} concept within our
>>>>> SPIRAL SELECTOR@{}
>>>>>
>>>>> On 16/9/2023 12:35, dolf wrote:
>>>>>> STATUS UPDATE @1230 HOURS: The scope of the functions within our
>>>>>> Date /
>>>>>> Time Heuristic {} concept are accessible via the Savvy.GNOSIS {} as
>>>>>> payload module and therefore amenable for our SPIRAL SELECTOR@{}
>>>>>> dialectic data representation...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> H505@{
>>>>>>    {@1: Sup: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#40); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA
>>>>>> (#40)},
>>>>>>    {@2: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#81 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%0});
>>>>>> Ego:
>>>>>> 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#41)},
>>>>>>    {@3: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#152); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI
>>>>>> (#71 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%2})},
>>>>>>    {@4: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#222 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%12});
>>>>>> Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#151 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%16})},
>>>>>>    Male: #222; Feme: #151
>>>>>> } // #151
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TELOS TOTAL: #151
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #525
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MALE: @81 + @222 = #303
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FEME: @71 + @151 = #222
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GRUMBLE (#222, #151)@[40, 40, 41, 1, 71, 30, 70, 80]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GRUNTLE (#392, #373)@[40, 40, 80, 40, 40, 41, 41, 1, 31, 71, 61,
>>>>>> 30, 50,
>>>>>> 70, 49, 80]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thusly we've completed that action for our present DEME {} concept and
>>>>>> because we may in the future require processes to occur between the
>>>>>> ONTIC {}, MALE {} and FEME {} concepts we'll replicate our present
>>>>>> code
>>>>>> as tomorrow's logical thinking activity...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/reason/selector.json>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For those who are keeping pace with our self education as informal
>>>>>> research project, you'll see that we already have some reference
>>>>>> conveyed within our subordinate DEME {} concept within SPIRAL
>>>>>> SELECTOR@{} concept.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since there are likely to be complex screen / data dynamics as actions
>>>>>> over which we might have little control, for example:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a) The Savvy.DEMEIDEAS {} object which are requisite for the DEME {}
>>>>>> concept might not be present (whether deleted / or not loaded) so we
>>>>>> check for its viability within the concept {} know() function and make
>>>>>> an other fetch request which then does a refresh() of the screen
>>>>>> dialogs
>>>>>> and thereby completes its operation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> b) The Savvy.ONSCREEN {} object stores a copy of the params which are
>>>>>> used for the refresh() process and therefore to ensure an integrity
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> the subordinate {} concept within SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} concept we have a
>>>>>> devised a task automation named flipSelectorContext () which ensures
>>>>>> params object has the right data context.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> flipSelectorContext: function (act) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      for (var i = 0; i < Savvy.ONSCREEN.length; i++) {
>>>>>>          if (Savvy.ONSCREEN[i].concept == act.form) {
>>>>>>              Savvy.ONSCREEN[i].params.form = act.data.context;
>>>>>>              Savvy.ONSCREEN[i].params.data = act.data;
>>>>>>              return (true);
>>>>>>          }
>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>      return (true);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As we continue with our DEME {} concept it is likely we'll adopt a
>>>>>> similar dialectic data representation as we presently use within the
>>>>>> Date / Time Heuristic {} concept, so we'll need to look at the
>>>>>> scope of
>>>>>> those functions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That will be our logical thinking task for the weekend...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 15/9/2023 07:20, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>> This is just our informal note so that we can do further informal
>>>>>>> research: Whilst we may understand the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE as a
>>>>>>> philosophical conception being a logical quaternary as a pivotal
>>>>>>> septenary construct:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW:
>>>>>>> FORMULA OF HUMANITY:
>>>>>>> FORMULA OF AUTONOMY:
>>>>>>> FORMULA OF PROGRESSION:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The consideration concerning our selective CASE STUDY example of #237
>>>>>>> - USE OF FORCE, is whether the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE can also be
>>>>>>> devised as a METALOGIC CONSTRUCT consisting of an ONTIC / DEME IDEA
>>>>>>> STEM with either a template META-DESCRIPTIVE (#40, #41, #81) standard
>>>>>>> or non-standard (ie. the meta-descriptive elements as metakosmeo and
>>>>>>> in being ONTIC can be deployed by any formulation including
>>>>>>> repetition) AGGREGATION AND ASSOCIATIVE ONTIC / DEME IDEA CHAINING
>>>>>>> where the teleological IDEA with NOUMENON redaction is a BLOOM /
>>>>>>> BLOME:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- The state of being first-ranked or of first priority.
>>>>>>> -- (rare) An appellation for Jesus Christ, among other religious
>>>>>>> figures
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: #237 - USE OF FORCE
>>>>>>> FORMULA OF HUMANITY: + #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE) = #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE
>>>>>>> A TEST
>>>>>>> FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: + #41 - RESPONSE (YING) = #278 - RELAXATION
>>>>>>> FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: + #81 - FOSTERING (YANG) = #318 - PUT TO
>>>>>>> DEATH
>>>>>>> BY VIOLENCE
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So we'll need to devise another ACTIONABLE TASK to then browse,
>>>>>>> select
>>>>>>> and defined a viable CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE and export the {} objects
>>>>>>> in progression of our informal research.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However before we can undertake that goal, we'll need to implement
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> visualisation of those various ONTIC / DEME / MALE / FEME dataset {}
>>>>>>> extrapolations within our SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} concept.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And that will be our logical thinking task for the present time.  And
>>>>>>> our fist action will be to visualise the DEME {} concepts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 13/9/2023 06:41, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>> IN SUMMARY THEN WITH RESPECTS TO STATE AND ITS #491 - AGENCY
>>>>>>>> (AMBULANCE, POLICE, SES, HOSPITALS, FIRE BRIGADE, ARMED SERVICES
>>>>>>>> etc)
>>>>>>>> AS THEN A FOUNDATION TO PRODUCTIVITY GAINS, INTEROPERABILITY AND
>>>>>>>> ESSENTIAL COMPONENT FOR TRANSITION TO AN INFORMATION ECONOMY WITHIN
>>>>>>>> THE COMMONWEALTH:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> #237 - USE OF FORCE
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> + #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE) = #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> + #41 - RESPONSE (YING) = #278 - RELAXATION
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> + #81 - FOSTERING (YANG) = #318 - PUT TO DEATH BY VIOLENCE
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The sort of lawless woke mind virus which is rampant in America
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <https://x.com/BoekDolf/status/1701432517251985584>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2ND TWEET:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The hypothetical question is whether we can as cyber warfare deploy
>>>>>>>> the SUPERNAL cushioning with a temporal heuristic to monitor, remedy
>>>>>>>> or disrupt the favourable responsiveness as mindset by inducing
>>>>>>>> hostilities and civil war:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> #375
>>>>>>>> #443
>>>>>>>> #337
>>>>>>>> #380
>>>>>>>> #393
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.09.12&time:14.00&heuristic>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3RD TWEET:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thusly theoretically the ontic / deme STEM meta descriptor of the
>>>>>>>> ontological categorical imperative conveys both in an inherent
>>>>>>>> simplicity as dialectic progression and complex dynamic by a
>>>>>>>> teleological hierarchy which temporal or conscious / subconscious
>>>>>>>> steeping to assay compliance as an universal rule of peace agreement
>>>>>>>> between parties.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> #375 <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:375>
>>>>>>>> #443 <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:443>
>>>>>>>> #337 <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:337>
>>>>>>>> #380 <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:380>
>>>>>>>> #393 <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:393>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/9/2023 11:09, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #237 - USE OF FORCE + #41 - RESPONSE = #278 - RELAXATION
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #1388 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL #278 as [#600, #1, #30, #1, #200, #1,
>>>>>>>>> #50, #300, #5, #200] = chaláō (G5465): {UMBRA: #1432 % #41 =
>>>>>>>>> #38} 1)
>>>>>>>>> to loosen, slacken, relax; 2) to let down from a higher place to a
>>>>>>>>> lower;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #1388 as [#20, #8, #100, #400, #60, #800] = kērýssō (G2784):
>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA:
>>>>>>>>> #1728 % #41 = #6} 1) to be a herald, to officiate as a herald; 1a)
>>>>>>>>> to proclaim after the manner of a herald; 1b) *always* *with* *the*
>>>>>>>>> *suggestion* *of* *formality*, *gravity* *and* *an* *authority*
>>>>>>>>> *which* *must* *be* *listened* *to* *and* *obeyed*; 2) to publish,
>>>>>>>>> proclaim openly: something which has been done; 3) used of the
>>>>>>>>> public proclamation of the gospel and matters pertaining to it,
>>>>>>>>> made
>>>>>>>>> by John the Baptist, by Jesus, by the apostles and other Christian
>>>>>>>>> teachers;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WE ALREADY HAVE TWO PENTAMORPHIC NORMALISATION / TEMPORAL HEURISTIC
>>>>>>>>> CANDIDATES FOR #318 - PUT TO DEATH BY VIOLENCE:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> GRAPPLE (330, 318)@[12, 76, 30, 45, 57, 42, 31, 21, 4] PROTOTYPE
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.09.11&time:02.05&heuristic>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> GRAPPLE (468, 318)@[79, 62, 23, 38, 39, 10, 47, 15, 5] PROTOTYPE
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.09.11&time:21.45&heuristic>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #650 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL #318 as [#30, #200, #300, #70, #10, #40]
>>>>>>>>> = râshâʻ (H7563): {UMBRA: #570 % #41 = #37} 1) wicked, criminal;
>>>>>>>>> 1a)
>>>>>>>>> guilty one, one guilty of crime (subst); 1b) wicked (hostile to
>>>>>>>>> God); 1c) wicked, guilty of sin (against God or man);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [#30, {@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD
>>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: YI (#30)}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #200, {@2: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
>>>>>>>>> {%24}); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH
>>>>>>>>> OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42})}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #300, {@3: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#142); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS:
>>>>>>>>> SHOU
>>>>>>>>> (#125)}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #70, {@4: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR
>>>>>>>>> {%22}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#195)}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #10, {@5: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#218); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
>>>>>>>>> DISTORTION: HSIEN (#205)}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #40] {@6: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD
>>>>>>>>> {%38}
>>>>>>>>> / I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#245)}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Our next activity is to implement the ONTIC / DEME / NOUMENON
>>>>>>>>> MALE /
>>>>>>>>> FEME REDACTION as SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} reporting so that we might get
>>>>>>>>> some sense of IDEA chaining ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Which will commence from next Thursday the 14 SEPTEMBER 2023.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We ought to once again stress here that whilst our neural
>>>>>>>>> linguistic
>>>>>>>>> pragma as informal research is derived from a hebrew / greek
>>>>>>>>> biblical lexicon source that this is "...exceedingly broad as a
>>>>>>>>> premise and could in my self educated perspective: be a procedural
>>>>>>>>> rule, a dialectic derived from an expert opinion (or chatGPT) or
>>>>>>>>> some other descriptive narrative..."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Our usage of this lexicon source is threefold:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> a)    those languages comprising 22 or 24 phonemes is then amenable
>>>>>>>>> to our context of temporal markers / continuum / linear progression
>>>>>>>>> as base-7: 24 x 7 x 13 = 6D x 364 = #2184 days x 49 = 6J = 294 x
>>>>>>>>> 364
>>>>>>>>> or 293 = 365.2423 days;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> b)    those languages are subject to substantial academic rigour;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> c)    that lexicon is widely translatable into other languages.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> CHATGPT: The Bible is one of the most translated books in the
>>>>>>>>> world.
>>>>>>>>> As of 2022, the full Bible has been translated into 724 languages,
>>>>>>>>> the New Testament has been translated into 1,617 languages, and
>>>>>>>>> parts of the Bible have been translated into 1,248 languages. These
>>>>>>>>> numbers may vary slightly depending on the source and the criteria
>>>>>>>>> for translation. The Bible has been translated from the original
>>>>>>>>> Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek versions into different languages,
>>>>>>>>> including sign languages.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is conceivable then that a DIALECTIC obtained from a superlative
>>>>>>>>> language description of a PROBLEM / SYMPTOM DESCRIPTION / TEXT BOOK
>>>>>>>>> CASE might also suffice.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hypothetically what's needed is some teleological descriptor by
>>>>>>>>> which a viable sense of IDEA chaining might be observed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> NECROMANCY (gk. #652 = νεκρομαντεία: ONTIC: #180; DEME: #237 - USE
>>>>>>>>> OF FORCE; MALE: #442; FEME: #328 - LAST TABLE TALK IDEA;
>>>>>>>>> GRUNTLE@[#1059, #770]): A conjuring involving the dead as loosely,
>>>>>>>>> any sorcery or witchcraft, especially involving death or the dead,
>>>>>>>>> particularly sorcery involving raising or reanimating the dead.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #9 as [#1 - CENTER (CHUNG), #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI), #2 - FULL CIRCLE
>>>>>>>>> (CHOU)] /
>>>>>>>>> #429 as [#20, #1, #2, #6, #400] = ʼôwb (H178): {UMBRA: #9 % #41 =
>>>>>>>>> #9} 1) water skin bottle; 2) necromancer; 2a) necromancer, one who
>>>>>>>>> evokes the dead; 2b) ghost, spirit of a dead one; 2c) *PRACTICE*
>>>>>>>>> *OF* *NECROMANCY*; 3) one that has a familiar spirit;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> AS WE NOTED THE META-LOGIC AUTONOMOUS #EIGHT DELIMITER ASSOCIATED
>>>>>>>>> WITH THE DEME EXTENT #237 - USE OF FORCE --> #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE)
>>>>>>>>> --> #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST THAT IT SEEMS LIKELY AS
>>>>>>>>> METAPHYSICAL NOMENCLATURE TO BE ABLE TO DEVISE FROM AN ONTIC / DEME
>>>>>>>>> STEM AN ASSOCIATION OF THE META DESCRIPTOR SPECTRUM:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>               | + #1 - CENTER
>>>>>>>>> #237 - USE OF FORCE -     | + #41 - RESPONSE
>>>>>>>>>               | + #81 - FOSTERING
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #237 - USE OF FORCE + #41 - RESPONSE = #278 - RELAXATION
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #1388 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL #278 as [#600, #1, #30, #1, #200, #1,
>>>>>>>>> #50, #300, #5, #200] = chaláō (G5465): {UMBRA: #1432 % #41 =
>>>>>>>>> #38} 1)
>>>>>>>>> to loosen, slacken, relax; 2) to let down from a higher place to a
>>>>>>>>> lower;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #1388 as [#20, #8, #100, #400, #60, #800] = kērýssō (G2784):
>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA:
>>>>>>>>> #1728 % #41 = #6} 1) to be a herald, to officiate as a herald; 1a)
>>>>>>>>> to proclaim after the manner of a herald; 1b) *always* *with* *the*
>>>>>>>>> *suggestion* *of* *formality*, *gravity* *and* *an* *authority*
>>>>>>>>> *which* *must* *be* *listened* *to* *and* *obeyed*; 2) to publish,
>>>>>>>>> proclaim openly: something which has been done; 3) used of the
>>>>>>>>> public proclamation of the gospel and matters pertaining to it,
>>>>>>>>> made
>>>>>>>>> by John the Baptist, by Jesus, by the apostles and other Christian
>>>>>>>>> teachers;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #237 - USE OF FORCE + #81 - FOSTERING = #318 - PUT TO DEATH BY
>>>>>>>>> VIOLENCE
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #821 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL #318 as [#5, #200, #500, #1, #60, #5,
>>>>>>>>> #50] = spházō (G4969): {UMBRA: #1508 % #41 = #32} 1) to slay,
>>>>>>>>> slaughter, butcher; 2) to put to death by violence; 3) mortally
>>>>>>>>> wounded;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [#5, {@1: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#5); Ego: 5 - KEEPING
>>>>>>>>> SMALL:
>>>>>>>>> SHAO (#5)}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #200, {@2: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#48); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS:
>>>>>>>>> SHENG
>>>>>>>>> (#43)}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #500, {@3: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#105); Ego: 14 -
>>>>>>>>> PENETRATION: JUI (#57)}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #1, {@4: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#163); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG
>>>>>>>>> (#58)}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #60, {@5: Sup: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF
>>>>>>>>> SACRED PROPERTY {%8} / I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
>>>>>>>>> Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#118 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%5})}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #5, {@6: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#242); Ego: 5 - KEEPING
>>>>>>>>> SMALL: SHAO (#123)}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #50] {@7: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#253); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS /
>>>>>>>>> WASTING: T'ANG (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27})}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #821 as [#5, #300, #40, #70, #6, #400] = hashmâʻûwth (H2045):
>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #821 % #41 = #1} 1) a causing to hear, a report, a
>>>>>>>>> communication;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.grapple369.com/?lexicon:H6,H202,H476,H1497,H2203,H2470,H2487,H2710,H3233,H3295,H3381,H3406,H3899,H4725,H4758,H4759,H4760,H4791,H4796,H4836,H5632,H5768,H5804,H5953,H5955,H6030,H6094,H6225,H7105,H7114,H7323,H7563,H7804,H7999,H8043,H8437,H8458,G132,G680,G1014,G1015,G1016,G1447,G1653,G2327,G2361,G2476,G2517,G2919,G3004,G4637,G4638,G4868,G4969>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: #365 = #360 - PATHOS + #5 - GROUNDING OF
>>>>>>>>> ACTION --> #237 - USE OF FORCE PENTAMORPH
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #THREE:    #98 as #17 - HOLDING BACK (JUAN)
>>>>>>>>> #FOUR:     #139 as #58 - GATHERING IN (HSI)
>>>>>>>>> #FIVE:         #237 as #75 - FAILURE (SHIH)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.8.29&time:11.05&heuristic>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST PENTAMORPHS AS UTILITARIAN #491 -
>>>>>>>>> AGENCY FUNCTIONS <-- THERE ARE MULTIPLE POSSIBLE ASSAYING
>>>>>>>>> CANDIDATES
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #THREE:     #138    as #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU)
>>>>>>>>> #FOUR:     #139    as #58 - GATHERING IN (HSI)
>>>>>>>>> #FIVE:        #277    as #34 - KINSHIP (CH'IN)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.08.31&time:16.05&heuristic>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF HUMANITY: #364 - TEMPORAL HEURISTIC --> 4.5 x #81 -->
>>>>>>>>> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: 9x9x9 = #729 as @1 - SELF + #728 - MORPHOS.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF PROGRESSION (#40 - LAW / MODEL (FE) DIFFERENTIATION
>>>>>>>>> BETWEEN #237 - USE OF FORCE --> #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST):
>>>>>>>>> Kant’s most prominent formulation of the Categorical Imperative,
>>>>>>>>> known as the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), is generally
>>>>>>>>> thought to
>>>>>>>>> demand that one act only on maxims that one can will as universal
>>>>>>>>> laws without this generating a contradiction. Kant’s view is
>>>>>>>>> standardly summarized as requiring the ‘universalizability’ of
>>>>>>>>> one’s
>>>>>>>>> maxims and described in terms of the distinction between
>>>>>>>>> ‘contradictions in conception’ and ‘contradictions in the will’.
>>>>>>>>> Focusing on the under appreciated significance of the simultaneity
>>>>>>>>> condition included in the FUL, PAULINE KLEINGELD argues, by
>>>>>>>>> contrast, that the principle is better read as requiring that
>>>>>>>>> one be
>>>>>>>>> able to will two things simultaneously without #215 -
>>>>>>>>> SELF-CONTRADICTION (ie. is the GAUGES controller deployment then
>>>>>>>>> causal for an aberration of ONTIC / DEME grounding?), namely,
>>>>>>>>> that a
>>>>>>>>> maxim be one’s own and that it be a universal law. This amounts
>>>>>>>>> to a
>>>>>>>>> new interpretation of the FUL with significant interpretive and
>>>>>>>>> philosophical advantages.
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2017-0006/html>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 7/9/2023 08:55, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> We've completed our logical thinking task for today which was to
>>>>>>>>>> nest our RESULTS {} concept code segment into a loop so that it is
>>>>>>>>>> contingent upon additional pentamorph binary mask associations.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We'll still need to test for any ANOMALOUS behaviour that will
>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>> readily become apparent as we complete our SPIRAL SELECTOR@{}
>>>>>>>>>> reporting stage of development.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Although we don't presently utilise this feature, when deploying
>>>>>>>>>> the ?run URL action, we've added a capability to pass parameter
>>>>>>>>>> variables to the main () function within the ACTIONABLE TASK
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Pentamorphic%20Normalisation&date:2023.9.7>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2023 14:06, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> We've now transitioned the "Pentamorphic Normalisation.json" code
>>>>>>>>>>> to deploy
>>>>>>>>>>> the search result pentamorph binary mask associations as clusters
>>>>>>>>>>> in which
>>>>>>>>>>> we convey a hierarchy of matched criteria.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Tomorrow's logical will be to nest this code segment into a loop
>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>> contingent upon additional pentamorph binary mask associations.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Our actionable task should then be completed and we'll leave the
>>>>>>>>>>> consideration of a Pentamorphism against any grapple @[] to some
>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>> actionable task.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> STATUS UPDATE @ 1330 HOURS ON 5 SEPTEMBER 2023:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We have some intermediate code in place which makes a
>>>>>>>>>>>> determination on
>>>>>>>>>>>> masking associated to the pentamorph grouping so that we can
>>>>>>>>>>>> suitably
>>>>>>>>>>>> evolve the processPentamorphs() function which now deploys four
>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>> states:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - penta as the nature of the pentamorph grouping
>>>>>>>>>>>> - flags [] array conveying the match criteria in the pentamorph
>>>>>>>>>>>> - met [] array to the record conveying nature of any match to
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> telos
>>>>>>>>>>>> [] array
>>>>>>>>>>>> - met [] array to each pentamorph node
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Such that for example the telos [298, 333] search array
>>>>>>>>>>>> produces a
>>>>>>>>>>>> result where the record met [4, 0] array and the flags: [0,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 0, 0,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 0, 4]
>>>>>>>>>>>> array when set to that criteria, it means the telos condition
>>>>>>>>>>>> 298
>>>>>>>>>>>> is met
>>>>>>>>>>>> in the MALE field of the MORPH5 and consequentially the met:
>>>>>>>>>>>> [4, 0]
>>>>>>>>>>>> array in that pentamorph node will similarly reflect the
>>>>>>>>>>>> condition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Such that if the MORPH5 with a specific met: [4, 0] criteria is
>>>>>>>>>>>> disconnected from the main record entry we'll still know that
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> telos
>>>>>>>>>>>> 298 and not the 333 condition is met.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Having completed that logical thinking task, we'll next have
>>>>>>>>>>>> to give
>>>>>>>>>>>> consideration as to what organisation criteria we deploy for our
>>>>>>>>>>>> results
>>>>>>>>>>>> representation: it's more likely we'll be concerned with the
>>>>>>>>>>>> teleological criteria as a priority to which pentamorph.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Accordingly, we'll wind back the intermediate code which was
>>>>>>>>>>>> requisite
>>>>>>>>>>>> for stabilising our processPentamorphs() function as our next
>>>>>>>>>>>> logical
>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking task.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/9/2023 07:26, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> During our hiatus we've been busy identifying viable
>>>>>>>>>>>>> consciousness
>>>>>>>>>>>>> instantiated rationalisation methods for GNOSIS EX MACHINA...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To state it concisely such involves:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1)  Redaction of speech into its memeBrain form consisting of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> neural
>>>>>>>>>>>>> linguistic pragma which provides the meta-descriptors
>>>>>>>>>>>>> associated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnitude of a teleological reprise;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) We then deploy our praxis pairing method to determine by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dynamic natural
>>>>>>>>>>>>> association (DNA) the categories which need resolution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) From those categories deploy a relative natural
>>>>>>>>>>>>> associator (RNA)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as selector for ontic / deme and noumenon idea chaining.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as we continue our pentamorphic / temporal heuristic
>>>>>>>>>>>>> development we'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to be mindful of the nested Platonic solids paradigm for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> action:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #65 (5) - neural linguistic pragma
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #34 (4) - praxis of rationality
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #15 (3) - ontic / deme and noumenon chaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #111 (6) - meta logic grapple @ []
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #175 (7) - pentamorph (doing)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which is quantified  as then #260 - actionable [#1807 = sṓzō
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (G4982):
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (computing) save (a file)] within the relative #369 - sphere
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (meta verse)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of operation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1082 as [#200, #800, #10, #7, #5, #10, #50] = sṓzō (G4982):
>>>>>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #1807
>>>>>>>>>>>>> % #41 = #3} 1) to save, keep safe and sound, to rescue from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> danger or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction; 1a) one (from injury or peril); 1a1) to save a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suffering one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from perishing), i.e. one suffering from disease, to make
>>>>>>>>>>>>> well,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> heal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore to health; 1a2) to preserve one who is in danger of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction, to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> save or rescue; 1b) to save in the technical biblical sense;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> negatively; i) to deliver from the penalties of the Messianic
>>>>>>>>>>>>> judgment; ii)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to save from the evils which obstruct the reception of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Messianic
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deliverance;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So we have much work to do on our pentamorphic normalisation
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> spiral
>>>>>>>>>>>>> selector development.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We return again to this informal research observation: "as we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> note from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this heuristic #507 - TELEOLOGICAL INSTANCE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.8.22&time:6.5&heuristic>, there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not necessarily an inclusion of any ontic / deme grounding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> premise to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our perpetual dynamic as process for which we might have to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rely on some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other sapient knowledge as neural linguistic pragma of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utilitarian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> circumscribed experience."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is exceedingly broad as a neural linguistic pragma
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> premise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in my self educated perspective: be a procedural rule, a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dialectic derived
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from an expert opinion (or chatGPT) or some other descriptive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> narrative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which this instance is a poem with an amended title that then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deploys the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GRUNTLE (to place into good humour) as a noumenon redacted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1139 --> #148 /
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #248 selector to then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> EDWARD ROSS:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> At the root of true and eternal personal unhappiness is death.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> At the root
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of time wasting and unending search for the real meaning of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is death.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> At the root of religions and countless metaphysical and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> existential theory,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypothesis and cults is death.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Though not the dying itself or the pain of it, or the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> leaving of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the loved
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones behind, or the leaving of wealth, or being put into a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> grave or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> scavenged by vultures, but the very concept of the End of Me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the meaning of life in collectives stretches
>>>>>>>>>>>>> differently.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Collectives impose their own version of mortality /
>>>>>>>>>>>>> immortality.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Collectives exist because they understand the needs of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prey on those needs and understandings to ensure the continuity
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> collective by stretching the meaning of life beyond the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> individual into a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> realm of collective needs, rewards and punishments.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So why is death or rather meaningless lives are at the root of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> all ills?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why shouldn’t they? Cattle are not philosophically or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> existentially
>>>>>>>>>>>>> challenged. They do not philosophise about life, nor do they
>>>>>>>>>>>>> invent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> religious scriptures or cults. They live in collectives and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> collective that they receive security and love. They are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> worried about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuity outside the collective and when one leaves for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> slaughterhouse others mourn it for a chew or two and get on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Opposite to this are humans, who has constructed a set of needs
>>>>>>>>>>>>> beyond and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> above what we can independently or collectively can satisfy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The continuity after death is not certain. Zeal-full or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise believers
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of life after death are well organised, motivated and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> willing to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what deems necessary to guarantee their continuity at whatever
>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> collective costs, committing some of the worst atrocities.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The nonbelievers, on the other hand, are more than happy to use
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and abuse
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what may come, for they suffer no fear of retaliation after the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> expiry
>>>>>>>>>>>>> date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In either case the definitiveness of death and the ambiguity
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuity of life after it,  is at the root of all human ills.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://x.com/edwardross01/status/1697925442286788994>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> TWEET:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This: "root of religions and countless metaphysical and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> existential theory,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypothesis and cults is death"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Parthenogenesis --> #65, #41, #17
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pythagorean theorem: #5 = #4 + #3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nested Platonic solids as pentamorphic paradigm of nihilism.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've saved your comment for analysis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2ND TWEET:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I use the praxis pairing method -> ontic / deme idea
>>>>>>>>>>>>> chaining:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Collectives exist ... realm of collectiveness needs" = #60 /
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #617 | #12 /
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #528
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get deme: #617 gives #666 - teléō (G5055) and thereby we have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bipartite /
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tripartite paradigm to then muse ultimate ends / good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

--

Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / resizable
DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third party d3
library.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)