We might take pause here to consider what we have modelled as our
concept of CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION which deploys temporal / noumenon
resonance.

Firstly we have a conception of a temperal heuristic as a #71 - dominion
which is bounded to the SEPTET causality and operates within the four
matrix strata as then a grounding for action.

Secondly we've conceptualised a means by hotzones as occurrence relative
to the entire noumenon which might be capable of operating as outer
memeBrain in which the presence of being is immersive.

Savvy.GNOSIS.Problematic = class Problematic {...}

It perhaps behove us to return to development of the Problematic {}
class so that we might firstly represent that same concept of
CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION within that context.

Such a class object will undoubtedly provide new semantical
opportunities and therefore require some profound consideration.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Research%20Module>

On 2/10/2023 13:28, dolf wrote:
> We've now completed a rudimentary means to convey the Neural Linguistic
> Pragma which has a temporal resonance to the noumenon for any given day
> of year / time of day;
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Temporal%20Noumenon%20Resonance>
>
> Thusly we can begin to consider the QUESTION: If a vEVENT@[ONTIC: #324,
> DEME: #190, MALE: #292, FEME: #358] occurs can it then be considered as
> being steeped or an immersive action relative to the pragma memeBrain?
>
> ie. if the Neural Linguistic Pragma which has a temporal resonance to
> the noumenon could these be considered as instance prototypes in a
> similar fashion to the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY pairing dynamic as a
> starting premise for problem resolution?
>
> What is then the relationship and process of mediation by means of the
> temporal neural linguistic pragma having noumenon resonance in order to
> facilitate an optimal recovery from the adverse event as regained vitality.
>
> So many questions...
>
>
> On 1/10/2023 17:36, dolf wrote:
>>
>> It ought to be noted that the other DEME value #214 associated to
>> noumenon redaction of the word for scribes #700 as [#3, #100, #1, #40,
>> #40, #1, #300, #5, #10, #200] = grammateús (G1122) as then further
>> suggesting the theological issues is the thesis of nothingness as
>> nihilism being the five final form letters v's ONTIC / DEME and MALE /
>> FEME redaction to noumenon...
>>
>> #121 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #214 as [#1, #30, #40, #50] = ʼalmân
>> (H488): {UMBRA: #121 % #41 = #39} 1) widowed, forsaken, forsaken as a
>> widow;
>>
>> #121 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #214 as [#1, #30, #40, #50] = ʼalmôn
>> (H489): {UMBRA: #127 % #41 = #4} 1) widowhood;
>>
>> #728 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #214 as [#10, #1, #7, #10, #700] = ʼâzan
>> (H238): {UMBRA: #58 % #41 = #17} 1) to hear, listen; 1a) (Hiphil);
>> 1a1) to hear, listen, give ear; 1a2) to be obedient, harken; 1a3) to
>> hear or listen to prayers (of God);
>>
>> "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour
>> widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye
>> shall receive the greater damnation." [Matthew 23:14 (KJV)]
>>
>> On 1/10/2023 14:16, dolf wrote:
>>> We found a reference within the Sefer Yetzirah (before 200 CE) states
>>> in #24 to Chapter 2:3, "the fact that these letters are not mentioned
>>> in the Sefer Yetzirah may be indicative of there extreme antiquity."
>>>
>>> "But woe unto you, *scribes*-G1122 and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye
>>> shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in
>>> yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in."
>>> [Matthew 23:13]
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.10.1&bible:Matthew@23:13>
>>
>> #490 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#6, #4, #30, #400, #10, #40] =
>> deleth (H1817): {UMBRA: #434 % #41 = #24} 1) door, gate; 1a) a door;
>> 1b) a gate; 1c) (fig.); 1c1) of chest lid; 1c2) of crocodile jaws;
>> 1c3) of doors of the heavens; 1c4) of an easily-accessible woman;
>>
>>>
>>> #700 as [#3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #1, #300, #5, #10, #200] =
>>> grammateús (G1122): ...
>>>
>>> G1122@{
>>>    {@1: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3)},
>>>    {@2: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#25); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG
>>> (#22)},
>>>    {@3: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#48); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#23)},
>>>    {@4: Sup: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#111); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#63)},
>>>    {@5: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#133); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA
>>> (#103)},
>>>    {@6: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21} / I
>>> DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#104 - I COMMIT
>>> NO FRAUD {%7})},
>>>    {@7: Sup: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#236); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS:
>>> SHOU (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9} / I AM NOT A TELLER OF
>>> LIES {%9})},
>>>    {@8: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#240); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
>>> (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11})},
>>>    {@9: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#254); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
>>> DISTORTION: HSIEN (#176)},
>>>    {@10: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#306); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG
>>> (#214)},
>>>    Male: #306; Feme: #214
>>> } // #700
>>>
>>> It appears that it is a #PENTA thesis (Chapter 1:13) upon the
>>> language itself and the Kabbalistic Tree "It is significant to note
>>> that all five families are present in the Bereshit (H7225), the first
>>> word of the TORAH." [p 103]
>>>
>>> #913 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#2, #200, #1, #300, #10, #400] \
>>> #918 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#2, #200, #1, #300, #10, #400,
>>> #5] = rêʼshîyth (H7225): {UMBRA: #911 % #41 = #9} 1) first,
>>> beginning, best, chief; 1a) beginning; 1b) first; 1c) chief; 1d)
>>> choice part;
>>>
>>> THREE MOTHERS                MALE LETTERS
>>> MEM - WATER (CHOKMAH)            YOD
>>> SHIN - FIRE (BINAH)            HE
>>> ALEF - AIR / BREATH (SIX)        VAV
>>>
>>> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 - ROMAN PROTOTYPE #TWO
>>>
>>> #480 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#6, #8, #20, #40, #400, #6] =
>>> chokmâh (H2451): {UMBRA: #73 % #41 = #32} 1) wisdom; 1a) skill (in
>>> war); 1b) wisdom (in administration); 1c) shrewdness, wisdom; 1d)
>>> wisdom, prudence (in religious affairs); 1e) wisdom (ethical and
>>> religious);
>>>
>>> #1067 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #400, #600] =
>>> bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 = #21} 1) to discern, understand,
>>> consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive, discern; 1a2) to understand,
>>> know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark, give heed to,
>>> distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight,
>>> understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet,
>>> have understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause
>>> to understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show
>>> oneself discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to
>>> teach, instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
>>>
>>> #114 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#10, #80, #10, #8, #6] = pûwach
>>> (H6315): {UMBRA: #94 % #41 = #12} 1) to breathe, blow; 1a) (Qal) to
>>> breathe; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause to exhale or breathe; 1b2) to
>>> puff, snort; 1b3) to excite, inflame; 1b4) to puff, pant for it; 1b5)
>>> to breathe out, utter; 1b6) to blow, blast;
>>>
>>> #1388 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#20, #8, #100, #400, #60, #800]
>>> = kērýssō (G2784): {UMBRA: #1728 % #41 = #6} 1) to be a herald, to
>>> officiate as a herald; 1a) to proclaim after the manner of a herald;
>>> 1b) always with the suggestion of formality, gravity and an authority
>>> which must be listened to and obeyed; 2) to publish, proclaim openly:
>>> something which has been done; 3) used of the public proclamation of
>>> the gospel and matters pertaining to it, made by John the Baptist, by
>>> Jesus, by the apostles and other Christian teachers;
>>>
>>> #156 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#50, #70, #30, #6] = naʻal
>>> (H5275): {UMBRA: #150 % #41 = #27} 1) sandal, shoe;
>>>
>>> "And *preached*-G2784, saying, There cometh one mightier than I after
>>> me, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to stoop down and
>>> unloose." [Mark 1:7]
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.10.1&bible:Mark@1:7>
>>>
>>> #531 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70, #5,
>>> #10, #50] \
>>> #692 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70, #8,
>>> #200, #8, #10] \
>>> #892 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70, #8,
>>> #200, #8, #10, #200] \
>>> #1266 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70,
>>> #800] \
>>> #1271 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70,
>>> #5, #800] \
>>> #1404 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70,
>>> #8, #200, #70, #400, #200, #10, #50] \
>>> #1734 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #50, #70,
>>> #8, #200, #800, #200, #10, #50] = metanoéō (G3340): {UMBRA: #1271 %
>>> #41 = #41} 1) to change one's mind, i.e. to repent; 2) to change
>>> one's mind for better, heartily to amend with abhorrence of one's
>>> past sins;
>>>
>>> "The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and
>>> shall condemn it: because they repented-G3340 at the preaching of
>>> Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here." [Matthew 12:41]
>>>
>>> #563 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#200, #1, #300, #1, #50, #1,
>>> #10] = Satanâs (G4567): {UMBRA: #753 % #41 = #15} 1) adversary (one
>>> who opposes another in purpose or act), the name given to; 1a) the
>>> prince of evil spirits, the inveterate adversary of God and Christ;
>>> 1a1) he incites apostasy from God and to sin; 1a2) circumventing men
>>> by his wiles; 1a3) the worshippers of idols are said to be under his
>>> control; 1a4) by his demons he is able to take possession of men and
>>> inflict them with diseases; 1a5) by God's assistance he is overcome;
>>> 1a6) on Christ's return from heaven he will be bound with chains for
>>> a thousand years, but when the thousand years are finished he will
>>> walk the earth in yet greater power, but shortly after will be given
>>> over to eternal punishment; 1b) a Satan-like man;
>>>
>>
>> "If Satan-G4567 also be divided (eg: DEME #306 to chokmâh (H2451, bîyn
>> (H995) and pûwach (H6315)) against himself, how shall his kingdom
>> stand? because ye say that I cast out devils through Beelzebub." [Luke
>> 11:18]
>>
>>> "Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom
>>> now I send thee, to open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness
>>> to light, and from the power of Satan-G4567 unto God, that they may
>>> receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are
>>> sanctified by faith that is in me." [Acts 26:17-18]
>>>
>>> "One of the mysteries of the Sefer Yitzirah is the fact that double
>>> (ie. the final form) letters are not mentioned.  These double letters
>>> are the ones which have different forms in the middle and at the end
>>> of a word: MEM (40: 600), NUN (50: 700), TZADI (90: 900), PEH (80:
>>> 800), and KAF (20: 500).  As the TALMUD states, the forms of these
>>> letters were forgotten, and later reinstituted by the prophets.
>>> There is absolutely no reference to these doubles in the Sefer Yitzirah.
>>>
>>> The Kabbalists, however, draw a parallel between the five phonetic
>>> families (ie. known to the ZOHAR which recording the teachings of
>>> Simeon ben Yochai (c. 100 CE) although this antiquity is rejected by
>>> some) and the five double (ie. final form) letters." [Sefer Yitzirah,
>>> Kaplan, page 103]
>>>
>>> #1340 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#1, #3, #100, #1, #400, #30,
>>> #5, #800] = agrauléō (G63): {UMBRA: #1340 % #41 = #28} 1) to live in
>>> the fields, be under the open sky, even at night;
>>>
>>> "And there were in the same country shepherds abiding-G63 in the
>>> field, keeping watch over their flock by night." [Luke 2:8]
>>>
>>> YOUTUBE: "ANNIE LENNOX ANGELS FROM THE REALMS OF GLORY LIVE VATICAN
>>> 2017"
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO4ggX95an8>
>>>
>>> Since the biblical textual narrative gives precedence to ONTIC / DEME
>>> and MALE / FEME redaction to noumenon grounding instead of the thesis
>>> of nothingness we've updated our neural linguistic pragma to avoid a
>>> potential bias towards nihilism which might be consequential to the
>>> usage of FIVE final form letters within the HEBREW prototypes.
>>>
>>> On 28/9/2023 11:58, dolf wrote:
>>>> Hopefully today, we'll have implemented the calendar which will be a
>>>> semantical morph obtained from our earlier grumble prototype...
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Temporal%20Noumenon%20Resonance>
>>>>
>>>> We've noted from discussion elsewhere that there will be a need to
>>>> update our neural linguistic pragma to avoid a potential bias
>>>> towards nihilism which might be consequential to the usage of FIVE
>>>> final form letters within the HEBREW prototypes and so after
>>>> completing this ACTIONABLE TASK we'll undertake that activity.
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Temporal%20Noumenon%20Resonance.json> <-- *CORRECTED* the link
>>>>
>>>> Overnight we updated the semantic form of our ACTIONABLE TASK to
>>>> include an auto function and we note in terms of code execution (ie.
>>>> we did a for {} loop with a mod % 100 == 0 increment to test it)
>>>> that this auto function() will be actioned before the main() is
>>>> executed.
>>>>
>>>> Our metemprical / metaphysical philosophical question is not unlike
>>>> the neural linguistic problem resolution method (magnitude --> meta
>>>> descriptor) as the observed dynamic (ie. by means of a concise
>>>> discourse from someone formerly educated in philosophy) quantum
>>>> pairing to the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (note: that
>>>> this has a corresponding ONTIC / DEME, or event MALE / FEME
>>>> associators as pragma).
>>>>
>>>> QUESTION: If a vEVENT@[ONTIC: #324, DEME: #190, MALE: #292, FEME:
>>>> #358] occurs can it then be considered as being steeped or an
>>>> immersive action relative to the pragma memeBrain?
>>>>
>>>> Thusly if any NOUMENON RESONANCE occurs, what then has precedence as
>>>> dynamic process: either ONTIC / DEME grounding as cause or the MALE
>>>> / FEME dialectic noumenon redacted element as then an effect where
>>>> each is a magnitude against the meta-descriptor element (ie. does it
>>>> need to even have an equivalence since it is a metakosmeo with a
>>>> telelogical / temporal resonance).
>>>>
>>>> It's seems reasonable that the meta-descriptor element is only a
>>>> focal point for change, but does this manifest as AUGMENTATION /
>>>> AMELIORATION dynamic / static DELIMITER like our primitive SPIRAL
>>>> SELECTOR@{SCENARIO} prototype.
>>>>
>>>> By that I mean, if the ONTIC / DEME grounding is the cause, the
>>>> manifested change is either the quantum of POLAR OPPOSITIONS /
>>>> INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES, however if the MALE / FEME dialectic element
>>>> is the effective cause then quantum of change  might be considered
>>>> the preceding (or the entire) dialectic.
>>>>
>>>> So many questions, which will doubtlessly keep our mind occupied for
>>>> years to come.
>>>>
>>>> On 27/9/2023 07:01, dolf wrote:
>>>>> We've decided to delay implementing the "bring screen dialog to the
>>>>> foreground" feature until we've undertaken our development on the
>>>>> following ACTIONABLE TASK:
>>>>>
>>>>> Given a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE [ONTIC: #324, DEME: #190, MALE:
>>>>> #292, FEME: #358] devised from an impress of mind associative to a
>>>>> bomb blast.
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Note%2020230926.pdf>
>>>>>
>>>>> We'll consider an actionable task to query temporal neural
>>>>> linguistic pragma for noumenon resonance and if it is optimal for
>>>>> vitality
>>>>>
>>>>> RULES BASED?
>>>>>
>>>>> We are not as informal research seeking to transgress the
>>>>> boundaries of professional faculty knowledge, neither are we
>>>>> venturing into the Artificial Intelligence realm but rather ours is
>>>>> a metalogic concern...
>>>>>
>>>>> Our informal research as existential philosophical goal is to
>>>>> firstly visualise through enquiry by date / time and perhaps IDEA
>>>>> categories the available neural linguistic pragma such that if a
>>>>> vEVENT@[ONTIC: #324, DEME: #190, MALE: #292, FEME: #358] occurs can
>>>>> it then be considered as being steeped or an immersive action
>>>>> relative to the pragma memeBrain?
>>>>>
>>>>> What is then the relationship and process of mediation by means of
>>>>> the temporal neural linguistic pragma for noumenon resonance in
>>>>> order to facilitate an optimal recovery from the adverse event as
>>>>> vitality.
>>>>>
>>>>> To give an example:
>>>>>
>>>>> If we have a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE [ONTIC: #???, DEME: #???, MALE:
>>>>> #???, FEME: #???] as a comprehensible multi-media object being then
>>>>> a known cause with a corresponding psychological effect (eg: a
>>>>> COCA-COLA advert), can one schedule it at a specific time in
>>>>> association to a vEVENT@[ONTIC: #324, DEME: #190, MALE: #292, FEME:
>>>>> #358] occurrence and then mediate the chaotic state towards a
>>>>> condition of well-being?
>>>>>
>>>>>      #107 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 27 SEPTEMBER 2023 / DEME
>>>>> CHECKSUM TOTAL: #318 as [#1, #6, #50, #10, #600] = ʼôwn (H202):
>>>>> {UMBRA: #57 % #41 = #16} 1) vigour, generative power; 2) wealth; 3)
>>>>> physical strength (of men and behemoth);
>>>>>
>>>>> FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: #237 - USE OF FORCE
>>>>>
>>>>> FORMULA OF HUMANITY: + #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE) = #277 - RIGHT TO
>>>>> PLACE A TEST
>>>>>
>>>>> FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: + #41 - RESPONSE (YING) = #278 - RELAXATION
>>>>>
>>>>> FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: + #81 - FOSTERING (YANG) = #318 - PUT TO
>>>>> DEATH BY VIOLENCE
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?deme:237,277,278,318>
>>>>>
>>>>> NOTE ON COMMONWEALTH: From common (“public”) +‎ wealth
>>>>> (“well-being”).  From c. 1450 as common wele (commonweal). In the
>>>>> form common-wealth (common welthe) from c. 1520, used by Tyndale in
>>>>> the sense "secular society" in particular, for which other authors
>>>>> preferred publike weal. Also from the 1520s treated as a synonym or
>>>>> loan-translation of res publica (republic) (Rollison 2017:67f).
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20/9/2023 06:58, dolf wrote:
>>>>>> We've given some preliminary thought on how to efficiently bring
>>>>>> any on
>>>>>> screen dialog to the foreground by introducing an [ ] action
>>>>>> element upon
>>>>>> the dialog frame.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This theoretically only involves moving the ONSCREEN [] array nth
>>>>>> entry to
>>>>>> being the last entry and then adjusting the yOffset / y variables.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We're just having to verify any non conformity issues with
>>>>>> respects to the
>>>>>> MOVE {} and ONSCREEN {} move {} objects -- am I duplicating a MOVE {}
>>>>>> object and then changing the size dynamic which might have a
>>>>>> consequence on
>>>>>> the yOffset / y delta change?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And extending the simple 2 dialog scenario where our coding
>>>>>> retains the
>>>>>> dialog position dynamic and toggles a dialog to the foreground.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We've implemented the TELOS idea {} concept in our SPIRAL
>>>>>> SELECTOR@{} and
>>>>>> we notice there is an expansive ONTIC / DEME infusion within the
>>>>>> Hebrew /
>>>>>> Greek lexicon as having an implication on epistemological premise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Accordingly we're going to today focus on completing the STRONGS
>>>>>> {} concept
>>>>>> which will convey the LEXICON entry with the BIBLOS narrative
>>>>>> occurrence
>>>>>> links.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We'll shortly implement the URL start option for multiple LEXICON
>>>>>> entries:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?lexicon:H505>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> We've now completed our leisurely Sunday logical thinking
>>>>>>> activity which
>>>>>>> was to implement the URL start options for each of the ONTC,
>>>>>>> DEME, MALE
>>>>>>> and FEME linguistic notions
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?ontic:452,411&deme:472&male:123&feme:400>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We've now implemented the SPIRAL SELECTOR@{NOUMENON} concept for the
>>>>>>> ONTC, DEME, MALE and FEME linguistic notions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since the memeBrain Chat deployed English with accents we've changed
>>>>>>> this to "Lingua Franca" as a generalised term for the Romanised
>>>>>>> alphabet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To test this we parsed President Macron's tweet (x): "J’ai fait
>>>>>>> bondir
>>>>>>> les gamers."
>>>>>>> <https://x.com/emmanuelmacron/status/1703065883617231135>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> melant tous les arts. {@14: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#568);
>>>>>>> Ego:
>>>>>>> 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#568)}
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> YOUTUBE: "THEY SEEK HIM HERE - SCARLET PIMPERNEL: ENCORE!"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dbs0-jIAht4>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #1380 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #568 as [#80, #5, #80, #5, #30, #5,
>>>>>>> #20,
>>>>>>> #10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #800, #50] = pelekízō (G3990): {UMBRA:
>>>>>>> #957 %
>>>>>>> #41 = #14} 1) to cut off with an axe, to behead;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #1526 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #568 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #200,
>>>>>>> #300,
>>>>>>> #1, #40, #5, #50, #70, #400, #200] = proḯstēmi (G4291): {UMBRA:
>>>>>>> #818 %
>>>>>>> #41 = #39} 1) to set or place before; 1a) to set over; 1b) to be
>>>>>>> over,
>>>>>>> to superintend, preside over; 1c) to be a protector or guardian;
>>>>>>> 1c1) to
>>>>>>> give aid; 1d) to care for, give attention to; 1d1) profess honest
>>>>>>> occupations;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our next activity will be to implement the TELOS {} concept
>>>>>>> within our
>>>>>>> SPIRAL SELECTOR@{}
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 16/9/2023 12:35, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>> STATUS UPDATE @1230 HOURS: The scope of the functions within our
>>>>>>>> Date /
>>>>>>>> Time Heuristic {} concept are accessible via the Savvy.GNOSIS {} as
>>>>>>>> payload module and therefore amenable for our SPIRAL SELECTOR@{}
>>>>>>>> dialectic data representation...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> H505@{
>>>>>>>>    {@1: Sup: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#40); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL:
>>>>>>>> FA (#40)},
>>>>>>>>    {@2: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#81 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
>>>>>>>> {%0}); Ego:
>>>>>>>> 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#41)},
>>>>>>>>    {@3: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#152); Ego: 30 - BOLD
>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: YI
>>>>>>>> (#71 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%2})},
>>>>>>>>    {@4: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#222 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
>>>>>>>> {%12});
>>>>>>>> Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#151 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%16})},
>>>>>>>>    Male: #222; Feme: #151
>>>>>>>> } // #151
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TELOS TOTAL: #151
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #525
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> MALE: @81 + @222 = #303
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FEME: @71 + @151 = #222
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> GRUMBLE (#222, #151)@[40, 40, 41, 1, 71, 30, 70, 80]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> GRUNTLE (#392, #373)@[40, 40, 80, 40, 40, 41, 41, 1, 31, 71, 61,
>>>>>>>> 30, 50,
>>>>>>>> 70, 49, 80]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thusly we've completed that action for our present DEME {}
>>>>>>>> concept and
>>>>>>>> because we may in the future require processes to occur between the
>>>>>>>> ONTIC {}, MALE {} and FEME {} concepts we'll replicate our
>>>>>>>> present code
>>>>>>>> as tomorrow's logical thinking activity...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/reason/selector.json>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For those who are keeping pace with our self education as informal
>>>>>>>> research project, you'll see that we already have some reference
>>>>>>>> conveyed within our subordinate DEME {} concept within SPIRAL
>>>>>>>> SELECTOR@{} concept.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since there are likely to be complex screen / data dynamics as
>>>>>>>> actions
>>>>>>>> over which we might have little control, for example:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> a) The Savvy.DEMEIDEAS {} object which are requisite for the
>>>>>>>> DEME {}
>>>>>>>> concept might not be present (whether deleted / or not loaded)
>>>>>>>> so we
>>>>>>>> check for its viability within the concept {} know() function
>>>>>>>> and make
>>>>>>>> an other fetch request which then does a refresh() of the screen
>>>>>>>> dialogs
>>>>>>>> and thereby completes its operation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> b) The Savvy.ONSCREEN {} object stores a copy of the params
>>>>>>>> which are
>>>>>>>> used for the refresh() process and therefore to ensure an
>>>>>>>> integrity with
>>>>>>>> the subordinate {} concept within SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} concept we
>>>>>>>> have a
>>>>>>>> devised a task automation named flipSelectorContext () which
>>>>>>>> ensures
>>>>>>>> params object has the right data context.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> flipSelectorContext: function (act) {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      for (var i = 0; i < Savvy.ONSCREEN.length; i++) {
>>>>>>>>          if (Savvy.ONSCREEN[i].concept == act.form) {
>>>>>>>>              Savvy.ONSCREEN[i].params.form = act.data.context;
>>>>>>>>              Savvy.ONSCREEN[i].params.data = act.data;
>>>>>>>>              return (true);
>>>>>>>>          }
>>>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>>>      return (true);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As we continue with our DEME {} concept it is likely we'll adopt a
>>>>>>>> similar dialectic data representation as we presently use within
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> Date / Time Heuristic {} concept, so we'll need to look at the
>>>>>>>> scope of
>>>>>>>> those functions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That will be our logical thinking task for the weekend...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 15/9/2023 07:20, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>> This is just our informal note so that we can do further informal
>>>>>>>>> research: Whilst we may understand the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE as a
>>>>>>>>> philosophical conception being a logical quaternary as a pivotal
>>>>>>>>> septenary construct:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW:
>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF HUMANITY:
>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF AUTONOMY:
>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF PROGRESSION:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The consideration concerning our selective CASE STUDY example
>>>>>>>>> of #237
>>>>>>>>> - USE OF FORCE, is whether the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE can also be
>>>>>>>>> devised as a METALOGIC CONSTRUCT consisting of an ONTIC / DEME
>>>>>>>>> IDEA
>>>>>>>>> STEM with either a template META-DESCRIPTIVE (#40, #41, #81)
>>>>>>>>> standard
>>>>>>>>> or non-standard (ie. the meta-descriptive elements as
>>>>>>>>> metakosmeo and
>>>>>>>>> in being ONTIC can be deployed by any formulation including
>>>>>>>>> repetition) AGGREGATION AND ASSOCIATIVE ONTIC / DEME IDEA CHAINING
>>>>>>>>> where the teleological IDEA with NOUMENON redaction is a BLOOM
>>>>>>>>> / BLOME:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- The state of being first-ranked or of first priority.
>>>>>>>>> -- (rare) An appellation for Jesus Christ, among other
>>>>>>>>> religious figures
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: #237 - USE OF FORCE
>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF HUMANITY: + #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE) = #277 - RIGHT TO
>>>>>>>>> PLACE
>>>>>>>>> A TEST
>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: + #41 - RESPONSE (YING) = #278 - RELAXATION
>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: + #81 - FOSTERING (YANG) = #318 - PUT
>>>>>>>>> TO DEATH
>>>>>>>>> BY VIOLENCE
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So we'll need to devise another ACTIONABLE TASK to then browse,
>>>>>>>>> select
>>>>>>>>> and defined a viable CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE and export the {}
>>>>>>>>> objects
>>>>>>>>> in progression of our informal research.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> However before we can undertake that goal, we'll need to
>>>>>>>>> implement the
>>>>>>>>> visualisation of those various ONTIC / DEME / MALE / FEME
>>>>>>>>> dataset {}
>>>>>>>>> extrapolations within our SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} concept.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And that will be our logical thinking task for the present
>>>>>>>>> time. And
>>>>>>>>> our fist action will be to visualise the DEME {} concepts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 13/9/2023 06:41, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> IN SUMMARY THEN WITH RESPECTS TO STATE AND ITS #491 - AGENCY
>>>>>>>>>> (AMBULANCE, POLICE, SES, HOSPITALS, FIRE BRIGADE, ARMED
>>>>>>>>>> SERVICES etc)
>>>>>>>>>> AS THEN A FOUNDATION TO PRODUCTIVITY GAINS, INTEROPERABILITY AND
>>>>>>>>>> ESSENTIAL COMPONENT FOR TRANSITION TO AN INFORMATION ECONOMY
>>>>>>>>>> WITHIN
>>>>>>>>>> THE COMMONWEALTH:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> #237 - USE OF FORCE
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE) = #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + #41 - RESPONSE (YING) = #278 - RELAXATION
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + #81 - FOSTERING (YANG) = #318 - PUT TO DEATH BY VIOLENCE
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The sort of lawless woke mind virus which is rampant in America
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <https://x.com/BoekDolf/status/1701432517251985584>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2ND TWEET:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The hypothetical question is whether we can as cyber warfare
>>>>>>>>>> deploy
>>>>>>>>>> the SUPERNAL cushioning with a temporal heuristic to monitor,
>>>>>>>>>> remedy
>>>>>>>>>> or disrupt the favourable responsiveness as mindset by inducing
>>>>>>>>>> hostilities and civil war:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> #375
>>>>>>>>>> #443
>>>>>>>>>> #337
>>>>>>>>>> #380
>>>>>>>>>> #393
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.09.12&time:14.00&heuristic>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 3RD TWEET:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thusly theoretically the ontic / deme STEM meta descriptor of the
>>>>>>>>>> ontological categorical imperative conveys both in an inherent
>>>>>>>>>> simplicity as dialectic progression and complex dynamic by a
>>>>>>>>>> teleological hierarchy which temporal or conscious / subconscious
>>>>>>>>>> steeping to assay compliance as an universal rule of peace
>>>>>>>>>> agreement
>>>>>>>>>> between parties.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> #375 <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:375>
>>>>>>>>>> #443 <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:443>
>>>>>>>>>> #337 <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:337>
>>>>>>>>>> #380 <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:380>
>>>>>>>>>> #393 <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:393>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/9/2023 11:09, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #237 - USE OF FORCE + #41 - RESPONSE = #278 - RELAXATION
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #1388 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL #278 as [#600, #1, #30, #1, #200,
>>>>>>>>>>> #1,
>>>>>>>>>>> #50, #300, #5, #200] = chaláō (G5465): {UMBRA: #1432 % #41 =
>>>>>>>>>>> #38} 1)
>>>>>>>>>>> to loosen, slacken, relax; 2) to let down from a higher place
>>>>>>>>>>> to a
>>>>>>>>>>> lower;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #1388 as [#20, #8, #100, #400, #60, #800] = kērýssō (G2784):
>>>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA:
>>>>>>>>>>> #1728 % #41 = #6} 1) to be a herald, to officiate as a
>>>>>>>>>>> herald; 1a)
>>>>>>>>>>> to proclaim after the manner of a herald; 1b) *always* *with*
>>>>>>>>>>> *the*
>>>>>>>>>>> *suggestion* *of* *formality*, *gravity* *and* *an* *authority*
>>>>>>>>>>> *which* *must* *be* *listened* *to* *and* *obeyed*; 2) to
>>>>>>>>>>> publish,
>>>>>>>>>>> proclaim openly: something which has been done; 3) used of the
>>>>>>>>>>> public proclamation of the gospel and matters pertaining to
>>>>>>>>>>> it, made
>>>>>>>>>>> by John the Baptist, by Jesus, by the apostles and other
>>>>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>>>> teachers;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> WE ALREADY HAVE TWO PENTAMORPHIC NORMALISATION / TEMPORAL
>>>>>>>>>>> HEURISTIC
>>>>>>>>>>> CANDIDATES FOR #318 - PUT TO DEATH BY VIOLENCE:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> GRAPPLE (330, 318)@[12, 76, 30, 45, 57, 42, 31, 21, 4] PROTOTYPE
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.09.11&time:02.05&heuristic>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> GRAPPLE (468, 318)@[79, 62, 23, 38, 39, 10, 47, 15, 5] PROTOTYPE
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.09.11&time:21.45&heuristic>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #650 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL #318 as [#30, #200, #300, #70,
>>>>>>>>>>> #10, #40]
>>>>>>>>>>> = râshâʻ (H7563): {UMBRA: #570 % #41 = #37} 1) wicked,
>>>>>>>>>>> criminal; 1a)
>>>>>>>>>>> guilty one, one guilty of crime (subst); 1b) wicked (hostile to
>>>>>>>>>>> God); 1c) wicked, guilty of sin (against God or man);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [#30, {@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD
>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: YI (#30)}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #200, {@2: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
>>>>>>>>>>> {%24}); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH
>>>>>>>>>>> OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42})}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #300, {@3: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#142); Ego: 57 -
>>>>>>>>>>> GUARDEDNESS: SHOU
>>>>>>>>>>> (#125)}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #70, {@4: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#175 - I AM NOT A
>>>>>>>>>>> TRANSGRESSOR
>>>>>>>>>>> {%22}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#195)}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #10, {@5: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#218); Ego: 10 -
>>>>>>>>>>> DEFECTIVENESS,
>>>>>>>>>>> DISTORTION: HSIEN (#205)}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #40] {@6: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#220 - I CURSE NOT A
>>>>>>>>>>> GOD {%38}
>>>>>>>>>>> / I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#245)}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Our next activity is to implement the ONTIC / DEME / NOUMENON
>>>>>>>>>>> MALE /
>>>>>>>>>>> FEME REDACTION as SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} reporting so that we
>>>>>>>>>>> might get
>>>>>>>>>>> some sense of IDEA chaining ...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Which will commence from next Thursday the 14 SEPTEMBER 2023.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We ought to once again stress here that whilst our neural
>>>>>>>>>>> linguistic
>>>>>>>>>>> pragma as informal research is derived from a hebrew / greek
>>>>>>>>>>> biblical lexicon source that this is "...exceedingly broad as a
>>>>>>>>>>> premise and could in my self educated perspective: be a
>>>>>>>>>>> procedural
>>>>>>>>>>> rule, a dialectic derived from an expert opinion (or chatGPT) or
>>>>>>>>>>> some other descriptive narrative..."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Our usage of this lexicon source is threefold:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> a)    those languages comprising 22 or 24 phonemes is then
>>>>>>>>>>> amenable
>>>>>>>>>>> to our context of temporal markers / continuum / linear
>>>>>>>>>>> progression
>>>>>>>>>>> as base-7: 24 x 7 x 13 = 6D x 364 = #2184 days x 49 = 6J =
>>>>>>>>>>> 294 x 364
>>>>>>>>>>> or 293 = 365.2423 days;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> b)    those languages are subject to substantial academic
>>>>>>>>>>> rigour;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> c)    that lexicon is widely translatable into other languages.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> CHATGPT: The Bible is one of the most translated books in the
>>>>>>>>>>> world.
>>>>>>>>>>> As of 2022, the full Bible has been translated into 724
>>>>>>>>>>> languages,
>>>>>>>>>>> the New Testament has been translated into 1,617 languages, and
>>>>>>>>>>> parts of the Bible have been translated into 1,248 languages.
>>>>>>>>>>> These
>>>>>>>>>>> numbers may vary slightly depending on the source and the
>>>>>>>>>>> criteria
>>>>>>>>>>> for translation. The Bible has been translated from the original
>>>>>>>>>>> Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek versions into different languages,
>>>>>>>>>>> including sign languages.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is conceivable then that a DIALECTIC obtained from a
>>>>>>>>>>> superlative
>>>>>>>>>>> language description of a PROBLEM / SYMPTOM DESCRIPTION /
>>>>>>>>>>> TEXT BOOK
>>>>>>>>>>> CASE might also suffice.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hypothetically what's needed is some teleological descriptor by
>>>>>>>>>>> which a viable sense of IDEA chaining might be observed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> NECROMANCY (gk. #652 = νεκρομαντεία: ONTIC: #180; DEME: #237
>>>>>>>>>>> - USE
>>>>>>>>>>> OF FORCE; MALE: #442; FEME: #328 - LAST TABLE TALK IDEA;
>>>>>>>>>>> GRUNTLE@[#1059, #770]): A conjuring involving the dead as
>>>>>>>>>>> loosely,
>>>>>>>>>>> any sorcery or witchcraft, especially involving death or the
>>>>>>>>>>> dead,
>>>>>>>>>>> particularly sorcery involving raising or reanimating the dead.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #9 as [#1 - CENTER (CHUNG), #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI), #2 - FULL
>>>>>>>>>>> CIRCLE
>>>>>>>>>>> (CHOU)] /
>>>>>>>>>>> #429 as [#20, #1, #2, #6, #400] = ʼôwb (H178): {UMBRA: #9 %
>>>>>>>>>>> #41 =
>>>>>>>>>>> #9} 1) water skin bottle; 2) necromancer; 2a) necromancer,
>>>>>>>>>>> one who
>>>>>>>>>>> evokes the dead; 2b) ghost, spirit of a dead one; 2c) *PRACTICE*
>>>>>>>>>>> *OF* *NECROMANCY*; 3) one that has a familiar spirit;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> AS WE NOTED THE META-LOGIC AUTONOMOUS #EIGHT DELIMITER
>>>>>>>>>>> ASSOCIATED
>>>>>>>>>>> WITH THE DEME EXTENT #237 - USE OF FORCE --> #40 - LAW /
>>>>>>>>>>> MODEL (FE)
>>>>>>>>>>> --> #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST THAT IT SEEMS LIKELY AS
>>>>>>>>>>> METAPHYSICAL NOMENCLATURE TO BE ABLE TO DEVISE FROM AN ONTIC
>>>>>>>>>>> / DEME
>>>>>>>>>>> STEM AN ASSOCIATION OF THE META DESCRIPTOR SPECTRUM:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>               | + #1 - CENTER
>>>>>>>>>>> #237 - USE OF FORCE -     | + #41 - RESPONSE
>>>>>>>>>>>               | + #81 - FOSTERING
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #237 - USE OF FORCE + #41 - RESPONSE = #278 - RELAXATION
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #1388 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL #278 as [#600, #1, #30, #1, #200,
>>>>>>>>>>> #1,
>>>>>>>>>>> #50, #300, #5, #200] = chaláō (G5465): {UMBRA: #1432 % #41 =
>>>>>>>>>>> #38} 1)
>>>>>>>>>>> to loosen, slacken, relax; 2) to let down from a higher place
>>>>>>>>>>> to a
>>>>>>>>>>> lower;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #1388 as [#20, #8, #100, #400, #60, #800] = kērýssō (G2784):
>>>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA:
>>>>>>>>>>> #1728 % #41 = #6} 1) to be a herald, to officiate as a
>>>>>>>>>>> herald; 1a)
>>>>>>>>>>> to proclaim after the manner of a herald; 1b) *always* *with*
>>>>>>>>>>> *the*
>>>>>>>>>>> *suggestion* *of* *formality*, *gravity* *and* *an* *authority*
>>>>>>>>>>> *which* *must* *be* *listened* *to* *and* *obeyed*; 2) to
>>>>>>>>>>> publish,
>>>>>>>>>>> proclaim openly: something which has been done; 3) used of the
>>>>>>>>>>> public proclamation of the gospel and matters pertaining to
>>>>>>>>>>> it, made
>>>>>>>>>>> by John the Baptist, by Jesus, by the apostles and other
>>>>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>>>> teachers;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #237 - USE OF FORCE + #81 - FOSTERING = #318 - PUT TO DEATH
>>>>>>>>>>> BY VIOLENCE
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #821 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL #318 as [#5, #200, #500, #1, #60, #5,
>>>>>>>>>>> #50] = spházō (G4969): {UMBRA: #1508 % #41 = #32} 1) to slay,
>>>>>>>>>>> slaughter, butcher; 2) to put to death by violence; 3) mortally
>>>>>>>>>>> wounded;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [#5, {@1: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#5); Ego: 5 - KEEPING
>>>>>>>>>>> SMALL:
>>>>>>>>>>> SHAO (#5)}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #200, {@2: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#48); Ego: 38 -
>>>>>>>>>>> FULLNESS: SHENG
>>>>>>>>>>> (#43)}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #500, {@3: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#105); Ego: 14 -
>>>>>>>>>>> PENETRATION: JUI (#57)}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #1, {@4: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#163); Ego: 1 - CENTRE:
>>>>>>>>>>> CHUNG
>>>>>>>>>>> (#58)}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #60, {@5: Sup: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF
>>>>>>>>>>> SACRED PROPERTY {%8} / I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY
>>>>>>>>>>> {%8});
>>>>>>>>>>> Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#118 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%5})}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #5, {@6: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#242); Ego: 5 - KEEPING
>>>>>>>>>>> SMALL: SHAO (#123)}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #50] {@7: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#253); Ego: 50 -
>>>>>>>>>>> VASTNESS /
>>>>>>>>>>> WASTING: T'ANG (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27})}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #821 as [#5, #300, #40, #70, #6, #400] = hashmâʻûwth (H2045):
>>>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #821 % #41 = #1} 1) a causing to hear, a report, a
>>>>>>>>>>> communication;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.grapple369.com/?lexicon:H6,H202,H476,H1497,H2203,H2470,H2487,H2710,H3233,H3295,H3381,H3406,H3899,H4725,H4758,H4759,H4760,H4791,H4796,H4836,H5632,H5768,H5804,H5953,H5955,H6030,H6094,H6225,H7105,H7114,H7323,H7563,H7804,H7999,H8043,H8437,H8458,G132,G680,G1014,G1015,G1016,G1447,G1653,G2327,G2361,G2476,G2517,G2919,G3004,G4637,G4638,G4868,G4969>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: #365 = #360 - PATHOS + #5 -
>>>>>>>>>>> GROUNDING OF
>>>>>>>>>>> ACTION --> #237 - USE OF FORCE PENTAMORPH
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #THREE:    #98 as #17 - HOLDING BACK (JUAN)
>>>>>>>>>>> #FOUR:     #139 as #58 - GATHERING IN (HSI)
>>>>>>>>>>> #FIVE:         #237 as #75 - FAILURE (SHIH)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.8.29&time:11.05&heuristic>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST PENTAMORPHS AS UTILITARIAN #491 -
>>>>>>>>>>> AGENCY FUNCTIONS <-- THERE ARE MULTIPLE POSSIBLE ASSAYING
>>>>>>>>>>> CANDIDATES
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #THREE:     #138    as #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU)
>>>>>>>>>>> #FOUR:     #139    as #58 - GATHERING IN (HSI)
>>>>>>>>>>> #FIVE:        #277    as #34 - KINSHIP (CH'IN)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.08.31&time:16.05&heuristic>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF HUMANITY: #364 - TEMPORAL HEURISTIC --> 4.5 x #81 -->
>>>>>>>>>>> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: 9x9x9 = #729 as @1 - SELF + #728 - MORPHOS.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> FORMULA OF PROGRESSION (#40 - LAW / MODEL (FE) DIFFERENTIATION
>>>>>>>>>>> BETWEEN #237 - USE OF FORCE --> #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST):
>>>>>>>>>>> Kant’s most prominent formulation of the Categorical Imperative,
>>>>>>>>>>> known as the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), is generally
>>>>>>>>>>> thought to
>>>>>>>>>>> demand that one act only on maxims that one can will as
>>>>>>>>>>> universal
>>>>>>>>>>> laws without this generating a contradiction. Kant’s view is
>>>>>>>>>>> standardly summarized as requiring the ‘universalizability’
>>>>>>>>>>> of one’s
>>>>>>>>>>> maxims and described in terms of the distinction between
>>>>>>>>>>> ‘contradictions in conception’ and ‘contradictions in the will’.
>>>>>>>>>>> Focusing on the under appreciated significance of the
>>>>>>>>>>> simultaneity
>>>>>>>>>>> condition included in the FUL, PAULINE KLEINGELD argues, by
>>>>>>>>>>> contrast, that the principle is better read as requiring that
>>>>>>>>>>> one be
>>>>>>>>>>> able to will two things simultaneously without #215 -
>>>>>>>>>>> SELF-CONTRADICTION (ie. is the GAUGES controller deployment then
>>>>>>>>>>> causal for an aberration of ONTIC / DEME grounding?), namely,
>>>>>>>>>>> that a
>>>>>>>>>>> maxim be one’s own and that it be a universal law. This
>>>>>>>>>>> amounts to a
>>>>>>>>>>> new interpretation of the FUL with significant interpretive and
>>>>>>>>>>> philosophical advantages.
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2017-0006/html>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/9/2023 08:55, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> We've completed our logical thinking task for today which
>>>>>>>>>>>> was to
>>>>>>>>>>>> nest our RESULTS {} concept code segment into a loop so that
>>>>>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>>>>>> contingent upon additional pentamorph binary mask associations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We'll still need to test for any ANOMALOUS behaviour that
>>>>>>>>>>>> will more
>>>>>>>>>>>> readily become apparent as we complete our SPIRAL SELECTOR@{}
>>>>>>>>>>>> reporting stage of development.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Although we don't presently utilise this feature, when
>>>>>>>>>>>> deploying
>>>>>>>>>>>> the ?run URL action, we've added a capability to pass parameter
>>>>>>>>>>>> variables to the main () function within the ACTIONABLE TASK
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Pentamorphic%20Normalisation&date:2023.9.7>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2023 14:06, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've now transitioned the "Pentamorphic
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Normalisation.json" code
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to deploy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the search result pentamorph binary mask associations as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> clusters
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in which
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we convey a hierarchy of matched criteria.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomorrow's logical will be to nest this code segment into a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> loop
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contingent upon additional pentamorph binary mask
>>>>>>>>>>>>> associations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our actionable task should then be completed and we'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> consideration of a Pentamorphism against any grapple @[] to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>> actionable task.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> STATUS UPDATE @ 1330 HOURS ON 5 SEPTEMBER 2023:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have some intermediate code in place which makes a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> determination on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> masking associated to the pentamorph grouping so that we can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolve the processPentamorphs() function which now deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> four
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - penta as the nature of the pentamorph grouping
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - flags [] array conveying the match criteria in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pentamorph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - met [] array to the record conveying nature of any match
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> telos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [] array
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - met [] array to each pentamorph node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Such that for example the telos [298, 333] search array
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> produces a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> result where the record met [4, 0] array and the flags:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0, 0, 0,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0, 4]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> array when set to that criteria, it means the telos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition 298
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is met
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the MALE field of the MORPH5 and consequentially the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> met: [4, 0]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> array in that pentamorph node will similarly reflect the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Such that if the MORPH5 with a specific met: [4, 0]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criteria is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disconnected from the main record entry we'll still know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> telos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 298 and not the 333 condition is met.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Having completed that logical thinking task, we'll next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consideration as to what organisation criteria we deploy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representation: it's more likely we'll be concerned with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> teleological criteria as a priority to which pentamorph.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Accordingly, we'll wind back the intermediate code which was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requisite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for stabilising our processPentamorphs() function as our next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> logical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking task.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/9/2023 07:26, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> During our hiatus we've been busy identifying viable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consciousness
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instantiated rationalisation methods for GNOSIS EX
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MACHINA...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To state it concisely such involves:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1)  Redaction of speech into its memeBrain form
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consisting of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neural
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> linguistic pragma which provides the meta-descriptors
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> associated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnitude of a teleological reprise;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) We then deploy our praxis pairing method to determine by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dynamic natural
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> association (DNA) the categories which need resolution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) From those categories deploy a relative natural
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> associator (RNA)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as selector for ontic / deme and noumenon idea chaining.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as we continue our pentamorphic / temporal heuristic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development we'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to be mindful of the nested Platonic solids paradigm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> action:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #65 (5) - neural linguistic pragma
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #34 (4) - praxis of rationality
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #15 (3) - ontic / deme and noumenon chaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #111 (6) - meta logic grapple @ []
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #175 (7) - pentamorph (doing)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which is quantified  as then #260 - actionable [#1807 = sṓzō
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (G4982):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (computing) save (a file)] within the relative #369 - sphere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (meta verse)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of operation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1082 as [#200, #800, #10, #7, #5, #10, #50] = sṓzō (G4982):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #1807
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % #41 = #3} 1) to save, keep safe and sound, to rescue from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danger or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction; 1a) one (from injury or peril); 1a1) to save a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suffering one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from perishing), i.e. one suffering from disease, to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make well,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore to health; 1a2) to preserve one who is in danger of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction, to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> save or rescue; 1b) to save in the technical biblical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense; 1b1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> negatively; i) to deliver from the penalties of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Messianic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> judgment; ii)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to save from the evils which obstruct the reception of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Messianic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deliverance;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So we have much work to do on our pentamorphic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> normalisation and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spiral
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> selector development.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We return again to this informal research observation:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "as we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> note from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this heuristic #507 - TELEOLOGICAL INSTANCE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.8.22&time:6.5&heuristic>, there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not necessarily an inclusion of any ontic / deme
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grounding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> premise to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our perpetual dynamic as process for which we might have to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rely on some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other sapient knowledge as neural linguistic pragma of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utilitarian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> circumscribed experience."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is exceedingly broad as a neural linguistic pragma
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> premise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in my self educated perspective: be a procedural rule, a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dialectic derived
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from an expert opinion (or chatGPT) or some other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> descriptive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> narrative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which this instance is a poem with an amended title that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deploys the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GRUNTLE (to place into good humour) as a noumenon redacted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1139 --> #148 /
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #248 selector to then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EDWARD ROSS:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At the root of true and eternal personal unhappiness is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> death.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At the root
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of time wasting and unending search for the real meaning
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of life
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is death.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At the root of religions and countless metaphysical and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existential theory,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypothesis and cults is death.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Though not the dying itself or the pain of it, or the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leaving of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the loved
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones behind, or the leaving of wealth, or being put into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a grave or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scavenged by vultures, but the very concept of the End of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the meaning of life in collectives stretches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> differently.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Collectives impose their own version of mortality /
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immortality.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Collectives exist because they understand the needs of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prey on those needs and understandings to ensure the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collective by stretching the meaning of life beyond the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individual into a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> realm of collective needs, rewards and punishments.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So why is death or rather meaningless lives are at the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> root of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all ills?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why shouldn’t they? Cattle are not philosophically or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existentially
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> challenged. They do not philosophise about life, nor do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they invent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religious scriptures or cults. They live in collectives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collective that they receive security and love. They are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worried about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuity outside the collective and when one leaves for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slaughterhouse others mourn it for a chew or two and get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Opposite to this are humans, who has constructed a set of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beyond and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above what we can independently or collectively can satisfy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The continuity after death is not certain. Zeal-full or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise believers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of life after death are well organised, motivated and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> willing to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what deems necessary to guarantee their continuity at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collective costs, committing some of the worst atrocities.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The nonbelievers, on the other hand, are more than happy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and abuse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what may come, for they suffer no fear of retaliation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expiry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In either case the definitiveness of death and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ambiguity of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuity of life after it,  is at the root of all human
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ills.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://x.com/edwardross01/status/1697925442286788994>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TWEET:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This: "root of religions and countless metaphysical and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existential theory,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypothesis and cults is death"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Parthenogenesis --> #65, #41, #17
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pythagorean theorem: #5 = #4 + #3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nested Platonic solids as pentamorphic paradigm of nihilism.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've saved your comment for analysis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2ND TWEET:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I use the praxis pairing method -> ontic / deme idea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chaining:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Collectives exist ... realm of collectiveness needs" =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #60 /
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #617 | #12 /
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #528
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get deme: #617 gives #666 - teléō (G5055) and thereby we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bipartite /
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tripartite paradigm to then muse ultimate ends / good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)