#TWO: #218 = [#66, #42, #18, #58, #34]

#42 #2 #58
#50 #34 #18
#10 #66 #26
= #102 / #306 {#TWO: JEWISH STAB-IN-THE-BACK-GAMES AS IDEA #218 IN
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK (1941-1944)}

REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK IDEA #218 - 15 MAY 1942: "And it is
these same Jews, experts in the stab-in-the-back game, over whom our
bourgeoisie now sheds tears when we ship them off somewhere to the east!
It is curious, all the same, that our soft-hearted bourgeoisie has never
shed any tears over the two or three hundred thousand Germans, who, each
year, were compelled to leave their homeland, nor over those among them
who elected to go to *AUSTRALIA*, and of whom 75 per cent used to die en
route.

In the political field there is no stupider a class than the
bourgeoisie. It is sufficient for an end to be put to some individual's
activities, on the score that he is a public menace, and, for reasons of
security, for him to be arrested, tried, condemned and put to death, and
immediately these tender souls set up a howl and denounce us as brutes."
[page 484]

MARK REGEV (OPINION) @ 1539 HOURS ON 6 OCTOBER 2023: "IN LIGHT OF IRISH
FOREIGN MINISTER MICHEÁL MARTIN VISIT TO ISRAEL LAST MONTH, IS IRELAND
READY TO ACKNOWLEDGE THEIR NAZI-SYMPATHIZER PAST?

Ireland’s foreign minister received a red-carpet welcome in Israel [when
he visited during #218 / #306 / #373 - 5 SEPTEMBER 2023]. During his
visit to Israel, Foreign Minister Martin was at Jerusalem’s Yad Vashem
memorial. In his words, he was “honoured, humbled, and moved” to be
there, stressing that “we never forget what happened during the
Holocaust, or the enduring lessons learned through the darkest period of
human history.”

Martin leads Fianna Fáil, the political party that dominated Irish
politics for most of the 20th century. Above being foreign minister,
Martin serves as deputy prime minister (Tánaiste). Until DECEMBER 2022,
he was Ireland’s prime minister (Taoiseach), but relinquished the post
to Fine Gael Party head Leo Varadkar as part of the coalition agreement
between them.

Possibly, it is Martin’s leadership of Fianna Fáil that has made it
especially difficult for him to honestly confront his country’s shocking
behaviour at the end of WORLD WAR II.

For almost five decades, Eamon de Valera was Ireland’s preeminent
politician. He was the Irish Republic’s founding father, serving
(non-consecutively) as head of government for some quarter-century and
as head of state for an additional 14 years. De Valera established and
ruled supreme over Fianna Fáil.

On 2 MAY 1945, Irish newspapers carried headlines with the news of
Hitler’s suicide. On that same day, and DESPITE ADVICE TO THE CONTRARY
FROM HIS SENIOR FOREIGN POLICY ADVISERS, PRIME MINISTER DE VALERA
PERSONALLY VISITED GERMANY’S LEGATION IN DUBLIN. THERE HE EXPRESSED
IRELAND’S CONDOLENCES ON THE PASSING OF THE FÜHRER to Eduard Hempel, the
Nazi regime’s senior diplomatic representative.

By then, the horrors of the Holocaust were widely known; the Nazi death
camps having been liberated one after another by the advancing Allied
armies.

The first major extermination factory liberated by the Red Army was
Majdanek, on the night of 22-23 JULY 1944. The Soviets reached
Auschwitz-Birkenau, the largest site of industrial mass-murder on 27
JANUARY 1945. American forces entered Buchenwald on 11 APRIL and Dachau
on 29 APRIL. The British freed Bergen-Belsen on 15 APRIL.

As these liberations received press coverage worldwide, de Valera could
not claim he was unaware of the genocide perpetrated against the Jews.
Nonetheless, he chose to honour Hitler, knowing that he was not obliged
to do so – later, he would admit that he “could have had a diplomatic
illness” that would have prevented him from signing the German
condolence book.

The Irish Independent newspaper reported that when asked about the
infamous May 1945 condolence call, Martin dismissed any criticism of de
Valera as “shallow.”

He said that the issue did not come up in his meetings with Israeli
interlocutors, adding that de Valera was “very respected” by Ireland’s
Jewish community and that “there is a lot of history about World War II
and we are not going to find answers in a sound bite.”

Irish Jews, a tiny minority in a country where national identity and
Catholicism were deeply intertwined, would have of course been
respectful of Ireland’s prime minister and president. Only in 1965 did
the Second Vatican Council repudiate the centuries-old antisemitic
deicide charge, and it was standard behaviour for small Diaspora
communities to seek the favour and protection of the authorities.

If de Valera erroneously believed that Ireland’s neutrality in World War
II necessitated an official visit of commiseration, he could have sent a
low-level government representative. Instead, he went himself,
asserting: “I certainly was not going to add to his [Hempel’s]
humiliation in the hour of defeat.”

Publicly paying respects to the Nazi leader did not prove a
disqualification from high office in postwar Ireland. De Valera
continued to serve as prime minister and leader of the opposition, going
on to be elected president in 1959.

Unlike Ireland, in early 1945 eleven neutral nations jumped on the
victorious Allied bandwagon and declared war on the Axis: Chile,
Ecuador, Egypt, Lebanon, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, Saudi Arabia, Syria,
Turkey, and Venezuela.

Because Dublin never jettisoned its World War II neutrality, it was
unable to become a founding member of the United Nations. Ireland only
joined the international organization in December 1955, alongside
Franco’s Spain (SOME 700 IRISH FOUGHT ON THE NATIONALIST SIDE IN THE
SPANISH CIVIL WAR (17 JULY 1936 – 1 APRIL 1939), THE LARGEST COUNTRY
CONTINGENT OF PRO-FASCIST VOLUNTEERS).

Perhaps it is wrong to overly criticize Martin; he is but one in a long
list of senior Irish politicians from all parties who have refused to
condemn de Valera’s display of respect for the dead Nazi dictator.

In recent years, Ireland has done much soul-searching about historic
wrongs committed by Irish institutions. A DECADE AGO, THE STATE FAMOUSLY
ISSUED AN APOLOGY OVER THE MAGDALENE LAUNDRIES’ SYSTEMATIC BRUTAL
TREATMENT OF UNMARRIED MOTHERS.

However, there has been no comparable official expression of Irish
remorse for de Valera honouring the Jews’ mass murderer. Until that
happens, in Jerusalem, Dublin’s talk of peace and justice will continue
to ring a touch hollow." <https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-761886>

#306 as [#1, #300, #5] = ʼishshâh (H802): {UMBRA: #0 as #306 % #41 =
#19} 1) woman, wife, female; 1a) woman (opposite of man); 1b) *WIFE*
(*WOMAN* *MARRIED* *TO* *A* *MAN*); 1c) female (of animals); 1d) each,
every (pronoun);

On 6/10/2023 17:55, dolf wrote:
> The consideration of such, is a progression of thinking involving a
> selective CASE STUDY on #491 - AGENCY WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH being
> primarily concerned with the #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE
> A TEST, as to whether the organisational CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE can also
> be devised as a METALOGIC CONSTRUCT consisting of an ONTIC / DEME IDEA
> STEM with either a template META-DESCRIPTIVE (#40, #41, #81) standard or
> non-standard (ie. the meta-descriptive elements as metakosmeo and in
> being ONTIC can be deployed by any formulation including repetition)
> AGGREGATION AND ASSOCIATIVE ONTIC / DEME IDEA CHAINING where the
> teleological IDEA with NOUMENON redaction is a BLOOM / BLOME:
>
> -- The state of being first-ranked or of first priority.
> -- (rare) An appellation for Jesus Christ, among other religious figures
>
> In summary then with respects to STATE and its #491 - AGENCY (AMBULANCE,
> POLICE, SES, HOSPITALS, FIRE BRIGADE, ARMED SERVICES etc) as a
> foundation to productivity gains, interoperability and essential
> component for transition to an information / knowledge economy within
> the COMMONWEALTH:
>
> FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: #237 - USE OF FORCE
>
> FORMULA OF HUMANITY: + #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE) = #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A
> TEST
>
> FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: + #41 - RESPONSE (YING) = #278 - RELAXATION
>
> FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: + #81 - FOSTERING (YANG) = #318 - PUT TO DEATH
> BY VIOLENCE
>
>     #107 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 27 SEPTEMBER 2023 / DEME
> CHECKSUM TOTAL: #318 as [#1, #6, #50, #10, #600] = ʼôwn (H202): {UMBRA:
> #57 % #41 = #16} 1) vigour, generative power; 2) *WEALTH*; 3) physical
> strength (of men and behemoth);
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?deme:237,277,278,318>
>
> When such template META-DESCRIPTIVE (#40, #41, #81) standard was then
> applied to the grounding notion of LAICITE (ie. the etymology is from
> the Greek #501 = laós (G2992)) as the FRENCH philosophical perspective
> of a REASONED SECULARISM, we were able to deduce a viable CATEGORICAL
> IMPERATIVE (#501, #541, #542, #582) as HYPOTHETICAL CANDIDATE:
>
> #111 - ONTIC SUBSTITUTION FOR BIPARTITE NUMBER PROTOTYPE #FIVE as [#30,
> #1, #70, #10] /
> #301 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA as [#30, #1, #70, #200] /
>         #311 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 15 SEPTEMBER 2023 / SEE KANT'S
> PROLEGOMENA IDEA as [#30, #1, #70, #10, #200] /
> #501 as [#30, #1, #70, #400] = laós (G2992): {UMBRA: #301 % #41 = #14}
> 1) a people, people group, tribe, nation, all those who are of the same
> stock and language; 2) of a great part of the population gathered
> together anywhere;
>
> FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: #501 - LAICITE SECULARISM <-- *OUR*
> *COMMONWEALTH* IS A PRODUCT OF A CAESAROPAPISM
>
> FORMULA OF HUMANITY: + #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE) = #541 - ESTABLISH; ORDAIN
>
> FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: + #41 - RESPONSE (YING) = #542 - A REASONING,
> STANDARD, RULE, FOLLOW FAITHFULLY
>
> FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: + #81 - FOSTERING (YANG) = #582 - AGAINST
> NIHILISM, DECADE (QUEEN VICTORIA LETTERS PATENT IDEA TEMPLATE), OBJECT
> OF KNOWLEDGE, INTELLIGENCE
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?deme:501,541,542,582&ontic:501,541,542,582>
>
> However, when this is viewed in light of the archaeological artefact as
> a 230 year old #298 - *ROCK* with dates 1786 & 1787 inscribed thereon
> and discovered upon a FRENCH beach cove in establishing it as an event
> being likely prior to the REVOLUTION (5 MAY 1789 – 9 NOVEMBER 1799)
> which intersects #501 / #298 with the later QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS
> PATENT of 29 OCTOBER 1900 as self evident truth in substance represents:
>
> #500 - FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS TO #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
>
> @84, {@1: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3)}
>
> ... omitted for context ...
>
> @86, {@12: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#500); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL:
> SHAO (#79)}
>
> #287 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #500 as [#6, #10, #10, #200, #1, #50, #10] =
> yârêʼ (H3372): {UMBRA: #211 % #41 = #6} 1) to fear, *REVERE*, be afraid;
> 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed;
> 1a3) to fear, reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be
> fearful, be dreadful, be feared; 1b2) to cause astonishment and awe, be
> held in awe; 1b3) *TO* *INSPIRE* *REVERENCE* *OR* *GODLY* *FEAR* *OR*
> *AWE*; 1c) (Piel) to make afraid, terrify; 2) (TWOT) to shoot, pour;
>
> #890 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #500 as [#300, #40, #30, #20, #500] = melek
> (H4428): {UMBRA: #90 % #41 = #8} 1) *KING*;
>
> #501 - IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT
>
> @84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501 - *LAICITE* AS FRENCH
> SECULARISM); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%11})}
> @86, {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
> (#87)}
> @200, {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
> @186, {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
> @191, {@17: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
> TUAN (#178)}
> @200, {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
> @84, {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN
> (#219)}
> @86, {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224)}
> @177, {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239)}
> @140 {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU
> (#298 - *ROCK*)}
>
> ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #389
>
> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #542
>
> "I HAVE EVEN HEARD OF THEE, THAT THE SPIRIT OF THE GODS IS IN THEE,
>
> #625 as [#10, #400, #10, #200, #5] = yattîyr (H3493): {UMBRA: #620 % #41
> = #5} 1) *PRE*-*EMINENT*, *SURPASSING*, *EXTREME*, *EXTRAORDINARY*; 2)
> exceedingly, extremely;
>
> FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL:     #139 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR NAIDOC WEEK 3
> JULY 2023 as [#6, #50, #8, #30, #40, #5] = châlam (H2492): {UMBRA: #78 %
> #41 = #37} 1) *TO* *DREAM*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to dream (ordinary); 1a2) to
> dream (prophetic); 1a3) to dream (of false prophets); 1b) (Hiphil) to
> dream; 2) to be healthy, be strong; 2a) (Qal) to be healthy; 2b)
> (Hiphil) *TO* *RESTORE* *TO* *HEALTH*;
>
> AND THAT LIGHT AND UNDERSTANDING AND *EXCELLENT*-H3493 WISDOM IS FOUND
> IN THEE." [Daniel 5:14]
>
> #625 - *WANDJINA*
>
> YOUTUBE: "MITCH TAMBO, REIGAN - GREAT SOUTHERN LAND"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1zakvWf970>
>
> #992 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #542 as [#5, #60, #8, #600, #8, #300, #1,
> #10] = exēchéomai (G1837): {UMBRA: #799 % #41 = #20} 1) to sound forth,
> emit, *SOUND*, resound;
>
> 
>
> [@84, @86, @84, @86, @186, @84, @86, @84, @86, @177, @84, @86, <-- *HERE*
>
> *HERE* --> @86,  {@12: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#500); Ego: 5 -
> KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#79)}
>
>     #452 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 6 OCTOBER 2023 as [#2, #40,
> #100, #4, #300, #6] /
> #500 as [#40, #100, #4, #300, #50, #6] / [#6, #40, #40, #100, #4, #300,
> #10] = miqdâsh (H4720): {UMBRA: #444 % #41 = #34} 1) *SACRED* *PLACE*,
> sanctuary, holy place; 1a) sanctuary; 1a1) of the temple; 1a2) of the
> tabernacle; 1a3) of Ezekiel's temple; 1a4) of Jehovah;
>
> #79 as [#20, #3, #6, #10, #600] = gôwy (H1471): {UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19}
> 1) *NATION*, *PEOPLE*; 1a) nation, people; 1a1) usually of non-Hebrew
> people; 1a2) of descendants of Abraham; 1a3) of Israel; 1b) of swarm of
> locusts, other animals (fig.); 1c) Goyim? = 'nations';
>
> @84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82)}
> <-- *HERE*
>
> #501 as [#200, #1, #300] = rêʼsh (H7217): {UMBRA: #501 % #41 = #9} 1)
> chief, head; 1a) head (of man); 1b) *HEAD* (*AS* *SEAT* *OF* *VISIONS*);
> 1c) chief; 1d) sum (essential content);
>
> #82 as [#8, #7, #10, #7, #10, #600] = chăzîyz (H2385): {UMBRA: #32 % #41
> = #32} 1) thunderbolt, lightning flash, lightning, *STORM*, cloud;
>
> *HERE* --> @84, @86, @200, @186, @191, @200, @84, @86, @177, @140]
>
> #836 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #389 as [#6, #40, #40, #300, #30, #400,
> #20] = memshâlâh (H4475): {UMBRA: #415 % #41 = #5} 1) rule, dominion,
> realm; 1a) rule, dominion, realm, domain; 1b) rule; 1c) rule, *DOMINION*
> (*OF* *GOD*);
>
> Wandjinas are #500 - *SACRED* and only found in the Kimberley region
> (north-eastern Western Australia), nowhere else in Australia. To these
> people, the Wandjina is the #389 - *SUPREME* *CREATOR* and a symbol of
> fertility and rain. Their ancestors have been painting Wandjina figures
> in #298 - *ROCK* art sites scattered throughout the western Kimberley
> for millennia. This is the oldest continuous sacred painting movement on
> the planet.
>
> #331 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #542 as [#20, #300, #3, #3, #5] = shᵉgâgâh
> (H7684): {UMBRA: #311 % #41 = #24} 1) sin, *SIN* *OF* *ERROR* *OR*
> *INADVERTENCE*, inadvertent sin; 1a) error;
>
> #520 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #389 as [#5, #40, #3, #2, #70, #400] =
> migbâʻâh (H4021): {UMBRA: #515 % #41 = #23} 1) turban, *HEAD*-*GEAR*;
>
> The Wandjina can punish those who break the law with *FLOODS*, lightning
> and cyclones. It is said they have no mouth because that would make them
> too powerful. They are often depicted with elaborate #389 -
> *HEADDRESSES*, indicating different types of storms. [Source: Creative
> Spirits,
> <https://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/arts/what-are-wandjinas>]
>
> ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #389 as [#300, #9, #80] = sheṭeph (H7858): {UMBRA:
> #389 % #41 = #20} 1) *FLOOD*, *DOWNPOUR*;
>
> SIAN JOHNSON / TAVLEEN SINGH (ABC) @ 0840 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2023:
> "Federal member for Gippsland Darren Chester says it's been "an eventful
> 72 hours" for the community.
>
> "*BUSHFIRES* (ie. SHIN - FIRE: BINAH) on the weekend and that *RAIN*
> (ie. MEM - WATER: CHOKMAH) event over the last 48 hours, and now the
> *WIND* (ie. ALEF - AIR / BREATH: SIX) is blowing severely across the
> region," he told ABC News Breakfast.
>
> “Facing strong *WINDS* and fierce and unseasonal temperatures,
> Gippslanders had little choice but to be resilient. From Sunday to
> Tuesday, the community banded together, sharing *BUSHFIRE* warning
> notices, helping evacuations and providing shelter.
>
> Then came the *RAIN*, and *FLOOD* evacuees began arriving at the
> emergency *FIRE* shelter that had been set up at the Gippsland regional
> sports complex in Sale.
>
> "It’s the first time the Victorian emergency map showed *FLOOD* warnings
> and *FIRE* warnings for the same area on the same day,” says the
> Wellington shire mayor, Ian Bye.
>
> The *FIRES* started on Sunday when a home was lost to a 17,500-hectare
> *BUSHFIRE* in Briagolong. By midweek, 130 properties in and around
> Tinamba, Newry and Maffra were issued evacuation orders due to *FLOODING*.
>
> “We’ve had *FLOODS* upon *FLOODS* in Sale, but to have a *FIRE* event
> that early in the season is extraordinary – and to have them
> back-to-back is just weird. It’s unheard of,” says Bye.
>
> As the local state MP, Danny O’Brien, puts it, the area had “*FIRES*
> literally one day, *FLOODS* the next”. [cf: DAISY DUMAS (THE GUARDIAN) @
> 0900 HOURS ON 6 OCTOBER 2023]
>
> Communities downstream of Lake Glenmaggie, including farming districts
> like Newry, Tinamba and Riverslea are expected to be *INUNDATED* (ie.
> *FLOOD*) with fears many properties will be impacted in the coming hours.
>
> "That is a significant cause for concern and I am encouraging people in
> the area to take the appropriate precautions," he says.
>
> A relief centre has been set up by the Wellington Shire Council in Sale
> for people wanting to get out of their homes and communities.
>
> Mr Chester said 15 people took refuge there last night.
>
> He praised the community's resilience and reminded everyone there are
> services available for people who may be forced to leave in a hurry."
> <https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-05/victoria-floods-gippsland-melbourne-bushfires-rain-warnings/102936508>
>
> "AND WITH THE ARMS OF A *FLOOD*-H7858 SHALL THEY BE OVERFLOWN FROM
> BEFORE HIM, AND SHALL BE BROKEN; YEA, ALSO THE PRINCE OF THE
> *COVENANT*-H1285." [Daniel 11:22]
>
> #612 as [#2, #200, #10, #400] / [#2, #200, #400, #10] = bᵉrîyth (H1285):
> {UMBRA: #612 % #41 = #38} 1) covenant, alliance, pledge; 1a) between
> men; 1a1) treaty, alliance, league (man to man); 1a2) *CONSTITUTION*,
> *ORDINANCE* (*MONARCH* *TO* *SUBJECTS*); 1a3) agreement, pledge (man to
> man); 1a4) alliance (of friendship); 1a5) alliance (of marriage); 1b)
> *BETWEEN* *GOD* *AND* *MAN*; 1b1) alliance (of friendship); 1b2)
> covenant (divine ordinance with signs or pledges); 1c) (phrases); 1c1)
> covenant making; 1c2) covenant keeping; 1c3) covenant violation;
>
> "I DO SET MY BOW IN THE CLOUD, AND IT SHALL BE FOR A TOKEN OF A
> *COVENANT*-H1285 BETWEEN ME AND THE EARTH." [Genesis 9:13]
>
> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #542 as [#400, #90, #6, #40, #6] = tsûwm (H6684):
> {UMBRA: #136 % #41 = #13} 0) to *COVER* *OVER* (*THE* *MOUTH*), i.e. to
> fast; [idiom] at all, fast.;
>
> #1341 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #542 as [#40, #1, #300, #400, #600] =
> ʼeshshâh (H800): {UMBRA: #306 % #41 = #19} 1) *FIRE*;
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?lexicon:H3493,H2492,H4720,H1471,H7217,H2385,H7858,H1285,H6684>
>
> Subject to the limited availability of historical records for the period
> 1770 to 1799 which are relevant to our informal neural linguistic pragma
> research, it appears that the #298 - FOUNDATION is relevant to KANT's
> PROLEGOMENA sections aligned with a TRIPARTITE definition of NUMBER
> which are enumerated within the CONST KANT_SECTIONS_1783 {} object as
> seemingly a philosophical metaphysical treatise as #6 - FORMULA OF
> PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE}
> associated with the #9 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE.
>
> Given the PROLEGOMENA commentary by its margin IDEAS furnishes a
> scaffolding provided by HEBREW / GREEK LEXICON ideas also exhibits a
> teleological #946 / #940 and redaction to noumenon #292 / #298 pairing,
> it is a reasonable conjecture relevant to the principle of #501 -
> *LAICITE* AS FRENCH SECULARISM, and the recently discovered #298 -
> *ROCK* that is submersed excepting for low tides, purveying an inscribed
> text and several iconic images that are both gematria ordinals in nature
> and most likely ONTIC / DEME grounding associative IDEA derivations to
> the CONST KANT_SECTIONS_1783 {} object itself.
>
> CONST KANT_SECTIONS_1783 = {
>     1: {idea: [265 - *THE* *KEY*, 266], page: [15, 15]},
>      2: {idea: [267, 268 - *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, 269 -
> *CONCEPT* *OF* *CONTRADICTION* {#1 + #25 {5x5: #65 - SOLDIER /
> DODECAHEDRON} + #49 {7x7: #175 - MARRIAGE / ICOSAHEDRON} x 2 = #150},
> 272, 273, 274 - *MISTRUST* *OF* *DOGMATISM*], page: [16, 17, 18, 20, 20,
> 21]},
>
>      3: {idea: [270 - *DIRK* *HARTOG* PRESENCE 26 OCTOBER 1616 /
> *COOK'S* *SHIP* *REPAIRS* 25 DECEMBER 1770 / *AUSTRALIA* *DAY* 26
> JANUARY 1788], page: [22]},
>
>     6: {}, // <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 -
> NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE})
>      9: {}, // <-- AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
>     18: {IDEA: [298], PAGE: [50]}, // <-- QUEEN VICTORIA'S APO: G575
> (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA) RIGHT GRANTING DIDOMI: G1325 (@104
> - PRESENTS),
>      27: {idea: [311], page: [62]}, // #27 - *DUTIES* (*SHIH*)
>      54: {idea: [348], page: [99]} // #54 - UNITY
> }
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?deme:265,266,267,268,269,270,272,273,274,311,348&ontic:265,266,267,268,269,270,272,273,274,311,348>
>
>
>
>
> JEFFREY ("RHUBARB") RUBARD <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> @ 0156 HOURS
> ON 3 OCTOBER 2023: "You're giving this garbage up, then?"
>
> DOLF @ 1032 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2023: "After a lifetime of disrespect, we
> again advise that our participation with the Jewish Community will now
> cease and you may never participate in the fruits of my labours since we
> are permanently estranged."
>
> H120@{
>   {@1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1)},
>   {@2: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#6); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#5)},
>   {@3: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#51); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#45 -
> I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1})},
>   Male: #51; Feme: #45
> } // #45
>
> #2  #9 #4
> #7  #5 #3
> #6  #1 #8
> = #15 / #45 {#ONE: GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE}
>
> [#11, {@1: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#11); Ego: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A
> (#11)}
> #16, {@2: Sup: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#38); Ego: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#27)}
> #15, {@3: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#80); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#42)}
> #56, {@4: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#97); Ego: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH:
> CHIN (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%24})}
> #61, {@5: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR
> {%22}); Ego: 61 - EMBELLISHMENT: SHIH (#159)}
> #60, {@6: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#232); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION:
> CHI (#219)}
> #47, {@7: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#255); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#266)}
> #52, {@8: Sup: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#330); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#318)}
> #51] {@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#375); Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG
> (#369)}
>
> #307 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #375 as [#200, #20, #1, #50, #4, #1, #30,
> #1] = skándalon (G4625): {UMBRA: #426 % #41 = #16} 1) the movable stick
> or trigger of a trap, a trap stick; 1a) a trap, snare; 1b) any
> impediment placed in the way and causing one to stumble or fall, (a
> stumbling block, occasion of stumbling) i.e. a rock which is a cause of
> stumbling; 1c) fig. *APPLIED* *TO* *JESUS* *CHRIST*, *WHOSE* *PERSON*
> *AND* *CAREER* *WERE* *SO* *CONTRARY* *TO* *THE* *EXPECTATIONS* *OF*
> *THE* *JEWS* *CONCERNING* *THE* *MESSIAH*, that they rejected him and by
> their obstinacy made shipwreck of their salvation; 2) *ANY* *PERSON*
> *OR* *THING* *BY* *WHICH* *ONE* *IS* (*ENTRAPPED*) *DRAWN* *INTO*
> *ERROR* *OR* *SIN*;
>
> #88 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #98 as [#10, #30, #8, #40] = lâcham (H3898):
> {UMBRA: #78 % #41 = #37} 1) to fight, do battle, make war; 1a) (Qal) to
> fight, do battle; 1b) (Niphal) to engage in battle, wage war; 2) (Qal)
> *TO* *EAT*, use as food;
>
> #45 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #45 as [#1, #4, #40] /
> #85 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #175 as [#40, #1, #4, #40] /
> #605 as [#1, #4, #600] = ʼâdâm (H120): {UMBRA: #45 % #41 = #4} 1) man,
> mankind; 1a) man, *HUMAN* *BEING*; 1b) man, mankind (much more
> frequently intended sense in OT); 1c) *ADAM*, first man; 1d) city in
> Jordan valley;
>
>
> #38  #45 #40
> #43  #41 #39
> #42  #37 #44
> = #123 / #369 {#FIVE /#CENTRE: GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE / #195 - tsâdaq
> (H6663): *TO* *BE* *JUST*, *BE* *RIGHTEOUS* (*IN* *CONDUCT* *AND*
> *CHARACTER*)}
>
> H120@{
>   {@1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1)},
>   {@2: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#6); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#5)},
>   {@3: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#44); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#38)},
>   Male: #44; Feme: #38
> } // #605
>
> EDUARD SHYFRIN @ 1228 HOURS ON 2 FEBRUARY 2023: "The expression of these
> above-mentioned principles in our reality, namely the family of
> “minimal” principles:
>
> 1)    Fermat Principle
> 2)    Principle of Least Action - PLA
> 3)    Ockham’s Razor
> 4)    Principle of Sufficient Reason - PSR
> 5)    Theories of Algorithmic Complexity
> 6)    Minimum Energy Principle
> 7)    Ground State
> 8)    Minimum Work Principle
>
> II. I will attempt to answer the question, ‘What is the nature of G-d’s
> work?’
> III. I will consider the connection between the “minimal principles,”
> causality and Divine Providence, the essence of Shabbat and the path of
> the Torah in the information space.
> IV. The influence of Man on the amount of G-d’s work.
> V. The information nature of the ‘physical’ laws and their connection
> with the punishment of Adam.
>
> 
>
> <https://x.com/Jerusalem_Post/status/1709561508848693532>
>
> In simple language, this PRINCIPLE OF LEAST ACT (PLA) is ingeniously
> described in the book of Nobel prize winner Richard Feynman “The
> Character of Physical Law:”
>
> “When you have a number of particles, and you want to know how one moves
> from one place to another, you do it by inventing a possible motion that
> gets from one place to the other in a given amount of time. Say the
> particle wants to go from X to Y in an hour, and you want to know by
> what route it can go. What you do is to invent various curves and
> calculate on each curve a certain quantity. (I do not want to tell you
> what the quantity is, but for those who have heard of these terms, the
> quantity on each route is the average of the difference between the
> kinetic and the potential energy.) If you calculate this quantity for
> one route, and then for another, you will get a different number for
> each route. There is one route which gives the least possible number,
> however, and that is the route that the particle in nature actually takes.”
>
> Initially, the PLA was proposed by Pierre Louis Maupertius in 1744 and
> elaborated by the great mathematician Leonhard Euler in the same year.
> In 1760, Joseph-Louis Lagrange proposed the way of mathematical
> description of the mechanical systems known today as Lagrangian.
> Lagrangian is known as the difference between the kinetic and potential
> energies, and the action is the integral of the Lagrangian over time. It
> is important to note that action is a scalar. It doesn’t describe what
> happens at a certain moment in time. It is a parameter of the trajectory.
>
> The Principle of Least (stationary) Action is central in modern physics.
> It was applied in Thermodynamics, General Theory of Relativity, Quantum
> Electro Dynamics (QED), Particle Physics and String Theory.
>
> It is well described in the article “The Principle of Least Action”
> (David Dalrymple, Edge): “Nature is lazy. Scientific paradigms and
> “ultimate” visions of the universe come and go, but the idea of “least
> action” has remained remarkably unperturbed.”"
>
> Max Planck, founder of quantum physics, wrote: “The least-action
> principle introduces a completely new idea into the concept of
> causality: The efficient cause, which operates from the present into the
> future and makes future situations appear as determined by earlier ones,
> is joined by the final cause for which, inversely, the future - namely,
> a definite goal - serves as the premise from which there can be deduced
> the development of the processes which lead to this goal.”
>
> Also, he wrote, “the most adequate formulation of this law creates the
> impression in every unbiased mind that nature is ruled by a rational,
> purposive will.”
>
> From the point of view of the mathematical description of the physical
> systems, PLA and formulations based on the physical laws – for example,
> Newton’s second law – give the same result. We again refer to Richard
> Feynman’s book. Feynman gives three equal descriptions of gravity - the
> famous Newton’s Law of Gravity, the local field method, and the PLA. He
> writes:
>
> “This is an example of the wide range of beautiful ways of describing
> nature. When people say that nature must have causality, you can use
> Newton’s law; or if they say that nature must be stated in terms of a
> minimum principle, you talk about it this last way; or if they insist
> that nature must have a local field - sure, you can do that. The
> question is: which one is right? If these various alternatives are not
> exactly equivalent mathematically, if for certain ones there will be
> different consequences than for others, then all we have to do is to
> experiment to find out which way nature actually chooses to do it.
>
> “But in the particular case I am talking about, the theories are exactly
> equivalent. Mathematically, each of the three different formulations,
> Newton’s law, the local field method and the minimum principle, give
> exactly the same consequences. What do we do then? You will read in all
> the books that we cannot decide scientifically on one or the other. That
> is true. They are equivalent scientifically. It is impossible to make a
> decision because there is no experimental way to distinguish between
> them if all the consequences are the same. But psychologically, they are
> very different in two ways. First, philosophically you like them or do
> not like them; and training is the only way to beat that disease.
> Second, psychologically they are different because they are completely
> inequivalent when you are trying to guess new laws.”
>
> The principal and most important difference between the description of
> the system by PLA or by the physical laws is in causality. The PLA
> implies teleology (finality) - an explanation for something which serves
> as a function of its end, its purpose, or its goal - actually backward
> causality.
>
> Formulation by the law implies efficient cause - straightforward causality.
>
> The answer to the question, “Which type of causality actually takes
> place in the Creation?” is of utmost importance since it affects our
> understanding of G-d’s plan, Divine Providence and freedom of choice.
>
> Both approaches demand certain explanations.
>
> In the case of PLA, the standard question is, “How does the particle
> ‘know’ which trajectory to choose?”
>
> When the founding father of quantum mechanics, Niels Bohr, visited
> Ernest Rutherford in Cambridge and told him that when an electron emits
> a photon, it jumps to the lower energy orbit, Rutherford inquired, “How
> does an electron know to which orbit to jump?”
>
> Any type of causality is effected through the transfer of energy,
> information or momentum.
>
> Since PLA implies backward causality, the mechanism should be explained.
> Also, we should ask a question about the connection between PLA and
> Divine Providence.
>
> In the case of the “law approach,” there are many unanswered questions.
> Where do the laws come from? What is their nature? How can we account
> for the mutability of the laws?
>
> In his book “At Home in the Universe,” John A. Wheeler writes:
>
> “No laws. So far as we can see today, the laws of physics cannot have
> existed from everlasting to everlasting. They must have come into being
> at the big bang.”
>
> He also writes: “How can one see the lesson of gravitational collapse -
> whether big bang or black hole or big crunch - in a larger framework? No
> concept puts itself forward with greater force than ‘mutability.’”
>
> There exists a distinction between the attitude of different schools of
> thought towards the problem of causality.
>
> One of the most ardent supporters of teleology (final causes) was
> Gottfried Leibnitz with his famous Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR),
> which in concise form could be laid out as “nothing happens without a
> reason.” Here Leibnitz meant reason of G-d. He writes:
>
> “I grant that particular effects of nature could and should be explained
> mechanically.…but the general principles of physics, and even of
> mechanics depend on the conduct of a sovereign intelligence and cannot
> be explained without taking it into consideration.”
>
> Actually, the essence of the principle is that the Creation is a
> “goal-directed activity,” as it was put forward by William of Auvergne,
> Bishop of Paris, much earlier than Leibnitz put forward his PSR. Long
> before William of Auvergne, Talmudic sages expressed the idea of
> backward causality in a very concise form: “What was conceived first was
> created last.”
>
> According to Descartes, Divine reasons exist, but are forever hidden
> from the human mind. (Yemima Ben-Menahem, “Causation in Science”). She
> writes: “According to Descartes, the natural laws are decreed by G-d and
> are humanly inexplicable. G-d’s reasons cannot be used for scientific
> explanations. The Cartesian school of thought rejected teleology and
> accepted the principles of straightforward causality.”
>
> It’s an established tradition in contemporary science to follow the
> Cartesian line of thought and to refute teleology, which is not
> surprising, taking into account the principle which says that “G-d is
> not a business of science, and He cannot be measured or computed.”
>
> The “law approach” has a number of weak points. Scientists can observe
> the pattern, express it in mathematical form and call it a law but
> science cannot explain the law. Isaac Newton admitted that he had no
> explanation for the Law of Universal Gravitation. He also admitted the
> problem of initial conditions which are not known to science. As John A
> Wheeler put it (“At home in the Universe” ):
>
> “Never has physics come up with a way to tell with what initial
> conditions the Universe was started.”
>
> The problem of initial conditions has a general character. In his
> seminal work “From Strange Simplicity to Complex Familiarity,” Nobel
> prize winner Manfred Eigen writes: “Darwin excluded any application of
> his theory to the origin of life, insisting that it dealt exclusively
> ‘with the manner of succession.’ Darwin derived his principle from
> observations in nature. Only once, many years later, did he think of a
> more general theoretical foundation. In a letter written in 1882 (during
> the last month of his life) to the zoologist and surgeon George C.
> Wallich, Darwin confirmed that his work was concerned only with the
> manner of succession, and he ‘left the question of the origin of life
> uncanvassed as being altogether in the present state of our knowledge.’”
> <https://www.jpost.com/kabbalah/article-730015>
>
> To purchase Eduard Shyfrin’s book ‘From Infinity to Man: The Fundamental
> Ideas of Kabbalah Within the Framework of Information Theory and Quantum
> Physics’ please click here.
>
> YOUTUBE: "My Sweet Lord (George Harrison)"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04v-SdKeEpE>
>
> A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Hebrew%20Thesis%20of%20Nihilism.pdf>
>
> Last Revision: 5 October 2023
>
> On 3/10/2023 01:56, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
>> On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 8:28:34 PM UTC-7, dolf wrote:
>>> We've now completed a rudimentary means to convey the Neural Linguistic
>>> Pragma which has a temporal resonance to the noumenon for any given day
>>> of year / time of day;
>>
>> "You're giving this garbage up, then?"
>

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)