On 1/10/2021 10:32 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 1/10/2021 9:25 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 30/09/2021 8:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2021 7:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replies quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hoot!) has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once again that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'I *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lying his fool
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Mind you, that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very keen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge
>>>>>>>>>>>> them up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and
>>>>>>>>>>>> me) also I know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly even jonz could except he's a noddy devotee now,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but you don't require noddy, a proven liar, to justify any
>>>>>>>>>>>> of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven
>>>>>>>>>>> liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false,
>>>>>>>>>> only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is
>>>>>>>>> lying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>>>>>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>>
>>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>>
>>> If there is only one course of action available then there are no
>>> option - basic logic.
>>>
>>
>> Basic logic says you're fucked.
>>
>> We will just call this Keef's paradox :-)
>>
>>
>
> hoisted by his own petard  :)
>
Little felix peeked from under the curtain and squeaked "Me too"