On Mar 16, 2022 at 6:27:22 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t0u2pp$nja$1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2022-03-16, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 16, 2022 at 3:06:50 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>> <t0tn1p$59i$1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 2022-03-16, David Brooks <BDB@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> (snip)
>>>
>>>>>> My off-Usenet relationship with Snit leads me to believe that he's had
>>>>>> difficulty defending himself from you.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's a simple explanation for that and we all know what it is, the
>>>>> 'r' word (IOW, it's not *me* he has a difficult time with).
>>>>
>>>> You DO appear, to me, to be a VERY difficult individual.
>>>
>>> For people who pretend reality isn't what it is, I'd suppose that's true.
>>
>> Gonna regret this, but back to responding to your trolling.
>>
>> Notice here you play victim. It is what you do.
>>
>>>
>>>>> Glasser likes having "off-Usenet" relationships with people from usenet
>>>>> newsgroups for one reason, and that reason is tied to what I just
>>>>> alluded to. You're not the first useful idiot he's tried to paint
>>>>> alternate versions of 'truth' for... but the 'r' word eventually kicks
>>>>> in (FWIW, you still have a ways to go to break the record).
>>>>
>>>> I hope I have helped Snit in some small way.
>>>
>>> You can't help him with his main problem, only people who are qualified
>>> *may* be able do so. And, of them, if Glasser is to be believed, he's
>>> apparently fooled all of those he's been to.
>>
>> This is a claim you fabricated.
>
> Nah, it's just common sense.

No. You made it up. You lied. You do that pretty much non-stop. And then you
cry I have no "response" for your non-stop lying and trolling, as if you are
entitled.

It is easy: your claim is a flat out lie, and one made for the purpose of
getting attention. You make up derogatory nonsense. It is what you do.

> No "professional" in their right mind would
> say you "handle the stresses of life better than average", let alone a
> "number" of them.

This is something you flat out made up. You have no clue. I do. You just push
nonsense attacks to try to get attention and then pretend you are entitled to
detailed responses and evidence, as if I am going to share with you medical
notes and the like. It is a part of your obsessive non-stop trolling. I used
to fall for it more... foolishly thinking you were actually trying to
understand the facts and not just doing what you do: trying to cause harm
based on your own obviously very significant issues.

You mock others for seeking the help you refuse to, and clearly very much
need.

>> You are speaking FOR me instead of seeking to
>> understand.
>
> Nope, I'm using simple common sense and the history or your 'story
> telling'.

You are either delusional or just flat out lying. I do not care which.

>
>>> At least, to hear him tell
>>> it, he must have and this has been known for almost two decades:
>>>
>>> "Hmmmm, I do not remember pointing out any trolling by you... so what is your
>>> support for your claim.
>>>
>>> Please keep in mind that based on my anxiety disorder I have seen a number
>>> of professionals who have consistently agreed I handle the stresses of life
>>> better than average, am well adjusted, and am in no need of any
>>> psychological counseling.
>>>
>>> Ahhhh, trolls... what say you?"
>>>
>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/Xa2yL-Y4NU8/m/YRP_RD7V9M8J>
>>>
>>> The first obvious question is: Why did he see "a number of professionals"?
>>
>> You just quoted the fact I speak of an "anxiety disorder".

What you snipped:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You just quoted the fact I speak of an "anxiety disorder". I have that, tied
to an atypical form of dysautonomia / POTS. You have mocked me relentlessly
for years over having these health challenges. You try to shame people over
seeking appropriate treatment over such challenges.

This shows your lack of character, and lack of honesty.

Also notice you do not answer the question about your speaking of gays with
kids as "parasites". It is just one example of your extreme bigotry. Your only
"defense" is to point out where, year ago, I do what I do -- gave you the
benefit of doubt. I was in error to do so, as you have proved time and time
again since then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And in response you just post vague accusations where you focus on your insane
views of others and not your own very obvious need for help.

What are you doing to get the help you very, very clearly need? My guess:
nothing. Ever. You refuse to get help with the issues you are demonstrating
now.

>
> And you may actually have that, in fact, it could explain a lot of the
> bizarre activity we've seen from you over the years.
>
>>> The second (which should probably be the first): Is *any* of that true?
>>
>> You assume others are as dishonest as you. Noted.

And you ignored this to post yet more of your delusional attacks -- another
habit of yours that puts you in a very poor light.

>
> There, I assumed you probably did what you had been doing all along
> ('story telling').
>
>>> I'm not seeing it... most of what I've *ever* seen from him are
>>> 'stories' in place of reality as a way of handling "the stresses of
>>> life" and I'm pretty sure Glasser still believes he needs no
>>> "psychological counseling" (at the least, he wants readers to believe
>>> this).
>>
>> There is nothing wrong with seeing a counselor.

What you snipped:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is nothing wrong with seeing a counselor. You should to get help with
your obvious challenges. But for you seeking help is seen as wrong and a
weakness. And it shows. You will likely never get the help you obviously need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

See: you just focus on your non-stop attacks and refuse to even speak of the
help you VERY clearly need. You demonstrate you need in the very post I
respond to.

> You've seen "a number of" them and claim they all "have consistently
> agreed" you "handle the stresses of life better than average", are "well
> adjusted, and are "in no need of any psychological counseling".

Agreed, though there are times when counseling is a benefit.

> Making
> up 'stories' isn't handling "the stresses of life" (we don't even need
> to go into the "better than average" lie).

If you want to say your making up of stories is based on you not handling
stress well, so be it... but I think there is a lot more to it than that. You
not only clearly handle stress poorly, you have deep seated insecurities you
try to deal with by lying about others and lashing out. Your claim is you are
lying not just to others but to yourself (you claim to believe your own lies).
Maybe that is true. If so that suggests you need help even more.
>
>>> Notably, even YOU said he has issues and even *he* has admitted to
>>> having these mental issues, he's just in denial regarding how they
>>> manifest.
>>
>> This is you pushing derogatory attacks based on your own issues. You see
>> nothing wrong with that.

Notice you dodge this and go back to your vague accusations. I am noting your
behavior NOW, in this very thread. No need to dig back, and no need to look at
the words of others. YOUR words speak of you. That is something you show no
sign of understanding.

>
> So why have so many noticed your antics and pointed them out to your
> repeated denials?
>
>>> But we've all seen how they manifest,
>>
>> Vague insult and attack... again based on your own issues.

You denied this... but remained vague. And focused on your past nonsense.
Notice I have no such need -- your actions NOW show exactly what I note about
you.

>
> There's nothing vague about it, many of us have gone into details over
> and over.
>
>>> even you once (and only once that
>>> I ever saw) called out one of his goofy bullsh*t stories (about an
>>> 'English lad' being my son). Notably, it was only when YOU challenged
>>> the veracity of his 'story' that he softened his stance (he should've
>>> done more than he did but that's not his way).
>>
>> Do you deny you have a som who goes by Ryan Sullivan?

And you refuse to answer. Fact is: he is your son.

Ryan Sullivan <sf4adq$f7v$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
-----
My father is jealous of my success in being sober since Nov 2
2018. He has not been able to stop that addiction nor his
addiction to the guy who goes by Snit in these groups.

I have no shame in being sober and am proud of how far I have
gotten considering the influences I had growing up. Does not stop
him from bringing it up to Adriana any time he sees her as he
tries to break us up.

I do not know who you are Snit, but my father is not a mentally
well man. He talks about you all the time. You are right that he
is wasting his life on whatever petty battle he has with you.
-----

Ryan Sullivan <sf4b12$l3u$1@gioia.aioe.org>
-----
My father has shown me this bot running. It is his. He speaks of
using it to prove to Snit he can make a better bot.
-----

Ryan Sullivan <sf4b2v$l3u$2@gioia.aioe.org>
-----
Is this about that Prescott site you talk about and ask us if your
work is better?
-----

Ryan Sullivan <sf6j6k$4fn$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
-----
Why could you not spend as much time focused on me and Steve as
you do on this guy online?
-----

Ryan Sullivan <sf6j6v$4fn$2@gioia.aioe.org>:
-----
You played a few gigs and grifted as you got your kids to drink.
You're a piece of shit father.
-----

Ryan Sullivan <<XnsADB0B5EAF75DA443322@46.165.242.75>>
-----
Unfortunately my father who posts here as Steve Carroll is a
mentally ill person.

He abuses alcohol and drugs as well and is a controil freak
maniac.

My mom left him years ago due to his substance abuse.

So my dad has been stalking snit Michael Glasser for years. I do
not know why but it is a major part of his life. My advice is to
ignore Steve Carroll and his many nyms.
-----

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.