Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

The Universe is populated by stable things. -- Richard Dawkins


computers / comp.sys.mac.advocacy / Re: Ping: Apd ..... BT question!

SubjectAuthor
o Re: Ping: Apd ..... BT question!Lefty Lundquist

1
Re: Ping: Apd ..... BT question!

<t4kd06$fgh$3@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=10088&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#10088

 copy link   Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.sys.mac.advocacy alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: lefty_lu...@ggmail.com (Lefty Lundquist)
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Ping: Apd ..... BT question!
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 18:25:10 -0400
Organization: Progressive Party
Lines: 118
Message-ID: <t4kd06$fgh$3@dont-email.me>
References: <_8DaK.444699$Lc1.415218@fx12.ams1>
<t4h6dh$s5p$1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
<jd2l6nFcrfqU1@mid.individual.net>
<t4jtkd$pv7$1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
<EUebK.387954$f2a5.228620@fx48.iad>
<t4jvq1$5qp$4@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 22:25:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="99c44aadf6d8ef1b5bacd573071c0433";
logging-data="15889"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193sPyS18/eAnravA1QUQszIHwpQlkRXz8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.8.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hgi5udqUoCgAztx1s931tFa2miY=
In-Reply-To: <t4jvq1$5qp$4@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Lefty Lundquist - Sat, 30 Apr 2022 22:25 UTC

On 4/30/2022 2:40 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2022-04-30, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 30, 2022 at 11:02:54 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>> <t4jtkd$pv7$1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 2022-04-29, Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote:
>>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>>>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>> I suspect you shouldn't take any more lying lessons from Glasser.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Awww. Little SC is lonesome for Snit; he wants to bring him back into
>>>>>> another unhealthy exchange between himself & Snit,
>>>>>
>>>>> Aww. Little Mike is lonesome because his puzzle threads don't generate
>>>>> the attention he claims he isn't looking for by posting them to a
>>>>> public forum (usually in a 'diary' format).
>>>>>
>>>>>> when the current exchange was between SC & BDB.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not trying to set a 'rule' in a public forum, are you?
>>>>>
>>>>>> You know that Snit can't resist rebutting your attack
>>>>>
>>>>> "attack"? Snit lies regularly, that's a fact. That you don't recognize
>>>>> it is your problem.
>>>>>
>>>> My point is that you are *worse* than Snit in your battles here and now
>>>
>>> "here and now" is a bullsh*t metric as usenet posts are not made in a
>>> vacuum.
>>
>> What we have is here and now.
>
> We have here, we have now and we have history. Being that you're still
> lying here and now, it's silly to pretend you've 'turned over a new
> leaf'. In any event, ME sure has no problem with history when going
> after DB. And we all know about your imfamous dossiers so there's no
> question you'll use history when it suits you and try to 'cancel' it
> when it doesn't. Why do you cowardly hypocrites think this game isn't
> spotted for what it is? Is ME as 'woke' as you are?
>
>>>> when you initiate a foray when Snit has said nothing to or about you in
>>>> this exact and precise instance.
>>>
>>> So... if I look around, I'll find you calling Snit out for the many
>>> times he's "unilaterally attacking" me "when the current exchange was
>>> between" BDB and myself? Funny, I've looked around and don't see *any*.
>>
>> More of your drama.
>
> Where "drama" equals fact.
>
>>>> Your 'excuse' that you are justified in unilaterally attacking another
>>>> because of his past misdeeds doesn't fly.
>>>
>>> His misdeeds aren't in the past so trying to sell that silliness won't
>>> help you, it only makes you look like Snit, not *worse*, but like him.
>>> AGAIN: rightfully calling a liar what he is isn't "unilaterally
>>> attacking", it's giving him what he spent so much time (20 years)
>>> earning.
>>
>> MORE of your drama.
>
> Same As Above.
>
>>>> I'm not defending Snit 'for all time'.
>>>
>>> No one can defend Snit for any period of time, they can try but it's an
>>> pointless endeavor.
>>
>> And MORE of your drama.
>
> SAA
>
>>>> I criticizing you for right now, here, this subthread of this thread.
>>>
>>> And you're notably not criticizing Snit, ever, for the same thing when
>>> he's done it far more often. (holding up crystal ball)
>>>
>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/ERRUpUlK1b4/m/bZd8bMXSuQoJ>
>>>
>>> That poor fool used to 'not defend' Snit, too.
>>>
>>>> It had nothing to do w/ Snit, and yet you attack unilaterally.
>>>
>>> Where "attack unilaterally" was my rightfully labeling a liar as a liar.
>>> You're just going to have to deal with the fact that you can't 'sell'
>>> Snit as something he's not.
>>>
>>>> Bad form; but you want to twist it into my making a rule. You are
>>>> wrong. Recognize it; own it.
>>>
>>> More Snit-ish behavior from you.
>>
>> He is being reasonable and logical. Agreed.
>
> LOL! He's being a lying hypocrite. He's nowhere near your level but
> that's what is going on here.
>
>>> I asked an obvious question regarding
>>> your statement about what exchanges must be limited to (in your mind)
>>> for you to engage in your hypocritical tirade here. Bad form.
>>>
>>> I'll say it AGAIN... Snit *will* turn you into a fool without you even
>>> realizing it.
>>
>> Why can't you drop your one-sided war?
>
> It's not my war, it's yours... with reality, I just point it out.
>
So is Ryan Sullivan your son?
A simple yes or no will do.
No need to re-write "The Magna Carta".

--
Lefty Lundquist

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor