Message-ID:

It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.

computers / alt.privacy.anon-server / Trying Omnimix with Yamn

Trying Omnimix with Yamn

<20211216.014535.83c3f422@mixmin.net>

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=10818&group=alt.privacy.anon-server#10818

copy link Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server

Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
Injection-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 01:50:01 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 01:45:35 +0000
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.neodome.net!mail2news
Subject: Trying Omnimix with Yamn
Message-ID: <20211216.014535.83c3f422@mixmin.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: nore...@mixmin.net (Yamn Remailer)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Comments: This message was transferred to Usenet via mail2news gateway at
<mail2news@neodome.net>. Please send questions and concerns to
<admin@neodome.net>. Report inappropriate use to <abuse@neodome.net>.
Injection-Info: neodome.net;
posting-account="mail2news";
key="DCNudYPd0W5PUo2RLhu9dpjT/totkwFVJs/gowQA870gGB47/b5/EE5bRDQXyOchPRE8Xy
UvS36oEoj6LBMaIAAhtZyW6p/26+WODh6hlulOW0fy3ToSv1GO7FtxWllZMWPXdkHk8GfbPDMIC
+/gHW6rw49puIPHSMRxyt4g/OHumbSAlgoWXmnsWllV3R33I4WRcr7CGBaNIxhmqd4Pk2Z9m/2m
8YkFrfrEEm2wYzXKf0jYMX7xgDVAxqmTETMFwnhxMaezjK/E13ovG4YLMVoSySJ3IUAnMPYyFK6
fVEtFnbfJ7gEulcLvLzMs2vlpxEwZHbJvrrLZ5wA23XyXdg==";
data="U2FsdGVkX1/1lHycyXb5lHkV1pv6IoIScKILoFoJZX7C5zuotGjkjwuiM3yNsd26GuEXq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";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@neodome.net"

by: Yamn Remailer - Thu, 16 Dec 2021 01:45 UTC

I know this isn't a test group but I have an issue using QSL and Yamn
clients which might be resolvable by the vast network of experienced
coders here who really, really understand the intricacies anon networks.

I post from behind a VPN which I always use. Using Thunderbird for
regular emails, I can email through the tunnel using normal SMTP
(gmail) and port 465/ssl. However, setting up QSL to use the same,
pingers update ok (TOR proxy, 9050) but the email chokes at the
SMTP/465 line in the log. Yamn has the same issue, it just doesn't
work.

So, I'm using Omnimix as a last resort and thinking it maybe should
have been my first resort.

I'm using neodome as the single m2n gate here and leaving the rest up
to Omnimix. If this gets through, then I'll be an OM convert from now
on. Any ideas why I'm having the issue with QSL and Yamn?

Re: Trying Omnimix with Yamn

<07yuJ.426683$xalc.267632@fx12.ams1>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=10819&group=alt.privacy.anon-server#10819

copy link Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!fx12.ams1.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Trying Omnimix with Yamn
Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
References: <20211216.014535.83c3f422@mixmin.net>
From: adm...@sec3.net (SEC3)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20211216.014535.83c3f422@mixmin.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <07yuJ.426683$xalc.267632@fx12.ams1>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blocknews.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 03:10:52 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 22:10:51 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1938

by: SEC3 - Thu, 16 Dec 2021 03:10 UTC

On 2021-12-15 8:45 p.m., Yamn Remailer wrote:
> I know this isn't a test group but I have an issue using QSL and Yamn
> clients which might be resolvable by the vast network of experienced
> coders here who really, really understand the intricacies anon networks.
>
> I post from behind a VPN which I always use. Using Thunderbird for
> regular emails, I can email through the tunnel using normal SMTP
> (gmail) and port 465/ssl. However, setting up QSL to use the same,
> pingers update ok (TOR proxy, 9050) but the email chokes at the
> SMTP/465 line in the log. Yamn has the same issue, it just doesn't
> work.
>
> So, I'm using Omnimix as a last resort and thinking it maybe should
> have been my first resort.
>
> I'm using neodome as the single m2n gate here and leaving the rest up
> to Omnimix. If this gets through, then I'll be an OM convert from now
> on. Any ideas why I'm having the issue with QSL and Yamn?

Neither the creator of QSL nor the creator of YAMN have ever claimed
that the two programs can work together.

Using Omnimix seems like the obvious solution and I'm happy you have had
success with it.

--
SEC3

YAMN Tutorials - https://sec3.net/yamnhelp

Re: Trying Omnimix with Yamn

<20211216.121328.df0102c8@mix2.remailer.xyz>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=10823&group=alt.privacy.anon-server#10823

copy link Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20211216.121328.df0102c8@mix2.remailer.xyz>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 12:13:28 +0100
Subject: Re: Trying Omnimix with Yamn
References: <20211216.014535.83c3f422@mixmin.net>
From: nore...@mix2.remailer.xyz (Yamn Remailer)
Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail
Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com
Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 2001::1/128

by: Yamn Remailer - Thu, 16 Dec 2021 11:13 UTC

On 12/15/2021 7:45 PM, Yamn Remailer wrote:

> I know this isn't a test group but I have an issue using QSL and Yamn
> clients which might be resolvable by the vast network of experienced
> coders here who really, really understand the intricacies anon networks.
>
> I post from behind a VPN which I always use. Using Thunderbird for
> regular emails, I can email through the tunnel using normal SMTP
> (gmail) and port 465/ssl. However, setting up QSL to use the same,
> pingers update ok (TOR proxy, 9050) but the email chokes at the
> SMTP/465 line in the log. Yamn has the same issue, it just doesn't
> work.
>
> So, I'm using Omnimix as a last resort and thinking it maybe should
> have been my first resort.
>
> I'm using neodome as the single m2n gate here and leaving the rest up
> to Omnimix. If this gets through, then I'll be an OM convert from now
> on. Any ideas why I'm having the issue with QSL and Yamn?
>

I can't help with your issue, but I'm very interested in any followup
replies.

I'm a recent convert to Omnimix and I can confirm your experience.

Omnimix is rock solid reliable for me. All my posts and NG replies
always make it with Omnimix. I can't recall ever having delivery
failures using Omnimix.

Subject	Author
Trying Omnimix with Yamn	Yamn Remailer
Re: Trying Omnimix with Yamn	SEC3
Re: Trying Omnimix with Yamn	Yamn Remailer