Message-ID:

"Not only is God dead, but just try to find a plumber on weekends." -- Woody Allen

computers / comp.os.linux.misc / Re: ventoy UEFI 64bit

ventoy UEFI 64bit

<u4r5nu$oi5$3@reader2.panix.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=10848&group=comp.os.linux.misc#10848

copy link Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.2001:470:30::a654:103!not-for-mail
From: vjp2...@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: ventoy UEFI 64bit
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 20:44:46 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Samani Marions Panyaught NYC-11357-3436-287-USA
Message-ID: <u4r5nu$oi5$3@reader2.panix.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 20:44:46 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="2001:470:30::a654:103";
logging-data="25157"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.0-20210823 ("Coleburn") (NetBSD/9.3 (amd64))

by: vjp2...@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com - Fri, 26 May 2023 20:44 UTC

Got another clue on my long abandoned Quatian install:
Ventoy complains it isn't 64bit UEFI
Kinda confirms my experience

So I noticed rescatux can fake UEFI? Might someone explain it to me?

--
Vasos Panagiotopoulos panix.com/~vjp2/vasos.htm
---{Nothing herein constitutes advice. Everything fully disclaimed.}---

Re: ventoy UEFI 64bit

<u4rt4m$9fv9$1@dont-email.me>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=10852&group=comp.os.linux.misc#10852

copy link Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bli...@mouse-potato.com (Bobbie Sellers)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: ventoy UEFI 64bit
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 20:24:04 -0700
Organization: dis-organization
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <u4rt4m$9fv9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <u4r5nu$oi5$3@reader2.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 03:24:07 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="720995c6fd59b2444393cd0050b1c69a";
logging-data="311273"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+btASjMnfkN0yz/XapZG1+"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.11.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WbvBLiWWUS4Dki79HFqiKggQwdQ=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <u4r5nu$oi5$3@reader2.panix.com>

by: Bobbie Sellers - Sat, 27 May 2023 03:24 UTC

On 5/26/23 13:44, vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:
> Got another clue on my long abandoned Quatian install:
> Ventoy complains it isn't 64bit UEFI
> Kinda confirms my experience
>
> So I noticed rescatux can fake UEFI? Might someone explain it to me?
>
First as has been previously mentioned in other posts you have
caused to be written, ReactOS is not yet ready for consumption unless
you enjoy development.
Pick a Linux Distro and you have read many suggestions. Then use it,
maybe MX or AntiX as an install on your machine. Then having a working
lightweight Linux system install VirtualBox. Then one at time
install your old stuff but into virtual machines set up for each of your
operating systems. If your processor can handle the work and you have
plenty of memory and space on your hard disk maybe you can run all your
virtual machines at the same time and won't that be fun.

Good day...
bliss PCLinuxOS 64 Linux 6.3.4 KDE Plasma 5.27.5 on a Dell 7450

--
bliss dash SF 4 ever at dslextreme dot com

Subject	Author
ventoy UEFI 64bit	vjp2.at
Re: ventoy UEFI 64bit	Bobbie Sellers