On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 03:06:46 -0000 (UTC), Bertram Zorieki <foo@bar.baz>
wrote:

>]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con> wrote in
>]news:mn.2a2d7e621e91cf1b.136487@phoid.con:
>
>> How peculiar that despite Chad not being online since I posted the
>> previous link, someone has petitioned Imgur to tak it down?!
>
>It takes two parties to remove an image: a petitioner, as you put it...
>and the hosting company itself. If one were to petition Imgur to remove
>an image which comported with the rules laid out in their user
>agreement, they wouldn't comply.
>
>So, why are you so insistent on flagrant violation of Imgur's terms of
>service? If they're removing images you put there, it's because a)
>someone complained that the images were against the rules AND b) Imgur
>agreed.
>
>Why are you disrespecting Imgur's wishes? If you want to host those
>sorts of images, can't you have some integrity and use your own server,
>or at least use a service which doesn't explicitly say that you cannot
>use their service to host the kinds of images which (apparently -- I'm
>not really following this nonsense) keep getting removed?
>
>Stop making work for Imgur. Stop abusing their service! It should be
>very clear by now that they don't want the kind of images you're posting
>on their server. If it were otherwise, the images wouldn't keep getting
>removed. Why won't you respect Imgur's wishes about how they want their
>service used?
>
>It isn't right what you're doing to Imgur...

Fuck Imgur.