Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.

computers / comp.sys.mac.advocacy / Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)

SubjectAuthor
* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaAndy Burnelli
`* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic inAlan
 `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaYour Name
  +* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaAndy Burnelli
  |`- Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic inAlan
  +* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic insms
  |+* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmanospam
  ||`- Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaAndy Burnelli
  |`* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic insms
  | `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmanospam
  |  +* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaAndy Burnelli
  |  |`* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmanospam
  |  | `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaAndy Burnelli
  |  |  `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmanospam
  |  |   `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaAndy Burnelli
  |  |    +* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic inAlan
  |  |    |`* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaYour Name
  |  |    | `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaAndy Burnelli
  |  |    |  `- Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic inAlan
  |  |    `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmanospam
  |  |     `- Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaAndy Burnelli
  |  `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic inJolly Roger
  |   `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaAndy Burnelli
  |    `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic inAlan
  |     `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaYour Name
  |      `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaAndy Burnelli
  |       `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmanospam
  |        +- Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaAndy Burnelli
  |        `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16Bob Campbell
  |         `- Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaYour Name
  `* Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System BenchmaAndy Burnelli
   `- Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic inAlan

Pages:12
Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)

<tlmbkm$v04$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=12001&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#12001

  copy link   Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.sys.mac.advocacy comp.mobile.android
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!htnL9PrEhukO41EXSqWbXA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: spa...@nospam.com (Andy Burnelli)
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:50:59 +0000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tlmbkm$v04$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tlgakn$3ra5j$3@dont-email.me> <tlm904$faor$2@dont-email.me> <tlm98n$640$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="31748"; posting-host="htnL9PrEhukO41EXSqWbXA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: Andy Burnelli - Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:50 UTC

Your Name wrote:

> The moron can't remember the utter garbage claimed two seconds ago, let
> alone 2 hours.

I get it that the iKooks hate me because I speak facts about Apple they're
ignorant of, but the fact remains Apple CPUs are highly unfixably flawed.

All the ad hominem attacks by the iKooks against the bearer of facts
can't fix the unpatchable design flaws in almost all of Apple's CPUs.

*Can these iKooks name a CPU that has _more_ flaws, than do Apple CPUs?*

Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)

<231120221853132806%nospam@nospam.invalid>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=12003&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#12003

  copy link   Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.sys.mac.advocacy comp.mobile.android
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nos...@nospam.invalid (nospam)
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:53:13 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <231120221853132806%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <tlgakn$3ra5j$3@dont-email.me> <tlm904$faor$2@dont-email.me> <tlm98n$640$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tlmbkm$v04$1@gioia.aioe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f7601a30234206c89eb5c6cbf399075a";
logging-data="508699"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Wk8loHmVAtWdKNJyOLopy"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ctOhBsNNzY4WRZt6Xzof5K++Ays=
 by: nospam - Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:53 UTC

In article <tlmbkm$v04$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
<spam@nospam.com> wrote:

>
> All the ad hominem attacks by the iKooks against the bearer of facts

that's funny.

Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)

<tlmcfi$16t2$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=12004&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#12004

  copy link   Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.sys.mac.advocacy comp.mobile.android
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!htnL9PrEhukO41EXSqWbXA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: spa...@nospam.com (Andy Burnelli)
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 00:05:18 +0000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tlmcfi$16t2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tlgakn$3ra5j$3@dont-email.me> <tlm904$faor$2@dont-email.me> <tlm98n$640$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tlmbkm$v04$1@gioia.aioe.org> <231120221853132806%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="39842"; posting-host="htnL9PrEhukO41EXSqWbXA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: Andy Burnelli - Thu, 24 Nov 2022 00:05 UTC

nospam wrote:

> that's funny.

I get it you are desperate to deflect away from all facts about Apple.
But the question remains valid whether or not you hate Apple facts, nospam.

Can any of you iKooks find a smartphone CPU that has _more_ unpatchable
hardware flaws than Apple's smartphone CPUs?

*Name a smartphone CPU that had _more_ flaws than Apple smartphone CPUs.*

Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)

<tlmcha$16ts$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=12005&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#12005

  copy link   Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.sys.mac.advocacy comp.mobile.android
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!htnL9PrEhukO41EXSqWbXA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: spa...@nospam.com (Andy Burnelli)
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 00:06:14 +0000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tlmcha$16ts$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tlgakn$3ra5j$3@dont-email.me> <tlm915$faor$3@dont-email.me> <tlm9d1$8ac$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="39868"; posting-host="htnL9PrEhukO41EXSqWbXA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: Andy Burnelli - Thu, 24 Nov 2022 00:06 UTC

Your Name wrote:

> Intel chips are so badly flawed that some even had trouble correctly
> dividing two numbers!
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug>

*Name a smartphone CPU that had _more_ flaws than Apple smartphone CPUs.*

Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)

<tlmds8$fmga$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=12010&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#12010

  copy link   Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.sys.mac.advocacy comp.mobile.android
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nuh...@nope.com (Alan)
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in
System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 16:28:54 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <tlmds8$fmga$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tlgakn$3ra5j$3@dont-email.me> <tlm915$faor$3@dont-email.me>
<tlm9d1$8ac$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tlmcha$16ts$1@gioia.aioe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 00:28:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2fd03dc07b14bf49d336e6e4a7092fa2";
logging-data="514570"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19c7TigoLouxA682/lkcvMYJwwOhNirm7Q="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:I+X8FP4RcwzsOlzIh05naFolDwM=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <tlmcha$16ts$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 by: Alan - Thu, 24 Nov 2022 00:28 UTC

On 2022-11-23 16:06, Andy Burnelli wrote:
> Your Name wrote:
>
>> Intel chips are so badly flawed that some even had trouble correctly
>> dividing two numbers!
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug>
>
> *Name a smartphone CPU that had _more_ flaws than Apple smartphone CPUs.*

You name one that has fewer.

Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)

<2u-cnRZjS_PdZuP-nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@supernews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=12011&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#12011

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.mobile.android
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 05:04:00 +0000
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O309nFECNS/s0WOhB/SdHgufosY=
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16
Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: non...@none.none (Bob Campbell)
References: <tlgakn$3ra5j$3@dont-email.me>
<tlm904$faor$2@dont-email.me>
<tlm98n$640$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<tlmbkm$v04$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<231120221853132806%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Message-ID: <2u-cnRZjS_PdZuP-nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@supernews.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 05:04:00 +0000
Lines: 15
X-Trace: sv3-Wtz/1qXwyiaSTip0TiTlXoxHaomOT9WFB7rfaV0OCUsCeIX866z6EFf5zqoFgHCTytntIrsSJNpDtJx!T9DUUA1yvSCb0f+rY25kLe/iPMLamTQAyVFVrbPMG9rIvAEvoQqgw3LwPN0YBEKJLHhwbq9dDiaw!RDxyKQLP4A==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 by: Bob Campbell - Thu, 24 Nov 2022 05:04 UTC

nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> In article <tlmbkm$v04$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
> <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> All the ad hominem attacks by the iKooks against the bearer of facts
>
> that's funny.

Actually, it’s hilarious.

There is a huge difference between “Arlen facts” and actual facts.

Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)

<tlmug8$f94$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=12012&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#12012

  copy link   Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.sys.mac.advocacy comp.mobile.android
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!LEV9UIo6P8WHVDGtYsK20A.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name)
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Outperforms Apple's A16 Bionic in System Benchmark (AnTuTu). A16 Bionic Outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in CPU Benchmark (Geekbench)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 18:12:41 +1300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tlmug8$f94$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tlgakn$3ra5j$3@dont-email.me> <2u-cnRZjS_PdZuP-nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@supernews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="15652"; posting-host="LEV9UIo6P8WHVDGtYsK20A.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Your Name - Thu, 24 Nov 2022 05:12 UTC

On 2022-11-24 05:04:00 +0000, Bob Campbell said:
> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> In article <tlmbkm$v04$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
>> <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> All the ad hominem attacks by the iKooks against the bearer of facts
>>
>> that's funny.
>
> Actually, it’s hilarious.
>
> There is a huge difference between “Arlen facts” and actual facts.

As in they are complete opposites ... "anti-facts" and "facts. They
probably explode if put in the same place at the same time. ;-)

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor