Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

"I have not the slightest confidence in 'spiritual manifestations.'" -- Robert G. Ingersoll


devel / comp.arch.embedded / Re: DSP like MCUs, or MCU like DSPs?

SubjectAuthor
o Re: DSP like MCUs, or MCU like DSPs?Clifford Heath

1
Re: DSP like MCUs, or MCU like DSPs?

<173af3a74c857a05$113$3905283$5aa10cbd@news.thecubenet.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=1242&group=comp.arch.embedded#1242

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded
Subject: Re: DSP like MCUs, or MCU like DSPs?
Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded
References: <c0dc506e-e26c-4629-8971-65432f8dcf15n@googlegroups.com> <to1mha$1cndn$1@dont-email.me> <to254j$1e5vh$1@dont-email.me> <f0da0c28-b449-499a-ba11-26800024118dn@googlegroups.com> <87wn6ibpgq.fsf@nightsong.com> <9ae0605e-4547-4733-85e4-66da826ff769n@googlegroups.com> <to3ttj$1ma14$1@dont-email.me>
From: no.s...@please.net (Clifford Heath)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:15:09 +1100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <to3ttj$1ma14$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 27
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!us1.netnews.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.thecubenet.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 01:15:11 +0000
Organization: theCubeNet - www.thecubenet.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@thecubenet.com
Message-Id: <173af3a74c857a05$113$3905283$5aa10cbd@news.thecubenet.com>
X-Received-Bytes: 2616
 by: Clifford Heath - Tue, 17 Jan 2023 01:15 UTC

On 23/12/22 20:54, David Brown wrote:
> On 23/12/2022 09:14, Rick C wrote:
>> On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 1:31:55 AM UTC-5, Paul Rubin wrote:
>>> I didn't personally work on it, but spent a while studying a
>>> cryptography app that ran on the now ancient Motorola DSP 56000
>>> series. The model number came from the architecture's 24 bit words
>>> and 56 bit MAC accumulator. The app wasn't particularly connected
>>> with realtime or with signal processing. Rather, the 24*24->56 MAC
>>> came in handy for high precision arithmetic used by the crypto
>>> algorithm.
>>
>> At that time there were generally, 16 bit fixed point DSP, and 32 bit
>> floating point DSP.  Neither was appropriate for audio work.  16 bits
>> is not enough resolution for high quality audio and 32 bit floating
>> point was overkill, using extra power and burning extra dollars.
>> Motorola came out with 24 bit devices as the sweet spot for high
>> quality audio work.
>
> Yes.  There are many manufacturers of 24-bit DSPs, and they almost all
> have a background in audio.
> (Now, of course, you just use the 32-bit - the millidollar difference in
> hardware costs is worth it for the added convenience.)

NXP still make DSC56xx and MC56xx (16 and 32 bit) families. No 24/56 bit
ones as far as I can see.

<https://www.nxp.com/products/processors-and-microcontrollers/additional-mpu-mcus-architectures/digital-signal-controllers/32-bit-56800ef-dsc-core:56F8XXXX-32BIT>

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor