On 6/29/2021 7:34 AM, YK wrote:
> On 6/29/2021 4:52 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> I think you'll forever be known as "idiot Kerman" based on that answer.
>>
>> Oh, *that* ship already sailed *loooong* ago.
>
> You, kensi, seem to own the facultative skills necessary to understand that
> the "point of view" of this "Idiot Kerman" is that of a gaumless moron.
>
> The "Idiot Kerman" point of view is that _everyone_ using _either_ aior or
> neodome is doing so expressly for nefarious purposes of Kerman's creation.
>
> Worse, the "Idiot Kerman" claims that anyone who points out the fallacy of
> his point of view is, in a word, someone whom "Idiot Kerman" doesn't like.

Even worse, he klames that anyone who falls into either category is the
SAME someone whom "Idiot Kerman" doesn't like.

Yep, he's clinically paranoid too. So is Sn!pe/Tr!pe (who has a large
assortment of additional socks; *usually* identifiable by "snipeco2"
appearing in the post headers).

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

On 6/29/2021 8:18 AM, Tr!pe wrote:
> Paul Derbyshire's notorious "kensi" sock

Proof, ko0k?

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

On 6/29/2021 8:36 AM, Tr!pe wrote:
> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> Hold on, Pratt aka puddles aka Neal aka Gregory Hall aka Colonel Burke
>> etc. etc. etc. is also the notorious "seamus"?
>>
>> He has even more sockpuppets than I'd thought.
>
> Tsk. What a feeble attempt at misdirection, Paul.

Who is "Paul", ko0ky? There is nobody in this thread using that alias.

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

On 6/30/2021 6:11 AM, kensi wrote:
> Even worse, he klames that anyone who falls into either category is the
> SAME someone whom "Idiot Kerman" doesn't like.
>
> Yep, he's clinically paranoid too. So is Sn!pe/Tr!pe (who has a large
> assortment of additional socks; *usually* identifiable by "snipeco2"
> appearing in the post headers).

kensi,

To me, what matters isn't the header (or the number of socks) but what they
say that has any value to me (or others) in terms of the conversation topic.

None of these idiots "can" add any value whatsoever (for me or for anyone).
Every statement these socks made was of no value in terms of the topic.

Their claim that everyone using neodome is nefarious are that of an idiot.
Their claim that nobody needs more than aioe's limits are that of an idiot.

The only thing they "taught" us is that they're idiots.
They can have this newsgroup; I'm out as there is no value to be gained.

Faggot wrote:

On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:33:23 -0400, Jackson Sprat
<jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:26:58 -0400, YK <youkidding@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On 6/28/2021 5:21 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>> "conversation" isn't a measure of Usenet activity; you are confused.
>>
>>1. The Idiot Kerman thinks aioe posts to alt.home.repair (but it doesn't)
>>2. The Idiot Kerman thinks aioe allows more posts than it does (it won't)
>>
>>Does the Idiot Kerman want to post more proof he's an utter moron?
>
>I wish you knew how stupid and petty you sound.
>
>1) aioe allows forty posts a day. If you cannot say what you wish to say in
> forty posts then you really need to take a step back and consolidate your
> 'shroom' addled thoughts,
>
>2) if you wish to spam or sporge <alt.home.repair> then get another
> NNTP server to abuse but keep in mind they will put a stop to your
> crap, too.

On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:54:48 -0400, YK <youkidding@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On 6/30/2021 6:11 AM, kensi wrote:
>> Even worse, he klames that anyone who falls into either category is the
>> SAME someone whom "Idiot Kerman" doesn't like.
>>
>> Yep, he's clinically paranoid too. So is Sn!pe/Tr!pe (who has a large
>> assortment of additional socks; *usually* identifiable by "snipeco2"
>> appearing in the post headers).
>
>kensi,
>
>To me, what matters isn't the header (or the number of socks) but what they
>say that has any value to me (or others) in terms of the conversation topic.
>
>None of these idiots "can" add any value whatsoever (for me or for anyone).
>Every statement these socks made was of no value in terms of the topic.
>
>Their claim that everyone using neodome is nefarious are that of an idiot.
>Their claim that nobody needs more than aioe's limits are that of an idiot.
>
>The only thing they "taught" us is that they're idiots.
>They can have this newsgroup; I'm out as there is no value to be gained.

'YK' is a typical liberal. Notice how it places itself smack dab in the center of the
universe and it believes that everything said and done in the universe has as its
purpose pleasing it. Poor little snowflake!

On 2021-06-30 10:24 a.m., Jackson Sprat wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:54:48 -0400, YK <youkidding@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6/30/2021 6:11 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> Even worse, he klames that anyone who falls into either category is the
>>> SAME someone whom "Idiot Kerman" doesn't like.
>>>
>>> Yep, he's clinically paranoid too. So is Sn!pe/Tr!pe (who has a large
>>> assortment of additional socks; *usually* identifiable by "snipeco2"
>>> appearing in the post headers).
>>
>> kensi,
>>
>> To me, what matters isn't the header (or the number of socks) but what they
>> say that has any value to me (or others) in terms of the conversation topic.
>>
>> None of these idiots "can" add any value whatsoever (for me or for anyone).
>> Every statement these socks made was of no value in terms of the topic.
>>
>> Their claim that everyone using neodome is nefarious are that of an idiot.
>> Their claim that nobody needs more than aioe's limits are that of an idiot.
>>
>> The only thing they "taught" us is that they're idiots.
>> They can have this newsgroup; I'm out as there is no value to be gained.
>
> 'YK' is a typical liberal. Notice how it places itself smack dab in the center of the
> universe and it believes that everything said and done in the universe has as its
> purpose pleasing it. Poor little snowflake!
>
did we run someone else off , yay

On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:24:01 -0400, Jackson Sprat
<jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:54:48 -0400, YK <youkidding@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On 6/30/2021 6:11 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> Even worse, he klames that anyone who falls into either category is the
>>> SAME someone whom "Idiot Kerman" doesn't like.
>>>
>>> Yep, he's clinically paranoid too. So is Sn!pe/Tr!pe (who has a large
>>> assortment of additional socks; *usually* identifiable by "snipeco2"
>>> appearing in the post headers).
>>
>>kensi,
>>
>>To me, what matters isn't the header (or the number of socks) but what they
>>say that has any value to me (or others) in terms of the conversation topic.
>>
>>None of these idiots "can" add any value whatsoever (for me or for anyone).
>>Every statement these socks made was of no value in terms of the topic.
>>
>>Their claim that everyone using neodome is nefarious are that of an idiot.
>>Their claim that nobody needs more than aioe's limits are that of an idiot.
>>
>>The only thing they "taught" us is that they're idiots.
>>They can have this newsgroup; I'm out as there is no value to be gained.
>
>'YK' is a typical liberal. Notice how it places itself smack dab in the center of the
>universe and it believes that everything said and done in the universe has as its
>purpose pleasing it. Poor little snowflake!

You're a typical faggot.