Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> asked
> Yup. What matters is how bugs are categorized, and whether the most
> critical ones are patched quickly.

No.

*Stop sending us Apple bugs, we have enough already*
<https://www.cyberscoop.com/ios-zero-day-zerodium-high-supply/>

The fact is all Apple operating systems are so horribly insecure, hackers
stopped accepting zero-click zero-day holes - there are so many out there!

And it's _never_ Apple who finds all these horrible holes in Apple products!
*Google Reveals BuggyCow, a new MacOS Zero-Day Vulnerability*
<https://www.wired.com/story/google-project-zero-buggycow-macos-zero-day/>

Apple spends their money not on QA, but on painting slogans on buildings.
Apple is all MARKETING (& almost zero R&D compared to high tech companies).

What matters is that the zero-click zero-day holes don't exist in the wild
for months and even for years without Apple having any clue whatsoever that
these zero-day zero-click security hole exists in _all_ their operating
systems.
a. These zero-day zero-click holes exist in the watch operating system
b. They exist right now in the mobile device (iPhone & iPad)
c. They exist at this very moment on all the macOS operating systems

Why?

*Because Apple doesn't give a shit about testing code for security holes.*
This has been shown time and time again by the published facts extent.

You don't make those ungodly profits without spending all your money on
ADVERTISING that the stuff is secure (without it actually being secure).

Apple has _entire huge swatches_ of code completely untested for years!

This was proved beyond a doubt (multiple times!) by security researchers
(Google being paramount in that effort).
--
Nobody in high tech spends less on R&D & more in MARKETING than Apple.