nospam wrote:

> how about you go through it and add all of the things iphones can do
> that android cannot, ones which you conveniently neglected to mention.

*There will _never_ be app functionality on iOS not already on Android.*

In fact, every time I ask you to *name just one* app functionality that is
on iOS that isn't long ago already on Android, you can't name even one.

What you do is you desperately google for a list of all known Apple
trademarks, and then you post that list of scores of trademarks nospam.

What you can't do is pick just the most important feature that you "think"
iOS has that Android doesn't have - because even that one - doesn't exist.

There is a good reason you never can find even a single one nospam,
and that's simply because Apple restricts what people can do.

Google can't.

What's no longer shocking is a concept that simple can't be comprehended by
the low IQ uneducated iKooks because they believe trademarks are functions.

In article <trkmtg$2s6f1$1@paganini.bofh.team>, Andy Burnelli
<nospam@nospam.net> wrote:

>
> *There will _never_ be app functionality on iOS not already on Android.*

demonstrably false.

> In fact, every time I ask you to *name just one* app functionality that is
> on iOS that isn't long ago already on Android, you can't name even one.

wrong. i've named several and you ignore all of them.

nospam wrote:

>> *There will _never_ be app functionality on iOS not already on Android.*
>
> demonstrably false.

*iOS will _always_ have less app functionality than Android*

I am beholden only to the truth, nospam... so if there were, I've _love_ to
know what app functionality is on iOS, all by its itty bitty self, that
isn't (usually already) on Android, all by its itty bitty self.

I _love_ useful functionality, nospam.
And I own both platforms - so I can test your bullshit, nospam.

*I have explained why iOS will _always_ be crippled compared to Android.*

It's impossible for iOS _not_ to be crippled, compared to Android, nospam.

The reason this will always be the case for useful functionality, nospam,
is beyond your comprehension, but I will expound upon this for others.

1. Apple strictly controls what app functionality is on the App Store.
2. Google does too - but Google cannot control typical user sideloading.
3. Hence, any functionality that _people_ want, developers will write.
4. But only for Android - because Apple won't let them on their App Store.

Note that I'm well aware your classic response is that you can write all
the functionality yourself or that you can jailbreak free of Apple
constraints; but we're talking here about normal users, nospam.

What you iKooks don't own the mental capacity to understand, is simple:
A. The iOS app store apps will always be limited by Apple, nospam.
B. Even Google tries to limit what apps are available on its app store.
C. But sideloading is trivial for Android users - which is the difference.

iOS will _always_ have less app functionality than Android as a result.

>> In fact, every time I ask you to *name just one* app functionality that is
>> on iOS that isn't long ago already on Android, you can't name even one.
>
> wrong. i've named several and you ignore all of them.

You easily forget one of my traits, nospam, is an excellent memory.
You can't be well educated if you don't own an excellent memory, IMHO.

The fact is, all you ever do is desperately google for all the Apple
trademarks you can find and then you post that idiotic list every time.

You don't even know yourself what half those trademarks indicate,
(particularly given a trademark is a fluid object in its essence).

You can't even name a _single_ useful app functionality which you claim is
_only on iOS_ that isn't (usually long ago) already available for Android.

If you could, you would - and yet - you can't - so you don't.
*Name just one*
--
HINT: Even Steve alludes to 7 but even he hasn't said what they are.
Personally, I would _love_ for Steve to explain them so I can learn
what he thinks they are, where I suspect I'll find alternatives instantly.