Message-ID:

"All my life I wanted to be someone; I guess I should have been more specific." -- Jane Wagner

computers / news.admin.net-abuse.usenet / Re: (PDF) Rockwood and Wilkins Fractures in Children 9th Edition by Waters

Re: (PDF) Rockwood and Wilkins Fractures in Children 9th Edition by Waters

<5nq3o9s3-oons-89o2-2p44-sr842nrnq11@zvaqfcevat.pbz>

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=1314&group=news.admin.net-abuse.usenet#1314

copy link Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Followup: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: dri...@mindspring.com (David Ritz)
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email,news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Subject: Re: (PDF) Rockwood and Wilkins Fractures in Children 9th Edition by
Waters
Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 22:31:39 -0500
Organization: SpamBusters!
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <5nq3o9s3-oons-89o2-2p44-sr842nrnq11@zvaqfcevat.pbz>
References: <59781171-88d3-47ec-98c7-97fc78859159n@googlegroups.com> <87zghq16jb.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <op.1oq0e4gda3w0dxdave@hodgins.homeip.net> <87zghozqdx.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <t9vnfp$in4$32@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: individual.net Vi+vROvl0wXlCo7zRYbC4wtUQUMbEAhEMsY+a9JBpF/lMeFyKN
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qb2HAuM6LB+RdUY4itC4chmYA7w=
In-Reply-To: <t9vnfp$in4$32@gallifrey.nk.ca>
OpenPGP: id=9CD055375C05466038D2194852BC29991A12DEEB
X-Comment-1: Spam is bad. <http://trillian.mit.edu/~jc/humor/WhatIsSpam.html>
X-Comment-2: LART a spammer for Dobbs.
X-Comment-3: Invalid assumptions tend to produce invalid conclusions.
X-Comment-4: This message is intended to be read with a monospaced font.
X-Meow: yes

by: David Ritz - Tue, 5 Jul 2022 03:31 UTC

[ note followup-to ]

On Monday, 04 July 2022 21:52 -0000,
in article <t9vnfp$in4$32@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

> In article <87zghozqdx.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,

> Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:

> >On Sun, 03 Jul 2022 16:55:42 -0400, David W. Hodgins wrote:

>>> On Sun, 03 Jul 2022 12:54:00 -0400, Andreas Kohlbach
>><ank@spamfence.net> wrote:

>>>> It's posted via Google. I don't think a botnet is involved.

>>> The Injection-Info header in the articles shows it's coming from a
>>> wide variety of ip addresses (hence botnet), and using multiple
>>> google accounts.

>>Good point. I overlooked this. Although it could be TOR?

> TOR!

Stop guessing; don't be in such a hurry to demonstrate your ignorance.
This is unrelated to TOR, bots and botnets. The Usenet spam in
question is being posted, individually, by hand. This is true for
every single article I've seen, coming from groups.google.com's G2
http2nntp interface.

These are the IP addresses shown in the NPH of the articles appearing
in comp.os.linux.misc, posted by "hester holt <hesterholt7@gmail.com>"
via Google Groups. See
<817p663n-9n89-q827-s822-77271rsp351@zvaqfcevat.pbz>
(http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=165699000400). tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de
provides a database of Tor exit nodes, which can be checked in the
same manner as most other DNSBLs.

178.170.183.64 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
68.235.38.177 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
217.138.255.202 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
198.55.126.214 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
104.129.56.166 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
149.57.28.198 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
178.170.158.41 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
45.87.214.77 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
149.57.28.76 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
45.87.212.78 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
37.120.137.72 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
217.138.255.203 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
208.78.41.158 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
146.70.103.22 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
178.170.183.64 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok

These are known proxies, for which I provided evidence. If you're
going to contradict me, Dave, the least you can do is to support your
assertion.

> Can it bypass a botnet?

If you're asking, "Can Tor bypass a botnet?", I'd ask you to rephrase.
As stated, it makes no sense. You are asking, can a network of
anonymous proxies get around a network of compromised hosts, which act
at the behest of nefarious third parties. WTF?

--
David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com>
"There are no good girls gone wrong, just bad girls found out."
- Mae West (1892-1980)

Re: (PDF) Rockwood and Wilkins Fractures in Children 9th Edition by Waters

<ta0df0$2u8i$41@gallifrey.nk.ca>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=1315&group=news.admin.net-abuse.usenet#1315

copy link Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!.POSTED.doctor.nl2k.ab.ca!not-for-mail
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Subject: Re: (PDF) Rockwood and Wilkins Fractures in Children 9th Edition by
Waters
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 04:08:00 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
Message-ID: <ta0df0$2u8i$41@gallifrey.nk.ca>
References: <59781171-88d3-47ec-98c7-97fc78859159n@googlegroups.com> <87zghozqdx.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <t9vnfp$in4$32@gallifrey.nk.ca> <5nq3o9s3-oons-89o2-2p44-sr842nrnq11@zvaqfcevat.pbz>
Injection-Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 04:08:00 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gallifrey.nk.ca; posting-host="doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:204.209.81.1";
logging-data="96530"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@gallifrey.nk.ca"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)

by: The Doctor - Tue, 5 Jul 2022 04:08 UTC

In article <5nq3o9s3-oons-89o2-2p44-sr842nrnq11@zvaqfcevat.pbz>,
David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> wrote:
>[ note followup-to ]
>
>On Monday, 04 July 2022 21:52 -0000,
> in article <t9vnfp$in4$32@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> In article <87zghozqdx.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
>
>> Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
>
>> >On Sun, 03 Jul 2022 16:55:42 -0400, David W. Hodgins wrote:
>
>>>> On Sun, 03 Jul 2022 12:54:00 -0400, Andreas Kohlbach
>>><ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
>
>>>>> It's posted via Google. I don't think a botnet is involved.
>
>>>> The Injection-Info header in the articles shows it's coming from a
>>>> wide variety of ip addresses (hence botnet), and using multiple
>>>> google accounts.
>
>>>Good point. I overlooked this. Although it could be TOR?
>
>> TOR!
>
>Stop guessing; don't be in such a hurry to demonstrate your ignorance.
>This is unrelated to TOR, bots and botnets. The Usenet spam in
>question is being posted, individually, by hand. This is true for
>every single article I've seen, coming from groups.google.com's G2
>http2nntp interface.
>
>These are the IP addresses shown in the NPH of the articles appearing
>in comp.os.linux.misc, posted by "hester holt <hesterholt7@gmail.com>"
>via Google Groups. See
><817p663n-9n89-q827-s822-77271rsp351@zvaqfcevat.pbz>
>(http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=165699000400). tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de
>provides a database of Tor exit nodes, which can be checked in the
>same manner as most other DNSBLs.
>
> 178.170.183.64 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 68.235.38.177 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 217.138.255.202 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 198.55.126.214 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 104.129.56.166 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 149.57.28.198 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 178.170.158.41 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 45.87.214.77 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 149.57.28.76 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 45.87.212.78 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 37.120.137.72 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 217.138.255.203 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 208.78.41.158 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 146.70.103.22 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
> 178.170.183.64 : tor.dnsbl.sectoor.de : ok
>
>These are known proxies, for which I provided evidence. If you're
>going to contradict me, Dave, the least you can do is to support your
>assertion.
>
>> Can it bypass a botnet?
>
>If you're asking, "Can Tor bypass a botnet?", I'd ask you to rephrase.
>As stated, it makes no sense. You are asking, can a network of
>anonymous proxies get around a network of compromised hosts, which act
>at the behest of nefarious third parties. WTF?
>

The Tor browser now makes sense.

>--
>David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com>
> "There are no good girls gone wrong, just bad girls found out."
> - Mae West (1892-1980)

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Those who will do evil for power will do evil with power. -unknowni Beware https://mindspring.com

Re: (PDF) Rockwood and Wilkins Fractures in Children 9th Edition by Waters

<9sr1rrr6-sq62-36p6-1s86-po5o4r78p41@zvaqfcevat.pbz>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=1316&group=news.admin.net-abuse.usenet#1316

copy link Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: dri...@mindspring.com (David Ritz)
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Subject: Re: (PDF) Rockwood and Wilkins Fractures in Children 9th Edition by
Waters
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 11:31:08 -0500
Organization: SpamBusters!
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <9sr1rrr6-sq62-36p6-1s86-po5o4r78p41@zvaqfcevat.pbz>
References: <59781171-88d3-47ec-98c7-97fc78859159n@googlegroups.com> <87zghozqdx.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <t9vnfp$in4$32@gallifrey.nk.ca> <5nq3o9s3-oons-89o2-2p44-sr842nrnq11@zvaqfcevat.pbz> <ta0df0$2u8i$41@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: individual.net ZaZqvI89ykz+J4w9XGqovALoTGKOylOWqWJo8/ZDj4kYfQD2ar
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TnGeVN1DTYCcafzRo6uDVYLeOZs=
In-Reply-To: <ta0df0$2u8i$41@gallifrey.nk.ca>
OpenPGP: id=9CD055375C05466038D2194852BC29991A12DEEB
X-Comment-1: Spam is bad. <http://trillian.mit.edu/~jc/humor/WhatIsSpam.html>
X-Comment-2: LART a spammer for Dobbs.
X-Comment-3: Invalid assumptions tend to produce invalid conclusions.
X-Comment-4: This message is intended to be read with a monospaced font.
X-Meow: yes

by: David Ritz - Tue, 5 Jul 2022 16:31 UTC

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday, 05 July 2022 04:08 -0000,
in article <ta0df0$2u8i$41@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

> The Tor browser now makes sense.

In what way, Dave? It's virtually impossible to log into Google
anything, from a Tor node, let alone a Tor browser, which uses Tor's
network of anonymizing proxies.

Stop guessing.

- --
David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com>
"Man is a credulous animal, and must believe something; in the absence
of good grounds for belief, he will be satisfied with bad ones."
- Bertrand Russell (1872-1970)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EARECAB0WIQSc0FU3XAVGYDjSGUhSvCmZGhLe6wUCYsRnTAAKCRBSvCmZGhLe
63AdAJ9yKgW80HCwsm7UARmZxJ2iecstuACeLL4MiPuRqSVfPO/Dz8bcnjd8ImQ=
=eLuN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Subject	Author
(PDF) Rockwood and Wilkins Fractures in Children 9th Edition by	David Ritz
(PDF) Rockwood and Wilkins Fractures in Children 9th Edition by	The Doctor
(PDF) Rockwood and Wilkins Fractures in Children 9th Edition by	David Ritz