On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:30:53 -0800, The Real Bev wrote:

> Physics. If you have that you can figure out everything else.

Hi The Real Bev,

Since you're not an iKook (e.g., Chris), nor a politician (e.g., Steve), I
need to ask you a simple question about that Physics Degree of your
significant other.

Can you (would you) ask your significant other two simple questions, which,
I just showed people like Steve are completely and utterly ignorant of?

#1: What does it mean that we all move through spacetime at the speed of
light?
#2: What do the seminal DK papers say about skills self assessment
dissonance?

The _reason_ I ask you this is we need someone, anyone, who is intelligent,
who can confirm (or deny if that's what they want to do) what I've said.

People like Steve and Chris outright deny all facts they simply don't like.
a. Like the fact we _do_ move orthogonal to space at the speed of light.
b. Like the fact the DK effect _does_ measure _all_ people's skill levels.

Steve, just said, through his multiple nyms (which he always replies to!)
a. Einstein's theory of relativity is "pure gibberish"
b. The DK effect only measures people at low skill levels

Now, between you and me and any _educated_ person, both those are wrong.
a. Anyone with _any_ Physics knows we move through time at the speed of c
b. Anyone with any knowledge of DK knows it covers _all_ skill levels

What I need is someone else, on this ng, who at least has a college degree,
who isn't stupid like Steve is, to confirm (or deny if they like) those
facts.

Can you ask your significant other?
The reason I ask you is two-fold:
1. You aren't a wacko like Steve is, and,
2. If your significant other has a Physics degree, that shows intelligence

I am _desperate_ to find someone, anyone, on this ng that owns intelligence.
Let _them_ confirm or deny the basic obvious facts I've stated that Steve
outright denies exists.

a. Steve denies Einstein's theory of relativity even exists, and,
b. Steve denies that the DK effect covers people of all skill levels.

I need this to help prove my main point in this thread, which is always:
*Those most ignorant are the ones trying to take away our rights*

Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:30:53 -0800, The Real Bev wrote:
>
>> Physics. If you have that you can figure out everything else.
>
> Hi The Real Bev,
>
> Since you're not an iKook (e.g., Chris), nor a politician (e.g., Steve), I
> need to ask you a simple question about that Physics Degree of your
> significant other.
>
> Can you (would you) ask your significant other two simple questions, which,
> I just showed people like Steve are completely and utterly ignorant of?
>
> #1: What does it mean that we all move through spacetime at the speed of
> light?
> #2: What do the seminal DK papers say about skills self assessment
> dissonance?
>
> The _reason_ I ask you this is we need someone, anyone, who is intelligent,
> who can confirm (or deny if that's what they want to do) what I've said.
>
> People like Steve and Chris outright deny all facts they simply don't like.
> a. Like the fact we _do_ move orthogonal to space at the speed of light.
> b. Like the fact the DK effect _does_ measure _all_ people's skill levels.
>
> Steve, just said, through his multiple nyms (which he always replies to!)
> a. Einstein's theory of relativity is "pure gibberish"
> b. The DK effect only measures people at low skill levels
>
> Now, between you and me and any _educated_ person, both those are wrong.
> a. Anyone with _any_ Physics knows we move through time at the speed of c
> b. Anyone with any knowledge of DK knows it covers _all_ skill levels
>
> What I need is someone else, on this ng, who at least has a college degree,
> who isn't stupid like Steve is, to confirm (or deny if they like) those
> facts.
>
> Can you ask your significant other?
> The reason I ask you is two-fold:
> 1. You aren't a wacko like Steve is, and,
> 2. If your significant other has a Physics degree, that shows intelligence
>
> I am _desperate_ to find someone, anyone, on this ng that owns intelligence.
> Let _them_ confirm or deny the basic obvious facts I've stated that Steve
> outright denies exists.
>
> a. Steve denies Einstein's theory of relativity even exists, and,
> b. Steve denies that the DK effect covers people of all skill levels.
>
> I need this to help prove my main point in this thread, which is always:
> *Those most ignorant are the ones trying to take away our rights*
>

Couldn’t she just post a picture of some old physics books?

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 09:25:34 -0000 (UTC), Hank Rogers wrote:

> Couldn�t she just post a picture of some old physics books?

Every time a fact is asked for, the kindergarten kids respond as Hank did.

On 2/15/2022 1:25 AM, Hank Rogers wrote:

<snip>

> Couldn’t she just post a picture of some old physics books?

LOL, she can use this one: <https://tinyurl.com/physicstextbookpile>.

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:44:06 -0800, sms wrote:

>> Couldn�t she just post a picture of some old physics books?
>
> LOL, she can use this one: <https://tinyurl.com/physicstextbookpile>.

Every response from Steve shows he owns the mind of a kindergarten child.