Appreciate your efforts.

On 07/08/2021 10:18, azirona wrote:
> Appreciate your efforts.
>

You're welcome. Any request and feedback are appreciated.

Sincerely

--
Ivo Gandolfo

Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
> Any request and feedback are appreciated.

I keep getting "Badword" when I write more than a few paragraphs,
where I can't for the life of me figure out WHAT the badword is.

For example, I often get "Badword" errors on a multi-paragraph article, but
I can break it into two or three two paragraph articles and it works every
time - without changing ANYTHING else - so it must be something secret that
is repeated (maybe a certain keyword like "bugs"?) that is considered a
"Badword" in the paganini.bofh.team:119 server.

But other than that, I too appreciate access to posting to text newsgroups!

Thanks!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bastard_Operator_From_Hell
--
Please wear your mask!
Bugs are everywhere. :)
!__!
(@)(@)
\.'||'./
-: :: :-
/'..''..'\

On 13/08/2021 04:06, Bugsy wrote:
> I keep getting "Badword" when I write more than a few paragraphs,
> where I can't for the life of me figure out WHAT the badword is.
>
> For example, I often get "Badword" errors on a multi-paragraph article, but
> I can break it into two or three two paragraph articles and it works every
> time - without changing ANYTHING else - so it must be something secret that
> is repeated (maybe a certain keyword like "bugs"?) that is considered a
> "Badword" in the paganini.bofh.team:119 server.
>

This is very strange, I mean you get the "Badword" error, as checking my
log's I have verified and the reject of the messages I have in spool are
for other reasons, for example:

Aug 11 19:54:29 paganini nnrpd[1323926]: filter: Error 8: Missing
Followup-To header

Aug 11 20:37:19 paganini nnrpd[1323926]: filter: Error 6: Too many
groups in Newsgroups header

Aug 12 21:46:45 paganini nnrpd[1811375]: filter: Error 1: Control
messages are fobidden

I don't know if is you (i don't save other than the reason of the
reject) but it's the only reject I have found on the server.

Please report with screenshot the error you receive and send to my email
with date and hour and I will check, thank's.

Sincerely

--
Ivo Gandolfo

In article <sf580n$1uass$1@paganini.bofh.team>
Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>
> On 13/08/2021 04:06, Bugsy wrote:
> > I keep getting "Badword" when I write more than a few paragraphs,
> > where I can't for the life of me figure out WHAT the badword is.
> >
> > For example, I often get "Badword" errors on a multi-paragraph article, but
> > I can break it into two or three two paragraph articles and it works every
> > time - without changing ANYTHING else - so it must be something secret that
> > is repeated (maybe a certain keyword like "bugs"?) that is considered a
> > "Badword" in the paganini.bofh.team:119 server.
> >
>
> This is very strange, I mean you get the "Badword" error, as checking my
> log's I have verified and the reject of the messages I have in spool are
> for other reasons, for example:
>
> Aug 11 19:54:29 paganini nnrpd[1323926]: filter: Error 8: Missing
> Followup-To header
>
> Aug 11 20:37:19 paganini nnrpd[1323926]: filter: Error 6: Too many
> groups in Newsgroups header
>
> Aug 12 21:46:45 paganini nnrpd[1811375]: filter: Error 1: Control
> messages are fobidden
>
> I don't know if is you (i don't save other than the reason of the
> reject) but it's the only reject I have found on the server.
>
> Please report with screenshot the error you receive and send to my email
> with date and hour and I will check, thank's.

I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
are no bad words in it.

On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
> I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
> are no bad words in it.
>

Hi Nomen,

I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, from
yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.

I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a rule
for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell into
it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
carelessness :P

You can post it now.

Sincerely.

Ivo

On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:46:29 +0200, Ivo Gandolfo
<usenet@bofh.team> wrote:

>On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>
>> I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
>> are no bad words in it.
>>
>
>Hi Nomen,
>
>I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, from
>yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.
>
>I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a rule
>for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell into
>it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
>carelessness :P
>
>You can post it now.
>
>Sincerely.
>
>Ivo

Just what we do not need - censors who do not understand how to
use their own censorship tools, let alone what constitutes free
speech which Usenet formerly embraced.

Go away and take your censorship with you!

On 15/08/2021 21:17, Jackson Sprat wrote:
> Just what we do not need - censors who do not understand how to
> use their own censorship tools, let alone what constitutes free
> speech which Usenet formerly embraced.
>
> Go away and take your censorship with you!
>

On 14/08/2021 20:14, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote:
> Why do you need filters in open newsgroups?. Where is that thing called
> "free speech" which you guys claim to support? The newsgroups have
> broken down because of filters applied by news-masters when these should
> be done by users them selves. Users should decide what they want to read
> and what they don;t like and they can use filters in their news-client.
>

1) Usenet was born as an anarchist, but it is up to the individual
newsmaster to decide what to bring to his server. The common thought is
"my home, my rules". And hierarchies (alt.* free.* etc) with their own
rules were also born on this philosophy. And many rules are not
respected today. If you don't like that, nobody forbids you to buy a
server, install INN on it, and then ask for a peering. But don't assume
that all newsmasters accept what you send them passively. The same rule
is applied to the internet itself by ISPs. If a provider doesn't like
traffic to/from Netflix, it bans it and all its users can't see it. But
I don't see popular masses rising up about it. If that ISP loses users
it could be for that reason, but it is its commercial or state policy
(see China that filters almost everything through the Great Wall
Firewall). I don't see you complaining because not all newsserver
carrying binary group, why? censorship anyone?

2) Given the previous point, and some people who have been vilified
through posts from my server and made me write a letter from their
lawyers, I preferred to put a filter upstream in order to block these
abuses in the bud to keep the concept of open server. I don't linke to
put mandatory login on my server and I don't like spending days in court
or paying a lawyer to defend me because an anonymous user who uses TOR
has insulted or dishonored someone on Usenet with my server. And where I
live, unfortunately, I am jointly and severally liable with those who
defame. Unfortunately, not everyone has USA First and Fourth Amendment
protection. My server have the rule of: you can read/write, without
exception, but just follow the netiquette. If you don't like it feel
free to use Gnews, he accept any type of shit you send. But don't
pretend of any user read you, a lot of newsmaster filter the path of
gnews because arriving a lot of spam and some other shit. He(she?)
protect own home, you can't complain about that.

3) https://xkcd.com/1357/

4) Someone once said that defending a position by citing free speech is
sort of the ultimate concession, you're saying that the most compelling
thing you can say for your position is that it's not literally illegal
to express. And I add: in your state, not in mine. You have right of
free speech, but don't ask me to listen you, or carry your idea's. I
don't like spam, heavy insult or defamation, etc.
If you need to use insults, slander etc for your ideas you are not only
in the wrong place (Usenet) but planet, solar system, universe, etc.

And last but not least:
5) https://i.imgur.com/U7P5lA6.png

Sincerely

--
Ivo Gandolfo

On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:36:52 +0200, Ivo Gandolfo
<usenet@bofh.team> wrote:

>On 15/08/2021 21:17, Jackson Sprat wrote:
>> Just what we do not need - censors who do not understand how to
>> use their own censorship tools, let alone what constitutes free
>> speech which Usenet formerly embraced.
>>
>> Go away and take your censorship with you!
>>
>
>On 14/08/2021 20:14, ? Good Guy ? wrote:
> > Why do you need filters in open newsgroups?. Where is that thing called
> > "free speech" which you guys claim to support? The newsgroups have
> > broken down because of filters applied by news-masters when these should
> > be done by users them selves. Users should decide what they want to read
> > and what they don;t like and they can use filters in their news-client.
> >
>
>1) Usenet was born as an anarchist, but it is up to the individual
>newsmaster to decide what to bring to his server. The common thought is
>"my home, my rules". And hierarchies (alt.* free.* etc) with their own
>rules were also born on this philosophy. And many rules are not
>respected today. If you don't like that, nobody forbids you to buy a
>server, install INN on it, and then ask for a peering. But don't assume
>that all newsmasters accept what you send them passively. The same rule
>is applied to the internet itself by ISPs. If a provider doesn't like
>traffic to/from Netflix, it bans it and all its users can't see it. But
>I don't see popular masses rising up about it. If that ISP loses users
>it could be for that reason, but it is its commercial or state policy
>(see China that filters almost everything through the Great Wall
>Firewall). I don't see you complaining because not all newsserver
>carrying binary group, why? censorship anyone?
>
>2) Given the previous point, and some people who have been vilified
>through posts from my server and made me write a letter from their
>lawyers, I preferred to put a filter upstream in order to block these
>abuses in the bud to keep the concept of open server. I don't linke to
>put mandatory login on my server and I don't like spending days in court
>or paying a lawyer to defend me because an anonymous user who uses TOR
>has insulted or dishonored someone on Usenet with my server. And where I
>live, unfortunately, I am jointly and severally liable with those who
>defame. Unfortunately, not everyone has USA First and Fourth Amendment
>protection. My server have the rule of: you can read/write, without
>exception, but just follow the netiquette. If you don't like it feel
>free to use Gnews, he accept any type of shit you send. But don't
>pretend of any user read you, a lot of newsmaster filter the path of
>gnews because arriving a lot of spam and some other shit. He(she?)
>protect own home, you can't complain about that.
>
>3) https://xkcd.com/1357/
>
>4) Someone once said that defending a position by citing free speech is
>sort of the ultimate concession, you're saying that the most compelling
>thing you can say for your position is that it's not literally illegal
>to express. And I add: in your state, not in mine. You have right of
>free speech, but don't ask me to listen you, or carry your idea's. I
>don't like spam, heavy insult or defamation, etc.
>If you need to use insults, slander etc for your ideas you are not only
>in the wrong place (Usenet) but planet, solar system, universe, etc.
>
>And last but not least:
>5) https://i.imgur.com/U7P5lA6.png
>
>Sincerely

You, sir, are a typical, woke, control freak. It is ironic that
such a control freak decides to run an NNTP.

Seems to me it is tantamount to a vegetarian sitting down to
eat a nice big steak.

So, why WOULD a control freak choose to run an NNTP as
a means to exert his censorship wont? The answer might well be
that such an individual wishes to make a big enough disturbance
that he gets noticed for the first time in his life.

GO AWAY ATTENTION WHORE! Find some other toy to destroy.

jacksprat@kewlmail.com wrote:
[...]
> GO AWAY ATTENTION WHORE! Find some other toy to destroy.

Hey look, Gerk made an accidental funny!

Steve <lammasland@gmail.com> wrote:

> jacksprat@kewlmail.com wrote:
> [...]
> > GO AWAY ATTENTION WHORE! Find some other toy to destroy.
>
> Hey look, Gerk made an accidental funny!

lol

--
^Ï^ <https://youtu.be/_kqytf31a8E>

My pet rock Gordon just is.

On 14 Aug 2021, =?UTF-8?B?8J+YiSBHb29kIEd1eSDwn5iJ?=
<Hello.World@example.onion> posted some
news:sf9199$jnu$1@news.mixmin.net:

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
> I have used 21st century technology to compose this post to make it
> easier for people to read the message in hypertext. I used a DELL
> keyboard to compose this message.
>

--
That was very kind of you to make the effort.

In article <sf8s16$2gkom$1@paganini.bofh.team>
Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>
> On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> >
> > I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
> > are no bad words in it.
> >
>
> Hi Nomen,
>
> I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, from
> yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.
>
> I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a rule
> for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell into
> it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
> carelessness :P
>
> You can post it now.
>
> Sincerely.
>
> Ivo

Thank you for the service you provide : )

On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:26:04 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

>In article <sf8s16$2gkom$1@paganini.bofh.team>
>Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>>
>> On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>> >
>> > I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
>> > are no bad words in it.
>> >
>>
>> Hi Nomen,
>>
>> I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, from
>> yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.
>>
>> I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a rule
>> for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell into
>> it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
>> carelessness :P
>>
>> You can post it now.
>>
>> Sincerely.
>>
>> Ivo
>
>Thank you for the service you provide : )

Yah, right. The more word police, the better. That's the ticket.

Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:26:04 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
><nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <sf8s16$2gkom$1@paganini.bofh.team>
>>Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
>>> > are no bad words in it.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Hi Nomen,
>>>
>>> I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, from
>>> yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.
>>>
>>> I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a rule
>>> for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell into
>>> it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
>>> carelessness :P
>>>
>>> You can post it now.
>>>
>>> Sincerely.
>>>
>>> Ivo
>>
>>Thank you for the service you provide : )
>
>Yah, right. The more word police, the better. That's the ticket.

Jesus. You've got quoted-printable set, as reported in your MIME
headers. Non-stop whining and Q-P. What next, you'll start posting in
HTML?

On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:33:59 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:26:04 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
>><nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <sf8s16$2gkom$1@paganini.bofh.team>
>>>Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
>>>> > are no bad words in it.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Hi Nomen,
>>>>
>>>> I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, from
>>>> yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.
>>>>
>>>> I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a rule
>>>> for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell into
>>>> it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
>>>> carelessness :P
>>>>
>>>> You can post it now.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely.
>>>>
>>>> Ivo
>>>
>>>Thank you for the service you provide : )
>>
>>Yah, right. The more word police, the better. That's the ticket.
>
>Jesus. You've got quoted-printable set, as reported in your MIME
>headers. Non-stop whining and Q-P. What next, you'll start posting in
>HTML?

What? Your 11 year old client cannot handle it? Can you even
see, let alone duplicate this: ®

So, you are for word policing AND character set policing?
You should move to China and join the CCP.

'Followup-To: alt.dev.null' laughed at.

Note: I attempted to set Followup-To an appropriate newsgroup, but
alt.hebetudinous.addlepated.twit.spooge.whine-simper-bleat isn't created
locally.

Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:33:59 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:26:04 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
>>><nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <sf8s16$2gkom$1@paganini.bofh.team>
>>>>Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
>>>>> > are no bad words in it.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Nomen,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, =
>from
>>>>> yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a =
>rule
>>>>> for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell =
>into
>>>>> it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
>>>>> carelessness :P
>>>>>
>>>>> You can post it now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ivo
>>>>
>>>>Thank you for the service you provide : )
>>>
>>>Yah, right. The more word police, the better. That's the ticket.
>>
>>Jesus. You've got quoted-printable set, as reported in your MIME
>>headers. Non-stop whining and Q-P. What next, you'll start posting in
>>HTML?
>
>What? Your 11 year old client cannot handle it?

The newsreader handles it just fine, by passing it to the terminal.
Terminal handles it just fine.

The bit that's not just fine is you being an idiot posting in Q-P, given
that Usenet has always been 8-bit clean.

>Can you even
>see, let alone duplicate this: =AE =20

>So, you are for word policing AND character set policing?=20
>You should move to China and join the CCP.

I said nothing about your character set nor your words. My we do have a
huge reading comprehension problem.

>'Followup-To: alt.dev.null' laughed at.

On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:55:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>Note: I attempted to set Followup-To an appropriate newsgroup, but
>alt.hebetudinous.addlepated.twit.spooge.whine-simper-bleat isn't created
>locally.
>
>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:33:59 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:26:04 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
>>>><nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In article <sf8s16$2gkom$1@paganini.bofh.team>
>>>>>Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
>>>>>> > are no bad words in it.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Nomen,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, >>from
>>>>>> yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a >>rule
>>>>>> for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell >>into
>>>>>> it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
>>>>>> carelessness :P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can post it now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sincerely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ivo
>>>>>
>>>>>Thank you for the service you provide : )
>>>>
>>>>Yah, right. The more word police, the better. That's the ticket.
>>>
>>>Jesus. You've got quoted-printable set, as reported in your MIME
>>>headers. Non-stop whining and Q-P. What next, you'll start posting in
>>>HTML?
>>
>>What? Your 11 year old client cannot handle it?
>
>The newsreader handles it just fine, by passing it to the terminal.
>Terminal handles it just fine.

Liar, see below.

>The bit that's not just fine is you being an idiot posting in Q-P, given
>that Usenet has always been 8-bit clean.
>
>>Can you even
>>see, let alone duplicate this: =AE =20

Handles it just fine? LOL. Instead of seeing a legitimate
registered trademark symbol, your POS sees and displays
'=AE =20' instead'

How useless!

I would consider using HTML but I am no Jeff Relf...

Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:55:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>>Note: I attempted to set Followup-To an appropriate newsgroup, but
>>alt.hebetudinous.addlepated.twit.spooge.whine-simper-bleat isn't created
>>locally.
>>
>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:33:59 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>>><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:26:04 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
>>>>><nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <sf8s16$2gkom$1@paganini.bofh.team>
>>>>>>Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
>>>>>>> > are no bad words in it.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Nomen,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, =
>>>from
>>>>>>> yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a =
>>>rule
>>>>>>> for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell =
>>>into
>>>>>>> it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
>>>>>>> carelessness :P
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can post it now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sincerely.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ivo
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thank you for the service you provide : )
>>>>>
>>>>>Yah, right. The more word police, the better. That's the ticket.
>>>>
>>>>Jesus. You've got quoted-printable set, as reported in your MIME
>>>>headers. Non-stop whining and Q-P. What next, you'll start posting in
>>>>HTML?
>>>
>>>What? Your 11 year old client cannot handle it?
>>
>>The newsreader handles it just fine, by passing it to the terminal.
>>Terminal handles it just fine.
>
>Liar, see below.
>
>>The bit that's not just fine is you being an idiot posting in Q-P, given
>>that Usenet has always been 8-bit clean.
>>
>>>Can you even
>>>see, let alone duplicate this: =AE =20

>Handles it just fine?

Just because you're an idiot doesn't mean I'm obligated to decode it.

LOL. Instead of seeing a legitimate
>registered trademark symbol, your POS sees and displays
>'=AE =20' instead'
>
>How useless!
>
>I would consider using HTML but I am no Jeff Relf...

On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:44:32 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:55:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Note: I attempted to set Followup-To an appropriate newsgroup, but
>>>alt.hebetudinous.addlepated.twit.spooge.whine-simper-bleat isn't created
>>>locally.
>>>
>>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:33:59 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>>>><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:26:04 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
>>>>>><nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In article <sf8s16$2gkom$1@paganini.bofh.team>
>>>>>>>Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
>>>>>>>> > are no bad words in it.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Nomen,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, >>>>from
>>>>>>>> yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a >>>>rule
>>>>>>>> for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell >>>>into
>>>>>>>> it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
>>>>>>>> carelessness :P
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can post it now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sincerely.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ivo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thank you for the service you provide : )
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yah, right. The more word police, the better. That's the ticket.
>>>>>
>>>>>Jesus. You've got quoted-printable set, as reported in your MIME
>>>>>headers. Non-stop whining and Q-P. What next, you'll start posting in
>>>>>HTML?
>>>>
>>>>What? Your 11 year old client cannot handle it?
>>>
>>>The newsreader handles it just fine, by passing it to the terminal.
>>>Terminal handles it just fine.
>>
>>Liar, see below.
>>
>>>The bit that's not just fine is you being an idiot posting in Q-P, given
>>>that Usenet has always been 8-bit clean.
>>>
>>>>Can you even
>>>>see, let alone duplicate this: =AE =20
>
>>Handles it just fine?
>
>Just because you're an idiot doesn't mean I'm obligated to decode it.
>
>LOL. Instead of seeing a legitimate
>>registered trademark symbol, your POS sees and displays
>>'=AE =20' instead'
>>
>>How useless!
>>
>>I would consider using HTML but I am no Jeff Relf...
>

And your obsolete client does not seem to handle attribution
worth a shit either.

Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:44:32 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:55:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>>><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Note: I attempted to set Followup-To an appropriate newsgroup, but
>>>>alt.hebetudinous.addlepated.twit.spooge.whine-simper-bleat isn't created
>>>>locally.
>>>>
>>>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:33:59 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>>>>><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:26:04 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
>>>>>>><nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In article <sf8s16$2gkom$1@paganini.bofh.team>
>>>>>>>>Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
>>>>>>>>> > are no bad words in it.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Nomen,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, =
>>>>>from
>>>>>>>>> yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a =
>>>>>rule
>>>>>>>>> for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell =
>>>>>into
>>>>>>>>> it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
>>>>>>>>> carelessness :P
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can post it now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sincerely.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ivo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Thank you for the service you provide : )
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yah, right. The more word police, the better. That's the ticket.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Jesus. You've got quoted-printable set, as reported in your MIME
>>>>>>headers. Non-stop whining and Q-P. What next, you'll start posting in
>>>>>>HTML?
>>>>>
>>>>>What? Your 11 year old client cannot handle it?
>>>>
>>>>The newsreader handles it just fine, by passing it to the terminal.
>>>>Terminal handles it just fine.
>>>
>>>Liar, see below.
>>>
>>>>The bit that's not just fine is you being an idiot posting in Q-P, given
>>>>that Usenet has always been 8-bit clean.
>>>>
>>>>>Can you even
>>>>>see, let alone duplicate this: =AE =20
>>
>>>Handles it just fine?
>>
>>Just because you're an idiot doesn't mean I'm obligated to decode it.
>>
>>LOL. Instead of seeing a legitimate
>>>registered trademark symbol, your POS sees and displays
>>>'=AE =20' instead'
>>>
>>>How useless!
>>>
>>>I would consider using HTML but I am no Jeff Relf...
>>
>
>And your obsolete client does not seem to handle attribution
>worth a shit either.

hi seamus

I'm attributing it all to you.

On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:50:59 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:44:32 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:55:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>>>><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Note: I attempted to set Followup-To an appropriate newsgroup, but
>>>>>alt.hebetudinous.addlepated.twit.spooge.whine-simper-bleat isn't created
>>>>>locally.
>>>>>
>>>>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:33:59 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>>>>>><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:26:04 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
>>>>>>>><nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In article <sf8s16$2gkom$1@paganini.bofh.team>
>>>>>>>>>Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
>>>>>>>>>> > are no bad words in it.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Nomen,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, >>>>>>from
>>>>>>>>>> yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a >>>>>>rule
>>>>>>>>>> for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell >>>>>>into
>>>>>>>>>> it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
>>>>>>>>>> carelessness :P
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You can post it now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ivo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Thank you for the service you provide : )
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Yah, right. The more word police, the better. That's the ticket.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Jesus. You've got quoted-printable set, as reported in your MIME
>>>>>>>headers. Non-stop whining and Q-P. What next, you'll start posting in
>>>>>>>HTML?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What? Your 11 year old client cannot handle it?
>>>>>
>>>>>The newsreader handles it just fine, by passing it to the terminal.
>>>>>Terminal handles it just fine.
>>>>
>>>>Liar, see below.
>>>>
>>>>>The bit that's not just fine is you being an idiot posting in Q-P, given
>>>>>that Usenet has always been 8-bit clean.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Can you even
>>>>>>see, let alone duplicate this: =AE =20
>>>
>>>>Handles it just fine?
>>>
>>>Just because you're an idiot doesn't mean I'm obligated to decode it.
>>>
>>>LOL. Instead of seeing a legitimate
>>>>registered trademark symbol, your POS sees and displays
>>>>'=AE =20' instead'
>>>>
>>>>How useless!
>>>>
>>>>I would consider using HTML but I am no Jeff Relf...
>>>
>>
>>And your obsolete client does not seem to handle attribution
>>worth a shit either.
>
>hi seamus
>
>I'm attributing it all to you.

Who is "seamus", KoOky? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.

On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:17:10 -0400, Jackson Sprat
<jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:46:29 +0200, Ivo Gandolfo
><usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>
>>On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>
>>> I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
>>> are no bad words in it.
>>>
>>
>>Hi Nomen,
>>
>>I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, from
>>yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.
>>
>>I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a rule
>>for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell into
>>it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
>>carelessness :P
>>
>>You can post it now.
>>
>>Sincerely.
>>
>>Ivo
>
>Just what we do not need - censors who do not understand how to
>use their own censorship tools, let alone what constitutes free
>speech which Usenet formerly embraced.
>
>Go away and take your censorship with you!

Faggot.. you gag on others' balls.

On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:48:45 -0400, Jackson Sprat
<jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:50:59 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:44:32 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>>><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:55:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>>>>><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Note: I attempted to set Followup-To an appropriate newsgroup, but
>>>>>>alt.hebetudinous.addlepated.twit.spooge.whine-simper-bleat isn't created
>>>>>>locally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:33:59 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>>>>>>><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Jackson Sprat <jacksprat@kewlmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:26:04 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
>>>>>>>>><nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>In article <sf8s16$2gkom$1@paganini.bofh.team>
>>>>>>>>>>Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/08/2021 09:43, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > I am experiencing the same problem 441 bad word in body. There
>>>>>>>>>>> > are no bad words in it.
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Nomen,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have check my log's and found same message posted three time's, =
>>>>>>>from
>>>>>>>>>>> yesterday to today, from a tor-exit node.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have analize the log's and found the rule block them. I wrote a =
>>>>>>>rule
>>>>>>>>>>> for the filter with too much carelessness, and that message fell =
>>>>>>>into
>>>>>>>>>>> it. I apologize, now I have corrected the rule, but I doubt for the
>>>>>>>>>>> carelessness :P
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You can post it now.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ivo
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Thank you for the service you provide : )
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Yah, right. The more word police, the better. That's the ticket.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Jesus. You've got quoted-printable set, as reported in your MIME
>>>>>>>>headers. Non-stop whining and Q-P. What next, you'll start posting in
>>>>>>>>HTML?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What? Your 11 year old client cannot handle it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The newsreader handles it just fine, by passing it to the terminal.
>>>>>>Terminal handles it just fine.
>>>>>
>>>>>Liar, see below.
>>>>>
>>>>>>The bit that's not just fine is you being an idiot posting in Q-P, given
>>>>>>that Usenet has always been 8-bit clean.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Can you even
>>>>>>>see, let alone duplicate this: =AE =20
>>>>
>>>>>Handles it just fine?
>>>>
>>>>Just because you're an idiot doesn't mean I'm obligated to decode it.
>>>>
>>>>LOL. Instead of seeing a legitimate
>>>>>registered trademark symbol, your POS sees and displays
>>>>>'=AE =20' instead'
>>>>>
>>>>>How useless!
>>>>>
>>>>>I would consider using HTML but I am no Jeff Relf...
>>>>
>>>
>>>And your obsolete client does not seem to handle attribution
>>>worth a shit either.
>>
>>hi seamus
>>
>>I'm attributing it all to you.
>
>Who is "seamus", KoOky? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>that alias.

Faggot.. how many times a day do you suck someone's dick?