Message-ID:

You may call me by my name, Wirth, or by my value, Worth. -- Nicklaus Wirth

computers / comp.sys.mac.system / Mac Studio performance

Mac Studio performance

<slrnt6q3f5.ngt.g.kreme@zephyrus.local>

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=14242&group=comp.sys.mac.system#14242

copy link Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!kreme.dont-email.me!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: g.kr...@kreme.dont-email.me (Lewis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Mac Studio performance
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:22:29 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Miskatonic U
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <slrnt6q3f5.ngt.g.kreme@zephyrus.local>
Reply-To: g.kreme@gmail.don-t-email-me.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:22:29 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: kreme.dont-email.me; posting-host="fd2da22bb4adec4a26d6b1f6bf5a46d3";
logging-data="32627"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18lpJGOoQrvF5Br3+UmjYoM"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZpY01CLGv5BaDWZORKKwXELWfX4=
X-Face: )^b5"R:T7U>9~:PEn3YkzMfW*[b1qKeU.fP9C8~8HpU9}lA&6`bH1z
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett

by: Lewis - Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:22 UTC

The second chart here is hilarious.

<http://hrtapps.com/blogs/20220427/>
"Performance of the Mac Studio is actually off the chart here. Before it
went off the chart, the Mac Studio’s 6-core performance caught up to the
full 28-core performance of the Mac Pro and then surpassed it."

Then there's the THIRD chart.

Suck it, Intel.

--
"Are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
"I think so, Brain, but Tuesday Weld isn't a complete sentence."

Re: Mac Studio performance

<t4jt2t$l32$1@dont-email.me>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=14243&group=comp.sys.mac.system#14243

copy link Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nuh...@nope.com (Alan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Mac Studio performance
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:53:30 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <t4jt2t$l32$1@dont-email.me>
References: <slrnt6q3f5.ngt.g.kreme@zephyrus.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 17:53:33 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f8212ab47e9a43e06cd6337e655fe5a8";
logging-data="21602"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18btPlF0zEuAuT7UcBlaMnrtymYIdauJnc="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+d4F8O25wzDUXrG2K/Fj715Oa00=
In-Reply-To: <slrnt6q3f5.ngt.g.kreme@zephyrus.local>
Content-Language: en-CA

by: Alan - Sat, 30 Apr 2022 17:53 UTC

On 2022-04-30 3:22 a.m., Lewis wrote:
> The second chart here is hilarious.
>
> <http://hrtapps.com/blogs/20220427/>
> "Performance of the Mac Studio is actually off the chart here. Before it
> went off the chart, the Mac Studio’s 6-core performance caught up to the
> full 28-core performance of the Mac Pro and then surpassed it."
>
> Then there's the THIRD chart.
>
> Suck it, Intel.
>

Saw this already...

....but what I really want to know is how they fooled this former winner
of NASA's Software of the Year Award into believing that these are
really Apple processors.

;-)

Subject	Author
Mac Studio performance	Lewis
Re: Mac Studio performance	Alan