On 2023-10-05, Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
>
>>> Blah blah blah blah
>>
>> "WAHHHHH!!!! He huwt my feewings!"
>
> Such an adult these iKooks like Jolly Roger are...
>
> What's no longer shocking is how deathly afraid iKooks are of facts.

Cry harder, weakling. 🤣

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

On 2023-10-05, Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
>
>>>> such a clown
>>>
>>> Blah blah blah blah
>>
>> Cry harder, Arlen.
>
> It's no longer shocking that the iKooks blah blah blah

It's no longer shocking that Arlen still can't provide a source for his
made-up words he attributes to Apple. Arlen is ever the shit-talking
child.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

On 2023-10-05, Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> Dorper <usenet@dorper.me> wrote
>
>>> HINT: Think about the primitive release mechanism that only iOS uses.
>>
>> Rapid Security Response?
>
> It's good you're aware of the RSR as the iKooks are _still_ unaware of it!

Actually, everyone is aware of it.

> I'm the one who first brought it up on this newsgroup

Obvious lie. 🤣

In reality, *Hemidactylus* was the first person to mention Apple's RSR
updates on this newsgroup in 2023:

<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/VdyhxbaZ9gg/m/sgqXuyhtAQAJ>

Arlen years go by *very* quickly, you guys. *Way* faster than dog years
- much more like gnat years. 😉

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>
>> Time for the resident troll to circle jerk with his sock drawer.
>
> You hate me, Hemidactyulus... *because you fear me*.
> You fear all facts about Apple products, Hemidactylus. Don't you.
>
> So be it.
>
> You fear anyone who informs you of the truth about Apple products.
>
> Your entire goal in life - is to remain ignorant of the truth.
> By me bringing the truth to you - I ruin your pleasant life.
>
> So be it.
>
> My goal is to bring an adult conversation to these child-like Apple
> newsgroups in terms of the truth behind what Apple says & what they do.
>
> What's no longer shocking is how deathly afraid low-IQ uneducated ignorant
> religious-zealot iKooks are of the simple truths about Apple products.
>
> a. Apple fucked up with the defective iPhone 15 product line;
> b. Apple forgot to test the defective iPhone 15 product line;
> c. When Apple was forced to test the defective iPhone 15 product line,
> Apple found multiple and rather embarrassingly diverse causative bugs.
>
> Worse... Apple has blamed everyone but Apple for the defective iPhones.
>
> That's the truth, right?
> *Why are you so deathly _afraid_ of those simple truths, Hemidactylus?*
>
> What is going to be interesting, for adults to ponder, is how Apple reduced
> performance since we know Apple's laywers have already couched that fact.
>
> A. Apple publicly said they'll try to limit the *long-term* impact;
> B. Apple said they'll try to not limit the *top performance* impact;
> C. And Apple said there won't be an *A17 Pro chip performance* reduction.
>
> That's the truth, right?
> *Why are you so deathly _afraid_ of these simple truths, Hemidactylus?*

Hey jackass, I purposely posted my OP to the misc.phone.mobile.iphone group
as that’s where it was relevant. Look at the title “iOS 17.0.3 has
dropped”. You masturbatorily megaphoned yourself by adding comp.mobile.ipad
and comp.sys.mac.advocacy.

Then you reply to Dorper’s post on this thread on Jolly Roger’s “iOS 17.0.3
does not throttle & Instagram's app update fixes overheating”. Proof you
are exhibiting dysfunctional symptoms and are totally unhinged due to your
psychotic obsession with Apple that is addling your brain. Given the amount
of output across groups meth binging cannot be ruled out. Check yourself
into some program that prevents your access to the internet and to whatever
chemical stimulants cause you to spew such worthless repetitive bilge in
excess.

On 10/5/23, 10:21 AM, in article ufmrap$121r4$1@dont-email.me, "Wally J"
<walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:

> Dorper <usenet@dorper.me> wrote
>
>> Dude you repeating "iOS has 3x the zero days" does not make it true.
>
> "Dude" (or, if you're female... "Bitch")... those were 17 _exploited_ zero
> day holes, and yes, everyone but you knows this - as it's simply a fact.
>
> The fact you're completely unaware of facts doesn't make them not facts.
>
> I quoted exactly where that came from so many times that for you to
> _remain_ completely ignorant of every fact about Apple, means you haven't
> clicked on a single reference that has been provided to you on this topic.
>
> If I provide a reference, please do not say that the reference doesn't
> exist simply because you don't like what the reference is telling you.
>
> That's probably 90% of all the iKooks' posts in this newsgroup, Dorper.
> *They _hate_ facts - so they simply deny the existence of all facts.*
>
> I was hoping you'd be more intelligent than the iKooks are, Dorper.
>
> BTW, there's a reason Apple has so many zero-day exploits, Dorper.
>
> <https://www.securityweek.com/apple-warns-of-newly-exploited-ios-17-kernel-zer
> o-day/>
> "This is the 16th documented in-the-wild zero-day against Apple's iOS,
> iPadOS and macOS-powered devices, according to data tracked by
> SecurityWeek."
>
> Although the number is apparently 17 according to SecurityWeek themselves.
>
> <https://cybersecurityworldconference.com/2023/10/04/apple-fixed-the-17th-zero
> -day-flaw-exploited-in-attacks/>
>
> And others... so the 16 active exploits may just be date related.
> <https://thehackernews.com/2023/10/apple-rolls-out-security-patches-for.html>
> "With the new development, Apple has addressed a total of 17 actively
> exploited zero-days in its software since the start of the year."
>
> Dorper - if you're going to act like an adult, you have to comprehend facts
> (e.g., you can't claim all bugs are zero-day bugs, for example).
>
> That's the kind of idiocy that the iKooks do.
> Let's hope you are not an iKook for God's sake.
>
> Remember, all adults agree on the facts.
> Only fools disagree on facts - that's why they're fools.
>
> No intelligent discourse can occur until adults agree on facts.
> Only _after_ we agree on facts, can an intelligent conversation ensue.
>
> Do you yet agree that Apple has had 17 zero-day exploits this year, Dorper?
> Yes? or No?
>
> Note: Not all might be iOS though - but most seem to be (if not all).

The issue isn't about if there were 17 zero-day exploits. The issue is that
you say that this is 3x higher than the number of exploits for Android. That
is what everyone is having a problem with. You do ignore vulns that aren't
zero days which isn't fair because they still are risks for users of older
devices and people who have not updated. And for Open Source projects the
term "zero-day" doesn't really make sense.

The zero day exploits published by Android this year:
CVE-2023-4211 (Mali GPU Driver, ARM Holdings)
CVE-2023-35674 (Android, Google)
CVE-2023-4863 (libwebp, Google)
CVE-2023-26083 (Mali GPU Driver, ARM Holdings)
CVE-2023-2136 (Skia, Google)
CVE-2021-29256 (Mali GPU Driver, ARM Holdings)
CVE-2022-22706 (Mali GPU Driver, ARM Holdings)
CVE-2021-22600 (Linux, Linus Torvalds)
CVE-2022-0847 "Dirty Pipe" (Linux, Linus Torvalds)
CVE-2022-38181 (Mali GPU Driver, ARM Holdings)
CVE-2023-21096 (Android, Google)
CVE-2023-20963 (Android, Google)

So that is 12 "zero-days" in AOSP alone.

I believe that you own a Samsung. In a year, Google found 18 *hardware*
"zero-days" unique to Samsung devices:

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/google-finds-18-zero-day-vuln
erabilities-in-samsung-exynos-chipsets/

That brings the total # of "zero-days" for a Samsung device in a year to
around 30.