Yamn4 Remailer Wrote:

blah, blah, blah

this is a Fed's post pumping you for profiling.
don't answer these stupid posts!

On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 00:07:48 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>Yamn4 Remailer Wrote:
>>$remailer{"extropia"} = "<remail@extropia.wimsey.com> cpunk pgp special";
>>$remailer{"portal"} = "<hfinney@shell.portal.com> cpunk pgp hash";
>>$remailer{"alumni"} = "<hal@alumni.caltech.edu> cpunk pgp hash";
>>$remailer{"bsu-cs"} = "<nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> cpunk hash ksub";
>>$remailer{"c2"} = "<remail@c2.org> eric pgp hash reord";
>>$remailer{"penet"} = "<anon@anon.penet.fi> penet post";
>>$remailer{"ideath"} = "<remailer@ideath.goldenbear.com> cpunk hash ksub reord";
>>$remailer{"hacktic"} = "<remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl> cpunk mix pgp hash latent cut post ek";
>>$remailer{"flame"} = "<remailer@flame.alias.net> cpunk mix pgp. hash latent cut post ek reord";
>>$remailer{"rahul"} = "<homer@rahul.net> cpunk pgp hash filter";
>>$remailer{"mix"} = "<mixmaster@remail.obscura.com> cpunk mix pgp hash latent cut ek ksub reord ?";
>>$remailer{"syrinx"} = "<syrinx@c2.org> cpunk pgp hash cut reord mix post";
>>$remailer{"ford"} = "<remailer@bi-node.zerberus.de> cpunk pgp hash ksub";
>>$remailer{"hroller"} = "<hroller@c2.org> cpunk pgp hash latent ek";
>>$remailer{"vishnu"} = "<mixmaster@vishnu.alias.net> cpunk mix pgp. hash latent cut ek ksub reord";
>>$remailer{"robo"} = "<robo@c2.org> cpunk hash mix";
>>$remailer{"replay"} = "<remailer@replay.com> cpunk mix pgp hash latent cut post ek";
>>$remailer{"spook"} = "<remailer@valhalla.phoenix.net> cpunk mix pgp hash latent cut ek reord";
>>$remailer{"rmadillo"} = "<remailer@armadillo.com> mix cpunk pgp hash latent cut";
>>$remailer{"ecafe"} = "<cpunk@remail.ecafe.org> cpunk mix";
>>$remailer{"wmono"} = "<wmono@valhalla.phoenix.net> cpunk mix pgp. hash latent cut ek";
>>$remailer{"shinobi"} = "<remailer@shinobi.alias.net> cpunk mix hash latent cut ek reorder";
>>$remailer{"amnesia"} = "<amnesia@chardos.connix.com> cpunk mix pgp hash latent cut ek ksub";
>>$remailer{"gondolin"} = "<mix@remail.gondolin.org> cpunk mix pgp hash latent cut ek reord";
>>$remailer{'alpha'} = '<alias@alpha.c2.org> alpha pgp';
>>$remailer{'gondonym'} = '<alias@nym.gondolin.org> alpha pgp';
>>Much of the knowledge about the characteristics of these re-mailers is available
>>from <remailer-list@kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu>
>>
>blah, blah, blah
>this is a Fed's post pumping you for profiling.
>don't answer these stupid posts!

why not? using mix or yamn remailers to post on-topic (not spam) articles
to usenet newsgroups is always a welcome contribution . . . and nostalgia
can be fun, 300 baud modem, dos, edlin, telnet, bbs, and the new wordstar:

https://winworldpc.com/product/wordstar/300
>WordStar 3.00
>WordStar, originally from MicroPro, was a popular word processor during the
>early 80s. It was ported to a number of CP/M architectures as well as Unix
>and PC/MS-DOS. It competed directly against many word processors, including
>WordPerfect, Microsoft Word for DOS, and Multimate. By the late 80s most
>business word processing had moved to WordPerfect. In the early 90s, Microsoft
>Word for Windows took over.
>Also see a history of WordStar: A Potted History of WordStar and some earlier
>0.x versions at The WordStar Collection
>Wanted: Pre-1.0 versions were sold publicly. WordStar 0.87 redump, WordStar
>0.89, WordStar 0.91, WordStar 0.92, (Google results indicate these existed)
>WordStar 1.0. Early WordStar 2.0 releases were reported to be copy protected.
>Available releases
> 0.x/1.x
> 2.x
> 3.00 (current)
> 3.30
> for PCjr
> 2000
> 4.0
> 1512
> 5.0
> COLT
> 5.5
> 6
> 1.5 for Windows
> 7
> 2.0 for Windows
>Release notes
>Wanted: Wordstar 3.00 for PC/MS-DOS. Reportedly 3.0 was the first version available for DOS.
>Information
>Product type
> Application Word Processor
>Vendor
> MicroPro
>Release date
> 1982
>Minimum CPU
> Z80
>User interface
> Text
>Platform
> CPM
>Download count
> 35 (1 for release)
>Downloads
>Download name Version Language Architecture File size Downloads
> WordStar 3.00 for CPM Manuals 3.00 for CPM English [Z80] 17.19MB 1
> WordStar 3.00 for CPM-80 (files) 3.00 for CPM-80 English [Z80] 189.76KB 0
> https://winworldpc.com/download/08c3841f-c383-c398-c2b3-11c3a5c28f13
> https://winworldpc.com/download/08c3841f-c383-c398-c2b3-11c3a5c28f13/from/c3ae6ee2-8099-713d-3411-c3a6e280947e
("WordStar 3.00 for CPM-80 (files).7z" ; 188 KB / 192,512 bytes)
> WordStar 3.01 for CPM-80 (1982) (5.25-DSQD) 3.01 for CPM-80 English [Z80] 11.05MB 0
> https://winworldpc.com/download/348b9ab2-df7d-11ec-8dc3-0200008a0da4
> https://winworldpc.com/download/348b9ab2-df7d-11ec-8dc3-0200008a0da4/from/c3ae6ee2-8099-713d-3411-c3a6e280947e
("WordStar 3.01 for CPM-80 (1982) (5.25-DSQD).7z" ; 10.5 MB / 11,055,104 bytes)
> WordStar 3.01 for CPM-80 Manuals (1982) 3.01 for CPM-80 English [Z80] 145.37MB 0
>Comments
[end quote]

Nomen Nescio wrote:

> Yamn4 Remailer Wrote:
>
> blah, blah, blah
>
> this is a Fed's post pumping you for profiling.
> don't answer these stupid posts!
>

You can make profiling more difficult if you write everything in
groups of five and capitalize. Humans can read this, albeit not
so easily, but AI has big problems with it. Hope this helps!