At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.

On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.

Just curious, dick:

Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
"company website) every day...

....or just once a week?

:-)

On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
> > At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
> Just curious, dick:
>
> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
> "company website) every day...
>
> ...or just once a week?
>
> :-)
Maybe every month or two, at the most. Of course, you deflected, dodged the question, so typical of you, dickhead.

On 2024-01-08 14:43, Thomas E. wrote:
> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
>> Just curious, dick:
>>
>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
>> "company website) every day...
>>
>> ...or just once a week?
>>
>> :-)
> Maybe every month or two, at the most. Of course, you deflected, dodged the question, so typical of you, dickhead.

Wow.

You admit to regularly stalking me...

....and you don't think you deserve to be called a "dick".

On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 9:35:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> On 2024-01-08 14:43, Thomas E. wrote:
> > On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> >> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
> >>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
> >> Just curious, dick:
> >>
> >> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
> >> "company website) every day...
> >>
> >> ...or just once a week?
> >>
> >> :-)
> > Maybe every month or two, at the most. Of course, you deflected, dodged the question, so typical of you, dickhead.
> Wow.
>
> You admit to regularly stalking me...
>
> ...and you don't think you deserve to be called a "dick".

Not stalking, exposing your lies. Your only defense is to attempt to discredit the source of truth.

On 2024-01-15 19:48, Thomas E. wrote:
> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 9:35:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>> On 2024-01-08 14:43, Thomas E. wrote:
>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
>>>> Just curious, dick:
>>>>
>>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
>>>> "company website) every day...
>>>>
>>>> ...or just once a week?
>>>>
>>>> :-)
>>> Maybe every month or two, at the most. Of course, you deflected, dodged the question, so typical of you, dickhead.
>> Wow.
>>
>> You admit to regularly stalking me...
>>
>> ...and you don't think you deserve to be called a "dick".
>
> Not stalking, exposing your lies. Your only defense is to attempt to discredit the source of truth.

"Maybe every month or two" you look at my website...

....and goodness knows what else...

....and you don't think that's creepy, dick?

I haven't lied.

Sorry.

On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
> > At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
> Just curious, dick:
>
> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
> "company website) every day...
>
> ...or just once a week?
>
> :-)

Just answer this question, why is bakermedia.ca no longer responding?

On 2024-01-15 19:52, Thomas E. wrote:
> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
>> Just curious, dick:
>>
>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
>> "company website) every day...
>>
>> ...or just once a week?
>>
>> :-)
>
> Just answer this question, why is bakermedia.ca no longer responding?

Just answer this question: Why is it any of your business...

....dick?

On Jan 15, 2024 at 10:50:34 PM EST, "Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

> On 2024-01-15 19:48, Thomas E. wrote:
>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 9:35:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>>> On 2024-01-08 14:43, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and
>>>>>> business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable.
>>>>>> Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a
>>>>>> Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as
>>>>>> an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
>>>>> Just curious, dick:
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
>>>>> "company website) every day...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...or just once a week?
>>>>>
>>>>> :-)
>>>> Maybe every month or two, at the most. Of course, you deflected, dodged the
>>>> question, so typical of you, dickhead.
>>> Wow.
>>>
>>> You admit to regularly stalking me...
>>>
>>> ...and you don't think you deserve to be called a "dick".
>>
>> Not stalking, exposing your lies. Your only defense is to attempt to
>> discredit the source of truth.
>
> "Maybe every month or two" you look at my website...
>
> ...and goodness knows what else...
>
> ...and you don't think that's creepy, dick?
>
> I haven't lied.
>
> Sorry.

Jesus fucking Christ. MUST you 2 ALWAYS perform this dance in public? What
does ANY of this have to do with Macs?

Here is a suggestion: Why don't you 2 get a room and blow each other in
private?

On 2024-01-15 20:57, Tyrone wrote:
> Jesus fucking Christ. MUST you 2 ALWAYS perform this dance in public? What
> does ANY of this have to do with Macs?
>
> Here is a suggestion: Why don't you 2 get a room and blow each other in
> private?

And your contributions to this group have been...?

On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 11:09:06 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> On 2024-01-15 19:52, Thomas E. wrote:
> > On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> >> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
> >>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
> >> Just curious, dick:
> >>
> >> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
> >> "company website) every day...
> >>
> >> ...or just once a week?
> >>
> >> :-)
> >
> > Just answer this question, why is bakermedia.ca no longer responding?
> Just answer this question: Why is it any of your business...
>
> ...dick?

Because you insist on calling me bad names and insulting my honesty. There, I answered your question.

So, I checked your 2 page bakermedia.ca URL on the Wayback site. Pitiful record, pitiful site. The last record was 21 Dec 2021.

So just tell the truth. Is your insulting/consulting business defunct? Well, the insulting part is clearly not, but the rest?

Are you going to force me to show people how to find something you really don't want revealed? Or are you going to be truthful for a change?

On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 12:40:07 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> On 2024-01-15 20:57, Tyrone wrote:
> > Jesus fucking Christ. MUST you 2 ALWAYS perform this dance in public? What
> > does ANY of this have to do with Macs?
> >
> > Here is a suggestion: Why don't you 2 get a room and blow each other in
> > private?
>
> And your contributions to this group have been...?

Sorry you can't see the relevance. Anyway, this group as a Mac vs. Windows discussion died at least a decade ago.

On 2024-01-17 07:49, Thomas E. wrote:
> On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 11:09:06 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>> On 2024-01-15 19:52, Thomas E. wrote:
>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site,
>>>>> and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca,
>>>>> is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time
>>>>> job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting
>>>>> company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP
>>>>> bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
>>>> Just curious, dick:
>>>>
>>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you
>>>> called my "company website) every day...
>>>>
>>>> ...or just once a week?
>>>>
>>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Just answer this question, why is bakermedia.ca no longer
>>> responding?
>> Just answer this question: Why is it any of your business...
>>
>> ...dick?
>
> Because you insist on calling me bad names and insulting my honesty.
> There, I answered your question.

How does that make it your business...

....dick?

You've earned your bad names and you DO lie...

....ALL...

....THE...

....TIME.

>
> So, I checked your 2 page bakermedia.ca URL on the Wayback site.
> Pitiful record, pitiful site. The last record was 21 Dec 2021.
>
> So just tell the truth. Is your insulting/consulting business
> defunct? Well, the insulting part is clearly not, but the rest?
>
> Are you going to force me to show people how to find something you
> really don't want revealed? Or are you going to be truthful for a
> change?

Wow.

Stalking and now you're threatening doxxing, dick?

On Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 11:49:17 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> On 2024-01-17 07:49, Thomas E. wrote:
> > On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 11:09:06 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> >> On 2024-01-15 19:52, Thomas E. wrote:
> >>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> >>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
> >>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site,
> >>>>> and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca,
> >>>>> is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time
> >>>>> job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting
> >>>>> company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP
> >>>>> bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
> >>>> Just curious, dick:
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you
> >>>> called my "company website) every day...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...or just once a week?
> >>>>
> >>>> :-)
> >>>
> >>> Just answer this question, why is bakermedia.ca no longer
> >>> responding?
> >> Just answer this question: Why is it any of your business...
> >>
> >> ...dick?
> >
> > Because you insist on calling me bad names and insulting my honesty.
> > There, I answered your question.
> How does that make it your business...
>
> ...dick?
>
> You've earned your bad names and you DO lie...
>
> ...ALL...
>
> ...THE...
>
> ...TIME.
> >
> > So, I checked your 2 page bakermedia.ca URL on the Wayback site.
> > Pitiful record, pitiful site. The last record was 21 Dec 2021.
> >
> > So just tell the truth. Is your insulting/consulting business
> > defunct? Well, the insulting part is clearly not, but the rest?
> >
> > Are you going to force me to show people how to find something you
> > really don't want revealed? Or are you going to be truthful for a
> > change?
> Wow.
>
> Stalking and now you're threatening doxxing, dick?

Where did I lie in this string of posts? Did I ever lie or just have a different opinion based on facts as I knew them at the time?

On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 10:50:38 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> On 2024-01-15 19:48, Thomas E. wrote:
> > On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 9:35:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> >> On 2024-01-08 14:43, Thomas E. wrote:
> >>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> >>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
> >>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
> >>>> Just curious, dick:
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
> >>>> "company website) every day...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...or just once a week?
> >>>>
> >>>> :-)
> >>> Maybe every month or two, at the most. Of course, you deflected, dodged the question, so typical of you, dickhead.
> >> Wow.
> >>
> >> You admit to regularly stalking me...
> >>
> >> ...and you don't think you deserve to be called a "dick".
> >
> > Not stalking, exposing your lies. Your only defense is to attempt to discredit the source of truth.
> "Maybe every month or two" you look at my website...
>
> ...and goodness knows what else...
>
> ...and you don't think that's creepy, dick?
>
> I haven't lied.
>
> Sorry.

You lie by omission all the time. You simply cannot answer a straightforward question if the answer contradicts the false image you have created of yourself.

On 2024-01-18 07:36, Thomas E. wrote:
> On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 10:50:38 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>> On 2024-01-15 19:48, Thomas E. wrote:
>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 9:35:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>>>> On 2024-01-08 14:43, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
>>>>>> Just curious, dick:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
>>>>>> "company website) every day...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...or just once a week?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :-)
>>>>> Maybe every month or two, at the most. Of course, you deflected, dodged the question, so typical of you, dickhead.
>>>> Wow.
>>>>
>>>> You admit to regularly stalking me...
>>>>
>>>> ...and you don't think you deserve to be called a "dick".
>>>
>>> Not stalking, exposing your lies. Your only defense is to attempt to discredit the source of truth.
>> "Maybe every month or two" you look at my website...
>>
>> ...and goodness knows what else...
>>
>> ...and you don't think that's creepy, dick?
>>
>> I haven't lied.
>>
>> Sorry.
>
> You lie by omission all the time. You simply cannot answer a straightforward question if the answer contradicts the false image you have created of yourself.

Not wanting to answer a question posed by a stalking DICK isn't "lying
by omission...

....Dick.

On 2024-01-18 07:33, Thomas E. wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 11:49:17 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>> On 2024-01-17 07:49, Thomas E. wrote:
>>> On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 11:09:06 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>>>> On 2024-01-15 19:52, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site,
>>>>>>> and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca,
>>>>>>> is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time
>>>>>>> job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting
>>>>>>> company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP
>>>>>>> bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
>>>>>> Just curious, dick:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you
>>>>>> called my "company website) every day...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...or just once a week?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Just answer this question, why is bakermedia.ca no longer
>>>>> responding?
>>>> Just answer this question: Why is it any of your business...
>>>>
>>>> ...dick?
>>>
>>> Because you insist on calling me bad names and insulting my honesty.
>>> There, I answered your question.
>> How does that make it your business...
>>
>> ...dick?
>>
>> You've earned your bad names and you DO lie...
>>
>> ...ALL...
>>
>> ...THE...
>>
>> ...TIME.
>>>
>>> So, I checked your 2 page bakermedia.ca URL on the Wayback site.
>>> Pitiful record, pitiful site. The last record was 21 Dec 2021.
>>>
>>> So just tell the truth. Is your insulting/consulting business
>>> defunct? Well, the insulting part is clearly not, but the rest?
>>>
>>> Are you going to force me to show people how to find something you
>>> really don't want revealed? Or are you going to be truthful for a
>>> change?
>> Wow.
>>
>> Stalking and now you're threatening doxxing, dick?
>
> Where did I lie in this string of posts? Did I ever lie or just have a different opinion based on facts as I knew them at the time?

I note for the record that you don't deny stalking and threatening to
dox me...

....dick.

On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 2:46:07 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> On 2024-01-18 07:36, Thomas E. wrote:
> > On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 10:50:38 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> >> On 2024-01-15 19:48, Thomas E. wrote:
> >>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 9:35:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> >>>> On 2024-01-08 14:43, Thomas E. wrote:
> >>>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
> >>>>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
> >>>>>> Just curious, dick:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
> >>>>>> "company website) every day...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...or just once a week?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> :-)
> >>>>> Maybe every month or two, at the most. Of course, you deflected, dodged the question, so typical of you, dickhead.
> >>>> Wow.
> >>>>
> >>>> You admit to regularly stalking me...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...and you don't think you deserve to be called a "dick".
> >>>
> >>> Not stalking, exposing your lies. Your only defense is to attempt to discredit the source of truth.
> >> "Maybe every month or two" you look at my website...
> >>
> >> ...and goodness knows what else...
> >>
> >> ...and you don't think that's creepy, dick?
> >>
> >> I haven't lied.
> >>
> >> Sorry.
> >
> > You lie by omission all the time. You simply cannot answer a straightforward question if the answer contradicts the false image you have created of yourself.
> Not wanting to answer a question posed by a stalking DICK isn't "lying
> by omission...
>
> ...Dick.

Oh, but yes it is a lie. Your lie is that you are/were supporting yourself as an independent consultant. You have been a full-time employee of a Toronto firm for some time now. Your independent consultancy failed to support you so you became an employee, or at least you claim full-time employment. The bakerMedia site was disappeared. Can't afford the url renewal fee? You claim to be an elite FF driver at the local track, but your record does not support that claim. You have a selfie photo of yourself on your employer's site that in no way resembles your current appearance on LinkedIn. Another lie. In fact when I pointed out that the company photo resembled the unflattering LinkedIn version you changed it to what makes you appear healthier and without scraggly facial hair. Which is the real you?

On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 2:46:41 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> On 2024-01-18 07:33, Thomas E. wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 11:49:17 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> >> On 2024-01-17 07:49, Thomas E. wrote:
> >>> On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 11:09:06 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> >>>> On 2024-01-15 19:52, Thomas E. wrote:
> >>>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
> >>>>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site,
> >>>>>>> and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca,
> >>>>>>> is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time
> >>>>>>> job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting
> >>>>>>> company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP
> >>>>>>> bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
> >>>>>> Just curious, dick:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you
> >>>>>> called my "company website) every day...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...or just once a week?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just answer this question, why is bakermedia.ca no longer
> >>>>> responding?
> >>>> Just answer this question: Why is it any of your business...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...dick?
> >>>
> >>> Because you insist on calling me bad names and insulting my honesty.
> >>> There, I answered your question.
> >> How does that make it your business...
> >>
> >> ...dick?
> >>
> >> You've earned your bad names and you DO lie...
> >>
> >> ...ALL...
> >>
> >> ...THE...
> >>
> >> ...TIME.
> >>>
> >>> So, I checked your 2 page bakermedia.ca URL on the Wayback site.
> >>> Pitiful record, pitiful site. The last record was 21 Dec 2021.
> >>>
> >>> So just tell the truth. Is your insulting/consulting business
> >>> defunct? Well, the insulting part is clearly not, but the rest?
> >>>
> >>> Are you going to force me to show people how to find something you
> >>> really don't want revealed? Or are you going to be truthful for a
> >>> change?
> >> Wow.
> >>
> >> Stalking and now you're threatening doxing, dick?
> >
> > Where did I lie in this string of posts? Did I ever lie or just have a different opinion based on facts as I knew them at the time?
> I note for the record that you don't deny stalking and threatening to
> dox me...
>
> ...dick.
I note for the record that you have slandered me repeatedly. I note that my definition of stalking is not taking an occasional look at certain sites and noting/recording changes. I note for the record that you are paranoid about people finding out facts contradicting the favorable image you attempt to portray on public facing sites.

On 2024-01-19 15:23, Thomas E. wrote:
> On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 2:46:07 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>> On 2024-01-18 07:36, Thomas E. wrote:
>>> On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 10:50:38 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>>>> On 2024-01-15 19:48, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 9:35:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-01-08 14:43, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>>>>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his
>>>>>>>>> bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a
>>>>>>>>> website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says
>>>>>>>>> he claims to have a full-time job, working for a
>>>>>>>>> Toronto-based financial consulting company. The
>>>>>>>>> company site shows him as an employee. RIP
>>>>>>>>> bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
>>>>>>>> Just curious, dick:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one
>>>>>>>> you called my "company website) every day...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...or just once a week?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>> Maybe every month or two, at the most. Of course, you
>>>>>>> deflected, dodged the question, so typical of you,
>>>>>>> dickhead.
>>>>>> Wow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You admit to regularly stalking me...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...and you don't think you deserve to be called a "dick".
>>>>>
>>>>> Not stalking, exposing your lies. Your only defense is to
>>>>> attempt to discredit the source of truth.
>>>> "Maybe every month or two" you look at my website...
>>>>
>>>> ...and goodness knows what else...
>>>>
>>>> ...and you don't think that's creepy, dick?
>>>>
>>>> I haven't lied.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry.
>>>
>>> You lie by omission all the time. You simply cannot answer a
>>> straightforward question if the answer contradicts the false
>>> image you have created of yourself.
>> Not wanting to answer a question posed by a stalking DICK isn't
>> "lying by omission...
>>
>> ...Dick.
>
> Oh, but yes it is a lie. Your lie is that you are/were supporting
> yourself as an independent consultant. You have been a full-time
> employee of a Toronto firm for some time now. Your independent
> consultancy failed to support you so you became an employee, or at
> least you claim full-time employment. The bakerMedia site was
> disappeared. Can't afford the url renewal fee? You claim to be an
> elite FF driver at the local track, but your record does not support
> that claim. You have a selfie photo of yourself on your employer's
> site that in no way resembles your current appearance on LinkedIn.
> Another lie. In fact when I pointed out that the company photo
> resembled the unflattering LinkedIn version you changed it to what
> makes you appear healthier and without scraggly facial hair. Which is
> the real you?

You don't know the first thing about me.

You have suppositions based on supposition...

....dick.

On 2024-01-19 15:28, Thomas E. wrote:
> On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 2:46:41 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>> On 2024-01-18 07:33, Thomas E. wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 11:49:17 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
>>>> On 2024-01-17 07:49, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 11:09:06 PM UTC-5, Alan
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-01-15 19:52, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
>>>>>>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his
>>>>>>>>> bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a
>>>>>>>>> website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says
>>>>>>>>> he claims to have a full-time job, working for a
>>>>>>>>> Toronto-based financial consulting company. The
>>>>>>>>> company site shows him as an employee. RIP
>>>>>>>>> bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
>>>>>>>> Just curious, dick:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one
>>>>>>>> you called my "company website) every day...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...or just once a week?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just answer this question, why is bakermedia.ca no
>>>>>>> longer responding?
>>>>>> Just answer this question: Why is it any of your
>>>>>> business...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...dick?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because you insist on calling me bad names and insulting my
>>>>> honesty. There, I answered your question.
>>>> How does that make it your business...
>>>>
>>>> ...dick?
>>>>
>>>> You've earned your bad names and you DO lie...
>>>>
>>>> ...ALL...
>>>>
>>>> ...THE...
>>>>
>>>> ...TIME.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I checked your 2 page bakermedia.ca URL on the Wayback
>>>>> site. Pitiful record, pitiful site. The last record was 21
>>>>> Dec 2021.
>>>>>
>>>>> So just tell the truth. Is your insulting/consulting
>>>>> business defunct? Well, the insulting part is clearly not,
>>>>> but the rest?
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you going to force me to show people how to find
>>>>> something you really don't want revealed? Or are you going to
>>>>> be truthful for a change?
>>>> Wow.
>>>>
>>>> Stalking and now you're threatening doxing, dick?
>>>
>>> Where did I lie in this string of posts? Did I ever lie or just
>>> have a different opinion based on facts as I knew them at the
>>> time?
>> I note for the record that you don't deny stalking and threatening
>> to dox me...
>>
>> ...dick.
> I note for the record that you have slandered me repeatedly.

I've called a grown man names and he calls it "slander".

> I note
> that my definition of stalking is not taking an occasional look at
> certain sites and noting/recording changes. I note for the record
> that you are paranoid about people finding out facts contradicting
> the favorable image you attempt to portray on public facing sites.

I note that you left out one of your activities from your definition of
"stalking"...

....dick.

On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 6:23:50 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
> On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 2:46:07 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > On 2024-01-18 07:36, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 10:50:38 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > >> On 2024-01-15 19:48, Thomas E. wrote:
> > >>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 9:35:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > >>>> On 2024-01-08 14:43, Thomas E. wrote:
> > >>>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > >>>>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
> > >>>>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
> > >>>>>> Just curious, dick:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
> > >>>>>> "company website) every day...
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> ...or just once a week?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> :-)
> > >>>>> Maybe every month or two, at the most. Of course, you deflected, dodged the question, so typical of you, dickhead.
> > >>>> Wow.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You admit to regularly stalking me...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ...and you don't think you deserve to be called a "dick".
> > >>>
> > >>> Not stalking, exposing your lies. Your only defense is to attempt to discredit the source of truth.
> > >> "Maybe every month or two" you look at my website...
> > >>
> > >> ...and goodness knows what else...
> > >>
> > >> ...and you don't think that's creepy, dick?
> > >>
> > >> I haven't lied.
> > >>
> > >> Sorry.
> > >
> > > You lie by omission all the time. You simply cannot answer a straightforward question if the answer contradicts the false image you have created of yourself.
> > Not wanting to answer a question posed by a stalking DICK isn't "lying
> > by omission...
> >
> > ...Dick.
> Oh, but yes it is a lie. Your lie is that you are/were supporting yourself as an independent consultant.

Got cite? Or is that merely your assumption?

> You have been a full-time employee of a Toronto firm for some time now.

So? Times have changed since the 1970s: generations after yours don’t stick
to just one or afew companies for their entire working career: it’s now common
to change every ~5 years.

> Your independent consultancy failed to support you so you became an employee,
> or at least you claim full-time employment.

Speculation, plus no proof that it was ever exclusively full time.

> The bakerMedia site was disappeared. Can't afford the url renewal fee?

Hasn’t the Farmecon LLC website has disappeared too?
Ouch. Projecting your own “can’t afford it?” paradigm onto yourself.

> You claim to be an elite FF driver at the local track, but your record does not support that claim.

“Elite”? Really? Let’s see the cite.

Plus this isn’t the only time that you’ve gotten jealous & petty when you can’t be the
sole center of attention, especially for when it’s someone who has some skill clearly
better than you: you should go fly for 30 minutes on just 15 minutes of fuel to show
readers that you’re halfway good at at least one thing. /s

> You have a selfie photo of yourself on your employer's site that in no way resembles
> your current appearance on LinkedIn.

So?
Is there a condition of employment that requires image synchronization that’s being violated?
FYI, the professional headshots a stalker may find of me are also out of date.

> Another lie. In fact when I pointed out that the company photo resembled the unflattering
> LinkedIn version you changed it to what makes you appear healthier and without scraggly
> facial hair. Which is the real you?

Because we all know that a random picture on the Internet is profoundly important! /s

-hh

On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 9:08:52 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
> On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 6:23:50 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 2:46:07 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > > On 2024-01-18 07:36, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > > On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 10:50:38 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > > >> On 2024-01-15 19:48, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > >>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 9:35:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > > >>>> On 2024-01-08 14:43, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > > >>>>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
> > > >>>>>> Just curious, dick:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
> > > >>>>>> "company website) every day...
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> ...or just once a week?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> :-)
> > > >>>>> Maybe every month or two, at the most. Of course, you deflected, dodged the question, so typical of you, dickhead.
> > > >>>> Wow.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> You admit to regularly stalking me...
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> ...and you don't think you deserve to be called a "dick".
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Not stalking, exposing your lies. Your only defense is to attempt to discredit the source of truth.
> > > >> "Maybe every month or two" you look at my website...
> > > >>
> > > >> ...and goodness knows what else...
> > > >>
> > > >> ...and you don't think that's creepy, dick?
> > > >>
> > > >> I haven't lied.
> > > >>
> > > >> Sorry.
> > > >
> > > > You lie by omission all the time. You simply cannot answer a straightforward question if the answer contradicts the false image you have created of yourself.
> > > Not wanting to answer a question posed by a stalking DICK isn't "lying
> > > by omission...
> > >
> > > ...Dick.
> > Oh, but yes it is a lie. Your lie is that you are/were supporting yourself as an independent consultant.
> Got cite? Or is that merely your assumption?
> > You have been a full-time employee of a Toronto firm for some time now.
> So? Times have changed since the 1970s: generations after yours don’t stick
> to just one or afew companies for their entire working career: it’s now common
> to change every ~5 years.
> > Your independent consultancy failed to support you so you became an employee,
> > or at least you claim full-time employment.
> Speculation, plus no proof that it was ever exclusively full time.
> > The bakerMedia site was disappeared. Can't afford the url renewal fee?
> Hasn’t the Farmecon LLC website has disappeared too?
> Ouch. Projecting your own “can’t afford it?” paradigm onto yourself.
> > You claim to be an elite FF driver at the local track, but your record does not support that claim.
> “Elite”? Really? Let’s see the cite.
>
> Plus this isn’t the only time that you’ve gotten jealous & petty when you can’t be the
> sole center of attention, especially for when it’s someone who has some skill clearly
> better than you: you should go fly for 30 minutes on just 15 minutes of fuel to show
> readers that you’re halfway good at at least one thing. /s
> > You have a selfie photo of yourself on your employer's site that in no way resembles
> > your current appearance on LinkedIn.
> So?
> Is there a condition of employment that requires image synchronization that’s being violated?
> FYI, the professional headshots a stalker may find of me are also out of date.
> > Another lie. In fact when I pointed out that the company photo resembled the unflattering
> > LinkedIn version you changed it to what makes you appear healthier and without scraggly
> > facial hair. Which is the real you?
> Because we all know that a random picture on the Internet is profoundly important! /s
>
> -hh
The FarmEcon site disappeared because I shuttered the business over 2 years ago and transitioned some investments to income generation, seeing no drop in income.

Search for FarmEcon.com in Google. Takes you to https://www.hugedomains.com/domain_profile.cfm?d=farmecon.com where I have the URL for sale. Will I ever get that advertised price? Likely not, but per WHOIS I own it for a few more years, until 2027. It's assigned to the GoDaddy URL sales site until expiration.

Then try a bakermedia.ca search. It's dead, no hits. On WHOIS it shows a 2032 URL expiration date. So the URL is apparently still owned by Alan. In fact, I have a copy of his un-redacted URL registration. Wayback has the URL last record as 12/21/2021. The site must have disappeared after that. A Google search "bakermedia vancouver bc location" shows the correct business location, so that is still left.

On LinkedIn Alan still claims to be involved in bakerMEDIA. If so, it must be very part-time. He shows working for companies, 1994-1997 and 2001-2003, after moving to Vancouver in 1994, nothing after 2003 until February 2018 when he took his current job, which he claims as full-time.

The deletion of the company site and a full-time job all suggest that bakerMEDIA is defunct, or nearly so.

Actually, 2018 was a very interesting year for Alan. About the time he took the current full-time job he bought another FF race car, the one with the Honda engine. I have publicly available evidence that strongly infers that already in 2018 and going forward he was having growing financial issues, falling behind on a very important expense item until catching up very recently. There were good reasons for finding that job in 2018. Among them were that the bakerMEDIA gig was not prosperous enough to buy a race car or keep an important expense item current.

The difference in the photo images is simply an indication that he is not consistent in portraying reality. Having held the current job for 6 years does indicate that his job performance has been satisfactory. It's twice as long as he has held a job in the past. I'll give him that.

If his consulting practice had been lucrative why is he not still not doing that full-time? My consulting was, in contrast, very rewarding personally and financially. I worked it actively from 2003 to 2022, and even collected my last income in 2023. Net income, IRS basis, was about $1.3 million before 401K contributions. As you know, some expenses become deductible just because you are running a business from home, so this is lower than actual. Since I also had pension and SSI income I'll admit I did not solicit many projects. They were referrals for the most part.

Simply Google "thomas elam farmecon" for a small sample of my non-confidential projects that made it into the public domain.

Why go to all this trouble? Alan has repeatedly called me the "lying little shit" and a liar in general. I am neither. My body of work for numerous clients over many years indicates that I was known and respected in my chosen field. However, it's important for Alan to discredit those who disagree with his version of reality. His reality is a lot grittier than he would want you to believe.

On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 4:49:37 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
> On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 9:08:52 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
> > On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 6:23:50 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 2:46:07 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > > > On 2024-01-18 07:36, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > > > On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 10:50:38 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > > > >> On 2024-01-15 19:48, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > > >>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 9:35:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > > > >>>> On 2024-01-08 14:43, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > > >>>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
> > > > >>>>>> Just curious, dick:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
> > > > >>>>>> "company website) every day...
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> ...or just once a week?
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> :-)
> > > > >>>>> Maybe every month or two, at the most. Of course, you deflected, dodged the question, so typical of you, dickhead.
> > > > >>>> Wow.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> You admit to regularly stalking me...
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> ...and you don't think you deserve to be called a "dick".
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Not stalking, exposing your lies. Your only defense is to attempt to discredit the source of truth.
> > > > >> "Maybe every month or two" you look at my website...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ...and goodness knows what else...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ...and you don't think that's creepy, dick?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I haven't lied.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Sorry.
> > > > >
> > > > > You lie by omission all the time. You simply cannot answer a straightforward question if the answer contradicts the false image you have created of yourself.
> > > > Not wanting to answer a question posed by a stalking DICK isn't "lying
> > > > by omission...
> > > >
> > > > ...Dick.
> > > Oh, but yes it is a lie. Your lie is that you are/were supporting yourself as an independent consultant.
> > Got cite? Or is that merely your assumption?
> > > You have been a full-time employee of a Toronto firm for some time now.
> > So? Times have changed since the 1970s: generations after yours don’t stick
> > to just one or afew companies for their entire working career: it’s now common
> > to change every ~5 years.
> > > Your independent consultancy failed to support you so you became an employee,
> > > or at least you claim full-time employment.
> > Speculation, plus no proof that it was ever exclusively full time.
> > > The bakerMedia site was disappeared. Can't afford the url renewal fee?
> > Hasn’t the Farmecon LLC website has disappeared too?
> > Ouch. Projecting your own “can’t afford it?” paradigm onto yourself.
> > > You claim to be an elite FF driver at the local track, but your record does not support that claim.
> > “Elite”? Really? Let’s see the cite.
> >
> > Plus this isn’t the only time that you’ve gotten jealous & petty when you can’t be the
> > sole center of attention, especially for when it’s someone who has some skill clearly
> > better than you: you should go fly for 30 minutes on just 15 minutes of fuel to show
> > readers that you’re halfway good at at least one thing. /s
> > > You have a selfie photo of yourself on your employer's site that in no way resembles
> > > your current appearance on LinkedIn.
> > So?
> > Is there a condition of employment that requires image synchronization that’s being violated?
> > FYI, the professional headshots a stalker may find of me are also out of date.
> > > Another lie. In fact when I pointed out that the company photo resembled the unflattering
> > > LinkedIn version you changed it to what makes you appear healthier and without scraggly
> > > facial hair. Which is the real you?
> >
> > Because we all know that a random picture on the Internet is profoundly important! /s
> >
>
> The FarmEcon site disappeared because I shuttered the business over 2 years ago

So? You could have left the reports up, and just said you’re no longer actively consulting.

> Search for FarmEcon.com in Google. Takes you to https://www.hugedomains.com/domain_profile.cfm?d=farmecon.com where I have the URL for sale. Will I ever get that advertised price? Likely not, but
> per WHOIS I own it for a few more years, until 2027. It's assigned to the GoDaddy URL sales site until expiration.

You’re asking $8K! GoDaddy’s appraisal tool says that it’s worth just $1555:

< https://www.godaddy.com/domain-value-appraisal/appraisal/?domainToCheck=Farmecon.com>

> Then try a bakermedia.ca search.

GoDaddy says $948 for that domain..basically two thirds as much as your domain:
not as “bad off” as you’re trying to imply.

> ... On WHOIS it shows a 2032 URL expiration date. ..
>
> On LinkedIn …

Stalking by Tommy.

> The deletion of the company site and a full-time job all suggest that bakerMEDIA is defunct, or nearly so.

That wasn’t the question. The question was if it ever was represented as full time.

> Actually, 2018 was a very interesting year for Alan…

Even more stalking by Tommy.

> If his consulting practice had been lucrative why is he not still not doing that full-time?

Don’t know, don’t care, because it’s none of my business. But I do know that a lot
of people are seeking a better work-life balance than what old Boomers tolerated.

> My consulting was, in contrast, very rewarding personally and financially..

Because you got travel boondoggles? /s

> I worked it actively from 2003 to 2022, and even collected my last income in 2023.
> Net income, IRS basis, was about $1.3 million before 401K contributions. As you
> know, some expenses become deductible just because you are running a business
> from home, so this is lower than actual.

SS & Medicare is 15.3%, but only half of that is unique to self-employment to be
comparable to a regular job. Plus write-offs for laptops, office, etc and it’s a 10%
variance or so in total. Another are business travel costs, which of course are usually
customer-approval specific, but not a big money suck…unless one wants it to be.
Plus wasn’t there also a corporate donation to a local theater for tickets too, eh?
The write-off game is very much just that for some folks.

> Since I also had pension and SSI income I'll admit I did not solicit many projects.
> They were referrals for the most part.

You were nevertheless still hustling for work for more than decade beyond normal
retirement age. That shows that you weren’t anywhere near ‘comfortable’ without it.

> Simply Google "thomas elam farmecon" for a small sample of my non-confidential
> projects that made it into the public domain.

Despite how you still own the domain and could have just left those papers up?

> Why go to all this trouble? Alan has repeatedly called me the "lying little shit" and
> a liar in general. I am neither. My body of work for numerous clients …

…is not representative of the crap that you regularly tried to pull here. As such, your
consultant work is irrelevant and not a defense for your poor behavior here..

-hh

On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 7:26:29 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
> On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 4:49:37 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
> > On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 9:08:52 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
> > > On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 6:23:50 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 2:46:07 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > > > > On 2024-01-18 07:36, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > > > > On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 10:50:38 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > > > > >> On 2024-01-15 19:48, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > > > >>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 9:35:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > > > > >>>> On 2024-01-08 14:43, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > > > >>>>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:31:12 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>> On 2024-01-08 05:05, Thomas E. wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>> At age ~61 has Alan finally given up on his bakerMEDIA site, and business? The lame excuse for a website, bakermedia.ca, is unreachable. Linkedin says he claims to have a full-time job, working for a Toronto-based financial consulting company. The company site shows him as an employee. RIP bakermedia.ca. You won't be missed.
> > > > > >>>>>> Just curious, dick:
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Do you check my website and my LinkedIn page (the one you called my
> > > > > >>>>>> "company website) every day...
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> ...or just once a week?
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> :-)
> > > > > >>>>> Maybe every month or two, at the most. Of course, you deflected, dodged the question, so typical of you, dickhead.
> > > > > >>>> Wow.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> You admit to regularly stalking me...
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> ...and you don't think you deserve to be called a "dick".
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Not stalking, exposing your lies. Your only defense is to attempt to discredit the source of truth.
> > > > > >> "Maybe every month or two" you look at my website...
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ...and goodness knows what else...
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ...and you don't think that's creepy, dick?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I haven't lied.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Sorry.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You lie by omission all the time. You simply cannot answer a straightforward question if the answer contradicts the false image you have created of yourself.
> > > > > Not wanting to answer a question posed by a stalking DICK isn't "lying
> > > > > by omission...
> > > > >
> > > > > ...Dick.
> > > > Oh, but yes it is a lie. Your lie is that you are/were supporting yourself as an independent consultant.
> > > Got cite? Or is that merely your assumption?
> > > > You have been a full-time employee of a Toronto firm for some time now.
> > > So? Times have changed since the 1970s: generations after yours don’t stick
> > > to just one or afew companies for their entire working career: it’s now common
> > > to change every ~5 years.
> > > > Your independent consultancy failed to support you so you became an employee,
> > > > or at least you claim full-time employment.
> > > Speculation, plus no proof that it was ever exclusively full time.
> > > > The bakerMedia site was disappeared. Can't afford the url renewal fee?
> > > Hasn’t the Farmecon LLC website has disappeared too?
> > > Ouch. Projecting your own “can’t afford it?” paradigm onto yourself.
> > > > You claim to be an elite FF driver at the local track, but your record does not support that claim.
> > > “Elite”? Really? Let’s see the cite.
> > >
> > > Plus this isn’t the only time that you’ve gotten jealous & petty when you can’t be the
> > > sole center of attention, especially for when it’s someone who has some skill clearly
> > > better than you: you should go fly for 30 minutes on just 15 minutes of fuel to show
> > > readers that you’re halfway good at at least one thing. /s
> > > > You have a selfie photo of yourself on your employer's site that in no way resembles
> > > > your current appearance on LinkedIn.
> > > So?
> > > Is there a condition of employment that requires image synchronization that’s being violated?
> > > FYI, the professional headshots a stalker may find of me are also out of date.
> > > > Another lie. In fact when I pointed out that the company photo resembled the unflattering
> > > > LinkedIn version you changed it to what makes you appear healthier and without scraggly
> > > > facial hair. Which is the real you?
> > >
> > > Because we all know that a random picture on the Internet is profoundly important! /s
> > >
> >
> > The FarmEcon site disappeared because I shuttered the business over 2 years ago
> So? You could have left the reports up, and just said you’re no longer actively consulting.
> > Search for FarmEcon.com in Google. Takes you to https://www.hugedomains..com/domain_profile.cfm?d=farmecon.com where I have the URL for sale. Will I ever get that advertised price? Likely not, but
> > per WHOIS I own it for a few more years, until 2027. It's assigned to the GoDaddy URL sales site until expiration.
> You’re asking $8K! GoDaddy’s appraisal tool says that it’s worth just $1555:
>
> < https://www.godaddy.com/domain-value-appraisal/appraisal/?domainToCheck=Farmecon.com>
> > Then try a bakermedia.ca search.
> GoDaddy says $948 for that domain..basically two thirds as much as your domain:
> not as “bad off” as you’re trying to imply.
>
> > ... On WHOIS it shows a 2032 URL expiration date. ..
> >
> > On LinkedIn …
>
> Stalking by Tommy.
> > The deletion of the company site and a full-time job all suggest that bakerMEDIA is defunct, or nearly so.
> That wasn’t the question. The question was if it ever was represented as full time.
>
> > Actually, 2018 was a very interesting year for Alan…
>
> Even more stalking by Tommy.
> > If his consulting practice had been lucrative why is he not still not doing that full-time?
> Don’t know, don’t care, because it’s none of my business. But I do know that a lot
> of people are seeking a better work-life balance than what old Boomers tolerated.
> > My consulting was, in contrast, very rewarding personally and financially.
> Because you got travel boondoggles? /s
> > I worked it actively from 2003 to 2022, and even collected my last income in 2023.
> > Net income, IRS basis, was about $1.3 million before 401K contributions.. As you
> > know, some expenses become deductible just because you are running a business
> > from home, so this is lower than actual.
> SS & Medicare is 15.3%, but only half of that is unique to self-employment to be
> comparable to a regular job. Plus write-offs for laptops, office, etc and it’s a 10%
> variance or so in total. Another are business travel costs, which of course are usually
> customer-approval specific, but not a big money suck…unless one wants it to be.
> Plus wasn’t there also a corporate donation to a local theater for tickets too, eh?
> The write-off game is very much just that for some folks.
> > Since I also had pension and SSI income I'll admit I did not solicit many projects.
> > They were referrals for the most part.
> You were nevertheless still hustling for work for more than decade beyond normal
> retirement age. That shows that you weren’t anywhere near ‘comfortable’ without it.
> > Simply Google "thomas elam farmecon" for a small sample of my non-confidential
> > projects that made it into the public domain.
> Despite how you still own the domain and could have just left those papers up?
> > Why go to all this trouble? Alan has repeatedly called me the "lying little shit" and
> > a liar in general. I am neither. My body of work for numerous clients …
>
> …is not representative of the crap that you regularly tried to pull here. As such, your
> consultant work is irrelevant and not a defense for your poor behavior here.
>
> -hh