Do not respond to this troll if he responds to you! Regardless of lack of personal first-hand experience he will claim to be an expert in any area he chooses to criticize.

That includes, among others:

Driving in Carmel IN - he has never been here
Entering flights in pilot logbooks - never done that himself, not a pilot
How CarPlay/Siri interact - his car does not have CarPlay, never has
Siri versus Google voice heuristics - apparently has little Google experience
Honda car B pilar tensile strength - he is not a metallurgist
Interpreting a police auto accident report - can't see that an innocent driver had no fault shown, did not witness the accident, still insists the driver was at fault.
Insists that Siri results on his iPhone is the same as you get on CarPlay - his car does not have CarPlay, never has
And others too numerous to mention.

But he does not always lie. On Facebook he claims:
"Deep down... ...I'm nothing but trouble." This not a lie. He loves to cause trouble in peoples' lives.
"I'd love you more for your mind if it bounced gently when you walked" Not a lie either. Alan is myogenous.

I'll not be replying any time soon, Alan

On 2024-02-21 11:46, Thomas E. wrote:
> Do not respond to this troll if he responds to you! Regardless of lack of personal first-hand experience he will claim to be an expert in any area he chooses to criticize.
>
> That includes, among others:
>
> Driving in Carmel IN - he has never been here

I don't have to have driven IN Carmel to know the rules of the road...

....dick

> Entering flights in pilot logbooks - never done that himself, not a pilot

But I can analyze "data" that looks too perfect...

....dick

> How CarPlay/Siri interact - his car does not have CarPlay, never has

Yet I know that an Apple Maps database problem isn't a Siri problem...

....dick

> Siri versus Google voice heuristics - apparently has little Google experience

Example... ...dick?

> Honda car B pilar tensile strength - he is not a metallurgist
> Interpreting a police auto accident report - can't see that an innocent driver had no fault shown, did not witness the accident, still insists the driver was at fault.

Liar, dick. I never insisted your wife was at fault. In insisted that if
she had been in the right hand lane (as Indiana law required), then the
other driver wouldn't have tried to pass on the left...

....dick.

And the police report which you cite as an authority on what happened
doesn't cite speeding as a cause...

....dick.

> Insists that Siri results on his iPhone is the same as you get on CarPlay - his car does not have CarPlay, never has
> And others too numerous to mention.

Because CarPlay is just an alternate UI, dick.

>
> But he does not always lie. On Facebook he claims:
> "Deep down... ...I'm nothing but trouble." This not a lie. He loves to cause trouble in peoples' lives.
> "I'd love you more for your mind if it bounced gently when you walked" Not a lie either. Alan is myogenous.
>
> I'll not be replying any time soon, Alan

Good news, dick.

Does that mean you'll stop your stalking as well?

On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 at 2:46:43 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
> Do not respond to this troll if he responds to you! Regardless of lack
> of personal first-hand experience he will claim to be an expert in any
> area he chooses to criticize.

Speaking of a lack of personal first-hand experience ... when was the last time
that you've tried to talk smack about scuba diving? Or open wheel car racing?
Because the newsgroup knows that you've done both while experiencing neither.
> That includes, among others:
>
> Driving in Carmel IN - he has never been here

Because Carmel has unique traffic laws which don't exist anywhere else?

> Entering flights in pilot logbooks - never done that himself, not a pilot

Says the guy who couldn't believe that the FAA employs staff in other countries,
to monitor airlines who are authorized to have international flights to the USA. /s

> How CarPlay/Siri interact - his car does not have CarPlay, never has
> Siri versus Google voice heuristics - apparently has little Google experience

"Non IT guy whining at IT guy...Film at 11!" /s

> Honda car B pilar tensile strength - he is not a metallurgist

And you are? Nope, not even close.

> Interpreting a police auto accident report - can't see that an innocent driver
> had no fault shown, did not witness the accident, still insists the driver was at fault.

Not identifying guilt is not the same thing as being innocent. Besides, its foolish
to rely on nitpicking while ignoring the guy who grew up where Traffic Circles were
invented in the US, and told you that they always suck: only a foolish town would be
deliberately installing new ones in this century.

> Insists that Siri results on his iPhone is the same as you get on CarPlay - his
> car does not have CarPlay, never has

"Non IT guy *still* whining at IT guy...Film at 11!" /s

> And others too numerous to mention.
>
> But he does not always lie. On Facebook he claims:
> "Deep down... ...I'm nothing but trouble." This not a lie. He loves to cause trouble
> in peoples' lives.

Only egotistical liars seem to get offended...wonder why?

> "I'd love you more for your mind if it bounced gently when you walked"
> Not a lie either. Alan is myogenous.

That doesn't sound particularly hateful to me, as it is poking fun at
the common trope which actually is more misogynistic.
> I'll not be replying any time soon, Alan

Golly, you're really trying to go out with a real "BANG!" of butthurt.

-hh

WOO HOO. I as of Feb 22 meant Feb 21 was the cutoff, and I was making my last post. Not the case. I get to point out what an asshole you are yet again!!!!!

On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 at 4:01:46 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
> On 2024-02-21 11:46, Thomas E. wrote:
> > Do not respond to this troll if he responds to you! Regardless of lack of personal first-hand experience he will claim to be an expert in any area he chooses to criticize.
> >
> > That includes, among others:
> >
> > Driving in Carmel IN - he has never been here
> I don't have to have driven IN Carmel to know the rules of the road...

According the police report she broke no laws

Dick

>
> ...dick
> > Entering flights in pilot logbooks - never done that himself, not a pilot
> But I can analyze "data" that looks too perfect...
>
You can analyze anything, that does not make your analysis correct

Dick

> ...dick
> > How CarPlay/Siri interact - his car does not have CarPlay, never has
> Yet I know that an Apple Maps database problem isn't a Siri problem...
>
You are not correct. If you type in an address it works. If you use Siri via CarPlay not so much. But then again, your car does not have CarPlay.

Dick

> ...dick
> > Siri versus Google voice heuristics - apparently has little Google experience
> Example... ...dick?
> > Honda car B pilar tensile strength - he is not a metallurgist

Then why did you insist that my Insight's B pilar had to intrude into the passenger compartment in my at-fault T-bone accident? Another case of turning theory into fact?

Dick

> > Interpreting a police auto accident report - can't see that an innocent driver had no fault shown, did not witness the accident, still insists the driver was at fault.
> Liar, dick. I never insisted your wife was at fault. In insisted that if
> she had been in the right hand lane (as Indiana law required), then the
> other driver wouldn't have tried to pass on the left...

That is totally wrong. If we had been in the right lane the other driver would have too. She entered the circular in the right lane intending to turn left in a lane marked at that point for right turn only. The keep right law has exceptions for traffic conditions. The investigating officer did not check the improper lane use box for our vehicle. He did for the other. HE took first-hand testimony from both drivers. You are wrong.

Dick

>
> ...dick.
>
> And the police report which you cite as an authority on what happened
> doesn't cite speeding as a cause...
>
There is no special speed limit for roundabouts here. 15 mph is advised by a yellow sign, not a white regulatory sign. The wife was not speeding. We were doing about 15, the other driver caught up from behind. As I stated, IMHO, but not the police, she was driving aggressively. The police did not witness the accident or talk to anyone but the drivers involved. There was no legal basis for citing either of us for exceeding the speed limit.

Dick

> ...dick.
> > Insists that Siri results on his iPhone is the same as you get on CarPlay - his car does not have CarPlay, never has
> > And others too numerous to mention.
> Because CarPlay is just an alternate UI, dick.

CarPlay is so different from your phone it's like another world. Only a few apps are permitted. The UI interface is very different. Many apps that are permitted have very different options and settings compared to a phone, tablet or the app's website on laptop computer. There are numerous CarPlay search results and other restrictions. Get a car with CarPlay and use it on a daily basis. Then tell me "it's just an alternate UI". You don't always get the same results as on your phone.

Dick

> >
> > But he does not always lie. On Facebook he claims:
> > "Deep down... ...I'm nothing but trouble." This not a lie. He loves to cause trouble in peoples' lives.
> > "I'd love you more for your mind if it bounced gently when you walked" Not a lie either. Alan is myogenous.
> >
I see you don't dispute your Facebook quotes. Your record of insults across a wide range of newsgroups leaves quite a legacy.

> > I'll not be replying any time soon, Alan
> Good news, dick.
>
> Does that mean you'll stop your stalking as well?

No, I'll be watching your race results, or lack thereof, and checking on LinkedIn and your employer's site. You might or might not hear from me again. I'm sure you would rather I not discuss your shortcomings.