Hello,

More of my philosophy about creativity and innovation and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

Yet more philosophy about what you see is not what you see and more..

So i can say to humans the following:

"What you see is not what you see"

So we have to "decompose", so the first "what you see" in
the sentence above is the "reality" that you see, and
the second "what you see" is both how you see with your eyes "and"
how you see with your thinking the reality, so then i have just made you understand that most of humans are using linear thinking and not exponential thinking that understand the exponential
progress of our humanity and that understand the law of accelerating returns, and this linear thinking is not correct thinking, so this linear thinking makes our thinking of the reality not correct, so we can
then logically say to humans: "What you see is not what you see."

Look at the following video to understand more the way of exponential thinking:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s

More philosophy about the human existence..

I also invite you to read my following philosophy in my following beautiful webpage about human existence:

https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence

My philosophy about the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and more..

I invite you to look at the following video about philosophy:

SARTRE - Le regard des autres

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIM41TnDHI

I have just noticed by looking at the above video, that it is lacking,
since first you have to understand the following:

Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre.

But i think people are not understanding the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, since the functionality of our essence is also our genetics that predetermines to a certain level what is our existence, so the essence that is our genetics is also important, but since the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre was a communist, he has wanted to give much more "hope" by saying: "Existence precedes essence", and i think this also means that
humans are by essence free, and this also means that the human nurture is much more important than the human nature, but it is not truth, so i think that Jean-Paul Sartre has made a big error by saying so. And Jean-Paul Sartre has also accepted the views of the philosopher Albert Camus about the absurdism of existence, but i am a philosopher and here again i am not in accord with it, since i say that human existence is not absurd, and read my below thoughts to understand my philosophy. Also Jean-Paul Sartre said that we are a subjectivity or he said "Le regard de l'autre nous fige dans une essence" or such, but i am not in accord with Jean-Paul Sartre, since i say that we have not to loose our way in the much less important details, and we have to know about the most important goal, this is why i am explaining the following:

More political philosophy about: Are humans smart ?

So are humans smart ?

I am very positive about humans, and i think that humans are smart, since we are also advancing by the following process of Swarm Intelligence that is so efficient, read about it here:

How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter

https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/

So i think that "collectively", we humans, we are smart, and i think that you will soon notice it by the following exponential progress of our humanity, read about in my following thoughts:

More political philosophy about do we have to be pessimistic..

I think it is a beautiful day in history, and how can you understand it ?

First you will notice that the exponential progress of our humanity is going very fast and is going faster and faster , look at the following video to understand it:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s

So as you are noticing that you have to take this exponential progress of our humanity into account and be much more optimistic.

And you have to know that this exponential progress of our humanity also comes from the following process:

How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter

https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/

And here is my new poem about this exponential progress of our humanity called : "This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress"

--

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

Because it is a beautiful maturity but not the adolescence

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

And we have to beautifully tune it with the beautiful consensus

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

So let us not be just guesses but technicality and science

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

So let us be a beautiful expressiveness that is not helpless

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

So let us take together this beautiful breakfast

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

Since you are also like my so beautiful Princess

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

So let us be a beautiful presence for present and future acceptance

--

More political philosophy about Ray Dalio and about happiness..

Read about Ray Dalio here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Dalio

And look at the following video of him:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tw0wtyzW6nA

I think that Ray Dalio is not thinking correctly, since he speaks like an economist and he is not a philosopher, and this way of doing is lacking intelligence, so i will explain with my smartness:

Read the following about what is the Standard of living:

"Standard of living generally refers to wealth, comfort, material goods, and necessities of certain classes in certain areas—or more objective characteristics—whereas quality of life is more subjective and intangible, such as personal liberty or environmental quality."

So i think that Ray Dalio is making a "mistake" since the world has very much changed and i think i am a philosopher and Ray Dalio is not understanding correctly my philosophy: So in my philosophy i am talking
about how to be happiness and joy even if we are not the standard of living of being highly wealthy etc. i mean even if we are also having a problem with unequal distribution of income and opportunities because of globalization, i think we can still be happy and i am giving the way in
my following philosophy, so read my following philosophy so that to understand:

More philosophy about The future of financial stability and cyber risk..

I have just read rapidly the following very interesting article,
i invite you to read it carefully:

The future of financial stability and cyber risk

https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-future-of-financial-stability-and-cyber-risk/

I think that we have to be positive about the future of financial stability and cyber risk, since notice that the financial stability
depends on three things:

1- Leverage
2- Maturity and Risk Transformation
3- Procyclicality of the price of risk

Read the above article to notice it, but i think that for the first two, i mean Leverage and Maturity and Risk Transformation, the financial institutions have not to put all the eggs in the same basket, so
they need to diversify the risk correctly, and for the third that is the Procyclicality of the price of risk, i think that it is less risky
since it depends on the "asset" prices that are diversified to a certain level, and for the cyber risk i am positive since i think we are getting
much more sophisticated in cyber security. So i am positive.

More philosophy about what is the purpose of education..

I invite you to read the following interesting article:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2015/02/12/whats-the-purpose-of-education-in-the-21st-century/

So can we ask a philosophical question of:

Should young people become educated to get prepared to enter the workforce, or should the purpose of education be focused more on social, academic, cultural and intellectual development so that students can grow up to be engaged citizens?

I think that we have to be optimistic because i just said in my philosophy(read it below) that our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, so as you are noticing that we are "continually" educating ourselves in internet to become much better citizens. So being connected to internet with a computer is
so important, so Africa too has to be connected to internet.

More philosophy about internet and phone and addiction and more..

I invite you to look at the following video:

The Ugly Truth about Modern Life!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFR0Mk9KDZ4

I think that the above video is making a mistake, since there is, technically, no such thing as internet or phone "addiction",
here is the proof, read the following important article: