In QSL Proxy Manager, Socks 5 doesn't work. You get

ERROR: 10061 Connection refused (Error #10061)

Need to use Socks 4a.

On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:25:42 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>In QSL Proxy Manager, Socks 5 doesn't work. You get
>ERROR: 10061 Connection refused (Error #10061)
>Need to use Socks 4a.

omnimix works great . . . qsl is obsolete

https://danner-net.de/om.htm

On 3/12/2024 2:40 AM, D wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:25:42 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>> In QSL Proxy Manager, Socks 5 doesn't work. You get
>> ERROR: 10061 Connection refused (Error #10061)
>> Need to use Socks 4a.
>
> omnimix works great . . . qsl is obsolete

Honestly. That's the truth.

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

> In QSL Proxy Manager, Socks 5 doesn't work. You get
>
> ERROR: 10061 Connection refused (Error #10061)
>
> Need to use Socks 4a.

Hard to understand, as SOCKS 5 is SOCKS 4a plus
the acceptance of an IP address as destination.

On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 06:56:19 -0400, Yamn Remailer <remailer@domain.invalid> wrote:
>On 3/12/2024 2:40 AM, D wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:25:42 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio
><nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>> In QSL Proxy Manager, Socks 5 doesn't work. You get
>>> ERROR: 10061 Connection refused (Error #10061)
>>> Need to use Socks 4a.
>>
>> omnimix works great . . . qsl is obsolete
>
>Honestly. That's the truth.

the interminable recurrence of qsl-error related posts here in a.p.a-s
appear obfuscatory (in the classic psyops troll-farm sense of the word)
omnimix does everything, is maintained, and runs on windows xp thru 11

On Tue 12 Mar 2024 4:51 pm, D wrote:
> the interminable recurrence

Goodness, what a frightfully clever literary fellow.

On 12 Mar 2024, Yamn Remailer <remailer@domain.invalid> posted some
news:20240312.065619.793c5350@erienetworks.net:

> On 3/12/2024 2:40 AM, D wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:25:42 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio
><nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>> In QSL Proxy Manager, Socks 5 doesn't work. You get
>>> ERROR: 10061 Connection refused (Error #10061)
>>> Need to use Socks 4a.
>>
>> omnimix works great . . . qsl is obsolete
>
>
> Honestly. That's the truth.

QSL was never finished and YAMN has a basic client. OmniMix client while
effective is cumbersome and there are a few quirks.

QS 127.X was the best client by far.

On 3/12/2024 11:33 AM, Nomen Nescio wrote:

> On 12 Mar 2024, Yamn Remailer <remailer@domain.invalid> posted some
> news:20240312.065619.793c5350@erienetworks.net:
>
>> On 3/12/2024 2:40 AM, D wrote:
>>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:25:42 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio
>> <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>>> In QSL Proxy Manager, Socks 5 doesn't work. You get
>>>> ERROR: 10061 Connection refused (Error #10061)
>>>> Need to use Socks 4a.
>>>
>>> omnimix works great . . . qsl is obsolete
>>
>>
>> Honestly. That's the truth.
>
> QSL was never finished and YAMN has a basic client. OmniMix client
while
> effective is cumbersome and there are a few quirks.
>
> QS 127.X was the best client by far.
>

I assure you, if Richard was still around, he would have integrated
YAMN into QSL.

But he isn't and it's not. So sadly, QSL is limited.

So if I'm using QSL,and I want to use YAMN, I have to maintain a
separate program. I'd have to use two programs.

Nope, none for me thanks.

Nomen Nescio wrote:

> QS 127.X was the best client by far.

Come on, every mail & news client is better than QS. IMO
that's the only aspect that counts, as OmniMix is nothing
more than a proxy server, a simple client-network interface.

On Tue 12 Mar 2024 11:36 pm, Anonymous wrote:
> On 3/12/2024 11:33 AM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
>> On 12 Mar 2024, Yamn Remailer <remailer@domain.invalid> posted some
>> news:20240312.065619.793c5350@erienetworks.net:
>>
>>> On 3/12/2024 2:40 AM, D wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:25:42 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio
>>> <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>>>> In QSL Proxy Manager, Socks 5 doesn't work. You get
>>>>> ERROR: 10061 Connection refused (Error #10061)
>>>>> Need to use Socks 4a.
>>>>
>>>> omnimix works great . . . qsl is obsolete
>>>
>>>
>>> Honestly. That's the truth.
>>
>> QSL was never finished and YAMN has a basic client. OmniMix client
> while
>> effective is cumbersome and there are a few quirks.
>>
>> QS 127.X was the best client by far.
>>
>
> I assure you, if Richard was still around, he would have integrated
> YAMN into QSL.
>
> But he isn't and it's not. So sadly, QSL is limited.
>
> So if I'm using QSL,and I want to use YAMN, I have to maintain a
> separate program. I'd have to use two programs.
>
> Nope, none for me thanks.
>
is he dead?

On 3/12/2024 9:56 PM, Yamn Remailer wrote:

>> I assure you, if Richard was still around, he would have integrated
>> YAMN into QSL.
>>
>> But he isn't and it's not. So sadly, QSL is limited.
>>
>> So if I'm using QSL,and I want to use YAMN, I have to maintain a
>> separate program. I'd have to use two programs.
>>
>> Nope, none for me thanks.
>>
> is he dead?
>

Richard retired some number of years ago, due to declining poor health.

On 12 Mar 2024, Yamn Remailer <noreply@mixmin.net> posted some
news:20240312.205317.52d1b965@mixmin.net:

> Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
>> QS 127.X was the best client by far.
>
> Come on, every mail & news client is better than QS. IMO
> that's the only aspect that counts, as OmniMix is nothing
> more than a proxy server, a simple client-network interface.

Lol! Your inexperience with OmniMix is showing.