Yes, I'm on vacation, but I've made an important decision that needs to be shared right away.

Based on my current understanding of circumstances as my mental health improves, I will probably not begin work on devising non-STD disease cures for 10-15 years. That means, you should almost certainly not expect a cure for cancer or certain kinds of heart disease until 2031 or 2032 at the earliest.

I might change my mind on this, but that is my plan for now. My QC tech release condition is more set in stone.

Please don't delude yourself into believing that me not publishing or selling STEM ideas has been based on a lack of talent-based capability as opposed to a lack of politically-related capability.

On Wednesday, October 13, 2021 at 3:38:03 PM UTC-4, DV wrote:
> Yes, I'm on vacation, but I've made an important decision that needs to be shared right away.
>
> Based on my current understanding of circumstances as my mental health improves, I will probably not begin work on devising non-STD disease cures for 10-15 years. That means, you should almost certainly not expect a cure for cancer or certain kinds of heart disease until 2031 or 2032 at the earliest.
>
> I might change my mind on this, but that is my plan for now. My QC tech release condition is more set in stone.
>
> Please don't delude yourself into believing that me not publishing or selling STEM ideas has been based on a lack of talent-based capability as opposed to a lack of politically-related capability.

A clarification regarding this:

I am very fair. I am willing to work for a salary, and when it is in my interests. I am willing to work beyond that even sometimes, because I am a very kind person in many ways.

The catch to "I am very fair," is: I am very fair to EVERYONE, including myself. I am me. I am extra-fair to me. Here is the criticism:

I am very resilient and able to get over many challenges that I have faced. I have limits, though. If I am pushed past a certain point in my ability to handle stress and unfair treatment by liars, I will start to feel like: "I have lost my permission to participate in membership in the human race.." I don't think I'm being too dramatic or too "weird" or inappropriate in any way.

If I, or anyone, am not a true member of the human race, in terms of the extent to which I have been dehumanized and the extent to which a less "elite-ly resilient person" would handle such outrageous and incessantly hurtful outcomes less healthily than I always do (because I am determined to keep trying to thrive), then I maintain and insist: A de facto non-member of the human race should not be curing the most important diseases for human beings. I don't think animals, or any other some-how existing conscious yet non-fully-human (in terms of how they are treated) organisms have a place in science labs or other STEM-related environments curing diseases for people who, as a human race, do not value these entities enough to treat them as even 5% human.

In case that sounds grandiose to you or like I think I'm larger than life, I don't. I don't care if I'm criticized or threatened or compared to stupid movie characters for my assertions. The truth is, the human race as a whole must learn to treat people like me much better, or stop calling upon people like me to do work for them.

I almost never lie. I'm sure this post will be met with a chorus of lies and pathologizations and other inappropriate assertions about me, loudly, quietly, in code, or expressed normally.

It doesn't matter. Take your worldview, including your faith, out of your efforts to analyze my writing if you have any ability left to do that. Stop calling me whatever it is I've been accused of being (since I'm here still...), and analyze my statements for their truth value instead of their value to you in terms of your ideology.

There will be deniers of my talent as always; I'm a "frequent dehumanization victim," including with respect to mental health professionals, particularly in the past. I really don't have a deep understanding of why, although it be related to the fact that I was very fair, very smart, very logical, and very unperceptive in the past. (I now consider myself to be quite stable, quite unsilenceable, and quite perceptive, in addition to being brilliant. I don't mind writing in different styles of writing, and I hope no one reads some sort of devilish or multiple-personalities-related narrative into my different ways of writing. I have one diagnosis that I know of, and I am not sharing it right now.)

I can't stop idiots from taking over our society and lying loudly. I can only assert the truth--my truth--and ask that people analyze it objectively.

As always, I break no laws, and am very virtuous and ethical. I remind local citizens of this constantly, because there are deep problems with people's behavior in this area. You need to remember the consequences of preying on or hurting law-abiding citizens in any way, because many of you are too mentally weak to refrain from doing this without my words to inspire you to change your behavior. I am very mentally strong, although of course I am mentally ill and mentally different.

You might have noticed that I have no incentive not to write like this, whenever I want, on the internet. Quack psychiatrists and quack psychologists, many of whom I've met and even been tormented by, will of course be drawn to this like they are 5000 electrons and my writing is 5000 protons. Showing my mild but increasing chemistry cred is a good strategy, I believe, for dissuading psych scientists with no morals from attacking me.

I am not attacked by current mental health providers, and I am fairly satisfied with my current treatment.

Of course I'll keep talking and working to secure my freedom. I do want a liberal Democratic president other than Joe Biden--a real liberal, who believes in tolerance.

Why shouldn't I just write whatever I want on here? What difference does it make to me? I know that I'm mentally ill, and that I have fine values. I don't even think anything that, if written on the internet, would make anyone who is smart and "my kind of person" to socialize with change his/her mind with respect to interacting with me.

All my writing on the internet can do is damage bozos who hurt me, quite aggressively actually. I am very aggressive, though fair, and law-abiding and ethical, in pursuing my rights. People in my family have fought and worked and killed and died for civil rights, from WW2 to Brown vs. Board of Education and beyond. I am not going to die for my civil rights, but I am comfortable typing and thinking and innovating and verbally/intellectually sabotaging, perhaps even lethally, and in accordance with US and international law, anyone at all who would dare to violate the human and in many cases civil rights of people like me--people from LGBTQ/female/ethnic minority/religious minority/disabled/impoverished/otherwise unfortunate backgrounds. Why shouldn't I keep up the fight that my family, which definitely is not comprised of all virtuous people but is very great overall, has given so much to pursue over the generations? I won't even die. I just have to consider typing right now. The innovation is already done.

- - -

OK, Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi. That's your cue to start lying some more. Do it in code and try to make it hard for me to respond to. Make sure to communicate your lies just right. Compare anything I say to some movie or Bible verse that everyone sees differently from how I see it.

Go do it. You aren't killing or hurting me. You're just devastating your top backers, doing horrible damage to the unfair pseudo-liberals who have put faith in you mistakenly, and wasting some more of my time. I don't like it, but yes, you can do it. I think you shouldn't. I will always follow laws and stay true to my values regardless of you do. I don't mind writing reminders to everyone who reads that yes, I follow the rules, and yes, that's important.