I am working on an idea for secure private-key cryptography. The idea is related to EXPTIME decision problems, and I hope to show that certain computations are provably not computable in PSPACE.

I am probably not going to explicitly patent intellectual property, but whenever this ordeal of mine is over, I am interested in selling intellectual property to firms, with the help of a lawyer, that such firms could patent and/or use to further their corporate goals.

I will probably do some more work on this idea over the next few days; not all ideas are fully based on provably correct propositions yet. I will likely post one or more updates as my work progresses.

-Philip White

On Sunday, October 31, 2021 at 8:12:36 PM UTC-4, DV wrote:
> I am working on an idea for secure private-key cryptography. The idea is related to EXPTIME decision problems, and I hope to show that certain computations are provably not computable in PSPACE.
>
> I am probably not going to explicitly patent intellectual property, but whenever this ordeal of mine is over, I am interested in selling intellectual property to firms, with the help of a lawyer, that such firms could patent and/or use to further their corporate goals.
>
> I will probably do some more work on this idea over the next few days; not all ideas are fully based on provably correct propositions yet. I will likely post one or more updates as my work progresses.
>
> -Philip White

Also: I'm not sure at this time, but I think that the mathematical idea I have in mind, which is related to EXPTIME as I said above, would be usable to devise provably secure public-key cryptography schemes too.

I haven't finished proving all the theorems, but I'm pretty sure that I could within a week at any time at this point.

On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 2:13:02 PM UTC-4, DV wrote:
> On Sunday, October 31, 2021 at 8:12:36 PM UTC-4, DV wrote:
> > I am working on an idea for secure private-key cryptography. The idea is related to EXPTIME decision problems, and I hope to show that certain computations are provably not computable in PSPACE.
> >
> > I am probably not going to explicitly patent intellectual property, but whenever this ordeal of mine is over, I am interested in selling intellectual property to firms, with the help of a lawyer, that such firms could patent and/or use to further their corporate goals.
> >
> > I will probably do some more work on this idea over the next few days; not all ideas are fully based on provably correct propositions yet. I will likely post one or more updates as my work progresses.
> >
> > -Philip White
> Also: I'm not sure at this time, but I think that the mathematical idea I have in mind, which is related to EXPTIME as I said above, would be usable to devise provably secure public-key cryptography schemes too.
>
> I haven't finished proving all the theorems, but I'm pretty sure that I could within a week at any time at this point.

Another update:

I now have 4 algorithms that break DLP and FACTOR based cryptography.

One of them is one that I could sell to an appropriate firm, once it is certain that my replacement public/private-key cryptography ideas will be in use to protect data. I'm not sure that anyone would want such an algorithm, but my point is that I could now demonstrate a working algorithm of this nature that would not interfere with my other plans.

I am still not going to publish anything that would dangerous at this time. Of course, I am still waiting to have my rights restored. The CIA/NSA bozos are truly idiotic in their persistence at attacking me.

On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 7:29:42 PM UTC-4, DV wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 2:13:02 PM UTC-4, DV wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 31, 2021 at 8:12:36 PM UTC-4, DV wrote:
> > > I am working on an idea for secure private-key cryptography. The idea is related to EXPTIME decision problems, and I hope to show that certain computations are provably not computable in PSPACE.
> > >
> > > I am probably not going to explicitly patent intellectual property, but whenever this ordeal of mine is over, I am interested in selling intellectual property to firms, with the help of a lawyer, that such firms could patent and/or use to further their corporate goals.
> > >
> > > I will probably do some more work on this idea over the next few days; not all ideas are fully based on provably correct propositions yet. I will likely post one or more updates as my work progresses.
> > >
> > > -Philip White
> > Also: I'm not sure at this time, but I think that the mathematical idea I have in mind, which is related to EXPTIME as I said above, would be usable to devise provably secure public-key cryptography schemes too.
> >
> > I haven't finished proving all the theorems, but I'm pretty sure that I could within a week at any time at this point.
> Another update:
>
> I now have 4 algorithms that break DLP and FACTOR based cryptography.
>
> One of them is one that I could sell to an appropriate firm, once it is certain that my replacement public/private-key cryptography ideas will be in use to protect data. I'm not sure that anyone would want such an algorithm, but my point is that I could now demonstrate a working algorithm of this nature that would not interfere with my other plans.
>
> I am still not going to publish anything that would dangerous at this time. Of course, I am still waiting to have my rights restored. The CIA/NSA bozos are truly idiotic in their persistence at attacking me.

Note, due to the (rather obvious) non-cryptography applications of the order finding algorithm, I would sell it for a rather high price or not at all. It wouldn't definitely have to be sold.

On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 10:21:03 AM UTC-4, DV wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 7:29:42 PM UTC-4, DV wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 2:13:02 PM UTC-4, DV wrote:
> > > On Sunday, October 31, 2021 at 8:12:36 PM UTC-4, DV wrote:
> > > > I am working on an idea for secure private-key cryptography. The idea is related to EXPTIME decision problems, and I hope to show that certain computations are provably not computable in PSPACE.
> > > >
> > > > I am probably not going to explicitly patent intellectual property, but whenever this ordeal of mine is over, I am interested in selling intellectual property to firms, with the help of a lawyer, that such firms could patent and/or use to further their corporate goals.
> > > >
> > > > I will probably do some more work on this idea over the next few days; not all ideas are fully based on provably correct propositions yet. I will likely post one or more updates as my work progresses.
> > > >
> > > > -Philip White
> > > Also: I'm not sure at this time, but I think that the mathematical idea I have in mind, which is related to EXPTIME as I said above, would be usable to devise provably secure public-key cryptography schemes too.
> > >
> > > I haven't finished proving all the theorems, but I'm pretty sure that I could within a week at any time at this point.
> > Another update:
> >
> > I now have 4 algorithms that break DLP and FACTOR based cryptography.
> >
> > One of them is one that I could sell to an appropriate firm, once it is certain that my replacement public/private-key cryptography ideas will be in use to protect data. I'm not sure that anyone would want such an algorithm, but my point is that I could now demonstrate a working algorithm of this nature that would not interfere with my other plans.
> >
> > I am still not going to publish anything that would dangerous at this time. Of course, I am still waiting to have my rights restored. The CIA/NSA bozos are truly idiotic in their persistence at attacking me.
> Note, due to the (rather obvious) non-cryptography applications of the order finding algorithm, I would sell it for a rather high price or not at all. It wouldn't definitely have to be sold.

I've decided that I'm probably going to pursue a patent on the cryptography idea.

It should be patentable, and even if illegal restrictions by the CIA prevent me from selling the technology for a few years, I assume I would have a chance of selling the technology eventually.

With any luck, I should be ready to proceed by the end of the year.