When-so-ever simulating halt decider H(X,Y) determines that the
simulated behavior of its input correctly matches a infinite behavior
pattern such that the input would never stop running unless its
simulation is aborted H correctly aborts this input and returns 0.

// Simplified Linz(1990) Ĥ and Strachey(1965) P
void P(u32 x)
{ if (H(x, x))
HERE: goto HERE;
}

This correctly eliminates the pathological feedback loop between the
halt decider and its input that otherwise make input like the above
input impossible for H(P,P) to decide.

Halting problem undecidability and infinitely nested simulation V2

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356105750_Halting_problem_undecidability_and_infinitely_nested_simulation_V2

--
Copyright 2021 Pete Olcott

Talent hits a target no one else can hit;
Genius hits a target no one else can see.
Arthur Schopenhauer

On 12/3/21 10:20 AM, olcott wrote:
> When-so-ever simulating halt decider H(X,Y) determines that the
> simulated behavior of its input correctly matches a infinite behavior
> pattern such that the input would never stop running unless its
> simulation is aborted H correctly aborts this input and returns 0.
>

(See other reply for more details)

Except in this case the input to H doesn't correctly atch a correct
infinite behavior pattern, so H is NOT correct in returning 0.

> // Simplified Linz(1990) Ĥ and Strachey(1965) P
> void P(u32 x)
> {
>   if (H(x, x))
>     HERE: goto HERE;
> }
>
> This correctly eliminates the pathological feedback loop between the
> halt decider and its input that otherwise make input like the above
> input impossible for H(P,P) to decide.

The 'pathological feedback' is VALID, and your H just gets the wrong
answer to the halting problem because it decided to be a POOP decider
instead.

>
> Halting problem undecidability and infinitely nested simulation V2
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356105750_Halting_problem_undecidability_and_infinitely_nested_simulation_V2
>
>
>
>
>

On Saturday, 4 December 2021 at 00:47:23 UTC+1, richar...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 12/3/21 10:20 AM, olcott wrote:

> > simulation is aborted H correctly aborts this input and returns 0.
> >
> (See other reply for more details)

What a fucking shithole...

Are you just stupid or yet another agent of the enemy?

Stop feeding the trolls, MORON.

*Plonk*

Julio

On 12/4/2021 2:52 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> On Saturday, 4 December 2021 at 00:47:23 UTC+1, richar...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 12/3/21 10:20 AM, olcott wrote:
>
>>> simulation is aborted H correctly aborts this input and returns 0.
>>>
>> (See other reply for more details)
>
> What a fucking shithole...
>
> Are you just stupid or yet another agent of the enemy?
>
> Stop feeding the trolls, MORON.
>
> *Plonk*
>
> Julio
>

The real problem is that you are either too stupid or dishonest to
acknowledge this obvious fact:

On 12/3/2021 6:18 PM, olcott wrote:
> Whenever the pure simulation of the input to simulating halt decider
> H(x,y) never stops running unless H aborts its simulation H correctly
> aborts this simulation and returns 0 for not halting.
>

--
Copyright 2021 Pete Olcott

Talent hits a target no one else can hit;
Genius hits a target no one else can see.
Arthur Schopenhauer