Message-ID:

Machines that have broken down will work perfectly when the repairman arrives.

devel / comp.theory / Re: As regards "Object-Oriented Programming"

Re: As regards "Object-Oriented Programming"

<b80dcfa3-b6b6-4cd8-a3fc-8a118c38af3bn@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=25528&group=comp.theory#25528

X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:3714:: with SMTP id de20mr2246215qkb.465.1641883688778;
Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:48:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:c01:: with SMTP id f1mr3937210ybq.593.1641883688578;
Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:48:08 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:48:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <243fbd10-b86f-4d54-9432-bcbe19f73737@v34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=98.246.212.4; posting-account=0pheVgoAAACKj674Kl3qdRoiYysIz_ok
NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.246.212.4
References: <67c11a31-5ba9-430e-8935-85980e7cf555@k5g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <243fbd10-b86f-4d54-9432-bcbe19f73737@v34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b80dcfa3-b6b6-4cd8-a3fc-8a118c38af3bn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: As regards "Object-Oriented Programming"
From: jeffreyd...@gmail.com (Jeffrey Rubard)
Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 06:48:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 10

by: Jeffrey Rubard - Tue, 11 Jan 2022 06:48 UTC

On Saturday, March 27, 2010 at 6:44:15 PM UTC-7, Marshall wrote:
> On Mar 15, 8:51 pm, Jeff Rubard <jeffrub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > C++ is a great programming language for working programmers.
> > Am I riteoramirite?
> http://www.deftcode.com/archives/every_language_war_ever.html
>
> Marshall

2022 Update: OOP is "still a thing", right?
(The thought occurred to me recently that the "multi-paradigm languages" constitute all and only the living programming languages.
OOP seems ditzy as a PL concept and brilliant as a commercial 'workflow' technique.)

Re: As regards "Object-Oriented Programming"

<0687df52-544f-462c-908e-b22c9006e116n@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=25530&group=comp.theory#25530

copy link Newsgroups: comp.theory

X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2596:: with SMTP id x22mr2456892qko.408.1641893948086;
Tue, 11 Jan 2022 01:39:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:4dd5:: with SMTP id a204mr4999655ybb.604.1641893947860;
Tue, 11 Jan 2022 01:39:07 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 01:39:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <b80dcfa3-b6b6-4cd8-a3fc-8a118c38af3bn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=58.115.187.102; posting-account=QJ9iEwoAAACyjkKjQAWQOwSEULNvZZkc
NNTP-Posting-Host: 58.115.187.102
References: <67c11a31-5ba9-430e-8935-85980e7cf555@k5g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
<243fbd10-b86f-4d54-9432-bcbe19f73737@v34g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <b80dcfa3-b6b6-4cd8-a3fc-8a118c38af3bn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0687df52-544f-462c-908e-b22c9006e116n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: As regards "Object-Oriented Programming"
From: wyni...@gmail.com (wij)
Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:39:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 15

by: wij - Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:39 UTC

On Tuesday, 11 January 2022 at 14:48:10 UTC+8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> On Saturday, March 27, 2010 at 6:44:15 PM UTC-7, Marshall wrote:
> > On Mar 15, 8:51 pm, Jeff Rubard <jeffrub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > C++ is a great programming language for working programmers.
> > > Am I riteoramirite?
> > http://www.deftcode.com/archives/every_language_war_ever.html
> >
> > Marshall
> 2022 Update: OOP is "still a thing", right?
> (The thought occurred to me recently that the "multi-paradigm languages" constitute all and only the living programming languages.
> OOP seems ditzy as a PL concept and brilliant as a commercial 'workflow' technique.)

The original OOP theory (of C++) was already flawed in the early time.
But, C++ is surely a great programming language for working programmers
(Python or others are either 'ditzy' or clumsy to me) except 'working' means
paid work, then, I don't really know.

Subject	Author
As regards "Object-Oriented Programming"	Jeffrey Rubard
As regards "Object-Oriented Programming"	wij