0

You're doing it again, I'm not you're secretary. You have no place in government and are a bad citizen if you can read this and have a CIA clearance at this time.

On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 8:29:56 PM UTC-5, B.H. wrote:
> 0
>
> You're doing it again, I'm not you're secretary. You have no place in government and are a bad citizen if you can read this and have a CIA clearance at this time.

(My mood is doing better, thanks in part to my efforts to work on my health.. If you think that means I'm going to slow down 0's, you're very mistaken. The CIA's efforts to destroy its ability to protect national security are laughable. Don't expect me to go easy on anyone, and don't expect a "free pass" on unacceptable behavior. Acting like a 3 year old when you are an adult is the height of irresponsibility and demonstrated unemployability. The intransigent bozos who won't cut it out are going to get more and more frustrated as they fail more and more, whether or not these idiots have a deep understanding of the science of "0's" or not. The typos are completely unacceptable, along with every other illegal or damaging or harassing action taken against, by the CIA and anyone else.)

On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 8:32:23 PM UTC-5, B.H. wrote:
> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 8:29:56 PM UTC-5, B.H. wrote:
> > 0
> >
> > You're doing it again, I'm not you're secretary. You have no place in government and are a bad citizen if you can read this and have a CIA clearance at this time.
> (My mood is doing better, thanks in part to my efforts to work on my health. If you think that means I'm going to slow down 0's, you're very mistaken. The CIA's efforts to destroy its ability to protect national security are laughable. Don't expect me to go easy on anyone, and don't expect a "free pass" on unacceptable behavior. Acting like a 3 year old when you are an adult is the height of irresponsibility and demonstrated unemployability. The intransigent bozos who won't cut it out are going to get more and more frustrated as they fail more and more, whether or not these idiots have a deep understanding of the science of "0's" or not. The typos are completely unacceptable, along with every other illegal or damaging or harassing action taken against, by the CIA and anyone else.)

0

On Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 09:34:12 UTC+8, B.H. wrote:
> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 8:32:23 PM UTC-5, B.H. wrote:
> > On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 8:29:56 PM UTC-5, B.H. wrote:
> > > 0
> > >
> > > You're doing it again, I'm not you're secretary. You have no place in government and are a bad citizen if you can read this and have a CIA clearance at this time.
> > (My mood is doing better, thanks in part to my efforts to work on my health. If you think that means I'm going to slow down 0's, you're very mistaken. The CIA's efforts to destroy its ability to protect national security are laughable. Don't expect me to go easy on anyone, and don't expect a "free pass" on unacceptable behavior. Acting like a 3 year old when you are an adult is the height of irresponsibility and demonstrated unemployability. The intransigent bozos who won't cut it out are going to get more and more frustrated as they fail more and more, whether or not these idiots have a deep understanding of the science of "0's" or not. The typos are completely unacceptable, along with every other illegal or damaging or harassing action taken against, by the CIA and anyone else.)
> 0
Good morning and wake up, B.H. Are you OK?