Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

"Why should we subsidize intellectual curiosity?" -- Ronald Reagan

devel / comp.arch / Re: 32 vs 1024 Bit Processor

SubjectAuthor
* Re: 32 vs 1024 Bit ProcessorQuadibloc
+- Re: 32 vs 1024 Bit ProcessorScott Lurndal
+- Re: 32 vs 1024 Bit ProcessorMitchAlsup
`- Re: 32 vs 1024 Bit ProcessorThomas Koenig

1
Re: 32 vs 1024 Bit Processor

<ae2257df-c56b-46c8-9af7-cce4d70e0972n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=28157&group=comp.arch#28157

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.arch
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:20c1:b0:4b9:f285:de7e with SMTP id 1-20020a05621420c100b004b9f285de7emr2554995qve.14.1666304486408;
Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:c4:b0:354:9470:7b99 with SMTP id
t4-20020a05680800c400b0035494707b99mr22605254oic.23.1666304486201; Thu, 20
Oct 2022 15:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4emdca$lm2@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>#1/1>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:56a:fb70:6300:94bb:1d6c:62cf:aee6;
posting-account=1nOeKQkAAABD2jxp4Pzmx9Hx5g9miO8y
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:56a:fb70:6300:94bb:1d6c:62cf:aee6
References: <310ead63.82771709@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu> <4emdca$lm2@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>#1/1>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ae2257df-c56b-46c8-9af7-cce4d70e0972n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: 32 vs 1024 Bit Processor
From: jsav...@ecn.ab.ca (Quadibloc)
Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:21:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1376
 by: Quadibloc - Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:21 UTC

On Wednesday, January 31, 1996 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Mike Schmit wrote:
> Current chips have 200 - 300 pins.

Huh? I thought that these days, microprocessors have from 1000 to 3000 pins.

John Savard

Re: 32 vs 1024 Bit Processor

<ndk4L.432371$wLZ8.161205@fx18.iad>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=28159&group=comp.arch#28159

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.arch
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx18.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
X-newsreader: xrn 9.03-beta-14-64bit
Sender: scott@dragon.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
From: sco...@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
Reply-To: slp53@pacbell.net
Subject: Re: 32 vs 1024 Bit Processor
Newsgroups: comp.arch
References: <310ead63.82771709@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu> <ae2257df-c56b-46c8-9af7-cce4d70e0972n@googlegroups.com>
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <ndk4L.432371$wLZ8.161205@fx18.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:46:43 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:46:43 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 973
 by: Scott Lurndal - Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:46 UTC

Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> writes:
>On Wednesday, January 31, 1996 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Mike Schmit wrote:
>> Current chips have 200 - 300 pins.
>
>Huh? I thought that these days, microprocessors have from 1000 to 3000 pins.
>
>John Savard

John, please read the posting date _before_ you reply. In 1996, that
wasn't a bad estimate.

Re: 32 vs 1024 Bit Processor

<06c108a8-d126-4048-97bf-29d22223fa9en@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=28160&group=comp.arch#28160

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.arch
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5cc5:b0:4b3:ec9e:79d8 with SMTP id lk5-20020a0562145cc500b004b3ec9e79d8mr13174731qvb.61.1666306030536;
Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1986:b0:355:30d1:dd22 with SMTP id
bj6-20020a056808198600b0035530d1dd22mr13107890oib.106.1666306030346; Thu, 20
Oct 2022 15:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ae2257df-c56b-46c8-9af7-cce4d70e0972n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:1700:291:29f0:da1:ef35:4299:143f;
posting-account=H_G_JQkAAADS6onOMb-dqvUozKse7mcM
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:1700:291:29f0:da1:ef35:4299:143f
References: <310ead63.82771709@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu> <4emdca$lm2@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>
<ae2257df-c56b-46c8-9af7-cce4d70e0972n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <06c108a8-d126-4048-97bf-29d22223fa9en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: 32 vs 1024 Bit Processor
From: MitchAl...@aol.com (MitchAlsup)
Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:47:10 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1666
 by: MitchAlsup - Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:47 UTC

On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 5:21:27 PM UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 31, 1996 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Mike Schmit wrote:
> > Current chips have 200 - 300 pins.
<
I had 200 pins in 1985...........~1300 in 2005..........
<
> Huh? I thought that these days, microprocessors have from 1000 to 3000 pins.
<
And somewhere between 1/3rd and 1/2 of the pins are Pwr and Gnd.
>
> John Savard

Re: 32 vs 1024 Bit Processor

<titbca$20crr$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=28163&group=comp.arch#28163

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.arch
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.mixmin.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!.POSTED.2001-4dd7-6464-0-7285-c2ff-fe6c-992d.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de!not-for-mail
From: tkoe...@netcologne.de (Thomas Koenig)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: 32 vs 1024 Bit Processor
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:40:26 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: news.netcologne.de
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <titbca$20crr$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de>
References: <310ead63.82771709@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu>
<4emdca$lm2@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>
<ae2257df-c56b-46c8-9af7-cce4d70e0972n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:40:26 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: newsreader4.netcologne.de; posting-host="2001-4dd7-6464-0-7285-c2ff-fe6c-992d.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de:2001:4dd7:6464:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d";
logging-data="2110331"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@netcologne.de"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
 by: Thomas Koenig - Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:40 UTC

Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> schrieb:
> On Wednesday, January 31, 1996 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Mike Schmit wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Current chips have 200 - 300 pins.
>
> Huh? I thought that these days, microprocessors have from 1000 to 3000 pins.

That post wasn't written "these days", it's a resurrected necro-thread.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor