Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Disobedience: The silver lining to the cloud of servitude. -- Ambrose Bierce


computers / comp.dcom.telecom / Re: [telecom] 5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of Industries

SubjectAuthor
* 5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of Industries And Regulators (PodcaBill Horne
`* Re: 5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of Industries [telecom]Christopher Herot
 `* Re: [telecom] 5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of IndustriesFred Atkinson
  `- Re: [telecom] 5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of IndustriesScott Dorsey

1
5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of Industries And Regulators (Podcast) [telecom]

<20220119013615.30412869@telecom2018.csail.mit.edu>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2919&group=comp.dcom.telecom#2919

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!post.local
From: malQRMas...@gmail.com (Bill Horne)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: 5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of Industries And Regulators (Podcast) [telecom]
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 01:36:15 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Telecom Digest
Lines: 17
Sender: news@iecc.com
Approved: telecom-moderator@telecom.csail.mit.edu
Message-ID: <20220119013615.30412869@telecom2018.csail.mit.edu>
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970";
logging-data="82865"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Authentication-Results: iecc.com; spf=none spf.mailfrom=moder8@telecom.csail.mit.edu spf.helo=telecom2018.csail.mit.edu smtp.remote-ip="128.31.0.70"; dmarc=none header.from=gmail.com polrec.p=none polrec.pct=100
 by: Bill Horne - Wed, 19 Jan 2022 01:36 UTC

by Levine, Blaszak, Block & Boothby, LLP

There is a fascinating dispute unfolding between the wireless
communications industry and the aviation industry, or rather, a
dispute between their respective regulators, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA). The dispute revolves around the wireless
carriers' use of C-Band spectrum to deliver 5G and the aviation
industry's use of nearby spectrum to control aircraft.

Listen to this 12-minute podcast as Steve Rosen, a Partner at LB3,
David Lee, TC2's Technology Director, and Joe Schmidt explain this
technical and legal conundrum and why it will be a regulatory and
economic train wreck if the dispute doesn't get sorted.

https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/telecoms-mobile-cable-communications/1151072/5g-deployment-and-radio-altimetersa-clash-of-industries-and-regulators-podcast?email_access=on

Re: 5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of Industries [telecom]

<CDC13254-D8D1-4C23-91F3-D463F8C8FEEA@herot.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2927&group=comp.dcom.telecom#2927

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!post.local
From: che...@herot.com (Christopher Herot)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: 5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of Industries [telecom]
Date: 20 Jan 2022 13:19:24 -0500
Organization: The Telecom Digest
Lines: 7
Sender: news@iecc.com
Approved: telecom-moderator@telecom.csail.mit.edu
Message-ID: <CDC13254-D8D1-4C23-91F3-D463F8C8FEEA@herot.com>
References: <20220119013615.30412869@telecom2018.csail.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970";
logging-data="21710"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.57.22011101
Authentication-Results: iecc.com; spf=none spf.mailfrom=moder8@telecom.csail.mit.edu spf.helo=telecom2018.csail.mit.edu smtp.remote-ip="128.31.0.70"
In-Reply-To: <20220119013615.30412869@telecom2018.csail.mit.edu>
Thread-Topic: 5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of Industries [telecom]
 by: Christopher Herot - Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:19 UTC

A good presentation of the details, most of which have not been adequately reported in the popular or even the technical press:

https://www.rtca.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Slides-5G-Interference-Risk-to-Radar-Altimeters.pdf

Re: [telecom] 5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of Industries

<C4074DB8-54D7-4C35-A02B-4C5147D2468A@mishmash.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2930&group=comp.dcom.telecom#2930

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!post.local
From: fatkinso...@and-this-too.mishmash.com (Fred Atkinson)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: [telecom] 5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of Industries
Date: 21 Jan 2022 21:26:00 -0700
Organization: The Telecom Digest
Lines: 16
Sender: news@iecc.com
Approved: telecom-moderator@telecom.csail.mit.edu
Message-ID: <C4074DB8-54D7-4C35-A02B-4C5147D2468A@mishmash.com>
References: <CDC13254-D8D1-4C23-91F3-D463F8C8FEEA@herot.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970";
logging-data="89458"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Authentication-Results: iecc.com; spf=none spf.mailfrom=moder8@telecom.csail.mit.edu spf.helo=telecom2018.csail.mit.edu smtp.remote-ip="128.31.0.70"; dkim=fail (bad signature) header.d=mishmash.com header.s=default header.a=rsa-sha256 header.b="bEhRrXnd"; dmarc=none header.from=and-this-too.mishmash.com polrec.p=none polrec.pct=100
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
In-Reply-To: <CDC13254-D8D1-4C23-91F3-D463F8C8FEEA@herot.com>
 by: Fred Atkinson - Sat, 22 Jan 2022 04:26 UTC

> On Jan 21, 2022, at 8:42 PM, Christopher Herot <cherot@herot.com> wrote:

> A good presentation of the details, most of which have not been
> adequately reported in the popular or even the technical press:

> https://www.rtca.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Slides-5G-Interference-Risk-to-Radar-Altimeters.pdf

Ok, I see the issue.

My question is why did they wait until 5G is about to be deployed
rather than speaking up well before now?
=
Fred

Re: [telecom] 5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of Industries

<su8nfc$ja8$1@panix2.panix.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2959&group=comp.dcom.telecom#2959

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!post.local
From: klu...@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: [telecom] 5G Deployment And Radio Altimeters - A Clash Of Industries
Date: 12 Feb 2022 16:32:44 -0000
Organization: The Telecom Digest
Lines: 22
Sender: news@iecc.com
Approved: telecom-moderator@telecom.csail.mit.edu
Message-ID: <su8nfc$ja8$1@panix2.panix.com>
References: <CDC13254-D8D1-4C23-91F3-D463F8C8FEEA@herot.com> <C4074DB8-54D7-4C35-A02B-4C5147D2468A@mishmash.com>
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970";
logging-data="2638"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Authentication-Results: iecc.com; spf=none spf.mailfrom=moder8@telecom.csail.mit.edu spf.helo=telecom2018.csail.mit.edu smtp.remote-ip="128.31.0.70"; dkim=fail (bad signature) header.d=panix.com header.s=panix header.a=rsa-sha256 header.b="BlK+4B7D"
In-Reply-To: <C4074DB8-54D7-4C35-A02B-4C5147D2468A@mishmash.com>
 by: Scott Dorsey - Sat, 12 Feb 2022 16:32 UTC

Fred Atkinson <fatkinson.remove-this@and-this-too.mishmash.com> wrote:
>Ok, I see the issue.
>
>My question is why did they wait until 5G is about to be deployed
>rather than speaking up well before now?

Because neither the FAA nor the FCC have many technical experts left. So
it takes a long, long time for technical issues to trickle up from the few
technical people through all the lawyers up to the top.

European countries dealt with this quickly and efficiently.

And the honest truth is that for modern radar altimeters this isn't a
problem. But there are plenty of planes out there flying whose radar
altimeter receiver is just a horn and a diode detector. They were designed
that way because there wasn't any use of adjacent bands so nobody bothered
putting money and effort into making them any better.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor