Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Why use Windows, since there is a door? (By fachat@galileo.rhein-neckar.de, Andre Fachat)


computers / comp.sys.tandem / ITUGLIB Update: OpenSSL 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 In Progress

SubjectAuthor
o ITUGLIB Update: OpenSSL 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 In ProgressRandall

1
ITUGLIB Update: OpenSSL 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 In Progress

<0153ad17-7d8e-490f-b5ce-c6396aa1ae60n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=299&group=comp.sys.tandem#299

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.tandem
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:8031:: with SMTP id 46mr6920735qva.126.1639503699022;
Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:41:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:a2c1:: with SMTP id c1mr457929ybn.473.1639503698768;
Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:41:38 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.tandem
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:41:38 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2607:fea8:3ddf:f2b0:1d92:5b76:a185:3f41;
posting-account=6VebZwoAAAAgrpUtsowyjrKRLNlqxnXo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2607:fea8:3ddf:f2b0:1d92:5b76:a185:3f41
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0153ad17-7d8e-490f-b5ce-c6396aa1ae60n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: ITUGLIB Update: OpenSSL 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 In Progress
From: rsbec...@nexbridge.com (Randall)
Injection-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:41:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 86
 by: Randall - Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:41 UTC

Builds/Tests have started for OpenSSL 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 at ITUGLIB. I will post another thread when these are published. Details of this release are from the OpenSSL Team (under their copyright):

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

OpenSSL Security Advisory [14 December 2021] ===========================================
Invalid handling of X509_verify_cert() internal errors in libssl (CVE-2021-4044) ===============================================================================
Severity: Moderate

Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509_verify_cert() on the client side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. That function may return a negative return value to indicate an internal error (for example out of memory).. Such a negative return value is mishandled by OpenSSL and will cause an IO function (such as SSL_connect() or SSL_do_handshake()) to not indicate success and a subsequent call to SSL_get_error() to return the value SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY. This return value is only supposed to be returned by OpenSSL if the application has previously called SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback(). Since most applications do not do this the SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY return value from SSL_get_error() will be totally unexpected and applications may not behave correctly as a result. The exact behaviour will depend on the application but it could result in crashes, infinite loops or other similar incorrect responses.

This issue is made more serious in combination with a separate bug in OpenSSL
3.0 that will cause X509_verify_cert() to indicate an internal error when processing a certificate chain. This will occur where a certificate does not include the Subject Alternative Name extension but where a Certificate Authority has enforced name constraints. This issue can occur even with valid chains.

By combining the two issues an attacker could induce incorrect, application dependent behaviour.

OpenSSL 3.0.0 SSL/TLS clients are affected by this issue. Users of this version should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0.1.

OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.

This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 29th November 2021 by Tobias Nießen. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell and Tobias Nießen.

Note
===
OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Extended support is available for premium support customers:
https://www.openssl.org/support/contracts.html

OpenSSL 1.1.0 is out of support and no longer receiving updates of any kind..
The impact of these issues on OpenSSL 1.1.0 has not been analysed.

Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0 or 1.1.1.

References
=========
URL for this Security Advisory:
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20211214.txt

Note: the online version of the advisory may be updated with additional details over time.

For details of OpenSSL severity classifications please see:
https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhlersmDwVrHlGQg52cTSbQ5gRJEFAmG4zbUACgkQ2cTSbQ5g
RJG+TggAsQHgwpwy2j4FPzKFAar5hM+3cMI9hZUECu5VJBZaVUQM3fBY5Um16T5L
n6weB9EFe+xpA2ncuuDeUWGvACW5oj6j/obfse4cIRc2K4XfHNydzCi/EB1cG1Qi
d4/dqw4I8KgyZkk7iyZawtQ+vslSefsUbYSqrslBiETK7VMGjIrxNy7ohMadFdA7
E8dYicPPjkYX/4+vs/W0RiAe4kFAHKTFZIvh2ab65CBubAOGDS0CFavd57FvC10Y
UquSKdBIWIIlfueQ8IhYx3v/VEOvS4Q8OpkPkfuoRu0j3qX8lvyHV+gipHD9MK9q
zI7Kj9oa+mUqyT5cp3mhIbSqq3Qm0A==xJgY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor