Am 12.04.22 um 01:46 schrieb John Doe:
> Apps determine the operating system, not the other way around.
> I have some apps that cannot function in Android 12, therefore of course I
> want to avoid updating to android 12. I have no apps that require android 12.

More importantly you do not have apps under 11 that do not run under 12.
12 is standard now not 11. If you can upgrade then upgrade.

--
De gustibus non est disputandum

Joerg Lorenz wrote:

> you do not have apps under 11 that do not run under 12.
> 12 is standard now not 11.

How can you be certain?

There have been times when I've had a newly upgraded version of android (release
not beta) and an app e.g from my bank, where they have not even started
testing/fixing the app on that version of android ...

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:07:19 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t37006$iqj$1@dont-email.me>.

Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to
USENET has been 56.6% of its posts contributing "nothing except insults"
to USENET.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

M7hN3egFtccf

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:52:58 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t372lq$iqj$6@dont-email.me>.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
to USENET has been 56.5% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

eMWGUs7nv8+D

On 2022-04-12 11:10, Andy Burns wrote:
> Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>
>> you do not have apps under 11 that do not run under 12.
>> 12 is standard now not 11.
>
> How can you be certain?
>
> There have been times when I've had a newly upgraded version of android
> (release not beta) and an app e.g from my bank, where they have not even
> started testing/fixing the app on that version of android ...

Consider changing bank :-)

Means they will probably be slow on every thing computer related, and
have security issues.

--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.

Carlos E. R. wrote:

> Andy Burns wrote:
>
>> There have been times when I've had a newly upgraded version of android
>> (release not beta) and an app e.g from my bank, where they have not even
>> started testing/fixing the app on that version of android ...
>
> Consider changing bank :-)

I gave them a 1* review on the play store, that taught them!

> Means they will probably be slow on every thing computer related, and
> have security issues.

Supposedly they're a top five european bank, and since whatever version that
was, they've always been ready when new android versions hit. The biggest
reason for not leaving is that my account number has been seared into my brain
for 40 years.

On 2022-04-13 21:43, Andy Burns wrote:
> Carlos E. R. wrote:
>
>> Andy Burns wrote:
>>
>>> There have been times when I've had a newly upgraded version of android
>>> (release not beta) and an app e.g from my bank, where they have not even
>>> started testing/fixing the app on that version of android ...
>>
>> Consider changing bank :-)
>
> I gave them a 1* review on the play store, that taught them!
>
>> Means they will probably be slow on every thing computer related, and
>> have security issues.
>
> Supposedly they're a top five european bank, and since whatever version
> that was, they've always been ready when new android versions hit.  The
> biggest reason for not leaving is that my account number has been seared
> into my brain for 40 years.

Yeah, I know. I have similar problems.

--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.

Am 13.04.22 um 19:20 schrieb John Doe:
> Andy Burns wrote:
>
>> Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>>
>>> you do not have apps under 11 that do not run under 12. 12 is standard
>>> now not 11.
>>
>> How can you be certain?
>>
>> There have been times when I've had a newly upgraded version of android
>> (release not beta) and an app e.g from my bank, where they have not even
>> started testing/fixing the app on that version of android ...
>
> It's ridiculous, but apparently the vast majority of smartphone users,
> like "Joerg Lorenz", have no idea how computers work.
>
> Only in a dictatorship does an operating system maker FORCE users to
> update to the most recent OS. The only conceivable reason is so they can
> further manipulate users via the new operating system. There will always
> be applications that will not run on the new OS. One obvious simple
> reason, even morons like "Joerg Lorenz" should be able to understand, is
> because the developer stops developing the app.
>
> Coincidentally, one specific app I need to run is made by another Asian
> company... "DJI Go 4". Doesn't run on Android 12.

Chatterbox and group Troll?

--
De gustibus non est disputandum

Am 13.04.22 um 21:23 schrieb Carlos E. R.:
> On 2022-04-12 11:10, Andy Burns wrote:
>> Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>>
>>> you do not have apps under 11 that do not run under 12.
>>> 12 is standard now not 11.
>>
>> How can you be certain?
>>
>> There have been times when I've had a newly upgraded version of android
>> (release not beta) and an app e.g from my bank, where they have not even
>> started testing/fixing the app on that version of android ...
>
> Consider changing bank :-)

Definitely.

> Means they will probably be slow on every thing computer related, and
> have security issues.

Very probable.

--
De gustibus non est disputandum

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 14 Apr 2022 05:00:22 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t389p6$fpj$1@dont-email.me>.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 56.9% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1007 articles to USENET. Of which 121 have been pure insults and
452 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

v+R2IQNnI/qR

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:48:32 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t39j8v$ss6$1@dont-email.me>.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 57.1% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1013 articles to USENET. Of which 122 have been pure insults and
456 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

x0QOjPArZrO+

Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
> Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>
> > you do not have apps under 11 that do not run under 12.
> > 12 is standard now not 11.
>
> How can you be certain?
>
> There have been times when I've had a newly upgraded version of
> android (release not beta) and an app e.g from my bank, where they
> have not even started testing/fixing the app on that version of
> android ...

Isn't that a quite uncommon scenario, an older - not old - app, not
working on a somewhat newer OS version?

I would expect that only to happen because of bad coding, i.e.
specifically checking for all supported OS versions, instead of just
testing for the *mininum* required OS version.

Normally, the Google Play / Play Store entry for an app says "Requires
Android X.Y and up", not "... N.M through X.Y".

FWIW, the app of my bank says "Requires Android 7.0 and up".

For OSs, backward compatibility is the norm. For example, this post is
brought to you courtesy of nearly *two decade* old software, running
on an OS which is three major releases newer.

On 2022-04-14 21:29, John Doe wrote:
> Apparently the rules that apply to Windows don't apply well to Android.
>
> In fact, I have a common application "DJI Go 4" that works in Android 11
> but not in Android 12. I had to roll back the stupid thing, now it nags to
> upgrade so I won't be able to use an important application...
>
> You might also want to consider the fact we personal computer users are on
> Windows 10 while Android is on version 12, in a fraction of the time.
>
> Google appears to be a nastier company than Microsoft, shown by its
> occasionally HIDEOUS search results that make finding information via
> Google nearly impossible.
>
> Try searching for (how to control a YouTube Shorts video volume). You get
> a ZILLION results about how to make YouTube Shorts videos, for the obvious
> reason Google is promoting that. Practically NOTHING about how to control
> volume. Of course the mentally crippled phone user presses the up and down
> volume key.

Just google for:

how to control a YouTube Shorts video "volume"?

and you get the answer in the first hit.

--
Cheers, Carlos.

Frank Slootweg wrote:

> Andy Burns wrote:
>
>> There have been times when I've had a newly upgraded version of
>> android (release not beta) and an app e.g from my bank, where they
>> have not even started testing/fixing the app on that version of
>> android ...
>
> Isn't that a quite uncommon scenario, an older - not old - app, not
> working on a somewhat newer OS version?

I can't remember the exact reason, I think related to a permissions change

> Normally, the Google Play / Play Store entry for an app says "Requires
> Android X.Y and up", not "... N.M through X.Y".
>
> FWIW, the app of my bank says "Requires Android 7.0 and up".

Mine now says 5.0 and up, I can't see my history of rating their app to tell how
long ago it was.

> For OSs, backward compatibility is the norm. For example, this post is
> brought to you courtesy of nearly *two decade* old software, running
> on an OS which is three major releases newer.

On 2022-04-15 01:52, John Doe wrote:
> "Carlos E.R." wrote:
>
>> John Doe wrote:
>
>>> Apparently the rules that apply to Windows don't apply well to Android.
>>>
>>> In fact, I have a common application "DJI Go 4" that works in Android
>>> 11 but not in Android 12. I had to roll back the stupid thing, now it
>>> nags to upgrade so I won't be able to use an important application...
>>>
>>> You might also want to consider the fact we personal computer users are
>>> on Windows 10 while Android is on version 12, in a fraction of the
>>> time.
>>>
>>> Google appears to be a nastier company than Microsoft, shown by its
>>> occasionally HIDEOUS search results that make finding information via
>>> Google nearly impossible.
>>>
>>> Try searching for (how to control a YouTube Shorts video volume). You
>>> get a ZILLION results about how to make YouTube Shorts videos, for the
>>> obvious reason Google is promoting that. Practically NOTHING about how
>>> to control volume. Of course the mentally crippled phone user presses
>>> the up and down volume key.
>>
>> Just google for:
>>
>> how to control a YouTube Shorts video "volume"?
>>
>> and you get the answer in the first hit.
>
> Unfortunately, No.
>
> That's the shortcut for a PC-based YouTube video. That up/down key control
> is active or inactive depending on what area of the page you have focused
> on with a click of your mouse.
>
> Currently (apparently) there is no keyboard or mouse volume control.
> YouTube Shorts is for smartphone users. And that's all Google cares about
> when searching for something about YouTube Shorts, promoting new
> venue/device.

Then you can google for:

how to control "YouTube Shorts" video "volume"?

And then, again on the first hit, you get an answer:

YouTube Shorts: The COMPLETE Guide! - Primal Video
https://primalvideo.com › youtube-growth › optimization
To adjust the volume level of your original video versus the volume
level of your audio track, press the Volume button. Slide the button
until you find the ...

The next hit says:

People also ask
How do I adjust the volume on YouTube shorts?
How do you stop Shorts on YouTube?
How do I make YouTube louder?
How do you use YouTube Shorts?

You simply have to learn how to use google to find the results you want.

--
Cheers, Carlos.

Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
> Frank Slootweg wrote:
>
> > Andy Burns wrote:
> >
> >> There have been times when I've had a newly upgraded version of
> >> android (release not beta) and an app e.g from my bank, where they
> >> have not even started testing/fixing the app on that version of
> >> android ...
> >
> > Isn't that a quite uncommon scenario, an older - not old - app, not
> > working on a somewhat newer OS version?
>
> I can't remember the exact reason, I think related to a permissions change

Yes, after I responded, I realized that that might well be a possible
cause, Android tightening up security/permissions, especially storage
permissions, i.e. similar to Windows going from XP to Vista.

> > Normally, the Google Play / Play Store entry for an app says "Requires
> > Android X.Y and up", not "... N.M through X.Y".
> >
> > FWIW, the app of my bank says "Requires Android 7.0 and up".
>
> Mine now says 5.0 and up, I can't see my history of rating their app
> to tell how long ago it was.
>
> > For OSs, backward compatibility is the norm. For example, this post is
> > brought to you courtesy of nearly *two decade* old software, running
> > on an OS which is three major releases newer.

On 2022-04-16 07:21, John Doe wrote:
> "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>
>> John Doe wrote:
>>> "Carlos E.R." wrote:
>>>> John Doe wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Apparently the rules that apply to Windows don't apply well to
>>>>> Android.
>>>>>
>>>>> In fact, I have a common application "DJI Go 4" that works in Android
>>>>> 11 but not in Android 12. I had to roll back the stupid thing, now it
>>>>> nags to upgrade so I won't be able to use an important application...
>>>>>
>>>>> You might also want to consider the fact we personal computer users
>>>>> are on Windows 10 while Android is on version 12, in a fraction of
>>>>> the time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Google appears to be a nastier company than Microsoft, shown by its
>>>>> occasionally HIDEOUS search results that make finding information via
>>>>> Google nearly impossible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Try searching for (how to control a YouTube Shorts video volume). You
>>>>> get a ZILLION results about how to make YouTube Shorts videos, for
>>>>> the obvious reason Google is promoting that. Practically NOTHING
>>>>> about how to control volume. Of course the mentally crippled phone
>>>>> user presses the up and down volume key.
>>>>
>>>> Just google for:
>>>>
>>>> how to control a YouTube Shorts video "volume"?
>>>>
>>>> and you get the answer in the first hit.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, No.
>>>
>>> That's the shortcut for a PC-based YouTube video. That up/down key
>>> control is active or inactive depending on what area of the page you
>>> have focused on with a click of your mouse.
>>>
>>> Currently (apparently) there is no keyboard or mouse volume control.
>>> YouTube Shorts is for smartphone users. And that's all Google cares
>>> about when searching for something about YouTube Shorts, promoting its
>>> new venue/device.
>>
>> Then you can google for:
>>
>> how to control "YouTube Shorts" video "volume"?
>>
>> And then, again on the first hit, you get an answer:
>>
>> YouTube Shorts: The COMPLETE Guide! - Primal Video
>> https://primalvideo.com › youtube-growth › optimization To adjust
>> the volume level of your original video versus the volume level of your
>> audio track, press the Volume button. Slide the button until you find
>> the
>
> Are you intentionally acting stupid?

Plonk.

>
> That is talking about the video MAKER, not the user.

--
Cheers, Carlos.

On 2022-04-16 13:45, Frank Slootweg wrote:
> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
>> Frank Slootweg wrote:
>>
>>> Andy Burns wrote:
>>>
>>>> There have been times when I've had a newly upgraded version of
>>>> android (release not beta) and an app e.g from my bank, where they
>>>> have not even started testing/fixing the app on that version of
>>>> android ...
>>>
>>> Isn't that a quite uncommon scenario, an older - not old - app, not
>>> working on a somewhat newer OS version?
>>
>> I can't remember the exact reason, I think related to a permissions change
>
> Yes, after I responded, I realized that that might well be a possible
> cause, Android tightening up security/permissions, especially storage
> permissions, i.e. similar to Windows going from XP to Vista.

Now I recall that it happened to me. I used in Android 4 perhaps an app
that could switch off the data connection at will; it did that based on
location or hour rules. On my next phone the permissions didn't allow it.

I also had an app that could set the clock; using ntp or gps it found
out the exact time and then adjusted the clock. Then this was not
allowed, and instead it helped the user to set up the clock manually,
beeping to indicate when to tap.

I think both apps had root modes in which they could work (if the phone
had been rooted).

--
Cheers, Carlos.

In article <t3f4i6$uv2$2@dont-email.me>, John Doe
<always.look@message.header> wrote:

>
> We should not be FORCED to upgrade the operating system, plain and simple.

nobody is being forced to upgrade anything.

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Sat, 16 Apr 2022 19:10:29 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t3f4b5$uv2$1@dont-email.me>.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 57.1% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1045 articles to USENET. Of which 124 have been pure insults and
473 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

klBvgNLphzae

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Sat, 16 Apr 2022 19:26:21 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t3f58t$6o9$1@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to
USENET (**) has been 57.1% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
least 1045 articles to USENET. Of which 124 have been pure insults and
473 have been John Doe "troll format" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

p1CjQAWy2DGk

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Sun, 17 Apr 2022 08:12:42 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t3gi5q$emg$1@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to
USENET (**) has been 57.3% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
least 1053 articles to USENET. Of which 124 have been pure insults and
479 have been John Doe "troll format" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

PgUzzmGpEMIj

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Sun, 17 Apr 2022 08:12:53 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t3gi65$emg$2@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 57.3% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1053 articles to USENET. Of which 124 have been pure insults and
479 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

RCUo3mnrliRt

YouTube Shorts is a popular short-form video content platform presented by YouTube in 2020. It has become popular among users who create short-length video content. In a very short span of time, YouTube Shorts have taken place in users’ daily lives. It has benefited YouTube by making the platform more engaging.

However, some people might find it distracting or uninteresting in Youtube shorts and want to disable it. And if you are among them and want to know how to turn off YouTube shorts? then you’ve come to the right place. In this article, we will discuss how to disable YouTube Shorts.

https://www.trickyworlds.com/how-to-disable-youtube-shorts/