Hi everyone,

Here is my career plan for the future at this time:

- Do "service" by publishing research.
- Publish 5 or 6 (I don't have Yang-Mills yet) CMI math papers for $1 M each.
- Maybe publish a little more research, as service, if I choose to.
- Withhold my research according to my formula, mentioned in another post.
- Maybe do service by selling research to ETHICAL, SERIOUS startups only.
- Write non-fiction professionally and try to publish it.
- Write fiction professionally and try to publish it.

I should be able to get $6 million within a little over 2 years after I'm released; journals are evil but not that evil. I probably won't seek to sell patents to existing companies, since I doubt too many existing companies ethically. If a startup could prove it had traction, was very serious about having good ethics and morals, and could make the right offer for some of my other STEM ideas, I might sell. I don't really want to run a business, whether it's with computer programming or "running a factory to produce an electrical-engineering product" or something like that. I might change my mind and decide to do the news startup, which I planned out pretty fully, again, but I think I believe that innovation and publishing non-fiction is more important than "starting a website to stop news suppression and support transparency in news and the first amendment." I think I would appropriately help the world more by arming people than by arming internet algorithms with pro-free-speech ideas and/or algorithms. Educating readers and arming/supplying them with knowledge via non-fiction books is probably a better way to achieve my pro-1st-amendment goals than starting a sophisticated AI-driven website would be.

-Philip White (philipjwhite@yahoo.com)

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 2:11:59 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Here is my career plan for the future at this time:
>
> - Do "service" by publishing research.
> - Publish 5 or 6 (I don't have Yang-Mills yet) CMI math papers for $1 M each.
> - Maybe publish a little more research, as service, if I choose to.
> - Withhold my research according to my formula, mentioned in another post..
> - Maybe do service by selling research to ETHICAL, SERIOUS startups only.
> - Write non-fiction professionally and try to publish it.
> - Write fiction professionally and try to publish it.
>
> I should be able to get $6 million within a little over 2 years after I'm released; journals are evil but not that evil. I probably won't seek to sell patents to existing companies, since I doubt too many existing companies ethically. If a startup could prove it had traction, was very serious about having good ethics and morals, and could make the right offer for some of my other STEM ideas, I might sell. I don't really want to run a business, whether it's with computer programming or "running a factory to produce an electrical-engineering product" or something like that. I might change my mind and decide to do the news startup, which I planned out pretty fully, again, but I think I believe that innovation and publishing non-fiction is more important than "starting a website to stop news suppression and support transparency in news and the first amendment." I think I would appropriately help the world more by arming people than by arming internet algorithms with pro-free-speech ideas and/or algorithms. Educating readers and arming/supplying them with knowledge via non-fiction books is probably a better way to achieve my pro-1st-amendment goals than starting a sophisticated AI-driven website would be.
>
> -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)

I might one day start a firm based on IP I still possess if I don't wind up selling to startups, but I probably would mainly be an "IP supplier" to the firm and owner of the firm rather than a seriously involved executive. I would maybe make sure about the ethics and non-discrimination policy, and leave the running of the firm to business strategy enthusiasts.

-Philip White

On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 9:28:30 AM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 2:11:59 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Here is my career plan for the future at this time:
> >
> > - Do "service" by publishing research.
> > - Publish 5 or 6 (I don't have Yang-Mills yet) CMI math papers for $1 M each.
> > - Maybe publish a little more research, as service, if I choose to.
> > - Withhold my research according to my formula, mentioned in another post.
> > - Maybe do service by selling research to ETHICAL, SERIOUS startups only.
> > - Write non-fiction professionally and try to publish it.
> > - Write fiction professionally and try to publish it.
> >
> > I should be able to get $6 million within a little over 2 years after I'm released; journals are evil but not that evil. I probably won't seek to sell patents to existing companies, since I doubt too many existing companies ethically. If a startup could prove it had traction, was very serious about having good ethics and morals, and could make the right offer for some of my other STEM ideas, I might sell. I don't really want to run a business, whether it's with computer programming or "running a factory to produce an electrical-engineering product" or something like that. I might change my mind and decide to do the news startup, which I planned out pretty fully, again, but I think I believe that innovation and publishing non-fiction is more important than "starting a website to stop news suppression and support transparency in news and the first amendment." I think I would appropriately help the world more by arming people than by arming internet algorithms with pro-free-speech ideas and/or algorithms. Educating readers and arming/supplying them with knowledge via non-fiction books is probably a better way to achieve my pro-1st-amendment goals than starting a sophisticated AI-driven website would be.
> >
> > -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)
> I might one day start a firm based on IP I still possess if I don't wind up selling to startups, but I probably would mainly be an "IP supplier" to the firm and owner of the firm rather than a seriously involved executive. I would maybe make sure about the ethics and non-discrimination policy, and leave the running of the firm to business strategy enthusiasts.
>
> -Philip White

An important conclusion about my life:

Given the expected value of arrests that will be made on my behalf by the American/VA state/local governments--close to 0 and definitely not enough--over the various crimes committed against me, it is very clear that: I need to be extremely selfish and focused on "return on investment" for me when it comes to dealing with 100% of all Americans, except for me, any women I might be dating, and any children I might have in the future. I will be kinder and more generous to people who don't live here; I'll do some service-y work and some innovation for compensation that I want if the price and credit I might receive will be right. Other than that, I find it important, given my outcome, to be extremely "stingy" and self-interested regarding work and service I may do. I got this idea from thinking about something a HS teacher at Commonwealth Academy communicated in the past; I don't think it would be fair at all to young students, now and in the future, to be generous after what was done to me by our own Democratic American government. If I accepted being unselfish towards Americans, I would only be legitimizing more horrifying treatment against young kids who are possible future STEM stars and young kids who might just seem "easy to abuse." So, I must become extremely selfish and motivated by self-interest with respect to how I treat other Americans that I'm not dating or the ancestor of, whatever happens.

-Philip White (philipjwhite@yahoo.com)

On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 12:22:16 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 9:28:30 AM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> > On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 2:11:59 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Here is my career plan for the future at this time:
> > >
> > > - Do "service" by publishing research.
> > > - Publish 5 or 6 (I don't have Yang-Mills yet) CMI math papers for $1 M each.
> > > - Maybe publish a little more research, as service, if I choose to.
> > > - Withhold my research according to my formula, mentioned in another post.
> > > - Maybe do service by selling research to ETHICAL, SERIOUS startups only.
> > > - Write non-fiction professionally and try to publish it.
> > > - Write fiction professionally and try to publish it.
> > >
> > > I should be able to get $6 million within a little over 2 years after I'm released; journals are evil but not that evil. I probably won't seek to sell patents to existing companies, since I doubt too many existing companies ethically. If a startup could prove it had traction, was very serious about having good ethics and morals, and could make the right offer for some of my other STEM ideas, I might sell. I don't really want to run a business, whether it's with computer programming or "running a factory to produce an electrical-engineering product" or something like that. I might change my mind and decide to do the news startup, which I planned out pretty fully, again, but I think I believe that innovation and publishing non-fiction is more important than "starting a website to stop news suppression and support transparency in news and the first amendment." I think I would appropriately help the world more by arming people than by arming internet algorithms with pro-free-speech ideas and/or algorithms. Educating readers and arming/supplying them with knowledge via non-fiction books is probably a better way to achieve my pro-1st-amendment goals than starting a sophisticated AI-driven website would be.
> > >
> > > -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)
> > I might one day start a firm based on IP I still possess if I don't wind up selling to startups, but I probably would mainly be an "IP supplier" to the firm and owner of the firm rather than a seriously involved executive.. I would maybe make sure about the ethics and non-discrimination policy, and leave the running of the firm to business strategy enthusiasts.
> >
> > -Philip White
> An important conclusion about my life:
>
> Given the expected value of arrests that will be made on my behalf by the American/VA state/local governments--close to 0 and definitely not enough--over the various crimes committed against me, it is very clear that: I need to be extremely selfish and focused on "return on investment" for me when it comes to dealing with 100% of all Americans, except for me, any women I might be dating, and any children I might have in the future. I will be kinder and more generous to people who don't live here; I'll do some service-y work and some innovation for compensation that I want if the price and credit I might receive will be right. Other than that, I find it important, given my outcome, to be extremely "stingy" and self-interested regarding work and service I may do. I got this idea from thinking about something a HS teacher at Commonwealth Academy communicated in the past; I don't think it would be fair at all to young students, now and in the future, to be generous after what was done to me by our own Democratic American government. If I accepted being unselfish towards Americans, I would only be legitimizing more horrifying treatment against young kids who are possible future STEM stars and young kids who might just seem "easy to abuse." So, I must become extremely selfish and motivated by self-interest with respect to how I treat other Americans that I'm not dating or the ancestor of, whatever happens.
>
> -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)

Update:

I will probably only publish two CMI problem solutions: B-S-D and the Hodge Conjecture, since those two would get me $2 million and not reveal or supply anything too useful for insufficient compensation.

-Philip White

On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 12:26:00 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 12:22:16 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 9:28:30 AM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> > > On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 2:11:59 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Here is my career plan for the future at this time:
> > > >
> > > > - Do "service" by publishing research.
> > > > - Publish 5 or 6 (I don't have Yang-Mills yet) CMI math papers for $1 M each.
> > > > - Maybe publish a little more research, as service, if I choose to.
> > > > - Withhold my research according to my formula, mentioned in another post.
> > > > - Maybe do service by selling research to ETHICAL, SERIOUS startups only.
> > > > - Write non-fiction professionally and try to publish it.
> > > > - Write fiction professionally and try to publish it.
> > > >
> > > > I should be able to get $6 million within a little over 2 years after I'm released; journals are evil but not that evil. I probably won't seek to sell patents to existing companies, since I doubt too many existing companies ethically. If a startup could prove it had traction, was very serious about having good ethics and morals, and could make the right offer for some of my other STEM ideas, I might sell. I don't really want to run a business, whether it's with computer programming or "running a factory to produce an electrical-engineering product" or something like that. I might change my mind and decide to do the news startup, which I planned out pretty fully, again, but I think I believe that innovation and publishing non-fiction is more important than "starting a website to stop news suppression and support transparency in news and the first amendment." I think I would appropriately help the world more by arming people than by arming internet algorithms with pro-free-speech ideas and/or algorithms. Educating readers and arming/supplying them with knowledge via non-fiction books is probably a better way to achieve my pro-1st-amendment goals than starting a sophisticated AI-driven website would be.
> > > >
> > > > -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)
> > > I might one day start a firm based on IP I still possess if I don't wind up selling to startups, but I probably would mainly be an "IP supplier" to the firm and owner of the firm rather than a seriously involved executive. I would maybe make sure about the ethics and non-discrimination policy, and leave the running of the firm to business strategy enthusiasts.
> > >
> > > -Philip White
> > An important conclusion about my life:
> >
> > Given the expected value of arrests that will be made on my behalf by the American/VA state/local governments--close to 0 and definitely not enough--over the various crimes committed against me, it is very clear that: I need to be extremely selfish and focused on "return on investment" for me when it comes to dealing with 100% of all Americans, except for me, any women I might be dating, and any children I might have in the future. I will be kinder and more generous to people who don't live here; I'll do some service-y work and some innovation for compensation that I want if the price and credit I might receive will be right. Other than that, I find it important, given my outcome, to be extremely "stingy" and self-interested regarding work and service I may do. I got this idea from thinking about something a HS teacher at Commonwealth Academy communicated in the past; I don't think it would be fair at all to young students, now and in the future, to be generous after what was done to me by our own Democratic American government. If I accepted being unselfish towards Americans, I would only be legitimizing more horrifying treatment against young kids who are possible future STEM stars and young kids who might just seem "easy to abuse." So, I must become extremely selfish and motivated by self-interest with respect to how I treat other Americans that I'm not dating or the ancestor of, whatever happens.
> >
> > -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)
> Update:
>
> I will probably only publish two CMI problem solutions: B-S-D and the Hodge Conjecture, since those two would get me $2 million and not reveal or supply anything too useful for insufficient compensation.
>
> -Philip White

Update:

I will stop publishing 0's and information about businesses that mainly American investors can use and benefit from, although I still support American values and plan to live here and pay taxes and do other things, for compensation.

I will supply "complaint 0's" that may provide information about the CIA and other people who harass me or deny me service, as well as 0's in support of international causes...but my internet posts as service to American citizens is done. It worked a little, but not enough or quickly enough, so I will stop supplying investors with that sort of information; I was ripped off to too great of an extent by swindlers. Probably, the failure of investors to properly "say thank you" to me in a big enough way cost such investors millions of dollars in lost profit opportunities, but of course, investors and many others in the US barely understand the basic meaning of the word "rational."

-Philip White (philipjwhite@yahoo.com)

On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 12:46:51 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 12:26:00 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 12:22:16 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 9:28:30 AM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> > > > On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 2:11:59 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is my career plan for the future at this time:
> > > > >
> > > > > - Do "service" by publishing research.
> > > > > - Publish 5 or 6 (I don't have Yang-Mills yet) CMI math papers for $1 M each.
> > > > > - Maybe publish a little more research, as service, if I choose to.
> > > > > - Withhold my research according to my formula, mentioned in another post.
> > > > > - Maybe do service by selling research to ETHICAL, SERIOUS startups only.
> > > > > - Write non-fiction professionally and try to publish it.
> > > > > - Write fiction professionally and try to publish it.
> > > > >
> > > > > I should be able to get $6 million within a little over 2 years after I'm released; journals are evil but not that evil. I probably won't seek to sell patents to existing companies, since I doubt too many existing companies ethically. If a startup could prove it had traction, was very serious about having good ethics and morals, and could make the right offer for some of my other STEM ideas, I might sell. I don't really want to run a business, whether it's with computer programming or "running a factory to produce an electrical-engineering product" or something like that. I might change my mind and decide to do the news startup, which I planned out pretty fully, again, but I think I believe that innovation and publishing non-fiction is more important than "starting a website to stop news suppression and support transparency in news and the first amendment." I think I would appropriately help the world more by arming people than by arming internet algorithms with pro-free-speech ideas and/or algorithms. Educating readers and arming/supplying them with knowledge via non-fiction books is probably a better way to achieve my pro-1st-amendment goals than starting a sophisticated AI-driven website would be.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)
> > > > I might one day start a firm based on IP I still possess if I don't wind up selling to startups, but I probably would mainly be an "IP supplier" to the firm and owner of the firm rather than a seriously involved executive. I would maybe make sure about the ethics and non-discrimination policy, and leave the running of the firm to business strategy enthusiasts.
> > > >
> > > > -Philip White
> > > An important conclusion about my life:
> > >
> > > Given the expected value of arrests that will be made on my behalf by the American/VA state/local governments--close to 0 and definitely not enough--over the various crimes committed against me, it is very clear that: I need to be extremely selfish and focused on "return on investment" for me when it comes to dealing with 100% of all Americans, except for me, any women I might be dating, and any children I might have in the future. I will be kinder and more generous to people who don't live here; I'll do some service-y work and some innovation for compensation that I want if the price and credit I might receive will be right. Other than that, I find it important, given my outcome, to be extremely "stingy" and self-interested regarding work and service I may do. I got this idea from thinking about something a HS teacher at Commonwealth Academy communicated in the past; I don't think it would be fair at all to young students, now and in the future, to be generous after what was done to me by our own Democratic American government. If I accepted being unselfish towards Americans, I would only be legitimizing more horrifying treatment against young kids who are possible future STEM stars and young kids who might just seem "easy to abuse." So, I must become extremely selfish and motivated by self-interest with respect to how I treat other Americans that I'm not dating or the ancestor of, whatever happens.
> > >
> > > -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)
> > Update:
> >
> > I will probably only publish two CMI problem solutions: B-S-D and the Hodge Conjecture, since those two would get me $2 million and not reveal or supply anything too useful for insufficient compensation.
> >
> > -Philip White
> Update:
>
> I will stop publishing 0's and information about businesses that mainly American investors can use and benefit from, although I still support American values and plan to live here and pay taxes and do other things, for compensation.
>
> I will supply "complaint 0's" that may provide information about the CIA and other people who harass me or deny me service, as well as 0's in support of international causes...but my internet posts as service to American citizens is done. It worked a little, but not enough or quickly enough, so I will stop supplying investors with that sort of information; I was ripped off to too great of an extent by swindlers. Probably, the failure of investors to properly "say thank you" to me in a big enough way cost such investors millions of dollars in lost profit opportunities, but of course, investors and many others in the US barely understand the basic meaning of the word "rational."
>
> -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)

Update:

I might still do my news website. It probably wouldn't be that hard to get it to work properly.

-Philip White (philipjwhite@yahoo.com)