In the past, I was quite impressed with Dr. Sipser, and although I had never met him, I was pleased with his reactions to my emails. (Yes, it's possible that this post, which constitutes a statement of opinion and not fact, will be used by my adversaries to portray me as "someone you should never respond to emails from because look at what he'll say later." I am grateful for email responses, it's a question of how I am treated as an atheist even by the academics who will sometimes write back to me, unlike, e.g., Dexter Kozen.)

Dr. Sipser's textbook is excellent and the tone of his emails is always pleasant and courteous/professional. At the same time, I'm concerned that he may have played a key role in quietly "locking me out" of academia and halting the publication of my research. I am concerned that there is some anti-atheist sentiment in the upper echelons of academia, as evidenced to an extent by the mysterious vehicle-related death of John Nash in 2015.

In particular, the number of breakthroughs that I've published on the internet, along with the "tone and feel" of Michael Sipser's email to me when I wrote to him asking about a journal that would treat me ethically and evaluate my research carefully, plus some thoughts about atheism that were conveyed to me that I recently finished thinking about, I am concerned that there might be a genuine and literal, truly existing Judeo-Christian "conspiracy to discriminate" against atheists and probably other faiths in academia. I am concerned that Michael Sipser, who presents himself as a pleasant person, might be involved in this, which is of concern given his position of tremendous power in academia, as a senior professor at MIT.

I hope Ivy League and other top-ranked schools will address this kind of outrageous discriminatory situation, which definitely exists regardless of whether or not the conspiracy that I allege may exist really does exist, very quickly, to stop the mass deaths of people who are dying directly because of it all over the world. Research is important; weird fringe political agendas must take a backseat to human life, particularly when the political agendas are purely evil and discriminatory. Atheist researchers must not be smeared.

-Philip White (philipjwhite@yahoo.com)

On 5/22/2022 7:05 AM, B.H. wrote:
> Ass-bucket

On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 10:05:16 AM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> In the past, I was quite impressed with Dr. Sipser, and although I had never met him, I was pleased with his reactions to my emails. (Yes, it's possible that this post, which constitutes a statement of opinion and not fact, will be used by my adversaries to portray me as "someone you should never respond to emails from because look at what he'll say later." I am grateful for email responses, it's a question of how I am treated as an atheist even by the academics who will sometimes write back to me, unlike, e.g., Dexter Kozen.)
>
> Dr. Sipser's textbook is excellent and the tone of his emails is always pleasant and courteous/professional. At the same time, I'm concerned that he may have played a key role in quietly "locking me out" of academia and halting the publication of my research. I am concerned that there is some anti-atheist sentiment in the upper echelons of academia, as evidenced to an extent by the mysterious vehicle-related death of John Nash in 2015.
>
> In particular, the number of breakthroughs that I've published on the internet, along with the "tone and feel" of Michael Sipser's email to me when I wrote to him asking about a journal that would treat me ethically and evaluate my research carefully, plus some thoughts about atheism that were conveyed to me that I recently finished thinking about, I am concerned that there might be a genuine and literal, truly existing Judeo-Christian "conspiracy to discriminate" against atheists and probably other faiths in academia.. I am concerned that Michael Sipser, who presents himself as a pleasant person, might be involved in this, which is of concern given his position of tremendous power in academia, as a senior professor at MIT.
>
> I hope Ivy League and other top-ranked schools will address this kind of outrageous discriminatory situation, which definitely exists regardless of whether or not the conspiracy that I allege may exist really does exist, very quickly, to stop the mass deaths of people who are dying directly because of it all over the world. Research is important; weird fringe political agendas must take a backseat to human life, particularly when the political agendas are purely evil and discriminatory. Atheist researchers must not be smeared.
>
> -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)

A simple narrative to illustrate my point:

Nurse Michael Sipser dispenses medications at an elementary school. I am a second-grade student with diabetes. When I go to my insulin shot at Nurse Sipser's office one day, however, I am notified that "because I'm unpopular with some local politicians, the school will not be available to give you insulin for the next 6 months at least." This means I will die, but Nurse Sipser is adamant--although it is Nurse Sipser's job to dispense insulin to students like me, this job will not be done for me in particular due to the protests of local politicians, thus ruining my life.

-Philip White (philipjwhite@yahoo.com)

On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 5:45:36 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 10:05:16 AM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> > In the past, I was quite impressed with Dr. Sipser, and although I had never met him, I was pleased with his reactions to my emails. (Yes, it's possible that this post, which constitutes a statement of opinion and not fact, will be used by my adversaries to portray me as "someone you should never respond to emails from because look at what he'll say later." I am grateful for email responses, it's a question of how I am treated as an atheist even by the academics who will sometimes write back to me, unlike, e.g., Dexter Kozen.)
> >
> > Dr. Sipser's textbook is excellent and the tone of his emails is always pleasant and courteous/professional. At the same time, I'm concerned that he may have played a key role in quietly "locking me out" of academia and halting the publication of my research. I am concerned that there is some anti-atheist sentiment in the upper echelons of academia, as evidenced to an extent by the mysterious vehicle-related death of John Nash in 2015.
> >
> > In particular, the number of breakthroughs that I've published on the internet, along with the "tone and feel" of Michael Sipser's email to me when I wrote to him asking about a journal that would treat me ethically and evaluate my research carefully, plus some thoughts about atheism that were conveyed to me that I recently finished thinking about, I am concerned that there might be a genuine and literal, truly existing Judeo-Christian "conspiracy to discriminate" against atheists and probably other faiths in academia. I am concerned that Michael Sipser, who presents himself as a pleasant person, might be involved in this, which is of concern given his position of tremendous power in academia, as a senior professor at MIT.
> >
> > I hope Ivy League and other top-ranked schools will address this kind of outrageous discriminatory situation, which definitely exists regardless of whether or not the conspiracy that I allege may exist really does exist, very quickly, to stop the mass deaths of people who are dying directly because of it all over the world. Research is important; weird fringe political agendas must take a backseat to human life, particularly when the political agendas are purely evil and discriminatory. Atheist researchers must not be smeared.
> >
> > -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)
> A simple narrative to illustrate my point:
>
> Nurse Michael Sipser dispenses medications at an elementary school. I am a second-grade student with diabetes. When I go to my insulin shot at Nurse Sipser's office one day, however, I am notified that "because I'm unpopular with some local politicians, the school will not be available to give you insulin for the next 6 months at least." This means I will die, but Nurse Sipser is adamant--although it is Nurse Sipser's job to dispense insulin to students like me, this job will not be done for me in particular due to the protests of local politicians, thus ruining my life.
>
> -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)

I meant to say "because you're unpopular with...," I typed that wrong.

On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 5:46:28 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 5:45:36 PM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> > On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 10:05:16 AM UTC-4, B.H. wrote:
> > > In the past, I was quite impressed with Dr. Sipser, and although I had never met him, I was pleased with his reactions to my emails. (Yes, it's possible that this post, which constitutes a statement of opinion and not fact, will be used by my adversaries to portray me as "someone you should never respond to emails from because look at what he'll say later." I am grateful for email responses, it's a question of how I am treated as an atheist even by the academics who will sometimes write back to me, unlike, e.g., Dexter Kozen.)
> > >
> > > Dr. Sipser's textbook is excellent and the tone of his emails is always pleasant and courteous/professional. At the same time, I'm concerned that he may have played a key role in quietly "locking me out" of academia and halting the publication of my research. I am concerned that there is some anti-atheist sentiment in the upper echelons of academia, as evidenced to an extent by the mysterious vehicle-related death of John Nash in 2015.
> > >
> > > In particular, the number of breakthroughs that I've published on the internet, along with the "tone and feel" of Michael Sipser's email to me when I wrote to him asking about a journal that would treat me ethically and evaluate my research carefully, plus some thoughts about atheism that were conveyed to me that I recently finished thinking about, I am concerned that there might be a genuine and literal, truly existing Judeo-Christian "conspiracy to discriminate" against atheists and probably other faiths in academia. I am concerned that Michael Sipser, who presents himself as a pleasant person, might be involved in this, which is of concern given his position of tremendous power in academia, as a senior professor at MIT.
> > >
> > > I hope Ivy League and other top-ranked schools will address this kind of outrageous discriminatory situation, which definitely exists regardless of whether or not the conspiracy that I allege may exist really does exist, very quickly, to stop the mass deaths of people who are dying directly because of it all over the world. Research is important; weird fringe political agendas must take a backseat to human life, particularly when the political agendas are purely evil and discriminatory. Atheist researchers must not be smeared.
> > >
> > > -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)
> > A simple narrative to illustrate my point:
> >
> > Nurse Michael Sipser dispenses medications at an elementary school. I am a second-grade student with diabetes. When I go to my insulin shot at Nurse Sipser's office one day, however, I am notified that "because I'm unpopular with some local politicians, the school will not be available to give you insulin for the next 6 months at least." This means I will die, but Nurse Sipser is adamant--although it is Nurse Sipser's job to dispense insulin to students like me, this job will not be done for me in particular due to the protests of local politicians, thus ruining my life.
> >
> > -Philip White (philip...@yahoo.com)
> I meant to say "because you're unpopular with...," I typed that wrong.

I continued thinking about this, so here are a couple more comments:

- I get worried that "people who are like Barack Obama" in terms of seeming polite/professional and able to present themselves well are sometimes "secretly evil" to an unknown degree. I don't know if that's true of Michael Sipser; maybe he is innocent, but I don't know that.
- The thing that makes me think that Michael Sipser might be innocent is the Boston Marathon bombing. Perhaps there is a real ongoing "life and death" threat that has compelled MIT personnel to stop supporting mathematicians like me, and stop paying attention to the responsibilities of MIT professors as global research leaders to ensure that the academic journal system works as it should. I'm not sure though...was the MIT bombing threat linked to too much attention to me personally? I doubt that a lot. Too much attention to journal efficacy? I doubt that too. That is why I am concerned; is the MIT Boston Marathon bombing being used, perhaps improperly, as an excuse to block research and thus research-related careers like mine? If so, that blockage is very costly; the coronavirus, as I've mentioned, is still going on due to my research being blocked. There does not seem to be a good way to complain about erroneous journal article rejection decisions, and that is very costly to humanity, and I think MIT is responsible. It's really not a joke.

-Philip White (philipjwhite@yahoo.com)