Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

"Turn on, tune up, rock out." -- Billy Gibbons

computers / comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware / Re: Are CPUs prior to 486 capable of memory interleave?

SubjectAuthor
* Are CPUs prior to 486 capable of memory interleave?Louis Ohland
+- Re: Are CPUs prior to 486 capable of memory interleave?Tomas Slavotinek
`* Re: Are CPUs prior to 486 capable of memory interleave?moussa
 `- Re: Are CPUs prior to 486 capable of memory interleave?schimmi

1
Are CPUs prior to 486 capable of memory interleave?

<u1gilb$1gid$1@842ffb22-07e1-11e5-a459-00266cf00584.csiph.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=3394&group=comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware#3394

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!csiph.com!.POSTED.071-087-128-099.res.spectrum.com!not-for-mail
From: ohl...@charter.net (Louis Ohland)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Subject: Are CPUs prior to 486 capable of memory interleave?
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 05:29:15 -0500
Organization: csiph.com Internet News Service
Message-ID: <u1gilb$1gid$1@842ffb22-07e1-11e5-a459-00266cf00584.csiph.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 10:28:59 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: 842ffb22-07e1-11e5-a459-00266cf00584.csiph.com; posting-host="071-087-128-099.res.spectrum.com:71.87.128.99";
logging-data="49741"; mail-complaints-to="admin@kev009.com"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.16
X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://csiph.com:119
 by: Louis Ohland - Sun, 16 Apr 2023 10:29 UTC

Sez it all.

Re: Are CPUs prior to 486 capable of memory interleave?

<u1gn71$1k5o$1@842ffb22-07e1-11e5-a459-00266cf00584.csiph.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=3396&group=comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware#3396

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!csiph.com!.POSTED.185-157-241-87.uh.cz!not-for-mail
From: slavoti...@gmail.com (Tomas Slavotinek)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Subject: Re: Are CPUs prior to 486 capable of memory interleave?
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 13:46:40 +0200
Organization: csiph.com Internet News Service
Message-ID: <u1gn71$1k5o$1@842ffb22-07e1-11e5-a459-00266cf00584.csiph.com>
References: <u1gilb$1gid$1@842ffb22-07e1-11e5-a459-00266cf00584.csiph.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 11:46:42 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: 842ffb22-07e1-11e5-a459-00266cf00584.csiph.com; posting-host="185-157-241-87.uh.cz:185.157.241.87";
logging-data="53432"; mail-complaints-to="admin@kev009.com"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.13.1
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <u1gilb$1gid$1@842ffb22-07e1-11e5-a459-00266cf00584.csiph.com>
 by: Tomas Slavotinek - Sun, 16 Apr 2023 11:46 UTC

On 16.04.2023 12:29, Louis Ohland wrote:
> Sez it all.

Memory interleaving is not a CPU feature*. It's realized by the memory
controller and is therefore chipset-dependent, not CPU-dependent. There
were some 386-based systems with interleaving (non-IBM).

(*modern CPUs have integrated memory controller and may natively support
dual channel/interleaved memory)

Re: Are CPUs prior to 486 capable of memory interleave?

<a0s3hj-cnq3.ln1@HPmini-i3.gateway>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=3415&group=comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware#3415

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!csiph.com!.POSTED.159.196.95.10!HPmini-i3.gateway!not-for-mail
From: devo...@hotmail.com (moussa)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Subject: Re: Are CPUs prior to 486 capable of memory interleave?
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 09:16:26 +0800
Organization: PS2moussa
Message-ID: <a0s3hj-cnq3.ln1@HPmini-i3.gateway>
References: <u1gilb$1gid$1@842ffb22-07e1-11e5-a459-00266cf00584.csiph.com>
Reply-To: devol95@hotmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: 842ffb22-07e1-11e5-a459-00266cf00584.csiph.com; posting-host="159.196.95.10";
logging-data="43128"; mail-complaints-to="admin@kev009.com"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.9.0
Content-Language: en-AU
In-Reply-To: <u1gilb$1gid$1@842ffb22-07e1-11e5-a459-00266cf00584.csiph.com>
 by: moussa - Wed, 19 Apr 2023 01:16 UTC

On 16/4/23 18:29, Louis Ohland wrote:
> Sez it all.

my brain screaming i385 !!

Dr, Dr....

--
Moussa

"People alike with a similar circumstances, tend to find each
others across space and time, given enough time in life, no
matter distance, language, race, colour and believes" (c) MEK
*** Do Not Copy, Duplicate or Use without my Permission ***

Re: Are CPUs prior to 486 capable of memory interleave?

<27d3c5e5-2ad8-408b-adfc-6db00efc8145n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=3419&group=comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware#3419

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1a14:b0:3e3:9041:3f6c with SMTP id f20-20020a05622a1a1400b003e390413f6cmr1284602qtb.11.1681916575067;
Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:efc4:0:b0:38c:6afd:931c with SMTP id
n187-20020acaefc4000000b0038c6afd931cmr1292140oih.8.1681916574723; Wed, 19
Apr 2023 08:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a0s3hj-cnq3.ln1@HPmini-i3.gateway>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=217.89.119.238; posting-account=MSoytgoAAAB840_pyx2nqfEwBbRVpagI
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.89.119.238
References: <u1gilb$1gid$1@842ffb22-07e1-11e5-a459-00266cf00584.csiph.com> <a0s3hj-cnq3.ln1@HPmini-i3.gateway>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <27d3c5e5-2ad8-408b-adfc-6db00efc8145n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Are CPUs prior to 486 capable of memory interleave?
From: stefan.l...@gmail.com (schimmi)
Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 15:02:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1879
 by: schimmi - Wed, 19 Apr 2023 15:02 UTC

386 - SCAMP from VLSI: http://dosdays.co.uk/media/vlsi/VL82C310.pdf two-way interleaving.
286 - NEAT from C&T: https://pdf.dzsc.com/20090227/200902230247143883.pdf 2/4way

But don't ask me if it does any good. Creative names, at least.

moussa schrieb am Mittwoch, 19. April 2023 um 04:08:08 UTC+2:
> On 16/4/23 18:29, Louis Ohland wrote:
> > Sez it all.
> my brain screaming i385 !!
>
> Dr, Dr....
>
> --
> Moussa
>
> "People alike with a similar circumstances, tend to find each
> others across space and time, given enough time in life, no
> matter distance, language, race, colour and believes" (c) MEK
> *** Do Not Copy, Duplicate or Use without my Permission ***

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor