Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Beeping is cute, if you are in the office ;) -- Alan Cox


computers / comp.dcom.telecom / Reconsideration Of Subscriber-Level ACP Data Collection [telecom]

SubjectAuthor
o Reconsideration Of Subscriber-Level ACP Data Collection [telecom]Bill Horne

1
Reconsideration Of Subscriber-Level ACP Data Collection [telecom]

<20230309213558.GA1720260@telecomdigest.us>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=4130&group=comp.dcom.telecom#4130

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!post.local
From: malQRMas...@gmail.com (Bill Horne)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Reconsideration Of Subscriber-Level ACP Data Collection [telecom]
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:35:58 -0500
Organization: The Telecom Digest
Sender: alias@iecc.com
Approved: telecom-moderator@telecom.csail.mit.edu
Message-ID: <20230309213558.GA1720260@telecomdigest.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970";
logging-data="29389"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Authentication-Results: iecc.com; spf=pass spf.mailfrom=moder8@telecomdigest.us spf.helo=telecomdigest.us smtp.remote-ip="71.19.144.55"; dmarc=none header.from=gmail.com polrec.p=none polrec.pct=100
Content-Disposition: inline
 by: Bill Horne - Thu, 9 Mar 2023 21:35 UTC

By Michael Dover (Los Angeles)

A key aspect of the FCC’s ACP Transparency Data Collection rules may
be in doubt if the FCC takes up a recent petition for reconsideration.
In its Fourth Report and Order and FNPRM, the FCC adopted an
aggregate-level approach for collecting ACP subscriber pricing and
plan information, finding that ACP providers should submit ACP
subscriber data grouped by each unique plan for a given geographic
area (such as by state) rather than submitting that data through
National Lifeline Accountability Database (NLAD) at the time of
enrollment. Relying on provider comments discussing the administrative
burdens of subscriber-level data collections, the FCC reasoned that
“the subscriber-level approach as proposed by the Commission may
conflict with the statutory requirement to stand up an annual
collection and may be too administratively burdensome for subscribers
and providers, particularly with respect to obtaining subscriber
consent to the collection of additional subscriber-specific data and
in light of privacy concerns.”

https://www.mondaq.com/article/news/1290594?q=1803232&n=722&tp=2&tlk=10&lk=25

--
(Please remove QRM for direct replies

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor