Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

lp1 on fire -- One of the more obfuscated kernel messages


devel / comp.unix.shell / Re: 2021/09/03 12:55:14 socat[1088517] E parseopts(): option "proxyauth" not supported with this address type

SubjectAuthor
* Re: 2021/09/03 12:55:14 socat[1088517] E parseopts(): optionGrant Taylor
`* Re: 2021/09/03 12:55:14 socat[1088517] E parseopts(): optionhongy...@gmail.com
 `- Re: 2021/09/03 12:55:14 socat[1088517] E parseopts(): optionhongy...@gmail.com

1
Re: 2021/09/03 12:55:14 socat[1088517] E parseopts(): option "proxyauth" not supported with this address type

<sh01pj$rkt$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=4306&group=comp.unix.shell#4306

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net!.POSTED.alpha.home.tnetconsulting.net!not-for-mail
From: gtay...@tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: Re: 2021/09/03 12:55:14 socat[1088517] E parseopts(): option
"proxyauth" not supported with this address type
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 08:58:51 -0600
Organization: TNet Consulting
Message-ID: <sh01pj$rkt$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
References: <21073e52-54aa-478d-9182-2e7537dd12e4n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 15:02:11 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net; posting-host="alpha.home.tnetconsulting.net:198.18.18.251";
logging-data="28317"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@tnetconsulting.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.9.0
In-Reply-To: <21073e52-54aa-478d-9182-2e7537dd12e4n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Grant Taylor - Sat, 4 Sep 2021 14:58 UTC

On 9/2/21 11:41 PM, hongy...@gmail.com wrote:
> I've a socks5 proxy running on 127.0.0.1:1080 with username and
> passwd set to 123 and 123. Now I want to make another socks5 proxy
> on 127.0.0.1:1090 which uses the 127.0.0.1:1080 as its upstream. The
> test is as follows:

I have done something like this in the past using Dante SOCKS proxy
server as a SOCKS application layer router. It had the ability to chain
proxies including adding authentication to different upstream proxies.

I remember looking at socat at the time and was not able to make it work.

I'm guessing that your problem with socat is realted tot he protocol
that it uses on the northbound / upstream connection.

The only references that I see to proxyauth in the socat man page are in
relation to the PROXY: address type. It also seems as if the PROXY:
address type is for talking to an HTTP proxy using the CONNECT verb,
which is incompatible with the upstream SOCKS proxy.

--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Re: 2021/09/03 12:55:14 socat[1088517] E parseopts(): option "proxyauth" not supported with this address type

<b25502a1-9537-4141-b007-4841a8b89504n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=4308&group=comp.unix.shell#4308

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1498:: with SMTP id l24mr5364217qtj.169.1630802497892;
Sat, 04 Sep 2021 17:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6145:: with SMTP id d5mr5329809qtm.197.1630802497722;
Sat, 04 Sep 2021 17:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 17:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <sh01pj$rkt$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=103.138.53.106; posting-account=kF0ZaAoAAACPbiK5gldhAyX5qTd3krV2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 103.138.53.106
References: <21073e52-54aa-478d-9182-2e7537dd12e4n@googlegroups.com> <sh01pj$rkt$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b25502a1-9537-4141-b007-4841a8b89504n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: 2021/09/03 12:55:14 socat[1088517] E parseopts(): option
"proxyauth" not supported with this address type
From: hongyi.z...@gmail.com (hongy...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 00:41:37 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 25
 by: hongy...@gmail.com - Sun, 5 Sep 2021 00:41 UTC

On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 10:58:54 PM UTC+8, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 9/2/21 11:41 PM, hongy...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I've a socks5 proxy running on 127.0.0.1:1080 with username and
> > passwd set to 123 and 123. Now I want to make another socks5 proxy
> > on 127.0.0.1:1090 which uses the 127.0.0.1:1080 as its upstream. The
> > test is as follows:
> I have done something like this in the past using Dante SOCKS proxy
> server as a SOCKS application layer router. It had the ability to chain
> proxies including adding authentication to different upstream proxies.
>
> I remember looking at socat at the time and was not able to make it work.
>
> I'm guessing that your problem with socat is realted tot he protocol
> that it uses on the northbound / upstream connection.
>
> The only references that I see to proxyauth in the socat man page are in
> relation to the PROXY: address type. It also seems as if the PROXY:
> address type is for talking to an HTTP proxy using the CONNECT verb,
> which is incompatible with the upstream SOCKS proxy.

Thank you for sharing your experience. Another similar tool for this purpose is proxychains-ng [1].
All these two tools need the conf file to work instead of the arguments supplied on the command line, which makes it inconvenient for some simple commang line testing scenarios, say, the question discussed here.

[1] https://github.com/rofl0r/proxychains-ng

Best, HY

Re: 2021/09/03 12:55:14 socat[1088517] E parseopts(): option "proxyauth" not supported with this address type

<c89ea644-ff81-4301-8c32-ce1edc4b8babn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=4313&group=comp.unix.shell#4313

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4b43:: with SMTP id e3mr5557250qts.312.1630807010934;
Sat, 04 Sep 2021 18:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:b95:: with SMTP id k21mr5334597qkh.459.1630807010805;
Sat, 04 Sep 2021 18:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 18:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b25502a1-9537-4141-b007-4841a8b89504n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=178.128.104.170; posting-account=kF0ZaAoAAACPbiK5gldhAyX5qTd3krV2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.128.104.170
References: <21073e52-54aa-478d-9182-2e7537dd12e4n@googlegroups.com>
<sh01pj$rkt$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <b25502a1-9537-4141-b007-4841a8b89504n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c89ea644-ff81-4301-8c32-ce1edc4b8babn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: 2021/09/03 12:55:14 socat[1088517] E parseopts(): option
"proxyauth" not supported with this address type
From: hongyi.z...@gmail.com (hongy...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 01:56:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 39
 by: hongy...@gmail.com - Sun, 5 Sep 2021 01:56 UTC

On Sunday, September 5, 2021 at 8:41:40 AM UTC+8, hongy...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 10:58:54 PM UTC+8, Grant Taylor wrote:
> > On 9/2/21 11:41 PM, hongy...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > I've a socks5 proxy running on 127.0.0.1:1080 with username and
> > > passwd set to 123 and 123. Now I want to make another socks5 proxy
> > > on 127.0.0.1:1090 which uses the 127.0.0.1:1080 as its upstream. The
> > > test is as follows:
> > I have done something like this in the past using Dante SOCKS proxy
> > server as a SOCKS application layer router. It had the ability to chain
> > proxies including adding authentication to different upstream proxies.
> >
> > I remember looking at socat at the time and was not able to make it work.
> >
> > I'm guessing that your problem with socat is realted tot he protocol
> > that it uses on the northbound / upstream connection.
> >
> > The only references that I see to proxyauth in the socat man page are in
> > relation to the PROXY: address type. It also seems as if the PROXY:
> > address type is for talking to an HTTP proxy using the CONNECT verb,
> > which is incompatible with the upstream SOCKS proxy.
> Thank you for sharing your experience. Another similar tool for this purpose is proxychains-ng [1].
> All these two tools need the conf file to work instead of the arguments supplied on the command line, which makes it inconvenient for some simple commang line testing scenarios, say, the question discussed here.
>
> [1] https://github.com/rofl0r/proxychains-ng

Another tool that can do the job is 3proxy [1]:

/***
2. Proxy chaining and network connections
+ Username/password authentication for parent proxy(s).
+ HTTPS/SOCKS4/SOCKS5 and ip/port redirection parent support

4. Access control
+ User authentication by username / password
***/

[1] https://github.com/3proxy/3proxy

Best, HY


devel / comp.unix.shell / Re: 2021/09/03 12:55:14 socat[1088517] E parseopts(): option "proxyauth" not supported with this address type

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor