On 08/05/2021 21:10, nospam wrote:
> In article <s76f8v$blg$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>, David.Brooks
> <David.B@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FYI - Safari cannot open your link. :-(
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What happens when you try? Works here.
>>>>>
>>>>> I posted a screenshot and sitrep.
>>>>
>>>> https://ibb.co/5BbmkKC
>>>>
>>>> There is something VERY strange going on.
>>>
>>> no there isn't.
>>
>> I'm a newbie. To *me* it's strange.
>
> nope.

It's strange that BT are blocking a URL which I then discover is hosting
malware.

> In article <beBlI.46508$ft1.23839@fx10.iad>, David Brooks
> <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> There's just SO much to remember. When I was first playing with naval
>> computers in the early 1960s, it was somewhat easier to remember things
>> - if I recall correctly! ;-)
>
> according to you, you've been using computers for roughly 50 years.

Longer - it's nearly 60 years since I started my apprenticeship (Control
Engineering Weapons)

What can you tell me about the MRS3 weapons computer?

> that's hardly a newbie.

Artistic licence!

>>> hilarious, yes. strange, not in the least.
>>
>> There's lots of people watching what you are saying, nospam.
>>
>> Perhaps you'd like to share the funny side of this?
>
> no need, as it's quite obvious.

It is NOT obvious to me.

Your comment makes YOU look like an arsehole. ;-(

In article <9zClI.303292$J_5.60684@fx46.iad>, David Brooks
<David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>
> It is NOT obvious to me.

nothing is.

On Sat, 8 May 2021 21:32:05 +0100, David Brooks
<David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>It's strange that BT are blocking a URL which I then discover is hosting
>malware.

If it's hosting malware, download it and upload it to a
scanning site. It's trivial to do, and there is NO risk of being
infected if you are a competent "malware investigator".
Post the results here. Use your own words to describe the
malware, there is no need to post a link to an image or a tracking
site.
The first time you claimed a webpage hosted "malware" it was a
little ad for Nike shoes put there by the web-host.
The second time it was commented out javascript which led
(rather didn't lead) to a parking domain.
So what's the big bad malware this time?
IN YOUR OWN WORDS.
I'm sure you can do it. You've been "investigating" bad guys
for two decades. Or so you claim.
TIA

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

86 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On 08/05/2021 23:08, Shadow wrote:
> On Sat, 8 May 2021 21:32:05 +0100, David Brooks
> <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>
>> It's strange that BT are blocking a URL which I then discover is hosting
>> malware.
>
> If it's hosting malware, download it and upload it to a
> scanning site. It's trivial to do, and there is NO risk of being
> infected if you are a competent "malware investigator".
> Post the results here. Use your own words to describe the
> malware, there is no need to post a link to an image or a tracking
> site.
> The first time you claimed a webpage hosted "malware" it was a
> little ad for Nike shoes put there by the web-host.
> The second time it was commented out javascript which led
> (rather didn't lead) to a parking domain.
> So what's the big bad malware this time?
> IN YOUR OWN WORDS.
> I'm sure you can do it. You've been "investigating" bad guys
> for two decades. Or so you claim.
> TIA

If you read ALL the posts here you would have seen this posted for
'nospam' already:-

https://ibb.co/FHwVb35

There are four vendors who flagged the URL as malicious.

Look for yourself.

I'm off to bed!

On Sat, 8 May 2021 23:20:29 +0100, David Brooks
<David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>On 08/05/2021 23:08, Shadow wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 May 2021 21:32:05 +0100, David Brooks
>> <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>
>>> It's strange that BT are blocking a URL which I then discover is hosting
>>> malware.
>>
>> If it's hosting malware, download it and upload it to a
>> scanning site. It's trivial to do, and there is NO risk of being
>> infected if you are a competent "malware investigator".
>> Post the results here. Use your own words to describe the
>> malware, there is no need to post a link to an image or a tracking
>> site.
>> The first time you claimed a webpage hosted "malware" it was a
>> little ad for Nike shoes put there by the web-host.
>> The second time it was commented out javascript which led
>> (rather didn't lead) to a parking domain.
>> So what's the big bad malware this time?
>> IN YOUR OWN WORDS.
>> I'm sure you can do it. You've been "investigating" bad guys
>> for two decades. Or so you claim.
>> TIA
>
>If you read ALL the posts here you would have seen this posted for
>'nospam' already:-
>
>https://CUT_TRACKING_LINK
>
>There are four vendors who flagged the URL as malicious.
>
>Look for yourself.
>
>I'm off to bed!

Too drunk to read my request for "no links to images or
tracking sites", huh?
OK, sleep it off.
Download the malware and post YOUR analysis tomorrow, OK?
TIA

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

86 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On Sat, 8 May 2021 23:20:29 +0100, David Brooks
<David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>On 08/05/2021 23:08, Shadow wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 May 2021 21:32:05 +0100, David Brooks
>> <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>
>>> It's strange that BT are blocking a URL which I then discover is hosting
>>> malware.
>>
>> If it's hosting malware, download it and upload it to a
>> scanning site. It's trivial to do, and there is NO risk of being
>> infected if you are a competent "malware investigator".
>> Post the results here. Use your own words to describe the
>> malware, there is no need to post a link to an image or a tracking
>> site.
>> The first time you claimed a webpage hosted "malware" it was a
>> little ad for Nike shoes put there by the web-host.
>> The second time it was commented out javascript which led
>> (rather didn't lead) to a parking domain.
>> So what's the big bad malware this time?
>> IN YOUR OWN WORDS.
>> I'm sure you can do it. You've been "investigating" bad guys
>> for two decades. Or so you claim.
>> TIA
>
>If you read ALL the posts here you would have seen this posted for
>'nospam' already:-
>
>https://ibb.co/FHwVb35
>
>There are four vendors who flagged the URL as malicious.

Kaspersky just denied the download! :-)
>
>Look for yourself.
>
>I'm off to bed!
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

On 09/05/2021 03:50, Eric Stevens wrote:
> On Sat, 8 May 2021 23:20:29 +0100, David Brooks
> <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>
>> On 08/05/2021 23:08, Shadow wrote:
>>> On Sat, 8 May 2021 21:32:05 +0100, David Brooks
>>> <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's strange that BT are blocking a URL which I then discover is hosting
>>>> malware.
>>>
>>> If it's hosting malware, download it and upload it to a
>>> scanning site. It's trivial to do, and there is NO risk of being
>>> infected if you are a competent "malware investigator".
>>> Post the results here. Use your own words to describe the
>>> malware, there is no need to post a link to an image or a tracking
>>> site.
>>> The first time you claimed a webpage hosted "malware" it was a
>>> little ad for Nike shoes put there by the web-host.
>>> The second time it was commented out javascript which led
>>> (rather didn't lead) to a parking domain.
>>> So what's the big bad malware this time?
>>> IN YOUR OWN WORDS.
>>> I'm sure you can do it. You've been "investigating" bad guys
>>> for two decades. Or so you claim.
>>> TIA
>>
>> If you read ALL the posts here you would have seen this posted for
>> 'nospam' already:-
>>
>> https://ibb.co/FHwVb35
>>
>> There are four vendors who flagged the URL as malicious.
>
> Kaspersky just denied the download! :-)

Thanks for letting me know, Eric! :-D

I trust you are keeping well.

Which group are you posting from?

On Sun, 09 May 2021 14:50:06 +1200, Eric Stevens
<eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:

>On Sat, 8 May 2021 23:20:29 +0100, David Brooks
><David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>
>>On 08/05/2021 23:08, Shadow wrote:

>>> Post the results here. Use your own words to describe the
>>> malware, there is no need to post a link to an image or a tracking
>>> site.
>>> The first time you claimed a webpage hosted "malware" it was a
>>> little ad for Nike shoes put there by the web-host.
>>> The second time it was commented out javascript which led
>>> (rather didn't lead) to a parking domain.
>>> So what's the big bad malware this time?
>>> IN YOUR OWN WORDS.
>>> I'm sure you can do it. You've been "investigating" bad guys
>>> for two decades. Or so you claim.
>>> TIA
>>
>>If you read ALL the posts here you would have seen this posted for
>>'nospam' already:-
>>
>>https://ibb.co/FHwVb35
>>
>>There are four vendors who flagged the URL as malicious.
>
>Kaspersky just denied the download! :-)

If Apd confirmed the file was NOT malware, I believe him.
It's probably just a jpg image file created by gd-jpeg v1.0
(using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 82, modified over a year ago, with NO
imbedded malware code.
100% harmless
OTOH, the site owner might allow malicious uploads by third
parties, so you could theoretically find anything there.
I'd never let an online AV monitor which sites I visit. By
uploading personal data, they become worse than some of the malware
they're supposed to protect you from.
See the recent revelation by Avast. They were selling all your
personal information (and even uploaded files from your computer) to
"trusted third parties", contrary to the TOS. They didn't stop doing
that when they were caught, they changed the TOS.
LOL.
Site checking is pointless, IMHO. Check your downloads, not
the site. And NEVER allow automatic downloads of plugins, add-ons,
whatever.
But you probably know that. You don't have BD's 50 years of
"experience" with computers, 20 of which were as a "malware
investigator".

>>
>>Look for yourself.
>>
>>I'm off to bed!

I'm looking forward to BD's analysis of the malicious file he
claims to have found.
He's probably reaching for the paracetamol as we speak, and
downing it with his first cup of alcohol. To steady his hands before
firing up IDA PRO. Maybe he uses x64dbg too?
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On 2021-05-08, David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> On 08/05/2021 23:08, Shadow wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 May 2021 21:32:05 +0100, David Brooks
>> <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>
>>> It's strange that BT are blocking a URL which I then discover is hosting
>>> malware.
>>
>> If it's hosting malware, download it and upload it to a
>> scanning site. It's trivial to do, and there is NO risk of being
>> infected if you are a competent "malware investigator".
>> Post the results here. Use your own words to describe the
>> malware, there is no need to post a link to an image or a tracking
>> site.
>> The first time you claimed a webpage hosted "malware" it was a
>> little ad for Nike shoes put there by the web-host.
>> The second time it was commented out javascript which led
>> (rather didn't lead) to a parking domain.
>> So what's the big bad malware this time?
>> IN YOUR OWN WORDS.
>> I'm sure you can do it. You've been "investigating" bad guys
>> for two decades. Or so you claim.
>> TIA
>
> If you read ALL the posts here you would have seen this posted for
> 'nospam' already:-
>
> https://ibb.co/FHwVb35

Where did you get that scan from (look familiar)?

Used to be one called Kidd Glove or similar. Not very nice to type on, you
used also to get hold of the whole keyboard with one glued on as well, meant
for the blind with big legends in a contrasting colour or very dirty
environments apparently.

Not very hard wearing though.
Brian

--

This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:op.02yz16rumvhs6z@ryzen.lan...
> Is there a silicone desktop keyboard cover with individual keys? Every one
> I've found has the entire bottom row, function key row, and arrows/numeric
> keypad area as single sections, yet the letters are individual. I want to
> protect it from pets taking the keys off, but I want to feel the keys
> seperately when using it.
>
> --
> Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Sat, 08 May 2021 11:21:05 +0100, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

> David Brooks wrote:
>> On 07/05/2021 19:00, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 06 May 2021 19:00:55 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On May 6, 2021 at 10:30:34 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.02zew8exmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 06 May 2021 16:48:07 +0100, Owain Lastname
>>>>> <spuorgelgoog@gowanhill.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thursday, 6 May 2021 at 13:09:40 UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>>>>> Is there a silicone desktop keyboard cover with individual keys?
>>>>>>> Every one
>>>>>>> I've found has the entire bottom row, function key row, and
>>>>>>> arrows/numeric
>>>>>>> keypad area as single sections, yet the letters are individual. I
>>>>>>> want to
>>>>>>> protect it from pets taking the keys off, but I want to feel the keys
>>>>>>> seperately when using it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This one is polyurethane but appears to have separate keys
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.keyboardco.com/cover/type-through-covers-for-chicony-2971-keyboards.asp
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks good, apart from the keys aren't all in the right place for my
>>>>> keyboard. I have a longer shift on the left, and 9 not 6 keys above
>>>>> the
>>>>> arrows. I'm guessing trying to modify that would be difficult. In
>>>>> fact
>>>>> looking through Ebay, I can't find a single keyboard that's set up
>>>>> that way
>>>>> with the small left shift. I guess I'm going to have to put up with
>>>>> one with
>>>>> generic areas for compatibility.
>>>>
>>>> What keyboard do you have? If you have the type it is easier to find the
>>>> cover.
>>>
>>> I can't find mine online, so I'll have to explain. Look at this:
>>> https://europrinty.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/07421-600x582.jpg
>>> Now add three more keys under the "delete", "end", "page down" keys,
>>> so the middle one is directly above the up arrow.
>>> The key left of the lower part of the main enter key is removed, and
>>> the enter key made larger.
>>
>>
>> FYI - Safari cannot open your link. :-(
>
> SSLLabs gives it an A rating, the server is hosted by Hetzner.
>
> Only the site scan shows anything amiss, possible some past event.
> I don't know what Safari uses for host filtering.

I use Opera and I don't think it has any filtering. If I wanted filtering I'd use an AV.

> https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/6e898ada088b3bf8437fac348bfba4dc8aa6f85beb9cd0ea5b2da485e126348c/detection
>
> On the machine I'm typing on, I have multiple browsers and multiple
> OSes to use. For example Imgur is a pig of a site to work with.
> I can use MSEdge (a Chromealike) for that, in a Win10 VM. As
> long as the VM will give me any cycles I can use for myself.
>
> Does your Mac have any VMs it can use ? Since my main OS here
> won't run the browsers I need, I use VMs for that.

You have an OS that doesn't have a wide selection of browsers? Why?

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Sat, 08 May 2021 20:01:27 +0100, David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

> On 08/05/2021 18:06, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 16:26:33, David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org>
>> wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
>> []
>>> Sitrep!
>>>
>>> I cannot reach the europrinty server using my computers or iPads
>>> connecting through BT, my ISP.
>>>
>>> I CAN reach the server when using a VPN connection or when using the
>>> 3/4G connection on two different phones.
>>>
>>> Any further thoughts Paul/anyone?
>>>
>>> TIA
>>>
>> Looks like BT is blocking europrinty.
>>
>> _Could_ be BT know (or suspect) something about europrinty.
>>
>> _Could_ be they (or _somewhere_ in your route to europrinty via BT) is
>> using a DNS that has a corrupted entry. You could test that by using the
>> URL with the numeric form instead of europrinty.net in it (if I ping it
>> now from here, I get that europrinty,net is 148.251.225.179, and it
>> responds in 27 or 28 ms with a TTL of 53; using two different ping
>> methods). In other words, if you try
>> https://147.251.225.179/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/07421-600x582.jpg .
>> Try pinging it from where you are - both by name and number.
>
> Tested as you suggested, John.
>
> I, too, now believe that BT is, indeed, blocking the domain.
>
> I was thrown a little off track because I know that 'Apd' uses BT yet he
> said it was no problem at HIS home. At that stage I hadn't considered
> that he might not be connecting to the site via BT. (How dopey was that?!!)
>
> There's just SO much to remember. When I was first playing with naval
> computers in the early 1960s, it was somewhat easier to remember things
> - if I recall correctly! ;-)
>
> Thank you for helping, John. :-D

If BT are censoring your browsing experience, it's time to tell them to fuck off.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Sat, 08 May 2021 18:14:30 +0100, David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

> On 08/05/2021 18:03, Snit wrote:
>> On May 8, 2021 at 9:32:23 AM MST, ""David.Brooks"" wrote
>> <s76eeo$5je$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 08/05/2021 17:15, Snit wrote:
>>>> On May 8, 2021 at 9:02:43 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>> <ECylI.112693$lyv9.13822@fx35.iad>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 08/05/2021 16:42, David Brooks wrote:
>>>>>> On 08/05/2021 16:36, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>> On May 8, 2021 at 1:53:28 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>>>> <ckslI.105593$Y87.103266@fx08.iad>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can't find mine online, so I'll have to explain. Look at this:
>>>>>>>>> https://europrinty.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/07421-600x582.jpg
>>>>>>>>> Now add three more keys under the "delete", "end", "page down"
>>>>>>>>> keys, so
>>>>>>>>> the middle one is directly above the up arrow.
>>>>>>>>> The key left of the lower part of the main enter key is removed,
>>>>>>>>> and the
>>>>>>>>> enter key made larger.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FYI - Safari cannot open your link. :-(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What happens when you try? Works here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I posted a screenshot and sitrep.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://ibb.co/5BbmkKC
>>>>>
>>>>> There is something VERY strange going on.
>>>>>
>>>>> Will you - CAN you - help?
>>>>
>>>> Are you using an older version of macOS / Chrome?
>>>
>>> My header info says ...
>>>
>>> From: David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org>
>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0)
>>>
>>> =
>>>
>>> But I'm actually using THE most up-to-date macOS Big Sur Version 11.3.1
>>>
>>> The only browser I currently have installed is Safari - Version 14.1
>>> (16611.1.21.161.6)
>>>
>>> Odd.
>>
>> Odd. I assume your time is set correctly?
>
> Yes, time set correctly.
>
> Can YOU reach the europrinty server?
>
> https://europrinty.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/07421-600x582.jpg
>
> Just an image of a keyboard <shrug>

So has anyone found me a fucking keyboard cover, or are you all going to witter on about crappy ISPs? ARGH!!! :-)

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 08 May 2021 18:14:30 +0100, David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>
>> On 08/05/2021 18:03, Snit wrote:
>>> On May 8, 2021 at 9:32:23 AM MST, ""David.Brooks"" wrote
>>> <s76eeo$5je$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>>
>>>> On 08/05/2021 17:15, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On May 8, 2021 at 9:02:43 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>> <ECylI.112693$lyv9.13822@fx35.iad>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 08/05/2021 16:42, David Brooks wrote:
>>>>>>> On 08/05/2021 16:36, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>> On May 8, 2021 at 1:53:28 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>>>>> <ckslI.105593$Y87.103266@fx08.iad>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I can't find mine online, so I'll have to explain. Look at this:
>>>>>>>>>> https://europrinty.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/07421-600x582.jpg
>>>>>>>>>> Now add three more keys under the "delete", "end", "page down"
>>>>>>>>>> keys, so
>>>>>>>>>> the middle one is directly above the up arrow.
>>>>>>>>>> The key left of the lower part of the main enter key is removed,
>>>>>>>>>> and the
>>>>>>>>>> enter key made larger.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FYI - Safari cannot open your link. :-(
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What happens when you try? Works here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I posted a screenshot and sitrep.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://ibb.co/5BbmkKC
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is something VERY strange going on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will you - CAN you - help?
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you using an older version of macOS / Chrome?
>>>>
>>>> My header info says ...
>>>>
>>>> From: David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org>
>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0)
>>>>
>>>> =
>>>>
>>>> But I'm actually using THE most up-to-date macOS Big Sur Version 11.3.1
>>>>
>>>> The only browser I currently have installed is Safari - Version 14.1
>>>> (16611.1.21.161.6)
>>>>
>>>> Odd.
>>>
>>> Odd. I assume your time is set correctly?
>>
>> Yes, time set correctly.
>>
>> Can YOU reach the europrinty server?
>>
>> https://europrinty.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/07421-600x582.jpg
>>
>> Just an image of a keyboard <shrug>
>
> So has anyone found me a fucking keyboard cover, or are you all going to
> witter on about crappy ISPs? ARGH!!! :-)
>

Instead of covering the keyboard cover your hands. :)

Did you ever post the make and model of the keyboard?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Mon, 10 May 2021 20:06:37 GMT, Shit the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:

>
> Instead of covering the keyboard cover your hands. :)
>
> Did you ever post the make and model of the keyboard?

Already at it again, you subnormal senile sucker of troll cock? LOL

On 10/05/2021 19:20, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> On Sat, 08 May 2021 20:01:27 +0100, David Brooks
> <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>
>> On 08/05/2021 18:06, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
>>> On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 16:26:33, David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org>
>>> wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
>>> []
>>>> Sitrep!
>>>>
>>>> I cannot reach the europrinty server using my computers or iPads
>>>> connecting through BT, my ISP.
>>>>
>>>> I CAN reach the server when using a VPN connection or when using the
>>>> 3/4G connection on two different phones.
>>>>
>>>> Any further thoughts Paul/anyone?
>>>>
>>>> TIA
>>>>
>>> Looks like BT is blocking europrinty.
>>>
>>> _Could_ be BT know (or suspect) something about europrinty.
>>>
>>> _Could_ be they (or _somewhere_ in your route to europrinty via BT) is
>>> using a DNS that has a corrupted entry. You could test that by using the
>>> URL with the numeric form instead of europrinty.net in it (if I ping it
>>> now from here, I get that europrinty,net is 148.251.225.179, and it
>>> responds in 27 or 28 ms with a TTL of 53; using two different ping
>>> methods). In other words, if you try
>>> https://147.251.225.179/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/07421-600x582.jpg .
>>> Try pinging it from where you are - both by name and number.
>>
>> Tested as you suggested, John.
>>
>> I, too, now believe that BT is, indeed, blocking the domain.
>>
>> I was thrown a little off track because I know that 'Apd' uses BT yet he
>> said it was no problem at HIS home. At that stage I hadn't considered
>> that he might not be connecting to the site via BT. (How dopey was
>> that?!!)
>>
>> There's just SO much to remember. When I was first playing with naval
>> computers in the early 1960s, it was somewhat easier to remember things
>> - if I recall correctly! ;-)
>>
>> Thank you for helping, John. :-D
>
> If BT are censoring your browsing experience, it's time to tell them to
> fuck off.

They are - as instructed by the UK government! ;-)

A prime example is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pirate_Bay

So far, though, they cannot prevent me from using a VPN if I wish.

On Mon, 10 May 2021 21:24:18 +0100, David_Braindead, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:

>> If BT are censoring your browsing experience, it's time to tell them to
>> fuck off.
>
> They are - as instructed by the UK government! ;-)

It's time for you to tell the trolling attention whore to fuck off, you
troll-feeding senile asshole!

On 09/05/2021 18:47, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2021-05-08, David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> On 08/05/2021 23:08, Shadow wrote:
>>> On Sat, 8 May 2021 21:32:05 +0100, David Brooks
>>> <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's strange that BT are blocking a URL which I then discover is hosting
>>>> malware.
>>>
>>> If it's hosting malware, download it and upload it to a
>>> scanning site. It's trivial to do, and there is NO risk of being
>>> infected if you are a competent "malware investigator".
>>> Post the results here. Use your own words to describe the
>>> malware, there is no need to post a link to an image or a tracking
>>> site.
>>> The first time you claimed a webpage hosted "malware" it was a
>>> little ad for Nike shoes put there by the web-host.
>>> The second time it was commented out javascript which led
>>> (rather didn't lead) to a parking domain.
>>> So what's the big bad malware this time?
>>> IN YOUR OWN WORDS.
>>> I'm sure you can do it. You've been "investigating" bad guys
>>> for two decades. Or so you claim.
>>> TIA
>>
>> If you read ALL the posts here you would have seen this posted for
>> 'nospam' already:-
>>
>> https://ibb.co/FHwVb35
>
> Where did you get that scan from (look familiar)?

It was a scan by Virus Total

Have you looked yourself?

On 08/05/2021 17:52, David Brooks wrote:
> On 08/05/2021 17:33, nospam wrote:
>> In article <ECylI.112693$lyv9.13822@fx35.iad>, David Brooks
>> <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>     I can't find mine online, so I'll have to explain.  Look at
>>>>>>> this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://europrinty.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/07421-600x582.jpg
>>>>>>>     Now add three more keys under the "delete", "end", "page down"
>>>>>>> keys, so
>>>>>>>     the middle one is directly above the up arrow.
>>>>>>>     The key left of the lower part of the main enter key is removed,
>>>>>>> and the
>>>>>>>     enter key made larger.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FYI - Safari cannot open your link. :-(
>>>>>
>>>>> What happens when you try? Works here.
>>>>
>>>> I posted a screenshot and sitrep.
>>>
>>> https://ibb.co/5BbmkKC
>>>
>>> There is something VERY strange going on.
>>
>> no there isn't.
>>
>> hilarious, yes. strange, not in the least.
>
>
> On 08/05/2021 13:55, David Brooks wrote:
>
> > https://ibb.co/FHwVb35
> >
> > Perhaps THIS is why Safari rejected the link?
>
> Notice anything strange here?
>
> https://shop-europrinty.com/en/?fbclid=IwAR1664Y2lqo8g4JydjckjsyNUJLacpsxMUDfcpFb2VwC8qDuIOsobcA7yaw

VT shows four vendors find the URL malicious

https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/7a8828e1075a1690e64a82840bd4393478b3bb811f16854e0b0e58cd3d7f9f23/detection

On 06/05/2021 14:09, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> Is there a silicone desktop keyboard cover with individual keys? Every
> one I've found has the entire bottom row, function key row, and
> arrows/numeric keypad area as single sections, yet the letters are
> individual.  I want to protect it from pets taking the keys off, but I
> want to feel the keys seperately when using it.
>

There are better ways to protect your keyboard. Stop watching porn and
tossing over your keyboard, you wanker.

David Brooks wrote:
> On 08/05/2021 17:52, David Brooks wrote:
>> On 08/05/2021 17:33, nospam wrote:
>>> In article <ECylI.112693$lyv9.13822@fx35.iad>, David Brooks
>>> <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> I can't find mine online, so I'll have to explain. Look at
>>>>>>>> this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://europrinty.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/07421-600x582.jpg
>>>>>>>> Now add three more keys under the "delete", "end", "page down"
>>>>>>>> keys, so
>>>>>>>> the middle one is directly above the up arrow.
>>>>>>>> The key left of the lower part of the main enter key is
>>>>>>>> removed,
>>>>>>>> and the
>>>>>>>> enter key made larger.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FYI - Safari cannot open your link. :-(
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What happens when you try? Works here.
>>>>>
>>>>> I posted a screenshot and sitrep.
>>>>
>>>> https://ibb.co/5BbmkKC
>>>>
>>>> There is something VERY strange going on.
>>>
>>> no there isn't.
>>>
>>> hilarious, yes. strange, not in the least.
>>
>>
>> On 08/05/2021 13:55, David Brooks wrote:
>>
>> > https://ibb.co/FHwVb35
>> >
>> > Perhaps THIS is why Safari rejected the link?
>>
>> Notice anything strange here?
>>
>> https://shop-europrinty.com/en/?fbclid=IwAR1664Y2lqo8g4JydjckjsyNUJLacpsxMUDfcpFb2VwC8qDuIOsobcA7yaw
>
>
> VT shows four vendors find the URL malicious
>
> https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/7a8828e1075a1690e64a82840bd4393478b3bb811f16854e0b0e58cd3d7f9f23/detection

Looks clean to me.

https://i.postimg.cc/j2Gr872Q/sitecheck.gif

Paul

Jenny Telia <jnytelia@gmail.com> wrote
> Commander Kinsey wrote

>> Is there a silicone desktop keyboard cover with individual keys?
>> Every one I've found has the entire bottom row, function key
>> row, and arrows/numeric keypad area as single sections, yet
>> the letters are individual. I want to protect it from pets taking
>> the keys off, but I want to feel the keys seperately when using it.

> There are better ways to protect your keyboard. Stop watching
> porn and tossing over your keyboard, you wanker.

That’s not very ladylike, you fishwife.

On Tue, 11 May 2021 19:44:32 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the trolling senile asshole's latest trollshit unread>

--
JimK addressing senile Rodent Speed:
"I really feel the quality of your trolling has dropped in the last few
months..."
MID: <n8idndHg5972A2DDnZ2dnUU78e-dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>

On 11/05/2021 09:42, Paul wrote:
> David Brooks wrote:
>> On 08/05/2021 17:52, David Brooks wrote:
>>> On 08/05/2021 17:33, nospam wrote:
>>>> In article <ECylI.112693$lyv9.13822@fx35.iad>, David Brooks
>>>> <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     I can't find mine online, so I'll have to explain.  Look at
>>>>>>>>> this:
>>>>>>>>> https://europrinty.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/07421-600x582.jpg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Now add three more keys under the "delete", "end", "page down"
>>>>>>>>> keys, so
>>>>>>>>>     the middle one is directly above the up arrow.
>>>>>>>>>     The key left of the lower part of the main enter key is
>>>>>>>>> removed,
>>>>>>>>> and the
>>>>>>>>>     enter key made larger.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FYI - Safari cannot open your link. :-(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What happens when you try? Works here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I posted a screenshot and sitrep.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://ibb.co/5BbmkKC
>>>>>
>>>>> There is something VERY strange going on.
>>>>
>>>> no there isn't.
>>>>
>>>> hilarious, yes. strange, not in the least.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/05/2021 13:55, David Brooks wrote:
>>>
>>>  > https://ibb.co/FHwVb35
>>>  >
>>>  > Perhaps THIS is why Safari rejected the link?
>>>
>>> Notice anything strange here?
>>>
>>> https://shop-europrinty.com/en/?fbclid=IwAR1664Y2lqo8g4JydjckjsyNUJLacpsxMUDfcpFb2VwC8qDuIOsobcA7yaw
>>
>>
>>
>> VT shows four vendors find the URL malicious
>>
>> https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/7a8828e1075a1690e64a82840bd4393478b3bb811f16854e0b0e58cd3d7f9f23/detection
>
>
> Looks clean to me.
>
> https://i.postimg.cc/j2Gr872Q/sitecheck.gif
>
>    Paul

Thank you, Paul.

I got the same result from Sucuri. I have emailed Sucuri and asked them
to investigate. I'll let you know what they say.

--
David

On Mon, 10 May 2021 21:24:18 +0100, David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

> On 10/05/2021 19:20, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> On Sat, 08 May 2021 20:01:27 +0100, David Brooks
>> <David@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/05/2021 18:06, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 16:26:33, David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org>
>>>> wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
>>>> []
>>>>> Sitrep!
>>>>>
>>>>> I cannot reach the europrinty server using my computers or iPads
>>>>> connecting through BT, my ISP.
>>>>>
>>>>> I CAN reach the server when using a VPN connection or when using the
>>>>> 3/4G connection on two different phones.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any further thoughts Paul/anyone?
>>>>>
>>>>> TIA
>>>>>
>>>> Looks like BT is blocking europrinty.
>>>>
>>>> _Could_ be BT know (or suspect) something about europrinty.
>>>>
>>>> _Could_ be they (or _somewhere_ in your route to europrinty via BT) is
>>>> using a DNS that has a corrupted entry. You could test that by using the
>>>> URL with the numeric form instead of europrinty.net in it (if I ping it
>>>> now from here, I get that europrinty,net is 148.251.225.179, and it
>>>> responds in 27 or 28 ms with a TTL of 53; using two different ping
>>>> methods). In other words, if you try
>>>> https://147.251.225.179/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/07421-600x582.jpg .
>>>> Try pinging it from where you are - both by name and number.
>>>
>>> Tested as you suggested, John.
>>>
>>> I, too, now believe that BT is, indeed, blocking the domain.
>>>
>>> I was thrown a little off track because I know that 'Apd' uses BT yet he
>>> said it was no problem at HIS home. At that stage I hadn't considered
>>> that he might not be connecting to the site via BT. (How dopey was
>>> that?!!)
>>>
>>> There's just SO much to remember. When I was first playing with naval
>>> computers in the early 1960s, it was somewhat easier to remember things
>>> - if I recall correctly! ;-)
>>>
>>> Thank you for helping, John. :-D
>>
>> If BT are censoring your browsing experience, it's time to tell them to
>> fuck off.
>
> They are - as instructed by the UK government! ;-)
>
> A prime example is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pirate_Bay

Are they? I don't use a VPN to get to it. But then I don't use the original whatever that might be. There are about 150 of them now. I can't even remember the original address.

> So far, though, they cannot prevent me from using a VPN if I wish.

But you never use Piratebay! You told me you were a good semen, sorry, seaman!

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.