Hi,

the following minimal example compiles:

\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
\documentclass{scrbook}

\usepackage{kpfonts-otf,wasysym}
\usepackage[euler]{textgreek}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\begin{document}

\chapter{The \textalpha-subunit}

This is more prevalent in \male\ than in \female.

\section{The electronegativity \textchi}

\end{document}

However, the \male and \female symbols get replaced by boxes (Missing
character: There is no ? in font [KpRoman-Regular.otf]/OT:script=latn;l
anguage=dflt;+liga;-rlig;-dlig;-hlig;mapping=tex-text;!). Well, they
should not be taken from KpRoman, but from wasy.

In addition, the upright Greek letters in the titles print fine, but are
missing in the bookmarks (Package hyperref Warning: Glyph not defined in
PU encoding,(hyperref) removing `\textchi' on input line)

Am Sat, 12 Feb 2022 11:35:44 +0100 schrieb Dr Engelbert Buxbaum:

> Hi,
>
> the following minimal example compiles:
>
> \NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
> \documentclass{scrbook}
>
> \usepackage{kpfonts-otf,wasysym}
> \usepackage[euler]{textgreek}
> \usepackage{hyperref}
>
> \begin{document}
>
> \chapter{The \textalpha-subunit}
>
> This is more prevalent in \male\ than in \female.
>
> \section{The electronegativity \textchi}
>
> \end{document}
>
> However, the \male and \female symbols get replaced by boxes (Missing
> character: There is no ? in font [KpRoman-Regular.otf]/OT:script=latn;l
> anguage=dflt;+liga;-rlig;-dlig;-hlig;mapping=tex-text;!). Well, they
> should not be taken from KpRoman, but from wasy.

kpfonts-otf loads unicode-math and that redefines \male and \female
at begin document. If you want the wasy definition you will have to
redo it.

> In addition, the upright Greek letters in the titles print fine, but are
> missing in the bookmarks (Package hyperref Warning: Glyph not defined in
> PU encoding,(hyperref) removing `\textchi' on input line)

Not in a current texlive.

--
Ulrike Fischer
https://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/

On Sat, 12 Feb 2022, Ulrike Fischer wrote:

> Am Sat, 12 Feb 2022 11:35:44 +0100 schrieb Dr Engelbert Buxbaum:
>

[ . . . ]

>
> kpfonts-otf loads unicode-math and that redefines \male and \female
> at begin document. If you want the wasy definition you will have to
> redo it.
>

That is right. So if you have to use {kpfonts-otf} (with just
{kpfonts} there is no such problem) then an easy solution is in the
following example file:
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\documentclass{scrbook}
\usepackage{kpfonts-otf,wasysym}
\let\wasymale\male\let\wasyfemale\female

\begin{document}
\let\male\wasymale\let\female\wasyfemale

This is more prevalent in \male\ than in \female.

\end{document}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

--
Paweł Wlaź

In article <16c97298-1e2f-39b6-3d48-e56863e9dc2@pollub.pl>,
p.wlaz@pollub.pl says...
> That is right. So if you have to use {kpfonts-otf} (with just
> {kpfonts} there is no such problem)

unfortunately, kpfonts causes other problems, that's why I switched

> then an easy solution is in the
> following example file:
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> \documentclass{scrbook}
> \usepackage{kpfonts-otf,wasysym}
> \let\wasymale\male\let\wasyfemale\female
>
> \begin{document}
> \let\male\wasymale\let\female\wasyfemale

Yes, thanks, that works.

Engelbert