novaBBS - comp.sys.mac.apps - Re: V14.8 released!

Re: V14.8 released!

<sid3uv$1r7m$1@gioia.aioe.org>

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=474&group=comp.sys.mac.apps#474

copy link Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.mobile.ipad comp.sys.mac.apps

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!pGO9hH1d1MQyq3ojvfqVcA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ancient-...@Heaven.Net (Robin Goodfellow)
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: V14.8 released!
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:15:18 +0000
Organization: Keeping Good Company
Message-ID: <sid3uv$1r7m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <4audnWR8JIV_EKL8nZ2dnUU7-N3NnZ2d@earthlink.com> <160920211519275044%nospam@nospam.invalid> <si0781$i3a$1@dont-email.me> <160920211559590937%nospam@nospam.invalid> <si095h$101$1@dont-email.me> <160920211639132147%nospam@nospam.invalid> <si0al0$ani$1@dont-email.me> <si5gmj$uk2$1@dont-email.me> <180920212044074805%nospam@nospam.invalid> <si6471$gnc$1@gioia.aioe.org> <180920212141311430%nospam@nospam.invalid> <si6744$1i8u$1@gioia.aioe.org> <si6857$fnu$1@dont-email.me> <si6apl$itu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <si6ck5$jb2$1@dont-email.me> <si6k7j$1cgl$1@gioia.aioe.org> <si7oh8$gpe$1@dont-email.me> <si7vvh$eo6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <si8k4b$d4m$1@dont-email.me> <190920212034332561%nospam@nospam.invalid> <slrnskk2fi.11sm.g.kreme@m1mini.local>
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="60662"; posting-host="pGO9hH1d1MQyq3ojvfqVcA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2

by: Robin Goodfellow - Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:15 UTC

Lewis <g.kreme@kreme.dont-email.me> asked
> To be fair, the hashing algorithm itself was developed by Microsoft.

I'm surprised Lewis knows that it's Microsoft's algorthim (and that the
developer himself said it's inherently flawed)...

>> other providers scan for much more than just csam
>
> Yes, that too.

It's shocking how _ignorant_ all you apologists always prove to be!

*Apologists never fail to blame everyone else for what _only_ Apple did.*
"The main difference is that Apple's scanning will happen on-device."

*Image Scanning on iCloud Photos: A Decrease in Privacy*
�<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/apples-plan-think-different-about-encryption-opens-backdoor-your-private-life>
>> apple's system is designed so that other entities *can't* force them to
>> scan for other stuff.
>
> Apple's system is a lot more complex that just the simple hashing, and
> all of that complexity and the hundreds of engineering hours it took to
> develop that system are all in the service of preserving as much privacy
> as possible while still being able to report pedophiles trafficking in
> CSAM images.

Can apologists name even _one_ privacy organization Apple consulted?
Can apologists name even _one_ privacy expert Apple consulted?

The answer is no.
Which proves Apple didn't do it for privacy.

In fact, the facts prove Apple doesn't give a shit about privacy.

It's shocking apologists aren't aware privacy was NOT a concern of Apple!
*Whatever Apple Calls It, It's No Longer Secure Messaging*
�<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/apples-plan-think-different-about-encryption-opens-backdoor-your-private-life>
"When that same server has a channel for revealing information
about the contents of a significant portion of messages,
that's not end-to-end encryption."
--
Apple belatedly brought up privacy because they had to defend themselves.

Today is the first day of the rest of your lossage.

computers / comp.sys.mac.apps / Re: V14.8 released!

Subject	Author
Re: V14.8 released!	Robin Goodfellow