Nothing for Dave to straighten out.

We're cleaning up the mailing lists, to get rid of the subscribers who
blowback stuff like this.

H
--
On 5/26/2023 7:39 PM, George R. Kasica wrote:
> I’m not David Hart but somehow got this below. Hope he gets it
> straightened out.
>
> —
> ===[George Kasica]===
> 🇺🇦
> Sent with Spark <https://sparkmailapp.com/source?from=signature>
> On May 26, 2023 at 12:42 -0500, Greystar <Greystar@assurant.com>, wrote:
>> <image.png>
>>
>> *Hi, *
>>
>>
>> Thanks for reaching out about your proof of insurance. It looks like
>> we weren’t able to accept the document
>> because it was too blurry, or we couldn’t access the attachment.
>>
>> Please resend a clear, crisp insurance document so we can confirm that
>> you’ve met your lease insurance requirement.
>> Make sure that the document is not password-protected so we can open
>> it on our end.
>>
>> You can send us a copy of your policy by submitting it to
>> https://resident.assurant.com/poi <https://resident.assurant.com/poi>
>> using the Resident and
>> Client ID listed in the email subject line. If your carrier is green,
>> they can use the email address we are writing you
>> from to send it to us directly.
>>
>> You can also give us a call using the toll-free number below, Monday
>> through Friday, 8 a.m-8 p.m. EST.
>> Assurant Insurance Service Center
>> /On behalf of Greystar/
>> Phone *1.800.249.1104*
>> Email Greystar@assurant.com
>>
>> Need a faster response? Chat with us 8AM – 5PM Monday – Friday at
>> https://resident.assurant.com/poi/confirmation
>> <https://resident.assurant.com/poi/confirmation>.
>> You will need the three letter Client ID and resident ID listed in the
>> subject line above.
>>
>> You can also self-service your Assurant policy by visiting
>> www.MyAssurantPolicy.com <http://www.MyAssurantPolicy.com>.
>> ------------------- Original Message -------------------
>> *From:* David Hart <davehart@gmail.com>;
>> *Received:* Wed May 24 2023 14:22:16 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
>> *To:* questions@lists.ntp.org;
>> *Subject:* Re: [questions] Fwd: Windows port pool IPv6 misbehavior
>>
>> On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 02:01, Jakob Bohm
>> <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> For more rapid testing, could you describe the particular failing
>> getaddrinfo() behavior and perhaps provide a sample command line C
>> program that tests it in isolation instead of forcing each tester to
>> run through a long ntpd run (usually hours of test time plus difficult
>> log interpretation versus a quick run that outputs relevant results to
>> stdout even with a different NTP daemon running).
>>
>> Actually it doesn't take hours, just seconds.  You just need to see if
>> using only "pool2.pool.ntp.org
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__2.pool.ntp.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=59WElTcIEwbBjXQe6gMr9RyqhrzJYRWAhv5h0b8rPQw&r=SFS-Xi521pAy4mTX_qIfD3V2MhNyuNL40eu8gHG8Lq8&m=ySav1sbezdLzYzTIAvHwqF0bdUOTfKWlxmRK8lBD76z9w_QVOCcBgAmHzW5YpaJX&s=98wHPRNzNA6i0bJ9dasbW5XTtZOxu26sMTzPEMhQJJg&e=>" you see only IPv4 pool servers or both IPv4 and IPv6 servers in the "ntpq -p" billboard right after starting ntpd on a Windows system with a global IPv6 address.  Nonetheless, a standalone test program is easi
+ er to set up and doesn't require messing with your existing ntpd, so I wrote one.
>> getaddrinfo-test optionally takes a hostname and service to look up,
>> defaulting to2.pool.ntp.org
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__2.pool.ntp.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=59WElTcIEwbBjXQe6gMr9RyqhrzJYRWAhv5h0b8rPQw&r=SFS-Xi521pAy4mTX_qIfD3V2MhNyuNL40eu8gHG8Lq8&m=ySav1sbezdLzYzTIAvHwqF0bdUOTfKWlxmRK8lBD76z9w_QVOCcBgAmHzW5YpaJX&s=98wHPRNzNA6i0bJ9dasbW5XTtZOxu26sMTzPEMhQJJg&e=> and ntp.  You can download the source and a ready-to-run 32-bit .exe from:
>> https://people.nwtime.org/hart/getaddrinfo-test.zip
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__people.nwtime.org_hart_getaddrinfo-2Dtest.zip&d=DwMFaQ&c=59WElTcIEwbBjXQe6gMr9RyqhrzJYRWAhv5h0b8rPQw&r=SFS-Xi521pAy4mTX_qIfD3V2MhNyuNL40eu8gHG8Lq8&m=ySav1sbezdLzYzTIAvHwqF0bdUOTfKWlxmRK8lBD76z9w_QVOCcBgAmHzW5YpaJX&s=fwRkT9S43ANQOQog1gt2FP4xAzqyyPqIyuTGed0RreU&e=>
>> Here's what the output looks like on my Windows 11 22H2 system without
>> IPv6 connectivity:
>> Using hostname 2.pool.ntp.org
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__2.pool.ntp.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=59WElTcIEwbBjXQe6gMr9RyqhrzJYRWAhv5h0b8rPQw&r=SFS-Xi521pAy4mTX_qIfD3V2MhNyuNL40eu8gHG8Lq8&m=ySav1sbezdLzYzTIAvHwqF0bdUOTfKWlxmRK8lBD76z9w_QVOCcBgAmHzW5YpaJX&s=98wHPRNzNA6i0bJ9dasbW5XTtZOxu26sMTzPEMhQJJg&e=>. service ntp
>> AF_UNSPEC:
>>         128.82.68.1
>>         216.84.68.1
>>         240.84.68.1
>>         160.83.68.1
>> AF_INET:
>>         56.82.68.1
>>         48.84.68.1
>>         80.82.68.1
>>         104.82.68.1
>> AF_INET6:
>> getaddrinfo error: The requested name is valid, but no data of the
>> requested type was found.
>> I'd appreciate testing on systems with both IPv4 and IPv6 internet
>> access with as many different versions of Windows as possible.  You'll
>> reproduce what I saw if there are IPv6 addresses under AF_INET6 but
>> not under AF_UNSPEC.
>> Incidentally, you can help me convince Microsoft this should be
>> investigated by upvoting the Feedback Hub issue I opened.  I presume
>> this link will work only from a Windows 10 or 11 machine:
>> https://aka.ms/AAkyamq
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__aka.ms_AAkyamq&d=DwMFaQ&c=59WElTcIEwbBjXQe6gMr9RyqhrzJYRWAhv5h0b8rPQw&r=SFS-Xi521pAy4mTX_qIfD3V2MhNyuNL40eu8gHG8Lq8&m=ySav1sbezdLzYzTIAvHwqF0bdUOTfKWlxmRK8lBD76z9w_QVOCcBgAmHzW5YpaJX&s=8O25GIVYJm9otvynr3HKpouvg8qZTvj5b3QoQq_iPUA&e=>
>> Cheers,
>> Dave Hart
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may
>> contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended
>> solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this message
>> is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>> reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or other use
>> of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
>> and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.
>

--
Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org>, part of
http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!
--
This is questions@lists.ntp.org
Subscribe: questions+subscribe@lists.ntp.org
Unsubscribe: questions+unsubscribe@lists.ntp.org