novaBBS - comp.mail.sendmail - Re: How the fuck can I force sendmail to efficiently process itsqueue

Re: How the fuck can I force sendmail to efficiently process itsqueue

<1ab4aa15-0ed6-4cf8-af72-41c70960d00cn@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=601&group=comp.mail.sendmail#601

copy link Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail

X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5be1:0:b0:498:79dc:d3ff with SMTP id k1-20020ad45be1000000b0049879dcd3ffmr27515925qvc.87.1666629893783;
Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:1188:0:b0:6b0:9a6:b751 with SMTP id
130-20020a251188000000b006b009a6b751mr28783163ybr.54.1666629893513; Mon, 24
Oct 2022 09:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <OdCdnd7PMdqcMdbanZ2dnUVZ_v3inZ2d@giganews.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2607:fb90:5fe4:e5fa:0:37:c7da:7a01;
posting-account=w3XuEwoAAABoT35RomrkGjGqGdF2a1WP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2607:fb90:5fe4:e5fa:0:37:c7da:7a01
References: <3eednYYYNNf-8dnanZ2dnUVZ_tOtnZ2d@giganews.com>
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0711241443420.31802@ebfjryy.nhfvpf.arg> <fi9a08$10o8$3@hedeland.org>
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0711250804430.1034@ebfjryy.nhfvpf.arg> <bill-8F5EDB.23141126112007@news.det.sbcglobal.net>
<OdCdnd7PMdqcMdbanZ2dnUVZ_v3inZ2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1ab4aa15-0ed6-4cf8-af72-41c70960d00cn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: How the fuck can I force sendmail to efficiently process itsqueue
From: amandara...@gmail.com (Amanda Savage)
Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:44:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2215

by: Amanda Savage - Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:44 UTC

On Monday, November 26, 2007 at 11:32:49 PM UTC-6, Ignoramus23492 wrote:
> On 2007-11-27, Bill Cole <bi...@scconsult.com> wrote:
> > Most importantly, I have seen that happen with both high-end
> > spammers (i.e. not the ones using zombied systems)
> Can you clarify this sentence?
> > By making rejections explicit at the border, you make it possible for
> > senders to know that they should stop sending your system mail that you
> > don't want to deliver. If you accept mail and silently discard it, you
> > are acting as a sink for that mail and giving senders (spammers or
> > "false positive" victims) the impression that the message was delivered.
> I actually agree. At the very least, I would like to learn how to 5xx
> the really high score spam.
> i

U X e dUdX, e dX, cosine, secant, tangent, sine, 3.14159...

computers / comp.mail.sendmail / Re: How the fuck can I force sendmail to efficiently process itsqueue

Subject	Author
Re: How the fuck can I force sendmail to efficiently process itsqueue	Amanda Savage