Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Hailing frequencies open, Captain.


computers / comp.os.linux.misc / Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64

SubjectAuthor
* Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Robert Heller
+- Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Jason Evans
`* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Anssi Saari
 `* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Aragorn
  `* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Anssi Saari
   `* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64The Natural Philosopher
    `* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Pascal Hambourg
     +* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Grant Taylor
     |+- Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Robert Riches
     |`- Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Rich
     `* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64The Natural Philosopher
      `* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Robert Heller
       `* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64The Natural Philosopher
        +* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Robert Heller
        |+* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64John-Paul Stewart
        ||`* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Pascal Hambourg
        || `* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Pascal Hambourg
        ||  `- Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64John-Paul Stewart
        |+* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64The Natural Philosopher
        ||`- Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64The Natural Philosopher
        |`* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Anssi Saari
        | +* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64The Natural Philosopher
        | |`- Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Robert Heller
        | `- Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Robert Heller
        `* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Pascal Hambourg
         `* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Robert Heller
          `* Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64Pascal Hambourg
           `- Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64The Natural Philosopher

Pages:12
Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64

<sm3e9g$v2e$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=6336&group=comp.os.linux.misc#6336

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tnp...@invalid.invalid (The Natural Philosopher)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:15:12 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <sm3e9g$v2e$1@dont-email.me>
References: <JMqdnVaDXY0whOP8nZ2dnUU7-cXNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<sm07dds1fs8.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi> <20211101231452.2e126fb8@nx-74205>
<sm0zgqly6y3.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi> <sltoml$dp1$1@dont-email.me>
<6182e42b$0$4993$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <sm0elt$8se$1@dont-email.me>
<Kdidndb0Wp6PUB78nZ2dnUU7-VnNnZ2d@giganews.com> <sm0vo2$2mn$1@dont-email.me>
<8NednaQqWsXRtBn8nZ2dnUU7-bHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<sm0fssax0q4.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:15:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5dbf75ba21452e42da0ad9f2ba763a63";
logging-data="31822"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX185eRCWzIXVMWtPTJ+N/l1MknhJhXi/+xY="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Fw+PF8zH+1/x+gAiMvFpIY8D/z8=
In-Reply-To: <sm0fssax0q4.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: The Natural Philosop - Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:15 UTC

On 05/11/2021 12:09, Anssi Saari wrote:
> Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> writes:
>
>> I'm actually hoping a x86_64 emulator already exists for ARM. I guess *worst
>> case* I could build a x86_64 cross-compiler hosted on ARM.
>
> Why is that the worst case? I've done cross compilation to MIPS and ARM
> a couple of times but not recently. Cross compilation was fine, mostly
> the problems I had were some software packages using build systems like
> the common Autotools in a way that was not compatible with cross
> compilation and required some fiddling. Or even a lot of fiddling.
>
I cant understand why, if you want an x86 target, you don't just grab a
second-hand WINPC and bang Linux on it, and cross mount a source
directory and compile on it using the command line - no need even for
screen and keyboard

My Pi code was all prototyped on a fast compiling x86 machine prior to
mounting the source directory on the pi and then typing "make clean; make;"
Cross compiling works, but is a lot easier to have the right CPU and
libraries handy for a target to compile and test upon.

--
When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over
the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that
authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.

Frédéric Bastiat

Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64

<O76dnZcQjNHw7Bj8nZ2dnUU7-dHNnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=6341&group=comp.os.linux.misc#6341

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:01:17 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: hel...@deepsoft.com (Robert Heller)
Organization: Deepwoods Software
X-Newsreader: TkNews 3.0 (1.2.12)
Subject: Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64
In-Reply-To: <sm0fssax0q4.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi>
References: <JMqdnVaDXY0whOP8nZ2dnUU7-cXNnZ2d@giganews.com>??<sm07dds1fs8.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi>
<20211101231452.2e126fb8@nx-74205>??<sm0zgqly6y3.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi>
<sltoml$dp1$1@dont-email.me>??<6182e42b$0$4993$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
<sm0elt$8se$1@dont-email.me>??<Kdidndb0Wp6PUB78nZ2dnUU7-VnNnZ2d@giganews.com>??<sm0vo2$2mn$1@dont-email.me>??<8NednaQqWsXRtBn8nZ2dnUU7-bHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<sm0fssax0q4.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Originator: heller@sharky4.deepsoft.com
Message-ID: <O76dnZcQjNHw7Bj8nZ2dnUU7-dHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:01:17 -0500
Lines: 34
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-NTGy1vEOrUnw7egKpe7RqLk3F5c7/3/c4SsP2K0DQ0FugglOI2iuDTfcvHSeAejjXj8Yfu2fvdizJqp!3/eEdAEHD4+m9duyqst0iKhaxEiCpNdO7q83UmlcStqFkXoYw0RY347DU0lWpfBMcV9REkLSrywb!vgw=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3388
 by: Robert Heller - Fri, 5 Nov 2021 18:01 UTC

At Fri, 05 Nov 2021 14:09:55 +0200 Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> wrote:

>
> Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> writes:
>
> > I'm actually hoping a x86_64 emulator already exists for ARM. I guess *worst
> > case* I could build a x86_64 cross-compiler hosted on ARM.
>
> Why is that the worst case? I've done cross compilation to MIPS and ARM
> a couple of times but not recently. Cross compilation was fine, mostly
> the problems I had were some software packages using build systems like
> the common Autotools in a way that was not compatible with cross
> compilation and required some fiddling. Or even a lot of fiddling.

Cross compiling to a target *OS*, as opposed to a micro-controller (which has
no bare-metal O/S), can be "interesting", since the build environment is not
quite the same as the target. And compiling gcc/g++ cross-compiler can take a
long time (well building an embeded ARMv7 target on an ARMv7 linux host took
like 72 hours and pushed close to the 1G RAM on a Pi3). And yes, the
Autotools are fiddly when cross building (at least for a MS-Windows target).
My build infrastructure is not really cleanly set up from cross-building to a
Linux target on a Linux host -- I suspect some fiddling with the
autoconf/aclocal/automake stuff would be needed, esp. since the
cross-compiling test assumes MS-Windows target on a Linux host.

>
>

--
Robert Heller -- Cell: 413-658-7953 GV: 978-633-5364
Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services
http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Linux Administration Services
heller@deepsoft.com -- Webhosting Services

Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64

<h7Odnew0BNfw7Bj8nZ2dnUU7-XHNnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=6342&group=comp.os.linux.misc#6342

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:01:17 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: hel...@deepsoft.com (Robert Heller)
Organization: Deepwoods Software
X-Newsreader: TkNews 3.0 (1.2.12)
Subject: Re: Linux "native" Virtualization: ARM64 vs x86_64
In-Reply-To: <sm3e9g$v2e$1@dont-email.me>
References: <JMqdnVaDXY0whOP8nZ2dnUU7-cXNnZ2d@giganews.com>?
<sm07dds1fs8.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi> <20211101231452.2e126fb8@nx-74205>?
<sm0zgqly6y3.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi> <sltoml$dp1$1@dont-email.me>?
<6182e42b$0$4993$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <sm0elt$8se$1@dont-email.me>?
<Kdidndb0Wp6PUB78nZ2dnUU7-VnNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<sm0vo2$2mn$1@dont-email.me>?
<8NednaQqWsXRtBn8nZ2dnUU7-bHNnZ2d@giganews.com>?
<sm0fssax0q4.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi> <sm3e9g$v2e$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Originator: heller@sharky4.deepsoft.com
Message-ID: <h7Odnew0BNfw7Bj8nZ2dnUU7-XHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:01:17 -0500
Lines: 38
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-T8sOj+0o0AiuIOj1+XX+qMeTsHn8c+P8By/az5CYFMF1GUI8TtWWTW/rMJwybAphmRhNQ8xUNS3MMRd!B9vfvxDLIM0Nsb9JncwaO7AdqZ8ojrgiTwYzYtkm4AocbtM9AXTPCvWFQTDWz6lrDoeA8RpGLPwZ!n+M=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3395
 by: Robert Heller - Fri, 5 Nov 2021 18:01 UTC

At Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:15:12 +0000 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>
> On 05/11/2021 12:09, Anssi Saari wrote:
> > Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> writes:
> >
> >> I'm actually hoping a x86_64 emulator already exists for ARM. I guess *worst
> >> case* I could build a x86_64 cross-compiler hosted on ARM.
> >
> > Why is that the worst case? I've done cross compilation to MIPS and ARM
> > a couple of times but not recently. Cross compilation was fine, mostly
> > the problems I had were some software packages using build systems like
> > the common Autotools in a way that was not compatible with cross
> > compilation and required some fiddling. Or even a lot of fiddling.
> >
> I cant understand why, if you want an x86 target, you don't just grab a
> second-hand WINPC and bang Linux on it, and cross mount a source
> directory and compile on it using the command line - no need even for
> screen and keyboard

It is another piece of hardware to maintain... (I do everything from the
command line and all of my build boxen are headless.) I am also getting fed
up with Intel and AMD processors and corresponding motherboard chipsets and I
really at the end of the line with laptops.

>
> My Pi code was all prototyped on a fast compiling x86 machine prior to
> mounting the source directory on the pi and then typing "make clean; make;"
> Cross compiling works, but is a lot easier to have the right CPU and
> libraries handy for a target to compile and test upon.
>

--
Robert Heller -- Cell: 413-658-7953 GV: 978-633-5364
Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services
http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Linux Administration Services
heller@deepsoft.com -- Webhosting Services

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor