jerryab <jerryab@juno.com> posted this:

<e8geahlne194kpudl25k50d6ndua3io24j@4ax.com>

[ Useless, redundant, derivitive nonsense <SNIPPED!> ]

Congress cannot repeal or alter a Constitutional Amendment. Period.

The Constitution and/or a Constitutional Amendment can only be amended
and/or repealed by the Constitutional Amendment process prescribed in
Article V of the Constitution. Once a Constitutional Amendment prevails
through the process, it becomes a part of the Constitution. No Congress
can change it; No court can change it; pursuant to Article VI, Paragraph 2
of the Constitution, "The Supremacy Clause".

That is *why* it is called a "Constitution".

--

I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^;

And *NO*, that is *NOT* a Jedi Light Saber I have in my pocket!

But that doesn't necessarily mean I'm happy to see you either.

Bucky Breeder <Breeder_Bucky-Breeder@That's.my.name_Don't.wear.it.out>
wrote:

>jerryab <jerryab@juno.com> posted this:
>
> <e8geahlne194kpudl25k50d6ndua3io24j@4ax.com>
>
> [ Useless, redundant, derivitive nonsense <SNIPPED!> ]
>
>Congress cannot repeal or alter a Constitutional Amendment. Period.

The Congress starts the process, but it must then be approved by 3/4
of the states. Not likely that any amendment (or repeal of an existing
amendment) could get past that hurdle today.

In case you don't know, the 21st amendment repealed the 18th
(prohipition). So yes, a constitutional amendment CAN be repealed.

--
Tim Slattery
tim <at> risingdove <dot> com

On Sat, 11 Jun 2022 09:45:05 -0500, in
<js99ahhgkdt16sc443rtmmrlub6c4tqevf@4ax.com>, jerryab
<jerryab@juno.com> wrote:

>Then, by applying logic, you (and anyone else--IF they have a
>functional brain. Do YOU?) would realize the Second Amendment was
>effectively repealed by Congress over a century ago (1903). They only
>left the Second Amendment unchanged because they were too afraid to
>reveal what they had actually done.

No! Unless the constitution was amended, the 2nd amendment remains in
force.

Laws passed by Congress do NOT override the Constitution... unless
people are stupid enough to pay attention to such laws.

And not only that, but our current Supreme Court is making rulings
that are chipping away at overregulation... such as in New York.

--
Jim H

On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 10:12:31 -0500, in
<3e0cahh3q7qvqm852uvhvf361kpcausdc1@4ax.com>, jerryab
<jerryab@juno.com> wrote:

>The public is NOT allowed to own real weapons that would be effective
>against the US military. How is it NOT an "authoritarian regime"?

If the time to rise up ever comes, the entity to go after isn't the
military.

--
Jim H

Tim Slattery <tim@risingdove.com> posted this:

> Bucky Breeder <Breeder_Bucky-Breeder@That's.my.name_Don't.wear.it.out>
> wrote:
>
>>jerryab <jerryab@juno.com> posted this:
>>
>> <e8geahlne194kpudl25k50d6ndua3io24j@4ax.com>
>>
>> [ Useless, redundant, derivitive nonsense <SNIPPED!> ]
>>
>>Congress cannot repeal or alter a Constitutional Amendment. Period.
>
> The Congress starts the process, but it must then be approved by 3/4
> of the states. Not likely that any amendment (or repeal of an existing
> amendment) could get past that hurdle today.
>
> In case you don't know, the 21st amendment repealed the 18th
> (prohipition). So yes, a constitutional amendment CAN be repealed.

It was called "Prohibition". I cited that earlier in the thread. Try to
keep up.

I did NOT say a Constitutional Amendment cannot be repealed. I said
Congress CANNOT repeal or alter a Constitutional Amendment. "PERIOD!"

I realize you probably didn't take Honors English in your Social Promotion
GED education indoctrination - and "reading" was likely not high on the
list of required subjects either; but, this shit ain't rocket surgery.
I don't really want to hear anymore of you moron snowflakes whining about
how difficult it is to amend the Constitution. This is a direct result of
your awards of participation-trophies and whatever "flavor" Kool-Aid they
were feeding you in your decadent public school system district.

If you don't like guns or AR-15s, then go ahead and move to Cuba or Russia
or Chicago where they're totally illegal.

Meanwhile, let the adults work on controlling the crazy people that you
Liberals are unleashing on law-abiding society.

--

I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^;

And *NO*, that is *NOT* a Jedi Light Saber I have in my pocket!

But that doesn't necessarily mean I'm happy to see you either.

"Bucky Breeder" wrote in message
news:XnsAEB3647F41028Ohmmmmmmm@85.12.62.254...
>
>Buffalo <phoney@physco.invalid.net> posted this :
>
>> Does this amendment say that you can carry sawed off shotguns,
>> shoulder-launched anti-aircraft weapons (Red-Eye) , 3.5 rocket
>> launchers, M-60 machine guns, grenade launchers, any type of rifle, any
>> type of pistol.,etc?
>
>What does "shall not be infringed" mean to *you*???
>
>
>
>> Where do put the limit?
>
>
>It's a Constitutional Amendment... Are you brain-damaged?
>
>"Limits" on Constitutional Amendments can ONLY be made by Constitutional
>Amendment, as prescribed in Article V of the Constitution.
>
>Dammit! What's so fuukeen difficult to unnerstand 'bout dat?
>
>
>WHY? Should there be any limit on what 'arms'
>> you can use? Who decides? YOU?? C'mon now. :)
>
>Previously answered.
>
>
>> Are hand grenades considers 'arms' ?
>
>Previously answered.
>
>>
>> What are the limits if you take the 2nd amendments as 'gospel' according
>> to 'your' own interpretation?
>
>It's *NOT* a matter of extrapolating a word or phrase out of context and
>superimposing the word or phrase over the Amendment and opining "that's
>what the Amendment 'really' means".
>
>King George's government was oppressive and the FIRST thing they did, or
>attempted to do, was disarm the Colonists. Our founding fathers recognized
>that disarming the population was the first step to dominance and
>oppression by whatever political power is extant.
>
>
>No matter *WHY* Amendment II was important, "... the right of the people
>to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" is the dominant directive.
>How many interpretations can you construe from that?
>
>It's like your typical Libtard's logic goes "well, we don't have a militia
>anymore therefore the 2nd Amendment is now totally invalid and guns are
>just so noisy and scary we should just take them all away and carry bicycle
>locks for weapons now and travel in gangs to terrorize people with whom we
>disagree..." D'uh!
>
>There *ARE* *NO* *LIMITS*! There can be *NO* *LIMITS* legislatively or
>judicially under our Constitution! Not by the federal government, state
>governments, or local governments. (See Amendment XIV)
>
>
>If "you" - or anyone else - wants to *legallly* limit "the right of the
>people to keep and bear Arms", "you" - or anyone else - *must* either
>repeal-and/or-replace or amend Amendment II with another amendment.
>
>That is the way our Constitution works... or is intended to work.
>
>It's designed to protect us - "the people" - from the whims of politics,
>public opinion, powerful authority, anarchy, cattle thieves, rapists, and
>smartasses on the usenets, etc....
>
>
>So... If your cause is so just, and your intentions are so honorable and
>your arguments are so cogent, *WHY* *NOT* *SIMPLY* amend the Constitution
>to suit your preferences.
>
>It's just so fuukeen simple.
>
>But ohhhhhhh noooooo, you snowflakes would much rather banter around and
>whine about it... collect money for political action committees over it...
>fragment and fractualize over it... position for yet more power over it...
>push the limits of 'Separation of Powers' over it...
>
>Oh, but that's right... Pursuant to Brown vs. Board of Education, *most* of
>the population is no longer educated about the Constitution and the *WHYs*,
>*HOWs*, *WHENs*, and *WHATs* of OUR CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS OF THE RULE OF LAW
>anymore, because mobs, mainstream Leftist media, and Hollywood tell you how
>these things *should* work...
>
>
>
>> Buffalo
>>
>>
>
>
>
You sound like you were home schooled in the outhouse, because your parents
were too ashamed to let anyone see you in the house itself.
And you didn't come up with even one good sentence or reason to my post in
your long bs reply.

--
Buffalo

"Buffalo" <phoney@physco.invalid.net> wrote:

> It's a Constitutional Amendment

This argument is academic, what the Second Amendment was meant to protect has
already been taken away. Your precious gun wasn't one of those things. The
only thing you can do with it now is blow your brains out when some day they
come to take it away, if you have the courage.

The fact it's a constitutional amendment doesn't define the term "arms" or
who exactly and where exactly arms are permitted. That's defined by the times
when it was written.

It's all been taken away already and you couldn't do anything about it if you
tried. Our Supreme Court has been making up law for decades. The recent
decision in Bostock v. Clayton County is the most obvious example of them
completely ignored reality. Whatever they think, they have no apparent
respect for the law or even our language (when such respect goes against
their politics). The Constitution is irrelevant.

On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 16:00:17 GMT, Bucky Breeder
<Breeder_Bucky-Breeder@That's.my.name_Don't.wear.it.out> wrote:

>Meanwhile, let the adults work on controlling the crazy people

By definition, YOU want the liberals in control because the RWNJs are
the morots (the RWNJs are not rational enough to be considered crazy).

>> Bucky, The Mostest Awesomest Home Skooler Ever, wrote this
>> in <XnsAEB3647F41028Ohmmmmmmm@85.12.62.254> :
>>
>>> What does "shall not be infringed" mean to *you*???

[...]

Buffalo <phoney@physco.invalid.net> posted this
via news:t8gufp$ljo$1@dont-email.me:
>
> You sound like you were home schooled in the outhouse, because your
> parents were too ashamed to let anyone see you in the house itself.
> And you didn't come up with even one good sentence or reason to my post
> in your long bs reply.
>

So says the moron who misspelledth their own Subject line (OP).

Meanwhile, go back to your Left-wing TV shows which are inculcating what
little brain matter you have left in your diapers with the ideaology of
delusional whining, deviant inclusion, and diverse moral tolerance until
your Chinese and Russian masters invade through our open southern border
and ration your fast food dietary habits and transportation options:

<https://tinyurl.com/3v9tsfez>

Repent, the end is near... Or, just smoke 'em if you got 'em.

Shortened Links Always Guaranteed Safe* by This Author:

*DISCLAIMER:

Exceptions may occur in the case of feeble-brained snowflakes who tend to
experience random idiopathic episodes of derangement, frothing, drooling,
and/or ire.

--

I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^;

Old men in loaded geriatric diapers stalk me on the usenets
and call me a "troll", a term of endearment and high praise.

Humbly, I am made more awesome because of these ad-hominem attacks.