Here is a news bit on military AI
The story reports on the need for AI.

I would like a request. World wars
procedure in AI targeting systems
must include AI preclusion of children
injury and death.

AI is to not allow child body counts.

The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
It basically means ground troops are to be risked
to save the children.

On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> Here is a news bit on military AI
> The story reports on the need for AI.
>
> I would like a request. World wars
> procedure in AI targeting systems
> must include AI preclusion of children
> injury and death.
>
> AI is to not allow child body counts.
>
> The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
> It basically means ground troops are to be risked
> to save the children.
forgot the story link:
https://www.rt.com/uk/524636-ai-killer-robots-military/

On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:28:05 PM UTC+1, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > Here is a news bit on military AI
> > The story reports on the need for AI.
> >
> > I would like a request. World wars
> > procedure in AI targeting systems
> > must include AI preclusion of children
> > injury and death.
> >
> > AI is to not allow child body counts.
> >
> > The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
> > It basically means ground troops are to be risked
> > to save the children.
> forgot the story link:
> https://www.rt.com/uk/524636-ai-killer-robots-military/
ever worried that contributers were chat bots
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3

On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 3:31:45 PM UTC-5, assumed. identiy.3396 wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:28:05 PM UTC+1, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > Here is a news bit on military AI
> > > The story reports on the need for AI.
> > >
> > > I would like a request. World wars
> > > procedure in AI targeting systems
> > > must include AI preclusion of children
> > > injury and death.
> > >
> > > AI is to not allow child body counts.
> > >
> > > The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
> > > It basically means ground troops are to be risked
> > > to save the children.
> > forgot the story link:
> > https://www.rt.com/uk/524636-ai-killer-robots-military/
> ever worried that contributers were chat bots
> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3

I am curious yellow and I am not a chat bot.

On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 3:31:45 PM UTC-5, assumed. identiy.3396 wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:28:05 PM UTC+1, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > Here is a news bit on military AI
> > > The story reports on the need for AI.
> > >
> > > I would like a request. World wars
> > > procedure in AI targeting systems
> > > must include AI preclusion of children
> > > injury and death.
> > >
> > > AI is to not allow child body counts.
> > >
> > > The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
> > > It basically means ground troops are to be risked
> > > to save the children.
> > forgot the story link:
> > https://www.rt.com/uk/524636-ai-killer-robots-military/
> ever worried that contributers were chat bots

working on your letter, N.
> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3

On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 12:53:34 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 3:31:45 PM UTC-5, assumed. identiy.3396 wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:28:05 PM UTC+1, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > Here is a news bit on military AI
> > > > The story reports on the need for AI.
> > > >
> > > > I would like a request. World wars
> > > > procedure in AI targeting systems
> > > > must include AI preclusion of children
> > > > injury and death.
> > > >
> > > > AI is to not allow child body counts.
> > > >
> > > > The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
> > > > It basically means ground troops are to be risked
> > > > to save the children.
> > > forgot the story link:
> > > https://www.rt.com/uk/524636-ai-killer-robots-military/
> > ever worried that contributers were chat bots
> working on your letter, N.
> > https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3

Well let's see . if you have got a nuclear weapon that vaporizes everything within several miles from ground zero it's a little hard to spare those children no matter what fantastic AI system you have.

On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 4:08:28 AM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 12:53:34 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 3:31:45 PM UTC-5, assumed. identiy.3396 wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:28:05 PM UTC+1, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > Here is a news bit on military AI
> > > > > The story reports on the need for AI.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like a request. World wars
> > > > > procedure in AI targeting systems
> > > > > must include AI preclusion of children
> > > > > injury and death.
> > > > >
> > > > > AI is to not allow child body counts.
> > > > >
> > > > > The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
> > > > > It basically means ground troops are to be risked
> > > > > to save the children.
> > > > forgot the story link:
> > > > https://www.rt.com/uk/524636-ai-killer-robots-military/
> > > ever worried that contributers were chat bots
> > working on your letter, N.
> > > https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3
> Well let's see . if you have got a nuclear weapon that vaporizes everything within several miles from ground zero it's a little hard to spare those children no matter what fantastic AI system you have.
I have raised the female problem question myself in this group, should we permit contraception & put some legall restraint on the numbers of children every couple has, or take land as if it was already ours & raise crops to feed everyone in the family.

On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 9:16:51 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 4:08:28 AM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 12:53:34 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 3:31:45 PM UTC-5, assumed. identiy.3396 wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:28:05 PM UTC+1, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > > Here is a news bit on military AI
> > > > > > The story reports on the need for AI.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like a request. World wars
> > > > > > procedure in AI targeting systems
> > > > > > must include AI preclusion of children
> > > > > > injury and death.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AI is to not allow child body counts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
> > > > > > It basically means ground troops are to be risked
> > > > > > to save the children.
> > > > > forgot the story link:
> > > > > https://www.rt.com/uk/524636-ai-killer-robots-military/
> > > > ever worried that contributers were chat bots
> > > working on your letter, N.
> > > > https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3
> > Well let's see . if you have got a nuclear weapon that vaporizes everything within several miles from ground zero it's a little hard to spare those children no matter what fantastic AI system you have.
> I have raised the female problem question myself in this group, should we permit contraception & put some legall restraint on the numbers of children every couple has, or take land as if it was already ours & raise crops to feed everyone in the family.
Not many women like the idea of having to shovel & plant in a garden plot, its heavy tiring & healthier than lounging about with make-up on spotlights wearing saucy gowns, in fact I was out in a plot recently in ouuet wear zipped overalls facemask in sunshine, I didn't get my clothes dirty & met some good people who shared food.

On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 3:27:32 PM UTC-5, job.com wrote:
> On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 9:16:51 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 4:08:28 AM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 12:53:34 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 3:31:45 PM UTC-5, assumed. identiy.3396 wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:28:05 PM UTC+1, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > > > Here is a news bit on military AI
> > > > > > > The story reports on the need for AI.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would like a request. World wars
> > > > > > > procedure in AI targeting systems
> > > > > > > must include AI preclusion of children
> > > > > > > injury and death.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > AI is to not allow child body counts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
> > > > > > > It basically means ground troops are to be risked
> > > > > > > to save the children.
> > > > > > forgot the story link:
> > > > > > https://www.rt.com/uk/524636-ai-killer-robots-military/
> > > > > ever worried that contributers were chat bots
> > > > working on your letter, N.
> > > > > https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3
> > > Well let's see . if you have got a nuclear weapon that vaporizes everything within several miles from ground zero it's a little hard to spare those children no matter what fantastic AI system you have.
> > I have raised the female problem question myself in this group, should we permit contraception & put some legall restraint on the numbers of children every couple has, or take land as if it was already ours & raise crops to feed everyone in the family.
> Not many women like the idea of having to shovel & plant in a garden plot, its heavy tiring & healthier than lounging about with make-up on spotlights wearing saucy gowns, in fact I was out in a plot recently in ouuet wear zipped overalls facemask in sunshine, I didn't get my clothes dirty & met some good people who shared food.

You are to be commended, jobsearch, for getting out and doing something real rather than surfing the Internet all day long as most people do.

On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 3:53:49 PM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 3:27:32 PM UTC-5, job.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 9:16:51 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> > > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 4:08:28 AM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 12:53:34 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 3:31:45 PM UTC-5, assumed. identiy.3396 wrote:
> > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:28:05 PM UTC+1, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > > > > Here is a news bit on military AI
> > > > > > > > The story reports on the need for AI.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I would like a request. World wars
> > > > > > > > procedure in AI targeting systems
> > > > > > > > must include AI preclusion of children
> > > > > > > > injury and death.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > AI is to not allow child body counts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
> > > > > > > > It basically means ground troops are to be risked
> > > > > > > > to save the children.
> > > > > > > forgot the story link:
> > > > > > > https://www.rt.com/uk/524636-ai-killer-robots-military/
> > > > > > ever worried that contributers were chat bots
> > > > > working on your letter, N.
> > > > > > https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3
> > > > Well let's see . if you have got a nuclear weapon that vaporizes everything within several miles from ground zero it's a little hard to spare those children no matter what fantastic AI system you have.
> > > I have raised the female problem question myself in this group, should we permit contraception & put some legall restraint on the numbers of children every couple has, or take land as if it was already ours & raise crops to feed everyone in the family.
> > Not many women like the idea of having to shovel & plant in a garden plot, its heavy tiring & healthier than lounging about with make-up on spotlights wearing saucy gowns, in fact I was out in a plot recently in ouuet wear zipped overalls facemask in sunshine, I didn't get my clothes dirty & met some good people who shared food.
> You are to be commended, jobsearch, for getting out and doing something real rather than surfing the Internet all day long as most people do.
Ta!

A reminder to many that this together with furlough putting on weight + lack of execrcise is going to provide new employment for the future. Lets hope that it is in the patients best interests.

On Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 1:58:07 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 3:53:49 PM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 3:27:32 PM UTC-5, job.com wrote:
> > > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 9:16:51 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 4:08:28 AM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 12:53:34 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 3:31:45 PM UTC-5, assumed. identiy.3396 wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:28:05 PM UTC+1, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Here is a news bit on military AI
> > > > > > > > > The story reports on the need for AI.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I would like a request. World wars
> > > > > > > > > procedure in AI targeting systems
> > > > > > > > > must include AI preclusion of children
> > > > > > > > > injury and death.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > AI is to not allow child body counts.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
> > > > > > > > > It basically means ground troops are to be risked
> > > > > > > > > to save the children.
> > > > > > > > forgot the story link:
> > > > > > > > https://www.rt.com/uk/524636-ai-killer-robots-military/
> > > > > > > ever worried that contributers were chat bots
> > > > > > working on your letter, N.
> > > > > > > https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3
> > > > > Well let's see . if you have got a nuclear weapon that vaporizes everything within several miles from ground zero it's a little hard to spare those children no matter what fantastic AI system you have.
> > > > I have raised the female problem question myself in this group, should we permit contraception & put some legall restraint on the numbers of children every couple has, or take land as if it was already ours & raise crops to feed everyone in the family.
> > > Not many women like the idea of having to shovel & plant in a garden plot, its heavy tiring & healthier than lounging about with make-up on spotlights wearing saucy gowns, in fact I was out in a plot recently in ouuet wear zipped overalls facemask in sunshine, I didn't get my clothes dirty & met some good people who shared food.
> > You are to be commended, jobsearch, for getting out and doing something real rather than surfing the Internet all day long as most people do.
> Ta!
>
> A reminder to many that this together with furlough putting on weight + lack of execrcise is going to provide new employment for the future. Lets hope that it is in the patients best interests.

There are times when employment has been made out to be sexist, if women are not either a model or an actor charging fees or offering financial assistance could be conscrewed as corrupt. If women said they would lose weight for say £50, instead of having to pay a dieticien that seems sensible, what she may not be able to put into precise details is how many. That logic seems to work quite well for child bearing too.

On Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 2:05:50 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> On Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 1:58:07 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> > On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 3:53:49 PM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 3:27:32 PM UTC-5, job.com wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 9:16:51 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 4:08:28 AM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > > > > On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 12:53:34 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 3:31:45 PM UTC-5, assumed. identiy.3396 wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:28:05 PM UTC+1, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Here is a news bit on military AI
> > > > > > > > > > The story reports on the need for AI.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I would like a request. World wars
> > > > > > > > > > procedure in AI targeting systems
> > > > > > > > > > must include AI preclusion of children
> > > > > > > > > > injury and death.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > AI is to not allow child body counts.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
> > > > > > > > > > It basically means ground troops are to be risked
> > > > > > > > > > to save the children.
> > > > > > > > > forgot the story link:
> > > > > > > > > https://www.rt.com/uk/524636-ai-killer-robots-military/
> > > > > > > > ever worried that contributers were chat bots
> > > > > > > working on your letter, N.
> > > > > > > > https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3
> > > > > > Well let's see . if you have got a nuclear weapon that vaporizes everything within several miles from ground zero it's a little hard to spare those children no matter what fantastic AI system you have.
> > > > > I have raised the female problem question myself in this group, should we permit contraception & put some legall restraint on the numbers of children every couple has, or take land as if it was already ours & raise crops to feed everyone in the family.
> > > > Not many women like the idea of having to shovel & plant in a garden plot, its heavy tiring & healthier than lounging about with make-up on spotlights wearing saucy gowns, in fact I was out in a plot recently in ouuet wear zipped overalls facemask in sunshine, I didn't get my clothes dirty & met some good people who shared food.
> > > You are to be commended, jobsearch, for getting out and doing something real rather than surfing the Internet all day long as most people do.
> > Ta!
> >
> > A reminder to many that this together with furlough putting on weight + lack of execrcise is going to provide new employment for the future. Lets hope that it is in the patients best interests.
> There are times when employment has been made out to be sexist, if women are not either a model or an actor charging fees or offering financial assistance could be conscrewed as corrupt. If women said they would lose weight for say £50, instead of having to pay a dieticien that seems sensible, what she may not be able to put into precise details is how many. That logic seems to work quite well for child bearing too.
There is no price on life and acts of God

On Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 8:08:10 AM UTC-5, jobse.com wrote:
> On Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 2:05:50 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 1:58:07 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> > > On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 3:53:49 PM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 3:27:32 PM UTC-5, job.com wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 9:16:51 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> > > > > > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 4:08:28 AM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 12:53:34 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 3:31:45 PM UTC-5, assumed. identiy.3396 wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:28:05 PM UTC+1, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Here is a news bit on military AI
> > > > > > > > > > > The story reports on the need for AI.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I would like a request. World wars
> > > > > > > > > > > procedure in AI targeting systems
> > > > > > > > > > > must include AI preclusion of children
> > > > > > > > > > > injury and death.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > AI is to not allow child body counts.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
> > > > > > > > > > > It basically means ground troops are to be risked
> > > > > > > > > > > to save the children.
> > > > > > > > > > forgot the story link:
> > > > > > > > > > https://www.rt.com/uk/524636-ai-killer-robots-military/
> > > > > > > > > ever worried that contributers were chat bots
> > > > > > > > working on your letter, N.
> > > > > > > > > https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3
> > > > > > > Well let's see . if you have got a nuclear weapon that vaporizes everything within several miles from ground zero it's a little hard to spare those children no matter what fantastic AI system you have.
> > > > > > I have raised the female problem question myself in this group, should we permit contraception & put some legall restraint on the numbers of children every couple has, or take land as if it was already ours & raise crops to feed everyone in the family.
> > > > > Not many women like the idea of having to shovel & plant in a garden plot, its heavy tiring & healthier than lounging about with make-up on spotlights wearing saucy gowns, in fact I was out in a plot recently in ouuet wear zipped overalls facemask in sunshine, I didn't get my clothes dirty & met some good people who shared food.
> > > > You are to be commended, jobsearch, for getting out and doing something real rather than surfing the Internet all day long as most people do.
> > > Ta!
> > >
> > > A reminder to many that this together with furlough putting on weight + lack of execrcise is going to provide new employment for the future. Lets hope that it is in the patients best interests.
> > There are times when employment has been made out to be sexist, if women are not either a model or an actor charging fees or offering financial assistance could be conscrewed as corrupt. If women said they would lose weight for say £50, instead of having to pay a dieticien that seems sensible, what she may not be able to put into precise details is how many. That logic seems to work quite well for child bearing too.
> There is no price on life and acts of God

Very true , there is no price on life and acts of God.

On Saturday, June 12, 2021 at 3:02:17 PM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> On Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 8:08:10 AM UTC-5, jobse.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 2:05:50 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> > > On Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 1:58:07 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> > > > On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 3:53:49 PM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 3:27:32 PM UTC-5, job.com wrote:
> > > > > > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 9:16:51 PM UTC+1, esa 4me wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 4:08:28 AM UTC+1, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 12:53:34 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 3:31:45 PM UTC-5, assumed. identiy.3396 wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:28:05 PM UTC+1, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Here is a news bit on military AI
> > > > > > > > > > > > The story reports on the need for AI.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I would like a request. World wars
> > > > > > > > > > > > procedure in AI targeting systems
> > > > > > > > > > > > must include AI preclusion of children
> > > > > > > > > > > > injury and death.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > AI is to not allow child body counts.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The monitory cost is to not alter this rule.
> > > > > > > > > > > > It basically means ground troops are to be risked
> > > > > > > > > > > > to save the children.
> > > > > > > > > > > forgot the story link:
> > > > > > > > > > > https://www.rt.com/uk/524636-ai-killer-robots-military/
> > > > > > > > > > ever worried that contributers were chat bots
> > > > > > > > > working on your letter, N.
> > > > > > > > > > https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3
> > > > > > > > Well let's see . if you have got a nuclear weapon that vaporizes everything within several miles from ground zero it's a little hard to spare those children no matter what fantastic AI system you have.
> > > > > > > I have raised the female problem question myself in this group, should we permit contraception & put some legall restraint on the numbers of children every couple has, or take land as if it was already ours & raise crops to feed everyone in the family.
> > > > > > Not many women like the idea of having to shovel & plant in a garden plot, its heavy tiring & healthier than lounging about with make-up on spotlights wearing saucy gowns, in fact I was out in a plot recently in ouuet wear zipped overalls facemask in sunshine, I didn't get my clothes dirty & met some good people who shared food.
> > > > > You are to be commended, jobsearch, for getting out and doing something real rather than surfing the Internet all day long as most people do..
> > > > Ta!
> > > >
> > > > A reminder to many that this together with furlough putting on weight + lack of execrcise is going to provide new employment for the future. Lets hope that it is in the patients best interests.
> > > There are times when employment has been made out to be sexist, if women are not either a model or an actor charging fees or offering financial assistance could be conscrewed as corrupt. If women said they would lose weight for say £50, instead of having to pay a dieticien that seems sensible, what she may not be able to put into precise details is how many. That logic seems to work quite well for child bearing too.
> > There is no price on life and acts of God
> Very true , there is no price on life and acts of God.
A couple has few options except to try for acts of God, prevaricate & bicker on the cost. Alternatives are for the man too sue the women for not provide what she was promised for or agreed to do. Some women are surprised if a man pays her or offers, plausibly because it could suggest enslavement. Bickering is one philosophical remedy, haggling over property is another.