In article <sp5urm$tgc$1@dont-email.me>, Peter Köhlmann
<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:

> >> Problem is, apple does not tell what kind of sensors is present
> >
> > yes they do
> >
>
> And because they do (as you claim), you are able to provide the missing
> info (spot the usual flaw with your claims)

indeed i can. there are numerous third party utilities that can read
all available sensor data.

On 12/12/2021 11:40, nospam wrote:
> In article <c437338fa74c86ffa41ae1ea8f230f1d@news.novabbs.com>, philo
> <philo@news.novabbs.com> wrote:
>
>> Also. As long as I'm being dumb enough to argue with you, I might as well
>> mention that quite a few here also assumed I was trying to crack the firmware
>> password. As I also stated...from my Googje search, I stated that the only
>> way to do that was to replace the (I used the wrong word) BIOS chip. (I
>> should have said firmware.)
>
> your supposed google search failed and your claim is demonstrably false.
>
> not only is that *not* the only way, but that's the worst possible way
> since the risk of permanent damage is extremely high.
>
> the easiest way is to have apple reset it, which was clearly explained
> in a link originally provided to you, which you later referenced.
>
> there are also other options, which were also explained to you.
>
> you chose to ignore all of it.
>
>> I mentioned that not only did I not just happen to have one, I also don't
>> have access to a de-soldering station so that would not be an option.
>
> even if you did have the necessary equipment, the risk of damage is
> extremely high, for a procedure that is not even needed.
>
>> So, the only way to reset the machine was by putting the drive in another
>> machine.
>
> also wrong. there are several options to reset the account password
> (for which you also used incorrect terminology).
>
> as usual you did not fully explain the problem, dribbling out new bits
> of information in successive posts, thereby guaranteeing that any
> advice given would not work. you do this a lot.

What on earth makes you think you have more knowledge than, Philo?

You don't have. :-(

On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>
> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

That really is NOT funny.

Tell the TRUTH - I do.

On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll <"Steve
> Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>
>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>
>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>
> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.

Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
is not true!)

On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:

>On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll <"Steve
>> Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> (snip)
>>>
>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>
>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>
>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>
>Shadow is <redacted> - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>is not true!)

Want to take a vote on that?

------------------------

Still working on that "simple question"?
Must be hard. 81 #FAKE_NYMS on your "special page" and your
alcohol-pickled brain can't remember where you used each one.
But we can.
LOL

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Stalker".
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:04:03 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:

>On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>
>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>
>That really is NOT funny.

The truth rarely is. He just said you are both "bad guys", and
you both *LIE* all the time. I gave a more complete description.

>
>Tell the TRUTH - I do.

See?

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Stalker".
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:04:03 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5v53$t30$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

> On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>
>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>
> That really is NOT funny.
>
> Tell the TRUTH - I do.

Another plea for attention from Carroll.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
>> <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> (snip)
>>>
>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>
>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>
>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>
> Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
> is not true!)

When do you get to blackmailing me?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:

>On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>
>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>
>Shadow is a *LIAR* -

Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.

>it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>is not true!)

Two things:
1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.

2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What
happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?

Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> Wrote in message:

>>On 2021-12-11, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:(snip) I have NEVER used a FALSE pseudonym EVER - each one has been REAL!>Translation: DB just admitted, AGAIN, that he uses sock puppet.

We are very glad to see that you a) noticed exactly what he
admitted to as he performed his dance and b) have created this
post calling him out on what he's just done. That goes a long
ways with us. It shows us that he hasn't succesfully snowed you
AND you've shown that you aren't a closet instigator as atleast
one other regular poster here is. We can not imagine the misery
and loneliness that you'd have to reach to find enjoyment in
stirring the shit around in here as you attempt to cover your
real m.o. a total pathetic loser is what we have described in the
event it didn't click for you. Naming names at this point is a
waste of our time. We haven't danced around the description and
we listed the individual directly when we replied
previously.

--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitlies>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Snit is one f*cked up puppy - who steals our hard earned tax
paying dollars from the government by running a long con for
welfare - who can be reached via telephone - text message - or in
person - by using the publically available contact information
below:

Michael (snit) and Anne Glasser (life-like troll lady)
3181 Willow Dr, Prescott, AZ
86301-4855 
1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425
1.928.776.9519 or 1-(928)-776-9519
They are professional Grifters who live on the benefits your hard
earned tax paying dollars provide. Animal abuser = snit pissed on
his own cat!

On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
<dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:

> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
> wrote:
>
>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>
>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>
>> Shadow is a *LIAR* -
>
> Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.
>
>> it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>> is not true!)
>
> Two things:
> 1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.
>
> 2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What
> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?

Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> Wrote in message:

>>On 2021-12-11, Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:(snip) Show where David asked to have such inappropriate behavior targeted at him.
>He 'asks' every week, just like you do, with his "inappropriate behavior".

It's becoming more and more obvious that snit is exactly as
described by you and so many others - a usenet troll. A liar and
a con.

--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitlies>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Snit is one f*cked up puppy - who steals our hard earned tax
paying dollars from the government by running a long con for
welfare - who can be reached via telephone - text message - or in
person - by using the publically available contact information
below:

Michael (snit) and Anne Glasser (life-like troll lady)
3181 Willow Dr, Prescott, AZ
86301-4855 
1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425
1.928.776.9519 or 1-(928)-776-9519
They are professional Grifters who live on the benefits your hard
earned tax paying dollars provide. Animal abuser = snit pissed on
his own cat!

On 2021-12-13, LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
> Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> Wrote in message:
>
>>>On 2021-12-11, Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:(snip) Show where David asked to have such inappropriate behavior targeted at him.
>>He 'asks' every week, just like you do, with his "inappropriate behavior".
>
> It's becoming more and more obvious that snit is exactly as
> described by you and so many others - a usenet troll. A liar and
> a con.

Indeed.
Those lists are spot on and one would have to believe some giant
conspiracy against snit to defend snit. The lists cross several
different usenet groups, have hundreds of different people mostly
saying the same things about snit and so forth.

And even if someone were to deem those lists a set up against snit,
all that person has to do is observe snit's recent posts to usenet
and it's trivial to match them up with the "Snit's Methods For
Lying" list.

The truth is snit is exactly the person described in the various
snit lists.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
because crazy Joe Biden is demented.

Am 13.12.21 um 00:01 schrieb nospam:
> In article <sp5urm$tgc$1@dont-email.me>, Peter Köhlmann
> <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>
>>>> Problem is, apple does not tell what kind of sensors is present
>>>
>>> yes they do
>>>
>>
>> And because they do (as you claim), you are able to provide the missing
>> info (spot the usual flaw with your claims)
>
> indeed i can. there are numerous third party utilities that can read
> all available sensor data.
>

And again you failed to provide the info what "third party utilities"
can read ALL sensor data. And you failed to substantiate how to know
that it is indeed ALL available data.
Business as usual. You claim something, and then you fail miserably. You
always do, because you are an incompetent useless dimbulb

On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
> <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>
>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
>>> <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> (snip)
>>>>
>>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>>
>>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>>
>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>
>> Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>> is not true!)
>
> When do you get to blackmailing me?

I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
deranged. :-(

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:01:31 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:

>On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>> <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow wrote:
>>>>
>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>
>>> Shadow is <redacted> - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>>> is not true!)

Not my problem you have memory issues. It would be impolite to
filth up a Mac forum with your email exchange with Diesel, but he
could post a link to a zipped version. He has done so before.
Your attempts to blackmail him into breaking into a private
server to steal personal data are quite clear, and rather nauseating.
>>
>> When do you get to blackmailing me?

As if snit puts his butt-hole on the line because he actually
likes BD. LOL.
BD has enough on snit to put him in jail for a long time.
>
>I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail....

.....WELL. You don't do it well.

It hasn't worked out for you yet, but I'll give you this: You
never stop trying. Enviable, considering how much you drink.
What a pity you don't use all that energy to help people.

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

On Dec 13, 2021 at 4:01:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp796b$cap$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

> On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>> <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
>>>> <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>>>
>>>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>>>
>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>
>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>>> is not true!)
>>
>> When do you get to blackmailing me?
>
> I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
>
> That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
> deranged. :-(

Oh. I was wondering why it was taking you so long. :)

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Who gets the idiot award here?

Boils down to Philo, No Spam and not-so-Jolly Roger>

Philo is a great idiot for asking a questions to non-tekkies, getting
upset, then finally blundering into a solution himself.

Next up is No Spam, but it's obvious he has an untreated mental illness,
so cannot in fairness count him.

Award goes to not-so-Jolly Roger who has just enough knowledge to be
dangerous. His most infamous statement was that one cannot know if a
drive is encrypted until one tries to mount it from another machine.

Since the drive in question was bootable, one simply needed to check
File Vault. Was it being used or not?

You may pickup your prize at the door.

On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
><dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:
>
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>
>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>
>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* -
>>
>> Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.
>>
>>> it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>>> is not true!)
>>
>> Two things:
>> 1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
>> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.
>>
>> 2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What
>> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?
>
> Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious.

Notice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to
using sock puppets. Curious.

On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
> On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>> <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
>>>> <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>>>
>>>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>>>
>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>
>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>>> is not true!)
>>
>> When do you get to blackmailing me?
>
> I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
me?

(cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)

On 2021-12-13, LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
> Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> Wrote in message:
>
>>>On 2021-12-11, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:(snip) I have NEVER used a FALSE pseudonym EVER - each one has been REAL!>Translation: DB just admitted, AGAIN, that he uses sock puppet.
>
> We are very glad to see that you a) noticed exactly what he
> admitted to as he performed his dance and b) have created this
> post calling him out on what he's just done.

That I'm willing to give people chances to change their behavior doesn't
mean I don't notice the behavior. I'd still give Glasser a chance, even
knowing full well that it'd likely be a waste of time, and he's done far
more to me than DB has.

Am 13.12.21 um 15:58 schrieb IdiotAward:
> Who gets the idiot award here?
>
> You may pickup your prize at the door.

The winner is: Arlen Holder alias Newton alias Ragnussen alias Andy
Burnelli alias you choose.

Can someone call the ambulance!

--
De gustibus non est disputandum

On 2021-12-12, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
> On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>
>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>
> That really is NOT funny.

You see it as the obvious joke I intended, yet, you labeled it a "LIE".

> Tell the TRUTH - I do.

Clearly not.

That aspect aside, if you consider Snit to be a "good" guy who is
"honest and honorable" (who is not a phony, who is not a drama queen of
a narcissistic, hypocritical, lying troll... on his best day), why would
you object here?

On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:04:03 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
><sp5v53$t30$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> (snip)
>>>
>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>
>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>
>> That really is NOT funny.
>>
>> Tell the TRUTH - I do.
>
> Another plea for attention from Carroll.

Actually I was being really kind by soft pedaling it like it did there.

On 13/12/2021 14:18, Snit wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2021 at 4:01:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
> <sp796b$cap$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
>>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>> <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>>
>>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
>>>>> <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>>
>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>>>> is not true!)
>>>
>>> When do you get to blackmailing me?
>>
>> I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
>>
>> That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
>> deranged. :-(
>
> Oh. I was wondering why it was taking you so long. :)

Hi Snit!

As you know already, I'm a guy who likes to /help/ the less fortunate
folk I meet, both on-line and in real-life.