On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>> On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
>>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>> <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>>
>>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
>>>>> <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>>
>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>>>> is not true!)
>>>
>>> When do you get to blackmailing me?
>>
>> I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
>
> Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
> me?
>
> (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)

I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
> On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>>> On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
>>>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>> <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
>>>>>> <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>>>>> is not true!)
>>>>
>>>> When do you get to blackmailing me?
>>>
>>> I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
>>
>> Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
>> me?
>>
>> (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
>
> I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
>
> Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.

You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:49:36 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:

>Hi Snit!

That's enough flirting! This is Usenet, not the Royal navy,
>
>As you know already, I'm a guy who likes to /help/ the less fortunate
>folk I meet, both on-line and in real-life.

I once asked you to show me an example of you helping people.
You gave two MSG_IDs.
In one you suggested he "Google it", and in another you copy
and pasted someone else's solution, but "forgot" to cite the source
and pretended it was your own work.

So ... enough *LIES*.

I'm curious, how many names on the list so far?
Oh, you "forgot". It was TWO DAYS AGO, slate clean?
I'll post the question again:

Here's the simple question, with the MSG_ID in case you "lost"
it:
Message-ID: <n49arg5eap8n82ca9kagk45rb8plpo56e0@4ax.com>

// Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
TIA

//
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:51:40 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:

>On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>>> On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
>>>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>> <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
>>>>>> <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>>>>> is not true!)
>>>>
>>>> When do you get to blackmailing me?
>>>
>>> I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
>>
>> Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
>> me?
>>
>> (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
>
>I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

You didn't?
>
>Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU!

Oh, another classic BD *LIE*.

Blackmail only works if you know who the victim is. You suck
at "investigating". I very much doubt you "frightened" anyone.
But thanks for confirming you DID attempt blackmail and that
it failed.
PS Your threat to kill me failed to "frighten" me too. You
have no idea who I am. "Failure"is kind of your M.O.

QUOTE from YESTERDAY
//Shadow .... "You are a dead man walking".//

PS Please put up an OT when posting to completely OT groups.
People can killfile on [OT] and won't need to add your 101 #FAKE_NYMS
to their filters. You'll be "helping" people.
TIA

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Stalker".
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
> On 13/12/2021 14:18, Snit wrote:
>> On Dec 13, 2021 at 4:01:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>> <sp796b$cap$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
>>>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>> <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
>>>>>> <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>>>>> is not true!)
>>>>
>>>> When do you get to blackmailing me?
>>>
>>> I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
>>>
>>> That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
>>> deranged. :-(
>>
>> Oh. I was wondering why it was taking you so long. :)
>
> Hi Snit!
>
> As you know already, I'm a guy who likes to /help/ the less fortunate
> folk I meet, both on-line and in real-life.

This guy might need your 'help' (aside from talent and money,
he's not so different than Glasser):

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G01RuErIUsc>

On 13/12/2021 15:13, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
>> <dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>>
>>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>>
>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* -
>>>
>>> Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.
>>>
>>>> it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
>>>> is not true!)
>>>
>>> Two things:
>>> 1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
>>> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.
>>>
>>> 2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What
>>> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?
>>
>> Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious.
>
> Notice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to
> using sock puppets. Curious.

I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.

What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the
names.

Many have NOT been used on Usenet.

It's a puzzle!

On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 13/12/2021 15:13, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
>>> <dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>>>
>>>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* -
>>>>
>>>> Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.
>>>>
>>>>> it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
>>>>> is not true!)
>>>>
>>>> Two things:
>>>> 1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
>>>> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What
>>>> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?
>>>
>>> Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious.
>>
>> Notice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to
>> using sock puppets. Curious.
>
> I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.

That's a ridiculous statement.

> What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the
> names.

I already know the answer.

> Many have NOT been used on Usenet.

Of course they have, you point to them all the time in some forum or
other that you've been banned from.

> It's a puzzle!

On 14/12/2021 01:49, Snit wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2021 at 1:25:30 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
> <sp8a7r$q8a$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> [....]
>>>>>> I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
>>>>
>>>> It's not like you to be stupid about such things.
>>>
>>> First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
>>> comparisons between you two.
>>
>> Yes. It was a joke.
>>
>> My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
>> Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
>> most of us do not have to deal.
>>
>> In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
>> a myriad of ways.
>>
>> Are you now sorry for having done so?
>
> I do not think Carroll has the capacity to feel regret for his poor actions.
> He will continue to lash out and lie and point to his obsessively scavenged
> and forged quotes about me BECAUSE he cannot actually quote me doing as he
> accuses. He knows his claims are lies... he just does not care.

That really saddens me. :-(

>>>> I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
>>>
>>> No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.
>>
>> I know who you are, what you look like and where you live. I know
>> friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to help 'teach
>> you a lesson' had you persisted in hurting Snit.
>>
>> What made you desist from so doing?
>
> Carroll and his ex used to repeatedly contact my neighbors and ask them to
> watch me... and Carroll contacted my employer, my co-workers, my clients, and
> more. Sometimes he denies it. Sometimes he brags about it.

That's the kind of behaviour engaged in by Dustin Cook.
Threats from such people should not be taken lightly.

Stay safe, Snit. 💕

On 14/12/2021 01:52, Snit wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2021 at 10:39:05 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
> <sp80fp$qa$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 13/12/2021 15:13, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
>>>> <dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* -
>>>>>
>>>>> Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.
>>>>>
>>>>>> it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
>>>>>> is not true!)
>>>>>
>>>>> Two things:
>>>>> 1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
>>>>> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What
>>>>> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?
>>>>
>>>> Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious.
>>>
>>> Notice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to
>>> using sock puppets. Curious.
>>
>> I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.
>>
>> What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the
>> names.
>>
>> Many have NOT been used on Usenet.
>>
>> It's a puzzle!
>
> Carroll has referred to his use of "aliases" -- socks. He is doing as he does:
> looking to have others argue with each other as he stays out of the fray even
> though he does FAR worse.
>
> He is good at such manipulations and I fell for it many times. I no longer do.

I appreciate you warning me.

Thanks. 🙂

On 14/12/2021 01:58, Snit wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:51:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
> <sp7q6c$1go$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>>>> On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>> <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
>>>>>>> <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>>>>>> is not true!)
>>>>>
>>>>> When do you get to blackmailing me?
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
>>>
>>> Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
>>> me?
>>>
>>> (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
>>
>> I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
>>
>> Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
>
> Again Carroll attacks others even though he has not only threatened (promised)
> blackmail but then tried to carry it out -- only to have those he attacked
> either ignore it or, in the most extreme case, get the police to pay him a
> visit. As far as I know that finally got Carroll to stop contacting people in
> my life.

Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:25:30 +0000, David Brooks
<DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

That nym is not on my list. 102 #FAKE_NYMS. Why did you make a
new one?

>My understanding, rightly or wrongly,

Wrongly (as usual).

>is that you are well aware that Snit has had to deal with medical
>conditions....

Other than hypochondria, sociopathy and drug abuse, I see no
others in his medical report
I don't think "laziness" counts as a medical condition.
None of his "medical conditions" justify demanding welfare
handouts and sitting at home trolling newsgroups and snorting coke.

I can think of hundreds of jobs for snit, none of which are
impeded by his hatred of fellow humans or his need to gossip about
"all the latest diseases" he self-diagnosed himself with.

PS Why are you posting this OT crap to csmm? Hoping snit will
unleash his bot there and wreck the group?

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

102 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Stalker".
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:05:48 +0000, David Brooks
<DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>*There is no such thing as a FAKE pseudonym*

What I said. Two negatives cancel each other out. The phrase
becomes "There is no such thing as a nym".
Obviously a *LIE*. You have 102 #FAKE_NYMS

Again, why are you cross-posting OT to a Mac group?
Did they *BAN* you with their killfiles?

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Stalker".
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

On 14/12/2021 01:59, Snit wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:49:36 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
> <sp7q2g$1go$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 13/12/2021 14:18, Snit wrote:
>>> On Dec 13, 2021 at 4:01:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>> <sp796b$cap$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>>
>>>> On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>> <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
>>>>>>> <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>>>>>> is not true!)
>>>>>
>>>>> When do you get to blackmailing me?
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
>>>>
>>>> That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
>>>> deranged. :-(
>>>
>>> Oh. I was wondering why it was taking you so long. :)
>>
>> Hi Snit!
>>
>> As you know already, I'm a guy who likes to /help/ the less fortunate
>> folk I meet, both on-line and in real-life.
>
> Yes, of course. As do I.
>
> It is sorta funny, and sad, how those who think in terms of harming others
> cannot imagine others not being like them.

You are correct. What goes around, comes around.

I've never seen this before .....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOrnUquxtwA

The blonde is/was lovely (IMO)

On 14/12/2021 12:22, Shadow declared:
> I see no
> others in his medical report

Do share, so that we may all see what has been written about Snit.

On 2021-12-14, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2021 at 1:25:30 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
><sp8a7r$q8a$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> [....]
>>>>>> I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
>>>>
>>>> It's not like you to be stupid about such things.
>>>
>>> First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
>>> comparisons between you two.
>>
>> Yes. It was a joke.
>>
>> My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
>> Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
>> most of us do not have to deal.
>>
>> In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
>> a myriad of ways.
>>
>> Are you now sorry for having done so?
>
> I do not think Carroll has the capacity to feel regret for his poor actions.

Calling out your lies is a perfectly acceptable 'action'.

>>>> I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
>>>
>>> No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.
>>
>> I know who you are, what you look like and where you live. I know
>> friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to help 'teach
>> you a lesson' had you persisted in hurting Snit.
>>
>> What made you desist from so doing?
>
> Carroll and his ex used to repeatedly contact my neighbors and ask them to
> watch me... and Carroll contacted my employer, my co-workers, my clients, and
> more.

And you'll 'prove' this 'any minute now' <eyeroll>.

On 2021-12-14, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:51:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
><sp7q6c$1go$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>>>> On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>> <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
>>>>>>> <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>>>>>> is not true!)
>>>>>
>>>>> When do you get to blackmailing me?
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
>>>
>>> Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
>>> me?
>>>
>>> (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
>>
>> I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
>>
>> Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
>
> Again Carroll attacks others

Reality isn't an 'attack' and DB's memory issues are well known.

(snip same ol' tired lies by an overmedicated loon)

On 2021-12-14, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

(snip)

> Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

I was but it's silly to pretend your memory isn't an issue. It happens
as we age <shrug>. Snit is just looking to play the 'victim' card again.
Who *hasn't* seen this?

On 2021-12-14, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 14/12/2021 01:52, Snit wrote:
>> On Dec 13, 2021 at 10:39:05 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>> <sp80fp$qa$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 13/12/2021 15:13, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
>>>>> <dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
>>>>>>> is not true!)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Two things:
>>>>>> 1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
>>>>>> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What
>>>>>> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?
>>>>>
>>>>> Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious.
>>>>
>>>> Notice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to
>>>> using sock puppets. Curious.
>>>
>>> I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.
>>>
>>> What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the
>>> names.
>>>
>>> Many have NOT been used on Usenet.
>>>
>>> It's a puzzle!
>>
>> Carroll has referred to his use of "aliases" -- socks. He is doing as he does:
>> looking to have others argue with each other as he stays out of the fray even
>> though he does FAR worse.

Yet, you're never able to show 'proof' of these "FAR worse" things.

>> He is good at such manipulations and I fell for it many times. I no longer do.
>
> I appreciate you warning me.
>
> Thanks. 🙂

LOL! It's obvious that even you know he's full of it.

On 2021-12-14, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:05:24 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll <"Steve
> Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>
>>On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> [....]
>>>>>>> I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not like you to be stupid about such things.
>>>>
>>>> First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
>>>> comparisons between you two.
>>>
>>> Yes. It was a joke.
>>
>>You acknowledge it, yet, you still lied by calling it a "LIE".
>>
>>> My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
>>> Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
>>> most of us do not have to deal.
>>
>>What I'm "well aware" of is that Glasser is a hypochondriac and a
>>perpetual 'victim' who can't string together many words before a lie
>>pops out. That extremely incomplete 'list' of his is very real and it's
>>something he can't explain, it's something you won't even address. So
>>cut the crap, troll. I don't care about his *alleged* ailments, they are
>>no reason to do what he does. There are plenty of people with serious
>>issues who don't resort to the crap he's pulled.
>>
>>> In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
>>> a myriad of ways.
>>
>>If calling out his lies 'hurts' him then, as his 'friend', you should be
>>using your time to convince him to stop lying, as opposed to lying on
>>your own on his behalf.
>>
>>> Are you now sorry for having done so?
>>
>>I've done nothing to be sorry for.
>>
>>>>> I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
>>>>
>>>> No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.
>>>
>>> I know who you are, what you look like and where you live.
>>
>>LOL!
>>
>>> I know friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to
>>> help 'teach you a lesson'
>>
>>Are we back to 'pikeys' again? ;)
>>
>>> . had you persisted in hurting Snit.
>>>
>>> What made you desist from so doing?
>>
>>You're asking me why I never hurt Snit *as* you write and tell me that
>>I've done my best to hurt him in a myriad of ways? And you want to be
>>seen as sober?! If I wanted to do anything to Snit I'd have done it many
>>years ago.
>>
>>I'll say it AGAIN, I haven't done the crap that lying ass has falsely
>>accused me of, he's been lying to you from day one. How can you verify
>>this? Where is all the proof that he's crowed about for years on end?
>>Why hasn't the crap he's presented as "evidence" ever convinced any real
>>posters (as opposed to his sock army)? People see what he does, stop
>>pretending otherwise and STFU about that pathological liar, there's
>>nothing you can do to defend him. Deal with it.
>
> While I agree with everything you wrote, could you please
> change the subject line?

Sorry, I'll try to remember next time.

> BD (and from the replies) snit are using it to feed the bots.
> Google bots are quite intelligent, but a mass of posts claiming my
> descriptions of BD and snit are not 100% accurate might stain my
> pristine reputation.
> TIA
>
> ------------------------------------
> BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
> hide".
> I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
> rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":
>
> <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>
> 102 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
> Google "David Brooks Stalker".
> []'s
> --
> Don't be evil - Google 2004
> We have a new policy - Google 2012
> Google Fuchsia - 2021

On Dec 14, 2021 at 5:20:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<spa26f$227$3@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

> On 14/12/2021 01:58, Snit wrote:
>> On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:51:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>> <sp7q6c$1go$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>>>>> On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>>> <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
>>>>>>>> <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
>>>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
>>>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
>>>>>>> is not true!)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When do you get to blackmailing me?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
>>>>
>>>> Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
>>>> me?
>>>>
>>>> (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
>>>
>>> I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
>>>
>>> Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
>>
>> Again Carroll attacks others even though he has not only threatened (promised)
>> blackmail but then tried to carry it out -- only to have those he attacked
>> either ignore it or, in the most extreme case, get the police to pay him a
>> visit. As far as I know that finally got Carroll to stop contacting people in
>> my life.
>
> Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Dec 14, 2021 at 5:17:23 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<spa20k$227$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

> On 14/12/2021 01:49, Snit wrote:
>> On Dec 13, 2021 at 1:25:30 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>> <sp8a7r$q8a$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> [....]
>>>>>>> I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not like you to be stupid about such things.
>>>>
>>>> First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
>>>> comparisons between you two.
>>>
>>> Yes. It was a joke.
>>>
>>> My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
>>> Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
>>> most of us do not have to deal.
>>>
>>> In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
>>> a myriad of ways.
>>>
>>> Are you now sorry for having done so?
>>
>> I do not think Carroll has the capacity to feel regret for his poor actions.
>> He will continue to lash out and lie and point to his obsessively scavenged
>> and forged quotes about me BECAUSE he cannot actually quote me doing as he
>> accuses. He knows his claims are lies... he just does not care.
>
> That really saddens me. :-(
>
>>>>> I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
>>>>
>>>> No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.
>>>
>>> I know who you are, what you look like and where you live. I know
>>> friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to help 'teach
>>> you a lesson' had you persisted in hurting Snit.
>>>
>>> What made you desist from so doing?
>>
>> Carroll and his ex used to repeatedly contact my neighbors and ask them to
>> watch me... and Carroll contacted my employer, my co-workers, my clients, and
>> more. Sometimes he denies it. Sometimes he brags about it.
>
> That's the kind of behaviour engaged in by Dustin Cook.

There is a reason the two of them get along.

> Threats from such people should not be taken lightly.

Sadly in the US the police do not take this stuff that seriously.

>
> Stay safe, Snit. 💕

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:

>There are *NO* MIDS supporting the use of the individual Pseudonyms I'm 99% sure that some have been collected by nefarious activities.

David, we did write that MIDs were provided where necessary. What
exactly do you mean by nefarious? Be very specific in what you're
claiming if you'd like us to provide a reasonable answer for
you.

>Can you prove otherwise?

Once you clarify exactly what you mean - be blunt and write to us
an explanation as you would a five year old American. No offense
but generally speaking a typical American kid at the age of five
isn't doing much with their brains - some might even say many
opportunities for learning are being wasted due to the ackward
way in which the parents interact (or not?) With their
children.

Every American we know has issues of some sort. Usually something
to do with their childhoods. Snit and Gremlin are both good
examples. They are both Americans. And both of them have their
own quirks or issues. To deny it is to lie to yourself. We know
Gremlins story. We've met both of his parents at some point along
the journey. While we don't personally know Snit as we do Gremlin
it's not hard for any of us to make reliable educated guesses. We
have Gremlin as one example to go by. As well as some others in
the group - you don't presently know any of us by our own handles
and we can't think of a reason for that to change for
you.

You do know of Gremlin and Snit so they can and have been used as
examples of our fucked up Americans. As a brit yourself you would
have to agree Americans do things differently yes?

>>The only poster here besides David Brooks who routinely writes bullshit they cannot support about others is you.
>That's a *LIE*!

Please explain how our writing is or was a lie? We have Snit dead
to rights as Americans say? Lying his whiny little arse off and
attempting to support his lie! We have him red handed! Lying on
specific posters multiple times. We have him creating total
malarky labels to falsely describe atleast two posters here AND
taking advantage of the floodbot to search engine seed false
statements he created to describe them. If that's not bad enough
for a short period of time he started to deny that he was infact
the source of the very comments he invited readers to search for
via their favorite search engine.

These are all things we can prove he has done here David. We
aren't making a single false accusation towards him or anyone
else. You are fully aware of both of the threads which involve
snit lying intentionally about another poster. You were involved
in one of them, David. And you know for an absolute fact that
snit not only falsely accused him of writing a direct lie he also
lied when he claimed you had asked him to do no such thing.
David, snit stalled Gremlin for several days about apologizing
for having falsely written that Gremlin had written a direct lie
about you. When snit finally did write an apology it had nothing
to do with what he wrote. It was complete garbage. Snit did not
apologize to Gremlin (or you) for falsely writing that Gremlin
had written a direct lie about you. Snit still refuses to
apologize for falsely claiming that Gremlin had an actual fucking
copy of the bot itself. When the entire post Gremlin made is read
though the first few lines clearly state that Gremlin doesn't
have the bot in any form and was already calling snit out for
having put words in Gremlins mouth. David anybody can see that
the full post snit did a little creative lifting from did not in
any way support snits multiple accusations he made about Gremlin
having the bot. Snit lied multiple times and quoted some of
Gremlins own reply - completely out of context - to try to
support the entire story he concocted about Gremlin and the
bot.

We can prove he (snit) did this too, David. Our signature shares a
link which proves both of his (snits) lies happened as we wrote.

We arenn't including ourselves in the tally because we are a
disposable handle and aren't really a regular or even a fair
target.

>Shadow lies on a daily basis and Wolffan and Dustin lie whenever they turn up here.

Let us go one by one here then. What specifically has Shadow lied
about?

Same question for the other two you listed.

We would also like to know why you address him as you did and not
his posting handle Gremlin? We are under the impression it's an
ongoing sign of disrespect in a non adult manner. Are we far off
the mark or spot on?

--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitlies>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Snit is one f*cked up puppy - who steals our hard earned tax
paying dollars from the government by running a long con for
welfare - who can be reached via telephone - text message - or in
person - by using the publically available contact information
below:

Michael (snit) and Anne Glasser (life-like troll lady)
3181 Willow Dr, Prescott, AZ
86301-4855 
1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425
1.928.776.9519 or 1-(928)-776-9519
They are professional Grifters who live on the benefits your hard
earned tax paying dollars provide. Animal abuser = snit pissed on
his own cat!

David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:r
> On 11/12/2021 18:08, Kelly Phillips wrote:> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:24:30 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>> wrote:> >> On 08/12/2021 21:06, Steve Carroll wrote:>>> On 2021-12-08, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:>>>> On Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47:12 AM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote>>>> <87v1rgptp66a3o2erhtkssqokrfiec1852@4ax.com>:>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:16:53 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>>>>>> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/12/2021 00:14, LegionX wrote:>>>>>>> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You've swallowed lies, hook line and sinker. You should be ashamed of yourself.>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No sane logical thinking individual would agree with you. You are>>>>>>> every bit as described.>>>>>>>>>>>> Total rubbish! I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record. :-D>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove otherwise! (You cannot!)>>>>>>>>>> Careful with those challenges. The last one didn't end well for you and>>>>> now you have a special page.>>>>>> I do not believe David ever asked anyone to put up a page with unsupported>>>> accusations about him.>>>>>> Being that DB has admitted to a number of them it's false to claim>>> there's no support.>>>> Whic
h ones?>>>> Be specific.>>>> *I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record*.> > Why, of course you do, David. Because you say so.It's simply the truth.> If anyone around here had access to your service records, I'm sure the> story would be very different, but you're safe, for now. You can claim> whatever you want.

>The 'story' would forever be the same.

You'd likely revise it as you tried doing when you were exposed
outright as a drunkard. Your efforts did fail but you certainly
did try to make it appear different than it was. Going so far as
to accuse Gremlin of hacking into your computers? That's really
sad my man. And sorry of you to even claim knowing what you did
of his background and the efforts he had taken for years by then
already to put it behind him. Hell of a friend you would have
been. He was wise not to do what you really contacted about. But
in our not humble group opinion he was foolish to have
entertained you in any way outside the scope of BugHunter
support. You are what he gets for trying to be helpful - which is
all he was towards you upto the point you tried to dox him to get
his attention. Total dick move on your part and you deserved what
you got for doing it.

>Others are lying and will NEVER find or show any evidence of misconduct on my part.

Sorry but you tried to trick Gremlin into giving up his source(s)
of dirt on you with nearly the same accusation. You probably
don't remember but Gremlin opted to tell a story about a certain
friendship you lost over your drinking problem. As snit likes to
claim - only with you it's true - you fucking lost it and instead
of denying it all you told everyone your side of it. By doing
that you *confirmed* Gremlin was telling the truth and he didn't
give you a single individual to harass because they talked about
you.

Due to that previous incident with you and the fact Gremlin hasn't
lied to any of us about fuck all we're inclined to believe him
over you. When you factor into the equation that several other
regulars are claiming the same information and don't even know
each other outside usenet well that pretty much seals the deal.
It's only logical for us to assume they are telling us the truth
and you are not. Other wise it's s huge conspiracy and that makes
us question what you could have possibly done to top the other
dumb shit you've done in order for all of these people to risk
their own personal reps online to falsely accuse you
David?

We are trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but it's very
difficult to do because of the history of you that all of us
know. Please answer our questions in a reasonable manner and we
will try to help you get to the bottom of this because it is a
serious accusation that they've been making.

--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitlies>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Snit is one f*cked up puppy - who steals our hard earned tax
paying dollars from the government by running a long con for
welfare - who can be reached via telephone - text message - or in
person - by using the publically available contact information
below:

Michael (snit) and Anne Glasser (life-like troll lady)
3181 Willow Dr, Prescott, AZ
86301-4855 
1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425
1.928.776.9519 or 1-(928)-776-9519
They are professional Grifters who live on the benefits your hard
earned tax paying dollars provide. Animal abuser = snit pissed on
his own cat!

Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> Wrote in message:

>That I'm willing to give people chances to change their behavior doesn' tmean I don't notice the behavior.

We understand that point of view. Several of us share it. But all
of us have - for the most part - come to the realization that
David has no desire or interest whatsoever in changing any aspect
of his behaviour. He doesn't consider his behaviour to be
abnornal. Rather - he considers most others to be.

We firmly believe this is one of many symptoms of long term
alcohol abuse in his case. If you have the available time we
would encourage you to visit alt.politics.scorched-earth (yes
David we found the newsgroup where a considerable amount of shit
- there's really no other way to describe it - went down) and
review any number of those older threads involving David and
various other posters.

You really are completely wasting your time and energy if you
think you'll ever achieve a reasonable adult conversation with
him. We are basically giving you the same style warning as you
feel duty bound to provide concerning snit. We are hopeful that
you heed this warning and don't ignore us as Gremlin did you
concerning snit. Many of us know how well not heeding your sound
advice concerning snit went for Gremlin.

David and snit truely are like two peas in a pod with their
general online behaviour. It really is difficult for us to be
able to determine which is actually the most unpleasant of the
two.

>I'd still give Glasser a chance, even knowing full well that it'd likely be a waste of time, and he's done far more to me than DB has.

How idiotic of you. Going by the results of the experiment thus
far you'd attempt to repeat it again expecting a different
result? C'mon now. Don't be shy - how many times have you already
done this?

--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitlies>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Snit is one f*cked up puppy - who steals our hard earned tax
paying dollars from the government by running a long con for
welfare - who can be reached via telephone - text message - or in
person - by using the publically available contact information
below:

Michael (snit) and Anne Glasser (life-like troll lady)
3181 Willow Dr, Prescott, AZ
86301-4855 
1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425
1.928.776.9519 or 1-(928)-776-9519
They are professional Grifters who live on the benefits your hard
earned tax paying dollars provide. Animal abuser = snit pissed on
his own cat!

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> Wrote in message:

LegionX wrote:
It's becoming more and more obvious that snit is exactly
asdescribed by you and so many others - a usenet troll. A liar
and a con.
****

>Indeed.Those lists are spot on and one would have to believe some giant conspiracy against snit to defend snit.

Based on our own observations and limited interaction with him for
ourselves we have no logical choice but to agree with you. What
we've read about him posted by others has only served to confirm
our own opinions of him. We don't often all agree on many things
but with snit and David we are in total agreement as a group on
what they both are and represent. We consider them to have the
present rank of what amounts to a cyber cockroach.

>The lists cross several different usenet groups, have hundreds of different people mostly saying the same things about snit and so forth.

And it's a pain to do so. We suspect snit counts on this. We have
done so though so we know there are no forged quotes or things
being taken out of context. They are authentic posts by over one
hundred and sixty other people all sharing the same common
description of snit when they weren't tearing some slimely
trollish post he made against one or more people.

We have seen for ourselves where he did reference linux users as
herd members. Such an arrogant attitude for someone who has
demonstrated that their actual computing level knowledge is that
of a power user of Macs and little to nothing else. Whatever that
actually is considering their user friendly GUI to start
with?

>And even if someone were to deem those lists a set up against snit, all that person has to do is observe snit's recent posts to usenet and it's trivial to match them up with the "Snit's Methods For Lying" list.

That works too but isn't even necessary. We have several
functional links such as these that aren't a very long read but
will certainly show the reader what snit is with snit being the
star of the demonstration. It's not even another individuals
opinion. It's snit himself in action:

Let the thread load and start from the beginning. No list viewing
necessary.

<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>

The following url will give readers the general idea for how long
snit has actually been doing the same old song and dance. You
will notice the same tricks or routines used in the thread above
- already being fine tuned to play - over a decade
ago.

<https://tinyurl.com/Snitlies>

>The truth is snit is exactly the person described in the various snit lists.

Yes. He is. And the urls above support everything you as well as
ourselves has written about him. We provide something snit
refuses to provide - evidence. <SMILE>

--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitlies>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Snit is one f*cked up puppy - who steals our hard earned tax
paying dollars from the government by running a long con for
welfare - who can be reached via telephone - text message - or in
person - by using the publically available contact information
below:

Michael (snit) and Anne Glasser (life-like troll lady)
3181 Willow Dr, Prescott, AZ
86301-4855 
1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425
1.928.776.9519 or 1-(928)-776-9519
They are professional Grifters who live on the benefits your hard
earned tax paying dollars provide. Animal abuser = snit pissed on
his own cat!