nospam wrote:

>> But seriously, your phone will likely last longer since the
>> Lightning Port is the third most common repair needed on iPhones.
>
> another unsubstantiated and demonstrably false claim.

What's obvious about you nospam, is almost every claim by _you_ is
unsubstantiated and yet you say Steve's claim is false.

If Steve didn't substantiate his claim, and since you never substantiated
your counterclaim, how the heck would _you_ have any basis to say it's
false?

You can't.
You have absolutely no basis for almost _all_ your unsubstantiated claims.

*The fact you iKooks do this constantly, is how I know you have a low IQ.*

Whenever you or Alan Browne or Alan Baker or Jolly Roger or Joerg or Chris
(what happened to Lewis) make your totally unsubstantiated claims, I have
to wonder what kind of person you iKooks are who can't figure this out.

*It doesn't occur to you your counter claims are _also_ unsubstantiated?*

Everything you write, nospam, proves you are an ignorant person on
everything that you speak of, and yet, you're so confident in ignorance.
I've never met people as ignorant as you iKooks are, in my whole life.

On 2023-02-04, Andy Burnelli <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
> nospam wrote:
>
>>> But seriously, your phone will likely last longer since the
>>> Lightning Port is the third most common repair needed on iPhones.
>>
>> another unsubstantiated and demonstrably false claim.
>
> *It doesn't occur to you your counter claims are _also_
> unsubstantiated?*

It occurs to those of us with brains that *you* made the initial claim
which is unsubstantiated and unproven, Arlen. And rather than backing up
your empty words with proof, you are slinging insults like the pathetic
man-child you are.

> I've never met people as ignorant as you iKooks are, in my whole life.

Projection. You can't provide objectively-verified evidence of your
bullshit assertion that the Lightning port is supposedly the third most
common repair needed on iPhones, because it is: FALSE.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Jolly Roger wrote:

> It occurs to those of us with brains that *you* made the initial claim
> which is unsubstantiated and unproven, Arlen. And rather than backing up
> your empty words with proof, you are slinging insults like the pathetic
> man-child you are.

The batteries in the iPhone are a joke on the (admittedly loyal) customer.

Are you seriously saying battery chemistry physics is wrong Jolly Roger?
You never even earned your GED (and you said so in the past), Jolly Roger.

*The iPhone has el cheapo _laughably puny batteries_, Jolly Roger.*

You've never taken a single class in physics or chemistry, so how would you
be able to evaluate the fact that similar chemistry batteries degrade
similarly, such that a smaller capacity battery degrades below threshold
sooner than a larger capacity battery.

*Apple _wants_ your iPhone battery to age sooner*, Jolly Roger.

Otherwise Apple wouldn't have cheaped out on those iPhone joke batteries.

On Feb 07, 2023, Andy Burnelli wrote
(in article<news:trsaj5$3u7v$1@paganini.bofh.team>):

> Jolly Roger wrote:
>
>> It occurs to those of us with brains that *you* made the initial claim
>> which is unsubstantiated and unproven, Arlen. And rather than backing up
>> your empty words with proof, you are slinging insults like the pathetic
>> man-child you are.
>
> The batteries in the iPhone are a joke on the (admittedly loyal) customer.
>
> Are you seriously saying battery chemistry physics is wrong Jolly Roger?
> You never even earned your GED (and you said so in the past), Jolly Roger.
>
> *The iPhone has el cheapo _laughably puny batteries_, Jolly Roger.*
>
> You've never taken a single class in physics or chemistry, so how would you
> be able to evaluate the fact that similar chemistry batteries degrade
> similarly, such that a smaller capacity battery degrades below threshold
> sooner than a larger capacity battery.
>
> *Apple _wants_ your iPhone battery to age sooner*, Jolly Roger.
>
> Otherwise Apple wouldn't have cheaped out on those iPhone joke batteries.

Why would I care that my iPhone is designed to last half as long as the
Android phones you speak of that have larger batteries if my iPhone lasts
for at least until I buy a new one from my carrier at a discounted price?

Ron, the humblest guy in town.

On 2023-02-07, Andy Burnelli <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
> Jolly Roger wrote:
>> On 2023-02-04, Andy Burnelli <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
>>> nospam wrote:
>>>
>>>>> But seriously, your phone will likely last longer since the
>>>>> Lightning Port is the third most common repair needed on iPhones.
>>>>
>>>> another unsubstantiated and demonstrably false claim.
>>>
>>> *It doesn't occur to you your counter claims are _also_
>>> unsubstantiated?*
>>
>> It occurs to those of us with brains that *you* made the initial
>> claim which is unsubstantiated and unproven, Arlen. And rather than
>> backing up your empty words with proof, you are slinging insults like
>> the pathetic man-child you are.
>
> The batteries in the iPhone are a joke

As is so often the case, you make an unsubstantiated claim (that the
Lightning Port is supposedly the "third most common repair needed on
iPhones", then when asked for proof, you fail to back it up with
evidence, and then follow that up by desperately snipping quoted
material (restored above for those who, unlike you, prefer FACTUAL
discourse) and squirming around trying to change the subject in a
childish attempt to derail the conversation. You're so predictable it's
outright boring. You're a pathetic troll, Arlen.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

On 2023-02-06 17:47, Andy Burnelli wrote:
> Jolly Roger wrote:
>
>> It occurs to those of us with brains that *you* made the initial claim
>> which is unsubstantiated and unproven, Arlen. And rather than backing up
>> your empty words with proof, you are slinging insults like the pathetic
>> man-child you are.
>
> The batteries in the iPhone are a joke on the (admittedly loyal) customer.

No... ...they're really not.

>
> Are you seriously saying battery chemistry physics is wrong Jolly Roger?
> You never even earned your GED (and you said so in the past), Jolly Roger.
>
>  *The iPhone has el cheapo _laughably puny batteries_, Jolly Roger.*

Really?

Then you can easily show that by their inferior actual battery life...

'Best phone battery life at a glance

Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro: 15:30
iPhone 14 Pro Max: 13:39
Moto G Power (2022): 13:15
OnePlus Nord N300: 13:13 (tie)
Asus Zenfone 9: 13:13 (tie)
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro: 13:13 (tie)
Moto G Play (2023): 12:54
Moto G Stylus (2022): 12:30
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: 12:22
iPhone 14 Plus: 11:57'

<https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphones-best-battery-life,review-2857.html>

Oh... ...that really didn't work out well for you...

....did it?

On 07-02-2023 10:03 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

> 'Best phone battery life at a glance
>
> Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro: 15:30
> iPhone 14 Pro Max: 13:39
> Moto G Power (2022): 13:15
> OnePlus Nord N300: 13:13 (tie)
> Asus Zenfone 9: 13:13 (tie)
> Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro: 13:13 (tie)
> Moto G Play (2023): 12:54
> Moto G Stylus (2022): 12:30
> Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: 12:22
> iPhone 14 Plus: 11:57'
>
> <https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphones-best-battery-life,review-2857.html>

Whooosh.

Look up the difference between daily battery life (measured in hours).
And useful battery lifetime (measured in years).

On 2023-02-07, mike <this@address.is.invalid> wrote:
>
> Look up the difference between daily battery life (measured in hours).
> And useful battery lifetime (measured in years).

You made the claim, so go ahead and prove your empty words, Arlen - if
you can. : )

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

On 2023-02-07 07:17, mike wrote:
> On 07-02-2023 10:03 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> 'Best phone battery life at a glance
>>
>> Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro: 15:30
>> iPhone 14 Pro Max: 13:39
>> Moto G Power (2022): 13:15
>> OnePlus Nord N300: 13:13 (tie)
>> Asus Zenfone 9: 13:13 (tie)
>> Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro: 13:13 (tie)
>> Moto G Play (2023): 12:54
>> Moto G Stylus (2022): 12:30
>> Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: 12:22
>> iPhone 14 Plus: 11:57'
>>
>> <https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphones-best-battery-life,review-2857.html>
>
> Whooosh.
>
> Look up the difference between daily battery life (measured in hours).
> And useful battery lifetime (measured in years).

Produce this alleged data.

Because I'm betting that you've got none.

On 07-02-2023 10:51 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>> On 07-02-2023 10:03 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 'Best phone battery life at a glance
>>>
>>> Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro: 15:30
>>> iPhone 14 Pro Max: 13:39
>>> Moto G Power (2022): 13:15
>>> OnePlus Nord N300: 13:13 (tie)
>>> Asus Zenfone 9: 13:13 (tie)
>>> Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro: 13:13 (tie)
>>> Moto G Play (2023): 12:54
>>> Moto G Stylus (2022): 12:30
>>> Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: 12:22
>>> iPhone 14 Plus: 11:57'
>>>
>>> <https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphones-best-battery-life,review-2857.html>
>>
>> Whooosh.
>>
>> Look up the difference between daily battery life (measured in hours).
>> And useful battery lifetime (measured in years).
>
> Produce this alleged data.
>
> Because I'm betting that you've got none.

He wasn't talking about daily life which is what I said you whooshed on.
Now you ask me to prove it again, which makes you even more of an idiot.

How am I going to "prove" to you, an idiot, that you're an idiot?
You whooshed. Stop denying it. Else I'm done with you. Idiot.

On 2023-02-07 11:01, mike wrote:
> On 07-02-2023 10:51 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>> On 07-02-2023 10:03 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 'Best phone battery life at a glance
>>>>
>>>> Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro: 15:30
>>>> iPhone 14 Pro Max: 13:39
>>>> Moto G Power (2022): 13:15
>>>> OnePlus Nord N300: 13:13 (tie)
>>>> Asus Zenfone 9: 13:13 (tie)
>>>> Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro: 13:13 (tie)
>>>> Moto G Play (2023): 12:54
>>>> Moto G Stylus (2022): 12:30
>>>> Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: 12:22
>>>> iPhone 14 Plus: 11:57'
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphones-best-battery-life,review-2857.html>
>>>
>>> Whooosh.
>>>
>>> Look up the difference between daily battery life (measured in hours).
>>> And useful battery lifetime (measured in years).
>>
>> Produce this alleged data.
>>
>> Because I'm betting that you've got none.
>
>
> He wasn't talking about daily life which is what I said you whooshed on.
> Now you ask me to prove it again, which makes you even more of an idiot.

"He" is almost certainly YOU, so that sentence should have started "I
wasn't".

>
> How am I going to "prove" to you, an idiot, that you're an idiot?
> You whooshed. Stop denying it. Else I'm done with you. Idiot.

You made the implicit claim that Apple's iPhones have a significantly
different "useful battery lifetime"...

....so prove it.

On 08-02-2023 00:38 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

> You made the implicit claim that Apple's iPhones have a significantly
> different "useful battery lifetime"...

This is exactly what I said.

Whooosh.
Look up the difference between daily battery life (measured in hours).
And useful battery lifetime (measured in years).

> ...so prove it.

Did you look it up yet? Do you know the difference yet? Idiot.
Until you know the difference, nothing you say matters. Idiot.

On 2023-02-07 11:26, mike wrote:
> On 08-02-2023 00:38 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> You made the implicit claim that Apple's iPhones have a significantly
>> different "useful battery lifetime"...
>
> This is exactly what I said.
>
> Whooosh.
> Look up the difference between daily battery life (measured in hours).
> And useful battery lifetime (measured in years).
>
>> ...so prove it.
>
> Did you look it up yet? Do you know the difference yet? Idiot.
> Until you know the difference, nothing you say matters. Idiot.

You're the one claiming that the results would be different, Sunshine.

Or do you not know what "implicit" means?

:-)

On 2023-02-07, mike <this@address.is.invalid> wrote:
> On 08-02-2023 00:38 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> You made the implicit claim that Apple's iPhones have a significantly
>> different "useful battery lifetime"...
>
> This is exactly what I said.
>
> Whooosh. Look up the difference between daily battery life (measured
> in hours). And useful battery lifetime (measured in years).

Nah. *You* look it up. Otherwise, you're just full of shit.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR